The Utility of Radiologic and Symptomatic Surveillance After Minimally-invasive Adult Pyeloplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate different types of failure after minimally-invasive pyeloplasty (MIP) when stratified by initial radiologic study and symptoms after ureteral stent removal. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed adults who underwent MIP (1996-2019) at a single academic center. Patients with at least 11 months of follow-up and patients who had a Mag3 scan as their initial postoperative imaging were included. Postprocedure, patients were categorized as having normal, equivocal, or obstructed imaging based on their initial radiologic test. Patients who were obstructed were excluded. Primary outcome was procedural failure, defined as the need for a procedure to treat recurrent obstruction. Secondary outcomes were radiologic failure and symptomatic failure. Groups were compared to assess for statistical significance (P <.05). RESULTS: Overall, 122 patients met inclusion criteria. On initial postoperative imaging, 108 (89%) patients had no obstruction and 14 (11%) had equivocal findings. The procedural failure rate was 6.5% in the unobstructed group and 28.6% in the equivocal group (P = .023). Seven unobstructed patients (6.5%) and 2 equivocal patients (14.3%) eventually experienced radiologic failure (P = .275). Among patients who had no obstruction on initial imaging and remained asymptomatic, only one (0.9%) required a salvage procedure. CONCLUSION: Recurrent obstruction after pyeloplasty varied based on the outcome of the initial radiologic study. These rates can be used to counsel patients and guide physicians' choice of surveillance schedules. The risk of future failure is very low in asymptomatic patients with normal initial imaging. The utility of routine radiologic surveillance in these patients may be limited.

Imaging appearance of fibrosing diseases of the retroperitoneum: can a definitive diagnosis be made?

PURPOSE: To assess the frequency with which previously reported characteristic findings of retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) (a circumferential or almost circumferential peri-aortic mass centered at L4, which does not displace the abdominal aorta or proximal common iliac arteries) are present in patients with RPF, in patients with other fibrosing diseases, and in cancer patients referred to a subspecialty clinic with a suspected diagnosis of RPF, in order to determine whether diagnostic percutaneous biopsy can be avoided in some patients. METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study assessed clinical and CT and MR imaging abnormalities on imaging studies in 92 patients referred to a subspecialty clinic with suspected RPF over a 14-year period. Two reviewers, in consensus, determined the frequency of different CT and MRI findings in three groups of patients (Group 1: those with an eventual diagnosis of RPF, Group 2: those with a fibrosing disease associated with vascular or urologic abnormalities, and Group 3: those with cancer). Assessed imaging features included the presence of retroperitoneal masses, whether masses were single or multiple, whether such masses were circumferential or nearly circumferential, whether they displaced the aorta away from the spine (with the degree of such displacement measured), and whether there were abnormalities outside of the peri-aortic region of the retroperitoneum. The frequency with which findings previously reported as characteristic of RPF were present was determined for each of the three groups. Imaging results were correlated with the final diagnoses. RESULTS: Of 68 subjects eventually diagnosed with retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) (Group 1), 47 had peri-aortic retroperitoneal masses, 18 of which displaced the aorta anteriorly away from the spine. Of 12 subjects with fibrosing abnormalities related to vascular or urologic disease (Group 2), six had retroperitoneal masses, none of which displaced the aorta away from the spine. Of 12 subjects with malignancies (Group 3), six had peri-aortic retroperitoneal masses only two of whom had aortic displacement. Only 34 of 68 Group 1 subjects had peri-aortic masses characteristic of RPF, compared with six Group 2 subjects and one Group 3 subject. Subjects with characteristic retroperitoneal masses were significantly more likely to have benign disease than cancer (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Many patients with RPF do not have characteristic imaging findings. Contrary to prior publications, absence of aortic displacement is not seen in all patients with RPF and is seen in some cancer patients. Nonetheless, when infiltrative peri-aortic retroperitoneal soft tissue that does not displace the aorta is encountered on CT or MRI, RPF can be diagnosed with a high degree of confidence, obviating the need for biopsy.

Reporting standards for the imaging-based diagnosis of renal masses on CT and MRI: a national survey of academic abdominal radiologists and urologists.

