Use of a tiered review for evaluation of appropriate use of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase-inhibitor therapy.

Despite abundant evidence of the benefits of lipid lowering in reducing mortality from all causes in high-risk patients with or without coronary artery disease (CAD) and the wide availability of guidelines for targeting such patients more aggressively, there are indications that this population is still being treated suboptimally. Our study sought to ascertain the appropriateness of prescribing practices of the hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A-reductase (HMG-CoA) inhibitor pravastatin that was used at our facility at the time. We conducted a drug utilization review of a randomly chosen sample of patients receiving prescriptions for pravastatin at the outpatient clinics of a tertiary care, academically affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center. The algorithm we used was based on National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel-2 guidelines. Patient charts were reviewed for the presence of CAD and standard cardiac risk factors and for lipid determinations performed since 1986, when laboratory test results began to be compiled electronically. The initial review was performed by a pharmacist; cases the pharmacist identified as involving possible suboptimal prescribing practices were subsequently reviewed and classified by a cardiologist. From the pharmacy database, we derived a random sample of 118 patients who were receiving doses >20 mg (high-dose cases) and 100 patients receiving doses of < or =20 mg (standard-dose cases). The pharmacist's review found 57 (48%) high-dose cases and 47 (47%) standard-dose cases that were questionable; the cardiologist's review of these cases determined that 43 (36%) high-dose cases and 38 (38%) standard-dose cases involved suboptimal prescribing practices. The deficiencies noted in patients receiving standard-dose pravastatin were generally minor; however, 23% of the deficiencies noted in patients receiving high-dose therapy were serious ones that may have exposed the patients to unnecessary therapy or caused a delay in their receiving appropriate therapy. In conclusion, slightly more than one third of a randomly selected sample of patients treated with an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor at a tertiary care medical center were receiving suboptimal therapy. Suboptimal prescribing practices have both clinical and economic implications, and a tiered, multidisciplinary review process allows convenient monitoring of prescribing practices.

Comparative efficacy and tolerability of low-dose pravastatin versus lovastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: The HMG CoA reductase inhibitors have quickly become the most widely prescribed family of agents for the treatment of patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. The incidence of side effects with these agents increases as the dose increases within the recommended dosage range. A lower dosage presumably would have a lower incidence of adverse effects. In addition, lower doses should translate into reduced drug costs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the efficacy of 10 mg of pravastatin and 10 mg of lovastatin in a randomized, crossover design trial among 30 patients with hypercholesterolemia. At baseline, their total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels were 249.0 +/- 27.3 and 185.1 +/- 25.5 mg/dL. After 4 weeks of treatment with lovastatin, the total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels fell to 202.8 +/- 29.6 and 141.0 +/- 25.3 mg/dL, decreases of 19% and 24%, respectively. Four weeks of pravastatin treatment resulted in levels of 212.6 +/- 30.8 and 150.5 +/- 25.5 mg/dL, or 15% and 19%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were highly significant changes in total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels with each agent and no differences in effect between the 2 agents. In 13 (43%) of the 30 patients, LDL levels were reduced to

The Release of Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor and Platelet Factor 4 After Heparin Injection in Patients with Thrombocytosis.

Platelet factor 4 (PF4) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) are two proteins with high affinity for heparin. They are each stored in platelets, as well as on endothelial cell surfaces, from where both are displaced or released following an injection of heparin with a rapid and marked increase in serum levels. Prior work has demonstrated that the platelet count is one of the factors affecting the levels of heparin-releasable PF4. We therefore characterized the response to a dose of intravenous heparin previously demonstrated to completely displace PF4 from the non-platelet pool in subjects with normal or increased platelet counts. Seventeen patients with essential thrombocytosis (ET), 10 patients with polycythemia vera and high platelet counts (PV-H), 7 patients with polycythemia vera and normal platelet counts (PV-N) and 10 controls received an initial bolus of 40 I.U./kg of unfractionated heparin, followed 2 hours later by a 2nd bolus of a fixed dose of 1000 I.U. TFPI activity did not show any variation among the different groups, either before (TFPI) or after (HR-TFPI) the first bolus of heparin: ET, TFPI 92.6 ± 21.5%, HR-TFPI 298.3 ± 165.8; PV-H, TFPI 91.5 ± 32.0, HR-TFPI 210 ± 1.0; PV-N, TFPI 69.4 ± 24.0, HR-TFPI 203.0 ± 79.0; C, TFPI 109.5 ± 33.5, HR-TFPI 234.0 ± 60.4. TFPI activity returned to basal values prior to the 2nd injection of heparin, which again elicited a rise in TFPI, albeit smaller due to the lower level of heparin injected. In contrast to the lack of any difference between groups with respect to TFPI, the level of heparin-releasable PF4 (HR-PF4) was significantly higher in ET and PV-H patients compared to PV-N patients or controls. However when normalized for platelet count, both PV-H and PV-N had HR-PF4 levels after the 1st heparin injection that were significantly higher than observed in ET patients (PV-H 1.163 + 0.108, PV-N 1.411 + 0.019, ET 0.737 + 0.086 ng/10/3 platelets) supporting an increased platelet activation in PV. Thus, although platelets contain approximately 5-10% of the total amount of TFPI in plasma, they do not affect the major intravascular pool of TFPI mobilizable by heparin. However, since the concentration at the site of vessel wall injury is enhanced several-fold, TFPI could play a role in competing with PF4 to limit thrombus formation in patients with high platelet count.

