High-Target Hemodiafiltration Convective Dose Achieved in Most Patients in a 6-Month Intermediary Analysis of the CONVINCE Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: High convection volumes in hemodiafiltration (HDF) result in improved survival; however, it remains unclear whether it is achievable in all patients. Methods: CONVINCE, a randomized controlled trial, randomized patients with end-stage kidney disease 1:1 to high-dose HDF versus high-flux hemodialysis (HD) continuation. We evaluated the proportion of patients achieving high-dose HDF target: convection volume per visit of ≥23 l (range ±1 l) at baseline, month 3, and month 6. We compared baseline characteristics in the following 2 ways: (i) patients on target for all 3 visits versus patients who missed target on ≥1 visits and (ii) patients on target for all 3 visits or missing it once versus patients who missed target on ≥2 visits. Results: A total of 653 patients were randomized to HDF. Their mean age was 62.2 (SD 13.5) years, 36% were female, 81% had fistula vascular access, and 33% had diabetes. Across the 3 visits, 75 patients (11%), 27 patients (4%), and 11 patients (2%) missed the convection volume target once, twice, and thrice, respectively. Apart from diabetes, there were no apparent differences in patient characteristics between patients who always achieved the high-dose target (83%) and those who missed the target either once or more (17%) or twice or more (6%). Conclusion: Achieving high-dose HDF is feasible for nearly all patients in CONVINCE and could be maintained during the 6-month follow-up period. Apart from diabetes, there were no other indications for confounding by indication on multivariable analyses that may explain the potential survival advantage for patients receiving high-dose HDF.

COGNITIVE-HD study: protocol of an observational study of neurocognitive functioning and association with clinical outcomes in adults with end-stage kidney disease treated with haemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of cognitive impairment may be increased in adults with end-stage kidney disease compared with the general population. However, the specific patterns of cognitive impairment and association of cognitive dysfunction with activities of daily living and clinical outcomes (including withdrawal from treatment) among haemodialysis patients remain incompletely understood. The COGNITIVE impairment in adults with end-stage kidney disease treated with HemoDialysis (COGNITIVE-HD) study aims to characterise the age-adjusted and education-adjusted patterns of cognitive impairment (using comprehensive testing for executive function, perceptual-motor function, language, learning and memory, and complex attention) in patients on haemodialysis and association with clinical outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective, longitudinal, cohort study of 750 adults with end-stage kidney disease treated with long-term haemodialysis has been recruited within haemodialysis centres in Italy (July 2013 to April 2014). Testing for neurocognitive function was carried out by a trained psychologist at baseline to assess cognitive functioning. The primary study factor is cognitive impairment and secondary study factors will be specific domains of cognitive function. The primary outcome will be total mortality. Secondary outcomes will be cause-specific mortality, major cardiovascular events, fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction and stroke, institutionalisation, and withdrawal from treatment at 12 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved before study conduct by the following responsible ethics committees: Catania (approval reference 186/BE; 26/09/2013), Agrigento (protocol numbers 61-62; 28/6/2013), USL Roma C (CE 39217; 24/6/2013), USL Roma F (protocol number 0041708; 23/7/2013), USL Latina (protocol number 20090/A001/2011; 12/7/2013), Trapani (protocol number 3413; 16/7/2013) and Brindisi (protocol number 40259; 6/6/2013). All participants have provided written and informed consent and can withdraw from the study at any time. The findings of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and national and international conference presentations and to the participants through communication within the dialysis network in which this study is conducted.

