The ISTH Bleeding Assessment Tool and the risk of future bleeding.

Essentials ISTH Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) is used to assist the diagnosis of bleeding disorders. We examined whether the ISTH-BAT is capable of predicting the risk of future bleeding. 136 subjects were administered the ISTH-BAT and followed for up to four years. The ISTH-BAT score failed to predict the risk of future bleeding. SUMMARY: Background The ISTH Bleeding Assessment Tool (ISTH-BAT) is a diagnostic tool used in subjects with suspected inherited bleeding disorders. Aim To evaluate whether the ISTH-BAT, applied at first work-up in a tertiary-care center, predicts the risk of subsequent bleeding events. Methods This was an observational cohort study including all consecutive subjects, of either sex and any age, referred between 2011 and 2015 because of a suspected bleeding disorder. The analysis was restricted to those with an ISTH-BAT score of ≥ 3. Incidence rates (IRs) of major bleeding (MB) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) events were calculated as the number of events over accrued person-years. The main analysis was performed with Cox regression analysis, assessing an ISTH-BAT score of ≤ 5 versus a score of > 5, as well as the score as a continuous variable, and various covariates (sex, age, and presence/absence of a final diagnosis). Results One hundred and thirty-six subjects had a median ISTH-BAT score of 4 (range 3-18). Eleven subjects (8.1%) had a bleeding event during follow-up (one MB event; 10 CRNMB events). The overall IR of bleeding events per 100 person-years was 3.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-6.6). No difference was observed between subjects with an ISTH-BAT score of ≤ 5 and those with a score of > 5 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2, 95% CI 0.3-4.6). The results were similar when the ISTH-BAT score was considered as a continuous variable (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4). The IR of bleeding was increased in individuals with a diagnosis of a hemostatic defect (IR of 7.5 per 100 person-years; HR 3.0, 95% CI 0.8-11.8). Conclusions The ISTH-BAT does not identify patients at increased risk of future bleeding events.

A comparative evaluation of a new fully automated assay for von Willebrand factor collagen binding activity to an established method.

INTRODUCTION: Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is made by the measurement of von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein level and its activities. Current VWF activity tests include ristocetin cofactor and collagen binding (VWF:CB) assays. AIM: We have undertaken an evaluation of a new fully automated VWF:CB assay relative to an established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. METHODS: The two analytical systems operate with different detection principles: a chemiluminescent method performed on ACL AcuStar Analyzer (the former) and a colorimetric ELISA by Asserachrom Stago (the latter) (type III collagen from human placenta). The HemosIL AcuStar VWF:CB assay is a chemiluminescent 2-step immunoassay that uses magnetic particles coated with a type III collagen triple-helical peptide. VWF:CB levels were determined in 50 healthy subjects and 100 VWD patients (22 type 1, 73 type 2 and 5 type 3). RESULTS: Eleven VWD samples reported VWF:CB values below the lower detection limit of one or both methods. The new method showed a good correlation with the ELISA method (r > .9, mean bias 3.85 IU/dL) in both healthy and VWD samples. One of 150 samples gave inconsistent results using the two assays, leading to an uncertain diagnosis of VWD type 1 (ELISA method) or type 2 MCB (fully automated method). CONCLUSION: The new assay is rapid and simple to use, with its ready-to-use reagent cartridges. This VWF:CB assay, in addition to the measurement of VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo made on the same platform, gives additional information for the diagnosis of VWD in both nonspecialized and reference laboratories.

von Willebrand disease type 1 mutation p.Arg1379Cys and the variant p.Ala1377Val synergistically determine a 2M phenotype in four Italian patients.