Control of heart rate during transition from intravenous to oral diltiazem in atrial fibrillation or flutter.

We tested whether patients presenting with atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFl) with a rapid ventricular response could maintain control of heart rate while transferring from a bolus and continuous infusion of intravenous diltiazem to oral diltiazem. Forty patients with AF or AFI and sustained ventricular rate > or = 120 beats/min received intravenous diltiazem "bolus" (20 to 25 mg for 2 minutes) and "infusion" (5 to 15 mg/hour for 6 to 20 hours). Oral long-acting diltiazem (diltiazem CD 180, 300, or 360 mg/24 hours) was administered in patients in whom stable heart rate control was attained during constant infusion. Intravenous diltiazem infusion was discontinued 4 hours after the first oral dose, and patients were monitored during 48 subsequent hours of "transition" to oral therapy. Response to diltiazem was defined as heart rate <100 beats/min, > or = 20% decrease in heart rate from baseline, or conversion to sinus rhythm. Other rate control or antiarrhythmic medications were not allowed during the study period. Thirty-seven of 40 patients maintained heart rate control during the bolus, and 35 of the remaining 37 maintained control during the infusion of intravenous diltiazem. Of the 35 patients achieving heart rate control with intravenous diltiazem who entered the transition to oral therapy, 27 maintained heart rate control (response rate of 77%/, 95% confidence interval 63% to 91%). The median infusion rate of intravenous diltiazem was 10 mg/hour, and the median dose of oral diltiazem CD was 300 mg/day. Oral long-acting diltiazem was 77% effective in controlling ventricular response over 48 hours in patients with AF or AFl in whom ventricular response was initially controlled with intravenous diltiazem.

Tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) activity in uremic patients during hemodialysis.

We studied tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) activity during hemodialysis in 10 uremic patients who were not receiving anticoagulant for at least 120 minutes. TFPI activity before dialysis was normal (patients 107 +/- 5.8%, controls 104 +/- 4.5%). During extracorporeal circuit it rose progressively with a statistically significant difference, reaching a plateau between 60 and 120 minutes. Since thrombin induces a marked redistribution and release of TFPI from stimulated endothelial cells and platelets contain about 10% of TFPI activity that is secreted following activation it is possible that thrombin-induced release of TFPI by endothelium and platelets could account for the increased TFPI we found during hemodialysis. To investigate this possibility we measured during dialysis beta-thromboglobulin (beta-TG), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT) and prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F 1.2). The increased levels of beta-TG, TAT and F1.2 we noted during extracorporeal circuit are in keeping with this concept. One hundred eighty minutes after initiation of dialysis, by which time all patients were receiving heparin there was a further increase in TFPI (to more than 200% of baseline), due to the presence of the glycosaminoglycan. This was due the previously reported displacement by heparin of the major intravascular pool of TFPI, from endothelial cell surfaces.