Nutrition and dietary intake and their association with mortality and hospitalisation in adults with chronic kidney disease treated with haemodialysis: protocol for DIET-HD, a prospective multinational cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Adults with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) treated with haemodialysis experience mortality of between 15% and 20% each year. Effective interventions that improve health outcomes for long-term dialysis patients remain unproven. Novel and testable determinants of health in dialysis are needed. Nutrition and dietary patterns are potential factors influencing health in other health settings that warrant exploration in multinational studies in men and women treated with dialysis. We report the protocol of the "DIETary intake, death and hospitalisation in adults with end-stage kidney disease treated with HaemoDialysis (DIET-HD) study," a multinational prospective cohort study. DIET-HD will describe associations of nutrition and dietary patterns with major health outcomes for adults treated with dialysis in several countries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: DIET-HD will recruit approximately 10,000 adults who have ESKD treated by clinics administered by a single dialysis provider in Argentina, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Sweden and Turkey. Recruitment will take place between March 2014 and June 2015. The study has currently recruited 8000 participants who have completed baseline data. Nutritional intake and dietary patterns will be measured using the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA(2)LEN) food frequency questionnaire. The primary dietary exposures will be n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid consumption. The primary outcome will be cardiovascular mortality and secondary outcomes will be all-cause mortality, infection-related mortality and hospitalisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the relevant Ethics Committees in participating countries. All participants will provide written informed consent and be free to withdraw their data at any time. The findings of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and to participants via regular newsletters. We expect that the DIET-HD study will inform large pragmatic trials of nutrition or dietary interventions in the setting of advanced kidney disease.

[Evidence-based guidelines and nephrological clinical practice: the GRADE system for rating of evidence]. / Applicabilità delle Linee Guida basate sull'evidenza e alla comune pratica clinica: il sistema GRADE.

It has become widely accepted that decision-making should be based on the best available evidence. The preparation of evidence-based guidelines in the interest of improving long-term outcomes has been a challenging task for many societies. Although nephrology is a relatively young medical discipline and therefore presumably well-disposed towards evidence-based decision making, many problems exist and evidence-based approaches to guidelines have also been widely criticized. One key issue has been the availability of only few and suboptimal randomized trials in this discipline. Considerable variation in the grading systems used to assess existing evidence in nephrology guidelines highlights the need for a better tool. Tools that rigidly assess existing evidence need to also explore the applicability to current practice. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system, developed and implemented in 2004 by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines panel, is the most advanced tool in this direction.

Antiviral medications for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplant recipients has resulted in the frequent use of prophylaxis with the aim of preventing the clinical syndrome associated with CMV infection. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of antiviral medications to prevent CMV disease and all-cause mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists and abstracts from conference proceedings without language restriction. Date of last search: February 2007 SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing antiviral medications with placebo or no treatment, comparing different antiviral medications and comparing different regimens of the same antiviral medications in recipients of any solid organ transplant. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analysis and univariate meta-regression were performed using restricted maximum-likelihood to estimate the between study variance. Multivariate meta-regression was performed to investigate whether the results were altered after allowing for differences in drugs used, organ transplanted and recipient CMV serostatus at the time of transplantation. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty four studies (3850 participants) were identified. Prophylaxis with aciclovir, ganciclovir or valaciclovir compared with placebo or no treatment significantly reduced the risk for CMV disease (19 studies; RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.52), CMV infection (17 studies; RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.77), and all-cause mortality (17 studies; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.92) primarily due to reduced mortality from CMV disease (7 studies; RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.78). Prophylaxis reduced the risk of herpes simplex and herpes zoster disease, bacterial and protozoal infections but not fungal infection, acute rejection or graft loss. Meta-regression showed no significant difference in the relative benefit of treatment (risk of CMV disease or all-cause mortality) by organ transplanted or CMV serostatus; no conclusions were possible for CMV negative recipients of negative organs. In direct comparison studies, ganciclovir was more effective than aciclovir in preventing CMV disease (7 studies; RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.60). Valganciclovir and IV ganciclovir were as effective as oral ganciclovir. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with antiviral medications reduces CMV disease and CMV-associated mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. They should be used routinely in CMV positive recipients and in CMV negative recipients of CMV positive organ transplants.

