Hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy for severe premenstrual syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a chronic, poorly understood psycho-endocrine disorder severely affecting 5%; of women. Hormonal therapy which suppresses ovulation is the mainstay of medical treatment, but these interventions are rarely permanent. We evaluated the effectiveness and patient satisfaction with total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH/BSO) in PMS sufferers, and assessed the post-operative HRT continuation. METHODS: All women undergoing TAH/BSO for severe PMS between January 1994 and April 2000 were interviewed and responses recorded by structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty-seven women were interviewed. Median age was 42 years (interquartile range 39.8-46.6) at the time of surgery. They had suffered with PMS for a mean of 9.68 years (SD 6.8) and received treatment for a mean of 3.57 years (SD 2.0) prior to referral to a gynaecologist. Fifty-two percent were treated with estradiol patches and 48% with estradiol implants prior to TAH/BSO. Ninety-six percent of women were 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with TAH/BSO, and 93.6% declared complete resolution of their cyclical symptoms; 93.6% were continuing with HRT usually by implants of estradiol and testosterone for a mean duration of 3.8 years (SD 1.86) post-operatively. CONCLUSION: Despite few reports of TAH/BSO as a treatment for severe PMS, we have found surgery, coupled with appropriate HRT, to be an extremely effective and well-accepted permanent cure for PMS.

Premenstrual syndrome and the use of alternative therapies.

Premenstrual syndrome is a collection of symptoms that may be encountered by up to 95% of the population, although it is estimated to affect 5% of women severely. The use of complementary and alternative therapies is high among this group, but does not seem to compromise conventional treatment. It has been established that complementary therapies are used by a large proportion of the developed world, but their efficacy and safety are not always proven. This is partly due to the difficulty of studying alternative practices and the cost, but also with respect to premenstrual syndrome, problems with defining the condition and specifying end points are encountered. The difficulties in evaluating unorthodox therapies are elucidated and the evidence base for nonprescribed treatments for premenstrual syndrome is presented. Overall these women are a neglected group for whom the evidence for conventional therapy is sparse and controversial. Since the majority of women self-diagnose and self-medicate, it is important that physicians have an understanding of the variety of interventions tried and their worth.

Continuation of hormone replacement therapy after hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To assess long-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT) usage in women after hysterectomy and to assess the relationship between age and long-term use of HRT in these women. Problems and comments of those women responding to a questionnaire were evaluated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A postal semistructured questionnaire survey was performed in a single gynecological practice. A total of 545 consecutive women who had undergone a hysterectomy for benign conditions between January 1986 and September 1997 were studied, the main outcome measure being continuing use of HRT. RESULTS: There was a response rate of 83.1% to the questionnaire; 83% of all responders were taking HRT at the time of the survey. A continuation rate of 95.7% was found among women who had had a hysterectomy after 1994, and of 84.7% among those operated on in 1989 or before. Implants were used by 68%, transdermal patches by 17%, oral preparations by 11% and estradiol gel by 4%. Ten per cent of those not taking HRT at present indicated that they were likely to start again in the near future. No correlation was found between age and likelihood of HRT continuation. Fifty per cent of women responding to the questionnaire made further comments: 17.6% of these made specific positive comments regarding HRT, 16.7% reported weight gain, 9.7% suffered breast symptoms and 13.2% admitted concerns regarding breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A high HRT continuation rate of between 95.7% (women having had their hysterectomy less than 5 years ago) and 84.7% (women 10 or more years from their operation) can be achieved in the long term. Considering the high proportion having implant therapy, the use of testosterone as well as estradiol replacement may be a major factor in the greater adherence to HRT of this group.

Use of complementary therapies by women attending a specialist premenstrual syndrome clinic.

In this study, we investigate the use of complementary therapies by women attending a specialist premenstrual syndrome (PMS) clinic in the UK. Data was collected via an anonymous questionnaire survey of 100 women attending the clinic. Results showed 91% of women had used at least one form of complementary therapy for the management of their premenstrual symptomatology although only 35% were current users. Over half (53%) felt that these therapies had been of some benefit. Prescribed medication for PMS was being used by 71% of women at the time of the questionnaire and 83% of these women were satisfied with the perceived success of conventional therapy. In conclusion, the vast majority of women attending a specialist PMS clinic in the UK have used complementary therapies to treat this chronic debilitating condition but few continue use long-term. Treatment may be instigated by the woman with advice from her informal support network and/or her physicians. However as use is so prevalent, but with few randomized controlled trials conducted to show their benefits or risks, it is important to improve awareness of these therapies, both in qualitative and quantitative terms. Satisfaction with prescribed medications did not appear to be influenced by complementary therapy use in this group of women.

Low dose 25 mg oestradiol implants and 1 mg norethisterone as continuous combined hormone therapy: a prospective study.

The anxiety regarding no-bleed regimens is that breakthrough bleeding and endometrial hyperplasia may occur. We aimed to demonstrate that 25 mg oestradiol implants can be adequately opposed by a low dose of progestogen protecting against osteoporosis. Twenty-two patients were recruited to the study. The mean age was 62 years and body mass index of 26.5. Median oestradiol rose from 77 pmol/L at baseline to 275 pmol/L at one year. Median endometrial thickness remained unchanged at 4 mm and only two women withdrew with bleeding problems. There was one case of proliferative endometrium at one year--all others samples were either atrophic or secretory. Lumbar bone density (L2-L4) rose significantly from 0.939 to 0.992 g/cm2 (6%, P = 0.005) and the total femoral density rose from 0.872 to 0.890 g/cm2 (+2.1%). Bone formation markers increased significantly (serum type 1 procollagen C terminal peptide, P1CP = 112-114, P = 0.0376) and bone resorption fell (serum type 1 collagen C terminal telopeptide, 1CTP = 3.0-2.9, P = 0.2863). E25 implants and low dose progestogen appear to avoid endometrial hyperplasia and bleeding problems while increasing bone density.

Hormone replacement therapy and malignant melanoma: to prescribe or not to prescribe?

The mean age of presentation of malignant melanoma in women is the early fifties, a time that may be concomitant with the onset of the menopause. As the lesion can often be successfully surgically excised, many women will enter the menopause disease-free but in need of treatment for their menopausal symptoms. Melanoma has traditionally been considered to be an estrogen receptor-positive tumor, whose prognosis is adversely affected by estrogen, whether during pregnancy or in association with the oral contraceptive pill or hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Recent evidence now refutes this. As most recurrences occur in the first 2 years following treatment, it may be prudent to defer HRT until this time. There is a particular paucity of information pertaining to HRT and melanoma, such that, at present, there appears to be no justification for withholding this potentially beneficial therapy from menopausal women who have undergone treatment for melanoma.