PURPOSE: To define important elements of a structured radiology report of a CT or MRI performed to evaluate an indeterminate renal mass. METHODS: IRB approval was waived for this multi-site prospective quality improvement study. A 35-question survey investigating elements of a CT or MRI report describing a renal mass was created through an iterative process by the Society of Abdominal Radiology Disease-Focused Panel on renal cell carcinoma. Surveys were distributed to consenting abdominal radiologists and urologists at nine academic institutions. Consensus within and between specialties was defined as ≥70% agreement. Respondent rates were compared with Chi Square test. RESULTS: The response rate was 68% (117/171; 55% [39/71] urologists, 78% [78/100] radiologists). Inter-specialty consensus was that the following were essential: mass size with comparison to prior imaging, mass type (cystic vs. solid), presence of fat, presence of enhancement, and radiologic stage. Urologists were more likely to prefer the Nephrometry score (75% [27/36] vs. 22% [17/76], p < 0.0001), quantitative reporting of enhancement on CT (85% [32/38] vs. 46% [36/77], p < 0.0001), and mass position with respect to the renal polar lines (67% [24/36] vs. 36% [27/76], p = 0.002). There was inter-specialty consensus that the Bosniak classification for cystic masses was preferred. Most urologists (60% [21/35]) preferred management recommendations be omitted for solid masses or Bosniak III-IV cystic masses. CONCLUSIONS: Important elements to include in a CT or MRI report of an indeterminate renal mass are critical diagnostic features, the Bosniak classification if relevant, and the most likely specific diagnosis when feasible; including management recommendations is controversial.

Long-term renal functional outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Preservation of renal function is the major benefit of partial over radical nephrectomy. We evaluated patients undergoing minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) to better understand factors predicting long-term renal function. METHODS: We identified 358 patients who underwent MIPN for confirmed renal cell carcinoma between 1998 and 2011 with a serum creatinine level at least 1 year postoperatively. Exposure variables included demographic, clinical, and perioperative information. The primary outcome was clinically significant progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) class, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreasing from >60 to<60, from 30 to 60 to <30, or from 15 to 30 to<15. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 39 months. Only 7 patients had a solitary kidney. A total of 47 patients (13%) had CKD class progression. The estimates for remaining free of CKD class progression at 5, 7, and 10 years were 86.98%, 75.45%, and 53.54%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, lower preoperative eGFR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96-0.98), larger tumor size (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01-1.48), and longer ischemia time (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05) were associated with CKD class progression. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically significant progression of CKD occurs in a minority of patients 5 years after MIPN, but in almost one-half, it occurs 10 years after surgery. Lower preoperative eGFR and larger tumor size are associated with greater incidence of CKD progression. Longer ischemia time, even when most patients had 2 kidneys and when controlling for other factors, nonetheless increased the risk of CKD progression, although this may be a marker of other unmeasured variables.

Indications for adrenalectomy during radical nephrectomy for renal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the selection criteria for ipsilateral adrenalectomy during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN) can be further restricted, with the goal of sparing more patients unnecessary adrenalectomy while preserving the removal of adrenal glands containing malignancy, as recent evidence suggests that adrenalectomy in association with RN for renal cancer can be limited to patients with abnormalities on adrenal imaging or large upper-pole renal tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of two data sets, each from one institution, i.e., a training set and a validation set. All patients underwent RN for radiographically localised disease. Removal of the adrenal gland was based on the surgeon's preference, related to the presence of a suspect adrenal lesion on preoperative imaging, suspicion for involvement of the adrenal gland intraoperatively, location of the tumour, size of the tumour and local tumour stage. RESULTS: Of 159 patients in the training cohort, three (2%) had metastatic renal cancer in the ipsilateral adrenal gland. All three patients had tumours of >7 cm and either an abnormal radiographic appearance of the adrenal gland or suspect intraoperative findings. In the validation cohort of 74 patients, seven (10%) had adrenal metastasis, of which one had a tumour of <7 cm and the indication for adrenalectomy was the high intraoperative suspicion. CONCLUSION: We recommend performing ipsilateral adrenalectomy in association with RN for renal cancer when there is either abnormal radiographic appearance of the adrenal gland or suspect intraoperative findings, with no regard for primary tumour size.

Laparoscopic treatment of Page kidney: a report of two cases and review of the literature.

Page kidney is defined as the external compression of the kidney, typically by a subcapsular hematoma, that leads to hypertension due to hypoperfusion and ischemia. The treatment options include medical anti-hypertensive treatment, percutaneous drainage, surgical decortication and nephrectomy. Laparoscopic decortication of Page kidney is a newly defined minimally invasive management technique. We describe 2 cases of Page kidney that failed to improve with percutaneous drainage but were successfully treated with the laparoscopic approach.