INTRODUCTION: We characterized five patients affected with von Willebrand disease (VWD) carrying the p.Arg1379Cys mutation. One was diagnosed as VWD type 1 and four as type 2M. The 2M patients also have the variant p.Ala1377Val in cis with p.Arg1379Cys. AIM: To evaluate the role of p.Ala1377Val and p.Arg1379Cys von Willebrand factor (VWF) variants to explain patients' phenotype. METHODS: Conventional phenotype tests were used to evaluate patients' plasma and platelets. Direct sequence analysis of exon 28 was carried out. The allele frequency of p.Ala1377Val was evaluated using online database. pcDNA3.1-VWF-WT and mutant (A1377V, R1379C and A1377V-R1379C) expression vectors were transiently transfected in HEK293 cells. The capacity of WT and mutant recombinant (r)VWF (along with patients' plasma VWF) to bind glycoprotein Ibα (GpIbα) were evaluated, using two ELISA assays. One with a wild-type (WT) recombinant (r)GpIbα at increasing ristocetin concentrations (from 0 to 1.50 mg mL-1 ) and the other with a gain-of-function mutant rGpIbα (VWF:GPIbM). RESULTS: The substitution c.4130C>T (p.Ala1377Val) was reported as rare variant in online databases. At 0.25 mg mL-1 of ristocetin, WT, A1377V and R1379C showed 6, 7.5 and 12-fold increased binding to rGpIbα, respectively. A1377V-R1379C rVWF showed no increased binding to rGpIbα at the same ristocetin concentration and reached the highest binding, of only 3-fold increased, at 1.50 mg mL-1 of ristocetin. The VWF:GPIbM showed strongly reduced values for the A1377V-R1379C rVWF and the 2M patients' plasma. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the presence of both p.Ala1377Val and p.Arg1379Cys mutations (synergistic effect) abolishes the binding of rVWF to rGpIbα, explaining patients' 2M phenotype.

Evaluation of an heterogeneous group of patients with von Willebrand disease using an assay alternative to ristocetin induced platelet agglutination.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 2 usually relies on the discrepancy between the von Willebrand factor (VWF) ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) and VWF antigen (VWF:Ag). Type 2B patients can be discriminated from other qualitative VWD variants by using ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination (RIPA) test. The major limitation of RIPA is the requirement of fresh blood sample. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we evaluated the VWF gain-of-function mutant GPIb binding (VWF:GPIbM) and VWF:RCo assays to investigate whether the VWF:GPIbM/VWF:RCo ratio was able to identify the type 2B variant among an heterogeneous VWD population, previously characterized following the ISTH-SSC guidelines. PATIENTS/METHODS: Seventy-six VWD patients and 31 healthy subjects were evaluated by using VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and VWF:GPIbM assays. RESULTS: The mean (minimum-maximum values) VWF:GPIbM/VWF:RCo ratio was higher in type 2B patients (2.53, 0.84-6.11) than in healthy controls (1.05, 0.87-1.34), type 1 (0.85, 0.51-1.15), 2A (1.20, 0.36-2.82), and 2M (1.07, 0.91-1.38) (P < 0.0001). Type 2B variants were divided into four groups (A, B, C, and D) according to their different multimeric patterns. The mean value of the VWF:GPIbM/VWF:RCo ratio in the four groups showed an increasing trend from group A (1.08) to D (3.69), proportional to the loss of high molecular weight multimers. Among 32 type 2B patients, previously diagnosed with RIPA, 8 (mainly with a type I New York/Malmö phenotype) were not confirmed using the VWF:GPIbM/VWF:RCo ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Whenever the RIPA test is not feasible, the VWF:GPIbM/VWF:RCo ratio might help to identify severe type 2B VWD patients.

Predictors of von Willebrand disease diagnosis in individuals with borderline von Willebrand factor plasma levels.