Interventions for minimal change disease in adults with nephrotic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Steroids have been used widely since the early 1970s for the treatment of adult-onset minimal change disease. The response rates to immunosuppressive agents in adult minimal change disease, especially steroids, are more variable than in children. The optimal agent, dose, and duration of treatment for the first episode of nephrotic syndrome, or for disease relapse(s) has not been determined. OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefits and harms of interventions for the nephrotic syndrome in adults caused by minimal change disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference articles and abstracts from conference proceedings, without language restriction. Search date: January 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of any intervention for minimal change disease in adults over 18 years with the nephrotic syndrome were included. Studies comparing different routes, frequencies, and duration of immunosuppressive agents were selected. Studies comparing non-immunosuppressive agents were also assessed. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results were expressed as a relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, or mean difference (WMD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS: Three RCTs (68 participants) were identified. All treatment comparisons contained only one study. No significant difference was found between prednisone compared with placebo for complete (RR 1.44, CI 0.95 to 2.19) and partial remission (RR 1.00, CI 0.07 to 14.45) of the nephrotic syndrome due to minimal change disease. There was no difference between intravenous methylprednisolone plus oral prednisone compared with oral prednisone alone for complete remission (RR 0.74, CI 0.50 to 1.08). Prednisone, compared with short-course intravenous methylprednisolone, increased the number of subjects who achieved complete remission (RR 4.95, CI 1.15 to 21.26). The lack of statistical evidence of efficacy associated with prednisone therapy was based on data derived from a single study that compared 'alternate-day prednisone' to no immunosuppression' with only a small number of participants in each group. No RCTs were identified comparing regimens in adults with a steroid-dependent or relapsing disease course or comparing treatments comprising alkylating agents, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, levamisole, or mycophenolate mofetil. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Further comparative studies are required to examine the efficacy of immunosuppressive agents for achievement of sustained remission of nephrotic syndrome caused by minimal change disease. Studies are also needed to evaluate treatments for adults with steroid-dependent or relapsing disease.

Treatment for peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis.

BACKGROUND: Peritonitis is a common complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and is associated with significant morbidity. Adequate treatment is essential to reduce morbidity and recurrence. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of treatments for PD-associated peritonitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference lists without language restriction. Date of search: February 2005 SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs assessing the treatment of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients (adults and children) evaluating: administration of an antibiotic(s) by different routes (e.g. oral, intraperitoneal, intravenous); dose of an antibiotic agent(s); different schedules of administration of antimicrobial agents; comparisons of different regimens of antimicrobial agents; any other intervention including fibrinolytic agents, peritoneal lavage and early catheter removal were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data on study quality and outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the dichotomous results were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 36 studies (2089 patients): antimicrobial agents (30); urokinase (4), peritoneal lavage (1) intraperitoneal (IP) immunoglobulin (1). No superior antibiotic agent or combination of agents were identified. Primary response and relapse rates did not differ between IP glycopeptide-based regimens compared to first generation cephalosporin regimens, although glycopeptide regimens were more likely to achieve a complete cure (3 studies, 370 episodes: RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.58). For relapsing or persistent peritonitis, simultaneous catheter removal/replacement was superior to urokinase at reducing treatment failure rates (1 study, 37 patients: RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.91). Continuous IP and intermittent IP antibiotic dosing had similar treatment failure and relapse rates. IP antibiotics were superior to IV antibiotics in reducing treatment failure (1 study, 75 patients: RR 3.52, 95% CI 1.26 to 9.81). The methodological quality of most included studies was suboptimal and outcome definitions were often inconsistent. There were no RCTs regarding duration of antibiotics or timing of catheter removal. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on one study, IP administration of antibiotics is superior to IV dosing for treating PD peritonitis. Intermittent and continuous dosing of antibiotics are equally efficacious. There is no role shown for routine peritoneal lavage or use of urokinase. No interventions were found to be associated with significant harm.

Protocol of the Long-term Impact of RAS Inhibition on Cardiorenal Outcomes (LIRICO) randomized trial.