A comparison of quality of life scores in patients with angina pectoris after angioplasty compared with after medical therapy. Outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Veterans Affairs Study of Angioplasty Compared to Medical Therapy Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Evaluations of therapy for the treatment of angina have traditionally consisted of a combination of objective measures, such as exercise tolerance, and subjective markers, such as angina attack rate. Recently, the need to assess "how patients feel"--their quality of life (QOL)--has been regarded with increasing importance. Standard instruments are available to assess QOL and its change after therapeutic intervention. Although QOL instruments have been used to assess the efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), they have not been used previously to compare the impact of PTCA with that of medical therapy in patients with angina pectoris. We report on the changes in self-assessed QOL among patients randomly assigned to treatment by PTCA or medical therapy and relate these measurements to changes in exercise performance and coronary angiograms. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with stable angina, a positive exercise tolerance test, and at least 70% stenosis (index lesion) in the proximal two thirds of one major coronary artery were randomly assigned to receive PTCA or medical therapy. Six months after randomization, each patient underwent repeat exercise testing and coronary angiography. Before randomization and at the 6-month visit, patients completed a self-administered QOL questionnaire that measured physical functioning and psychological well-being. We compared the changes in QOL with changes between the baseline and 6-month exercise tests, stratified by terciles (decrease in duration, 0- to 2-minute increase, and > 2-minute improvement). We also stratified patients by whether there was more or less than 2 SD change (18.8%) in diameter stenosis of the index lesion (initial minus follow-up angiogram), and we related these to changes in QOL measures. One hundred eighty-two patients with one-vessel disease completed baseline and 6-month questionnaires. At baseline, there were no differences in any QOL measurements between treatment groups. At the 6-month follow-up visit, there was greater improvement in both physical functioning and psychological well-being scores for patients receiving PTCA (+7.36 +/- 15.6, PTCA; +1.98 +/- 14.7, medical therapy; P < .02). Improvement in QOL variables was noted only in patients demonstrating an increase in exercise performance. Also, patients assigned to either treatment whose angiograms demonstrated more than 18.8% improvement in index lesion percent stenosis experienced a significant increase in their QOL scores. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first study of the relative changes in QOL measures assessed with the use of previously validated and standardized instruments in patients randomly assigned to treatment with PTCA or medical therapy. Patients assigned to PTCA demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in both physical and psychological measures. This improvement was noted in patients whose exercise performance improved and whose angiograms demonstrated an improvement in lesion severity.

Increase in circulating products of lipid peroxidation (F2-isoprostanes) in smokers. Smoking as a cause of oxidative damage.

BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that the pathogenesis of diseases induced by cigarette smoking involves oxidative damage by free radicals. However, definitive evidence that smoking causes the oxidative modification of target molecules in vivo is lacking. We conducted a study to determine whether the production of F2-isoprostanes, which are novel products of lipid peroxidation, is enhanced in persons who smoke. METHODS: We measured the levels of free F2-isoprostanes in plasma, the levels of F2-isoprostanes esterified to plasma lipids, and the urinary excretion of metabolites of F2-isoprostanes in 10 smokers and 10 nonsmokers matched for age and sex. The short-term effects of smoking (three cigarettes smoked over 30 minutes) and the effects of two weeks of abstinence from smoking on levels of F2-isoprostanes in the circulation were also determined in the smokers. RESULTS: Plasma levels of free and esterified F2-isoprostanes were significantly higher in the smokers (242 +/- 147 and 574 +/- 217 pmol per liter, respectively) than in the nonsmokers (103 +/- 19 and 345 +/- 65 pmol per liter; P = 0.02 for free F2-isoprostanes and P = 0.03 for esterified F2-isoprostanes). Smoking had no short-term effects on the circulating levels of F2-isoprostanes. However, the levels of free and esterified F2-isoprostanes fell significantly after two weeks of abstinence from smoking (250 +/- 156 and 624 +/- 214 pmol per liter, respectively, before the cessation of smoking, as compared with 156 +/- 67 and 469 +/- 108 pmol per liter after two weeks' cessation; P = 0.03 for free F2-isoprostanes and P = 0.02 for esterified F2-isoprostanes). CONCLUSIONS: The increased levels of F2-isoprostanes in the circulation of persons who smoke support the hypothesis that smoking can cause the oxidative modification of important biologic molecules in vivo.

Safety and efficacy of intravenous diltiazem in atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.

This study examines the efficacy of various doses of intravenous diltiazem to control the ventricular response during atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Control of the ventricular response of patients with atrial fibrillation and a rapid ventricular response can provide patients with relief of symptoms and improve hemodynamics. Eighty-four consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, or both, received an intravenous bolus dose of diltiazem followed by a continuous infusion of diltiazem at 5, 10, and 15 mg/hour. The mean ventricular response and blood pressure were monitored. Overall, 94% of patients (79 of 84) responded to the bolus dose with a > 20% reduction in heart rate from baseline, a conversion to sinus rhythm, or a heart rate < 100 beats/min. Seventy-eight patients received the continuous infusion. After 10 hours of infusion, 47% of patients (confidence interval [CI]: 36%, 59%) had maintained response with the 5 mg/hour infusion, 68% (CI: 57%, 79%) maintained response after the infusion was titrated to 10 mg/hour, and 76% (CI: 66%, 85%) after titration from the 5 and 10 mg/hour infusion to the 15 mg/hour dose. For the 3 diltiazem infusions studied, mean (+/- SD) heart rate was reduced from a baseline value of 144 +/- 14 beats/min to 98 +/- 19, 107 +/- 25, 107 +/- 22, 101 +/- 22, 91 +/- 17, and 88 +/- 18 beats/min at infusion times 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 10 hours, respectively. By the end of the infusion, 18% of patients (14 of 78) had conversion to sinus rhythm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Antiplatelet effects of a novel antianginal agent, nicorandil.

Nicorandil (nicotinamidoethyl nitrate) is a novel vasodilator. Its vasodilator properties are related both to the nicotinamide and nitrate moieties. Classic nitrates such as nitroglycerin (NTG) and isosorbide dinitrate demonstrate in vitro inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation. Such effects have been shown to occur in a dose-related manner, are potentiated by reduced thiols and by increasing preincubation time, and are associated with increases in intracellular cyclic GMP. We explored the effect of nicorandil on ADP-induced human platelet aggregation and the role of reduced thiol N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in modulating this response. Nicorandil significantly inhibited aggregation to ADP dose dependently (IC50 3.0 mM). These effects were associated with inhibition of fibrinogen binding to the platelet surface (IC50 2 mM). Addition of nicorandil after maximal ADP-induced aggregation was achieved resulted in disaggregation. Addition of a source of reduced thiol (NAC) potentiated the antiaggregatory effects of nicorandil threefold (p < 0.05). Platelet inhibition by nicorandil was also augmented by increase in duration of preincubation, with maximal effects observed at 180 min. Preincubation of platelets with 10 mM nicorandil resulted in attenuated inhibition of platelet aggregation on gel filtration and subsequent exposure to additional nicorandil, indicative of tolerance induction. Methylene blue (MB), an inhibitor of guanylate cyclase, significantly reversed nicorandil-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation. Moreover, in accordance with this mechanism, nicorandil increased intracellular platelet cyclic GMP levels. Although the antiplatelet effect of nicotinamide was partially reversed by the K+ channel inhibitor iberotoxin, preincubation with iberotoxin had no impact on inhibition of platelet aggregation by nicorandil.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Combined use of calcium-channel and beta-adrenergic blockers for the treatment of chronic stable angina. Rationale, efficacy, and adverse effects.

During the past decade, the therapy for stable angina pectoris has greatly expanded with the introduction of the calcium-channel blockers. Initially studied as monotherapy, these agents have been regularly used in combination with other antianginal medications, most notably the beta-adrenergic blockers. Although there are pharmacologic rationales for combining these agents, in daily practice, the major impetus for combination therapy is continuing angina during monotherapy. At least one well-conducted double-blind study was done to confirm that diltiazem, verapamil, and nifedipine each can markedly improve both subjective and objective measures of efficacy when used in combination with a beta-blocker. However, individual patient responses are of chief importance. Many persons do better with monotherapy than with combination treatment. The offsetting hemodynamic effects of nifedipine and a beta-blocker generally work well together; however, minor side effects are not infrequent. In the patient with underlying conduction system disease, this combination is clearly preferable. Diltiazem with a beta-blocker is usually well-tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse effects, similar to the experience with diltiazem monotherapy. Verapamil in conjunction with a beta-blocker warrants the greatest concern; approximately 10% to 15% of patients will have significant bradycardia, heart block, hypotension, or congestive failure. When these agents are used concurrently, reduced dosages, especially of the beta-blocker, will likely result in a lower incidence of adverse effects with maintained efficacy.

Mesothelioma of the AV node: potential utility of pacing.

Mesothelioma of the atrioventricular node are rare benign tumors with well-described potential for resulting in sudden death. The presentations have varied: the majority of patients have been predominantly female aged 15 to 40, dying suddenly; however, other patients have had documented heart block for many decades and a noncardiac cause of death. A 19-year-old female expired after presenting with ventricular fibrillation and was subsequently discovered to have a mesothelioma involving the AV node. Although high degree heart block is present in many patients, most episodes of sudden death probably are secondary to ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Either form of dysrhythmia may potentially benefit from ventricular pacing.