BACKGROUND: In individuals with borderline von Willebrand factor (VWF) plasma levels, second-level tests are required to confirm or exclude von Willebrand disease (VWD). These tests are time-consuming and expensive. OBJECTIVE: To assess which parameters can predict VWD diagnosis in individuals with borderline VWF levels (30-60 IU dL(-1) ). METHODS: Nine hundred and fifty individuals with bleeding episodes or abnormal coagulation test results were investigated with first-level tests (blood count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, blood clotting factor VIII, VWF ristocetin cofactor activity [VWF:RCo], and VWF antigen), and 93 (62 females and 31 males; median age, 28 years; interquartile range 15-44) had borderline VWF:RCo levels. All underwent second-level investigations to confirm or exclude VWD. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted with sex, age, bleeding score, family history, VWF:RCo and ABO blood group as predictors, and used to predict VWD diagnosis. RESULTS: Forty-five of the 93 individuals (48%) had VWD (84% type 1). A negative linear relationship between VWF:RCo levels and risk of VWD diagnosis was present, and was particularly evident with blood group non-O [adjusted odds ratio 7.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-33.11) for every 5 IU dL(-1) decrease in VWF:RCo]. The other variable clearly associated with VWD diagnosis was female sex (adjusted odds ratio 5.76 [95% CI 1.47-22.53]). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the full logistic model was 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with borderline VWF, the two strongest predictors of VWD diagnosis are low VWF:RCo levels (particularly in those with blood group non-O) and female sex. This predictive model has a promising discriminative ability to identify patients with borderline VWF levels who are likely to have VWD.

A two-centre comparative evaluation of new automated assays for von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity and antigen.

von Willebrand disease (VWD) is caused by a quantitative and/or qualitative deficiency of the von Willebrand factor (VWF). The laboratory diagnosis of VWD is dependent on the measurement of VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo). The aim of this study was to undertake a two-centre evaluation of two new automated VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo assays systems from Instrumentation Laboratory (Bedford, USA). Using the two new analytical systems that operated with different detection principles: immunoturbidimetric (TOP500 analyser) and chemiluminescent (AcuStar analyser), VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo levels were determined in samples from 171 healthy normal subjects, 80 VWD patients (16 type 1, 58 type 2 and 6 type 3) and 7 acquired von Willebrand syndrome patients. With commercial lyophilized normal and pathological plasmas VWF: Ag and VWF:RCo assays performed on both analysers exhibited low levels of inter-assay imprecision (AcuStar: CV% range 3.3-6.9; TOP500: CV% range 2.6-6.3). Samples from normal healthy subjects (range: VWF:Ag 44.6-173.9 IU dL(-1) ; VWF:RCo 43.1-191.5 IU dL(-1)) and patients (range: VWF:Ag <0.3-115.1 IU dL(-1) ; VWF:RCo <0.5-57.2 IU dL(-1)) showed a good correlation between the two VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo methods (rs = 0.92 and 0.82 respectively), with only a few inconsistent cases among the patients' samples evaluated. The chemiluminescent assays had a lower limit of detection for both VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo compared to immunoturbidimetric tests (0.3 IU dL(-1) vs. 2.2 IU dL(-1) and 0.5 IU dL(-1) vs. 4.4 IU dL(-1) respectively). The TOP500 and AcuStar VWF:Ag and VWF:RCo assays were precise and compare well between centres, making these systems suitable for the diagnosis of VWD in non-specialized and reference laboratories.

A synonymous (c.3390C>T) or a splice-site (c.3380-2A>G) mutation causes exon 26 skipping in four patients with von Willebrand disease (2A/IIE).

INTRODUCTION: We characterized four unrelated patients with von Willebrand disease type 2A/IIE, sharing the same von Willebrand factor (VWF) in-frame deletion (p.[P1127_G1180delinsR];[=]) resulting from exon 26 skipping (Δ26). OBJECTIVES: To identify the VWF mutations and how they caused the mRNA splicing alteration, to evaluate the deletion by in vitro expression studies, and to assess whether or not the heterogeneity of the patients' phenotype might be related to a different degree of expression of the deleted subunit in patient plasma VWF. METHODS: Sequence analysis was performed with patient genomic DNA and platelet mRNA. Semiquantitative RT-PCR was also carried out to compare the expression of the wild-type (WT) and Δ26 alleles in the four patients. In silico analysis was performed with prediction splicing programs. Expression studies were performed to evaluate mutant recombinant VWF (rVWF) (Δ26 and Δ26/WT) as compared with WT rVWF. RESULTS: Three patients shared the synonymous single-nucleotide substitution (SSS) c.[3390C>T];[=], whereas the novel mutation c.[3380-2A>G];[=] was present in the fourth patient. Semiquantitative RT-PCR of platelet mRNA revealed a different ratio of the WT and Δ26 alleles in the patients, consistent with the different VWF:FVIIIB values present in patient plasma. Expression studies confirmed reduced VWF-FVIII binding of rVWF-Δ26/WT. CONCLUSIONS: SSS can induce alternative splicing, and those like c.3390C>T, which impact on the poorly conserved splicing regulatory elements, are difficult to predict, so that their role can be evaluated only by mRNA analysis. Moreover, these mutations seem to have different effects on the efficiency of alternative splicing, producing heterogeneous VWF variants among the four patients.