Microalbuminuria is a strong, consistent and independent risk factor for cardiovascular and renal disease in patients with diabetes and/or hypertension and in the general population. Several randomized trials have shown the efficacy of inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) to prevent cardiovascular events and the progression of kidney disease. These 2 classes of drugs are equally effective for renal outcomes in patients with diabetic nephropathy, but only ACEIs have been found to significantly impact the risk of all-cause mortality, predominantly cardiovascular, in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Studies on the cardiorenal efficacy of combined therapy with ACEIs and ARBs in individuals with microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria and other cardiovascular risk factors have been inconclusive. The Long-term Impact of RAS Inhibition on Cardiorenal Outcomes (LIRICO) study aims to address existing questions in this setting. This is a phase III, randomized, comparative, pragmatic trial with prospective randomized open blinded endpoint (PROBE) design. It will evaluate the comparative efficacy of combined therapy with ACEIs and ARBs versus monotherapy with either ACEIs or ARBs in improving cardiovascular and renal outcomes in microalbuminuric or macroalbuminuric individuals at cardiorenal risk. The study will enroll 2,100 patients, selected in a network of internal medicine, diabetology or nephrology outpatient clinics. Patients will be randomly allocated to ACEIs, ARBs or their combination. The study has been approved and funded by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (A.I.F.A.) within the 2005 funding plan for independent research on drugs.

Choice of extracorporeal dialysis modality: can it be evidence based?

The incidence of end stage kidney disease is increasing worldwide and extracorporeal renal replacement techniques are widely used to treat these patients. Convective dialytic therapies such as hemodiafiltration are claimed to be superior to diffusive techniques such as hemodialysis given the higher clearance rates, hemodynamic stability and possibly reduced morbidity and mortality rates. Although observational studies have held this contention, randomized trials failed to do so. In this article, we present a case report and review available trial and systematic review evidence on the benefits-harms of various extracorporeal techniques. Both convective and diffusive clearance techniques were found to have similar all-cause mortality and hospitalization rates. Data on quality of life, dialysis related amyloidosis and procedure related outcomes such as hypotension have not been well studied. Most of the unbiased information, in the form of randomized trials, are only deriving from few and very small studies while large trials are lacking. Currently, there are three ongoing randomized clinical trials analyzing the efficacy of various extracorporeal techniques with focus on hard end points and their results will shed more light on this topic. Until then, since both convective and diffusive therapies have not been found to be different with respect to major patient-level outcomes but only some surrogates of uncertain clinical importance, the choice of renal replacement therapy should be based on other factors such as patients' preference, availability of dialysis centers and cost.

[Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and combined therapy in microalbuminuric patients with one or more cardiovascular risk factors. Protocol of the Long-term Impact of RAS Inhibition on Cardiorenal Outcomes randomized trial (LIRICO).]. / ACE-inibizione, antagonismo recettoriale e terapia combinata in soggetti microalbuminurici con fattori di rischio cardiovascolare. Protocollo dello studio randomizzato multicentrico ''Long-term impact of RAS inhibition on cardiorenal outcomes-LIRICO".

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-i) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) are considered to be equally effective for patients with diabetic kidney disease, while only ACE-i have been shown to determine a significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality, predominantly cardiovascular, in these patients. Studies on the cardio-renal efficacy of combined therapy with ACE-i and ARB are not available or not conclusive, in a population with cardiovascular risk with micro- or macroalbuminuria. In this paper, we present the protocol of a randomized controlled clinical trial that will address the question. The LIRICO (Long-term Impact of RAS Inhibition on Cardiorenal Outcomes) study will evaluate the comparative efficacy for cardiovascular and renal outcomes of combined therapy with ACE-i and ARB versus monotherapy with ACE-i or ARB in micro/macroalbuminuric individuals at cardio-renal risk. The study will enrol 2100 patients allocated to monotherapy with ACE-i, ARB or combined treatment with ACE-i + ARB. The LIRICO study is a randomized comparative trial, with PROBE (Prospective Randomized Open Blinded End-Point) design. The study has been approved and funded by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) within the 2005 funding plan for independent research on drugs. Availability of funding for this study provides, for the first time in our Country, an opportunity to organize a collaborative national network of nephrology, internal medicine and diabetology outpatient clinics to develop a large multicentre trial collaboration. The results of this trial will establish the optimal therapy for micro/macroalbuminuric individuals with cardiovascular and renal risk.

Interventions for preventing bone disease in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease have significant abnormalities of bone remodeling and mineral homeostasis and are at increased risk of fracture. The fracture risk for a kidney transplant recipient is four times that of the general population and higher than for a patient on dialysis. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) report the use of bisphosphonates, vitamin D sterols, calcitonin, and hormone replacement therapy to treat bone disease following transplantation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of interventions for treating bone disease following kidney transplantation. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library), Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists, and conference proceedings abstracts without language restriction. Date of last search: May 2006 SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs and quasi-RCTs comparing different treatments for kidney transplant recipients of any age were selected. We excluded all other transplant recipients, including kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous variables and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-four trials (1,299 patients) were included. No individual intervention (bisphosphonates, vitamin D sterol or calcitonin) was associated with a reduction in fracture risk compared with placebo. Combining results for all active interventions against placebo demonstrated any treatment of bone disease was associated with a reduction in the RR of fracture (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.99). Bisphosphonates (any route), vitamin D sterol, and calcitonin all had a beneficial effect on the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine. Bisphosphonates and vitamin D sterol also had a beneficial effect on the bone mineral density at the femoral neck. Bisphosphonates had greater efficacy for preventing bone mineral density loss when compared head-to-head with vitamin D sterols. Few or no data were available for combined hormone replacement, testosterone, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, fluoride or anabolic steroids. Other outcomes including all-cause mortality and drug-related toxicity were reported infrequently. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a bisphosphonate, vitamin D sterol or calcitonin after kidney transplantation may protect against immunosuppression-induced reductions in bone mineral density and prevent fracture. Adequately powered trials are required to determine whether bisphosphonates are better than vitamin D sterols for fracture prevention in this population. The optimal route, timing, and duration of administration of these interventions remains unknown.

Immunoglobulins, vaccines or interferon for preventing cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common virus causing disease and death in solid organ transplant recipients during the first six months post-transplant. Previous systematic reviews have demonstrated the efficacy of antiviral medications used prophylactically or pre-emptively in preventing CMV disease. In this review the efficacy of older agents (immunoglobulins (IgG), anti CMV vaccines and interferon) are examined. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of IgG, anti CMV vaccines or interferon for preventing symptomatic CMV disease in solid organ transplant recipients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists and abstracts from conference proceedings without language restriction. Date of last search: December 2005 SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing IgG, anti CMV vaccine or interferon with placebo or no treatment, IgG alone or combined with antiviral medications with antiviral medications or IgG alone in recipients of any solid organ transplant. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two of four authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data from each trial. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS: Thirty seven trials (2185 participants) were included in this review. There was no significant difference in the risk for CMV disease (16 trials, 770 patients: RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.05), CMV infection (14 trials, 775 patients: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.10) or all-cause mortality (8 trials, 502 patients: RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.03) with IgG compared with placebo/no treatment. However IgG significantly reduced the risk of death from CMV disease (6 trials, 346 patients: RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.80). There was no difference in the risk for CMV disease (4 trials, 298 patients: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.86), CMV infection (4 trials, 298 patients: RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.52) or all-cause mortality (2 trials, 217 patients: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.37 to 2.29) between antiviral medication combined with IgG and antiviral medication alone. There was no significant difference in the risk of CMV disease with anti CMV vaccine or interferon compared with placebo or no treatment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently there are no indications for IgG in the prophylaxis of CMV disease in recipients of solid organ transplants.

[Therapeutic strategies for membranous nephropathy: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]. / Terapia della nefropatia membranosa idiopatica: Linea Guida.

BACKGROUND: The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of interventions for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN) is presented. METHODS: SR of RCT and RCT on interventions for MN were identified referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update). RESULTS: Three SR and 18 RCT were available to address this issue. Methodological quality of available RCT was suboptimal according to current methodological standards. In patients with MN, nephrotic syndrome and normal renal function, methylprednisolone and chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide for 6 months alternately increase the probability of nephritic syndrome remission (evidence from SR) and long-term renal protection (evidence from RCT). Other drugs (ACTH and cyclosporine) are associated with nephrotic syndrome remission, but there is no evidence of significant effects on renal function (evidence from RCT). In patients with impaired renal function, association of corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents is proven to cause a short-term delay of renal damage progression, even though benefits are counterbalanced by complications (evidence from RCT). CONCLUSION: In patients with MN, nephrotic syndrome and normal renal function, current available evidence supports the hypothesis that primary intervention should be the association of corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents. Secondary therapeutic choices include ACTH and cyclosporine. Further studies are necessary to test new immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil.

[Immunosuppressive and non-immunosuppressive agents for patients with IgA nephropathy: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]. / Terapia immunosoppressiva e non immunosoppressiva della glomerulonefrite a depositi mesangiali di IgA: Linea Guida.

BACKGROUND: The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of the use of immunosuppressive and non-immunosuppressive treatments in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is presented. METHODS: SR of RCT and RCT on treatment in patients with IgAN were identified referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update). Quality of SR and RCT was assessed according to current methodological standards. RESULTS: Two SR of RCT (13 and 3 RCT, respectively), and 18 further RCT were available to address this issue. Methodological quality of available trials was suboptimal. In patients with IgAN and normal or mildly impaired renal function, steroids significantly delay the progression to end stage kidney disease (evidence from SR) and improve proteinuria. Associating steroids and cytotoxic agents (cyclophosphamide followed by oral azathioprine) proves effective in patients with rapidly progressive renal disease (evidence from RCT). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers significantly improve proteinuria (evidence from RCT), but there are no conclusive data on efficacy on hard patient level endpoints. There are no conclusive data available on the use of a therapy combining these agents. CONCLUSION: In IgAN patients current evidence supports the hypothesis that immunosuppressive agents delay the progression to end stage renal disease. Further studies are necessary to test this hypothesis in selected patient populations.

[Treating lupus nephritis: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]. / Terapia delle nefriti proliferative lupiche; confronto degli schemi di associazione di farmaci citotossici più steroide rispetto al solo steroide: Linea Guida.

BACKGROUND: The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of lupus nephritis (LN) treatment is presented. METHODS: SR of RCT and RCT on different therapeutic options for LN were identified referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update). RESULTS: One SR of 25 RCT and 6 further RCT were available to address this issue. Methodological quality of available RCT was suboptimal according to current methodological standards. In LN patients, combining cyclophosphamide (CyA) and steroids as induction therapy results in a reduced risk of serum creatinine doubling compared to steroids alone, although there is no evidence of significant survival advantage and risk of ovarian failure was demonstrated (evidence from SR). The association of azathioprine (Aza) and steroids significantly reduces the risk of all-cause mortality compared to steroids alone (evidence from SR). No significant survival advantages from the association of plasma exchange and CyA or Aza are proven (evidence from SR). No significant differences on renal and survival endpoints are demonstrated with different dosing of CyA (evidence from RCT). CONCLUSION: In LN patients available evidence supports the hypothesis that immunosuppressive agents reduce the risk of all-cause mortality and the risk of progressive renal disease. Further studies are necessary to test new immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil in severe LN patients.

[Haemoglobin targets for chronic kidney disease: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]. / Target ottimale di emoglobina per l'insufficienza renale cronica: Linea Guida.

BACKGROUND: The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of optimal haemoglobin (Hb) target levels in chronic kidney disease (CKD), either for pre-dialysis, dialysis or renal transplanted patients, is presented. METHODS: SR of RCT and RCT on different Hb target levels in patients with CKD were identified, referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update). Quality of SR and RCT was assessed according to current methodological standards. RESULTS: Four SR (19 RCT) were found addressing the point. Methodological quality of available trials was suboptimal. In CKD patients (non-dialysis patients) Hb targets of 11.3 g/dL should be preferred to Hb >13.5 g/dL (evidence from RCT). A Hb target of 11.0-11.5 g/dL should be preferred in CKD patients receiving dialysis treatment without significant cardiac disease, since no survival benefits has been showed with Hb >14 g/dL (evidence from RCT). The optimal Hb target in haemodialysis patients with severe cardiac disease should be 10.0-10.5 g/dL (evidence from SR). Increases in Hb target lev-els are associated with improved quality of life, although this was mainly noticed in observational studies and in few RCT often relying on unvalidated quality of life assessment scales. CONCLUSION: In CKD patients current available evidence supports the hypothesis that optimal Hb targets should be low to subnormal.

[Use of statins for preventing cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease excluding dialysis: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]. / Statine per la prevenzione della progressione del danno renale: Linea Guida.

BACKGROUND: The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of the efficacy of statins in chronic kidney disease patients (CKD, non-dialysis patients) is presented. METHODS: SR of RCT and RCT on statins in CKD (non-dialysis) patients were identified referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update). Quality of SR and RCT was assessed according to current methodological standards. RESULTS: Three SR and 36 RCT were found addressing this intervention issue. Methodological quality of the relevant RCT was suboptimal. There is no enough evidence to suggest that statins are associated with a significant reduction in the risk of serum creatinine doubling or of end-stage renal disease in CKD patients (evidence from SR and RCT). Statins compared to placebo or no treatment are associated with significant improvements in proteinuria (evidence from SR). Statins are also associated with significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality in CKD patients (evidence from SR and RCT) and in renal transplant recipients (evidence from RCT), and no significant increases in the risk of rhabdomyolysis and hepatotoxicity in CKD patients. CONCLUSION: Available evidence supports the hypothesis that statins should be recommended in CKD patients (non-dialysis patients) on the basis of significant evidence of cardiac and renal protection and no evidence of significant harms. Further studies are necessary to test this hypothesis in selected patient populations.

[Antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy for the prevention of Cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]. / Profilassi con farmaci antivirali e pre-emptive therapy per la prevenzione dell'infezione da Citomegalovirus nel trapianto di rene: Linea Guida.

BACKGROUND: The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive treatment for preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in kidney transplant recipients is presented. METHODS: SR of RCT and RCT on antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive treatment for CMV infection in kidney transplant recipients were identified referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update). RESULTS: Evidence from 4 SR of RCT was gathered to address this issue. Methodological quality of available RCT included in these SR was suboptimal. Antiviral prophylaxis is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of CMV infection and all-cause mortality in CMV-negative and CMV-positive renal transplant recipients from CMV-positive donors, regard-less of the immunosuppressive treatments used (evidence from SR). Pre-emptive therapy has been found to be effective in preventing CMV disease but not all-cause mortality in these patients, even if evidence is less satisfactory compared to data on antiviral prophylaxis (evidence from SR). There is insufficient evidence of conclusive recommendations on treatment of CMV-negative recipients of renal transplants from CMV-negative donors. CONCLUSION: In kidney transplant patients current available evidence supports the hypothesis that antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy are effective in preventing CMV disease; but antiviral should be the treatment of choice. Further studies are necessary on the treatment of CMV-negative recipients from CMV-negative donors.

[Calcimimetics, phosphate binders, vitamin D and its analogues for treating secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease: guideline from the Italian Society of Nephrology]. / Utilizzo della vitamina D e analoghi, dei chelanti del fosforo e dei calciomimetici nella terapia dell'iperparatiroidsmo secondario e della patologia ossea nelle nefropatie croniche: Linea Guida.

BACKGROUND: The current 3rd edition of the Italian Society of Nephrology guidelines has been drawn up to summarize evidence of key intervention issues on the basis of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized trials (RCT) or RCT data only. In the present guideline, evidence of the use of calcimimetics, phosphate binders, vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for treating secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is presented. METHODS: SR of RCT and RCT on interventions for secondary hyperparathyroidism in CKD were identified referring to a Cochrane Library and Renal Health Library search (2005 update). RESULTS: Three SR and 8 RCT were found addressing this intervention issue. Methodological quality of available RCT was suboptimal according to current methodological standards. Calcimimetics used in patients receiving haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis are more effective than placebo in controlling secondary hyperparathyroidism (reduced parathyroid hormone levels, calcium levels and phosphorus levels). All phosphate binders are effective in controlling hyperphosphatemia but different doses are to be used with different agents to achieve similar targets. Dosing needs to be adjusted according to phosphorus levels. Vitamin D and its analogues are recommended in CKD patients, although there is no significant evidence of superiority of individual agents in head-to-head comparisons. Dosing should be based on baseline parathyroid hormone levels, but the risk of hypercalcemia should also be considered. CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that calcimimetics, phosphate binders and vitamin D or its analogues are effective in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Superiority of individual agents or doses is still deeply debated. Further studies are necessary to test these issues.