Serial studies of platelet factor 4 and beta thromboglobulin during exercise in patients with coronary artery disease.

In vivo activation of platelets can be accurately measured by radioimmunoassays of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and beta thromboglobulin (beta TG). Studies that attempt to correlate increases in PF4 and beta TG levels with exercise-induced myocardial ischemia have yielded conflicting results. To further examine the natural history of release of PF4 and beta TG we used a method of serial samplings of these proteins during and after exercise in nine normal subjects and 24 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Mean values for PF4 and beta TG at rest, during each stage, and immediately after treadmill exercise were the same for normal subjects and for patients with positive and negative responses to exercise-tolerance tests (ETTs). However, nonparametric analysis and regression equations disclosed differences in trends of PF4 level during exercise; PF4 levels increased in normal subjects during exercise, while patients with positive ETTs had no change in PF4 levels and patients with negative ETTs actually showed a decrease in PF4. This investigation confirmed that exercise-induced myocardial ischemia is not associated with platelet aggregation as manifested by the release of the platelet-specific proteins PF4 and beta TG. Statistical analysis suggested that prior reports of elevated levels of PF4 during exercise could have been caused by technical and methodologic difficulties that were associated with the collection and handling of the samples.

Combination therapy with diltiazem and propranolol: precipitation of congestive heart failure.

Although congestive heart failure has been reported with the combination of a beta blocker and either verapamil or nifedipine, it has not previously been reported for combination therapy that includes diltiazem. The following case documents the occurrence of clinical congestive failure in a patient with baseline left ventricular dysfunction and severe angina pectoris. Although the patients had tolerated propranolol therapy for years without difficulty, and high-dose diltiazem monotherapy with an excellent clinical response, the combination of diltiazem and propranolol resulted in the development of congestive heart failure. Thus, although generally well tolerated, given the suitable scenario of reduced left ventricular function, the combination of diltiazem and a beta blocker may adversely affect left ventricular performance.

Superiority of combined diltiazem and propranolol therapy for angina pectoris.

Twenty-four patients with stable angina were evaluated in a 14 week crossover trial. A single-blind placebo period (baseline 1) was followed by two double-blind periods evaluating maximum tolerated doses of diltiazem (up to 360 mg daily) vs placebo. Over the next 1 to 4 weeks, propranolol was started and increased until clinically documented beta-blockade was achieved (baseline 2). The final phase consisted of a pair of evaluation periods comparing propranolol plus the maximum tolerated dose of diltiazem to propranolol and placebo. The daily rate of angina attack was 1.6 during baseline, was unchanged during placebo therapy, but fell during treatment with diltiazem to 0.6 (p less than .005). With the addition of diltiazem to propranolol, the angina rate was improved (0.3) compared with that with either propranolol alone (0.6) or propranolol and placebo (0.5) (p less than .01). Total exercise duration during baseline 1 was 360 sec and increased to 497 sec with diltiazem, 481 sec with propranolol, and 527 sec with the combination of diltiazem and propranolol. Two patients with reduced ejection fractions developed congestive heart failure with propranolol. The combination of diltiazem and propranolol similarly resulted in congestive heart failure in one patient who had tolerated both drugs alone.

Platelet factor 4 release induced by intravenous administration of heparin.

When heparin is injected intravenously, it can induce an immediate release of platelet factor 4 PF4), probably from the non-platelet pool of endothelial cells. We evaluated this release in a group of normal subjects and patients with cardiovascular disorders or thrombocytosis after an intravenous injection of a bolus of 5,000 I.U. of a commercial mucous heparin. The mean level in normals was 102 +/- 32 (range 50-160) ng/ml and no correlation was found before and after heparin injection between PF4 and heparin level, body weight or platelet count. Only three cardiovascular patients had an elevated level of PF4 released by heparin (HR-PF4) that could be the expression of an increased platelet turnover, whereas all the patients with thrombocytosis had an extremely elevated level of HR-PF4. These patients have much more PF4 available for the binding sites of endothelial cells since only a small percentage of potential binding sites are normally occupied "in vivo". Although no correlation could be found between platelet count and HR-PF4 in subjects with a normal platelet count or in patients with thrombocytosis there was a positive correlation, however, when all the cases were considered together. The other proteins with heparin affinity, B-thromboglobulin, antithrombin III and fibronectin were not influenced by a bolus of heparin and did not correlate in normals as well in patients with HR-PF4.