A comparative evaluation of a new automated assay for von Willebrand factor activity.

The ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo) is the reference method for assessing von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity in the diagnosis of von Willebrand's Disease (VWD). However, the assay suffers from poor reproducibility and sensitivity at low levels of VWF and is labour intensive. We have undertaken an evaluation of a new immunoturbidimetric VWF activity (VWF:Ac) assay (INNOVANCE(®) VWF Ac. Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany) relative to an established platelet-based VWF:RCo method. Samples from 50 healthy normal subjects, 80 patients with VWD and 50 samples that exhibited 'HIL' (i.e. Haemolysis, Icterus or Lipaemia) were studied. VWF:Ac, VWF:RCo and VWF:Ag were performed on a CS-analyser (Sysmex UK Ltd, Milton Keynes, UK), all reagents were from Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics. The VWF:Ac assay, gave low intra- and inter-assay imprecision (over a 31-day period, n = 200 replicate readings) using commercial normal (Mean 96.2 IU dL(-1), CV < 3.0%) and pathological (Mean 36.1 IU dL(-1), CV < 3.5%) control plasmas. The normal and clinical samples exhibited good correlation between VWF:RCo (range 3-753 IU dL(-1)) and VWF:Ac (rs = 0.97, P < 0.0001), with a mean bias of 5.6 IU dL(-1). Ratios of VWF:Ac and VWF:RCo to VWF:Ag in the VWD samples were comparable, although VWF:Ac had a superior lower level of detection to that of VWF:RCo (3% and 5% respectively). A subset (n = 97) of VWD and HIL samples were analysed for VWF:Ac at two different dilutions to assess the effect on relative potency, no significant difference was observed (P = 0.111). The INNOVANCE(®) VWF Ac assay was shown to be reliable and precise.

Different bleeding risk in type 2A and 2M von Willebrand disease: a 2-year prospective study in 107 patients.

BACKGROUND: Type 2A and 2M von Willebrand disease (VWD2A and VWD2M) are characterized by the presence of a dysfunctional von Willebrand factor (VWF) and a variable bleeding tendency. So far, a head-to-head comparison of the clinical history and bleeding risk between VWD2A and VWD2M has never been provided in a prospective manner. AIM OF THE STUDY: We assessed the bleeding incidence rate and clinical characteristics in two cohorts of 17 families (46 patients) with VWD2A and 15 families (61 patients) with VWD2M prospectively followed-up for 24 months. VWF gene mutations were characterized in all of them. RESULTS: Mean bleeding score (BS) and VWF antigen at enrollment were significantly higher in VWD2A patients (P = 0.007). No correlation between VWF activity or factor VIII levels and the severity of BS was observed. The incidence rate of spontaneous bleeding requiring treatment was 107/100 patient-years (95% CI, 88.3-131) in VWD2A compared with 40/100 patient-years (95% CI, 30-53) in VWD2M (P < 0.001). The risk of bleeding was significantly higher in patients with BS ≥ 10 at enrollment compared with those with BS 0-2. Furthermore, 54 episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in 17/46 (36.9%) VWD2A patients and seven in 2/61 (3.3%) VWD2M patients (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Bleeding tendency in VWD2A is greater than that of VWD2M, is not explained by factor VIII or VWF levels and is mainly due to an increased incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding.