Sexual outcomes in men who have sex with men who underwent radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Sexual difficulties are a recognized consequence of prostate cancer (PCa) treatments. An estimated one in three men who have sex with men (MSM) receive PCa a diagnosis during their lifetime. MSM may experience all types of sexual dysfunction as reported in men who have sex with women (MSW), along with a number of more specific bothersome problems. This systematic literature review aims to evaluate sexual outcomes in MSM who have undergone radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: A systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The searches were made using relevant keywords in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, thus including the whole literature from January 2000 to November 2023. Studies which did not allow to retrieve data on sexual outcomes on MSM treated with RP for PCa were excluded. Data on sexual outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were retrieved, mostly including changes in libido, erectile function, ejaculatory disorders, orgasm, climacturia, changes in role-in-sex identity, changes in sexual partnerships, and the presence of painful receptive anal intercourses (AI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42024502592. RESULTS: Six articles met the inclusion criteria. In total, data of 260 patients were analyzed. Three main themes emerged: (a) MSM may experience specific sexual dysfunctions due to the different dynamics of their intimacy; (b) the lack of tool validated on gay and bisexual population to assess sexual outcomes (c) the need for a tailored approach that also takes into account sexual orientation throughout the oncological journey. CONCLUSIONS: MSM undergoing RP may experience similar sexual problems as MSW. Painful AI should be considered a potential post-operative adverse outcome in MSM. Future studies should prioritize validating a questionnaire that explores AI. Healthcare providers should adopt a tailored approach that takes into account sexual orientation throughout the cancer journey.

Non-surgically related causes of erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) represents one of the most common long-term side effects in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (BNSRP). The aim of our study was to assess the influence of non-surgically related causes of ED in patients treated with BNSRP. METHODS: Overall, 716 patients treated with BNSRP were retrospectively identified. All patients had complete data on erectile function (EF) assessed by the Index of Erectile Function-EF domain (IIEF-EF) and depressive status assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) questionnaire. EF recovery was defined as an IIEF-EF of ⩾22. Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed the impact of preoperative IIEF-EF, depression and adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) on the time to EF recovery. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to test the impact of aRT on EF recovery after accounting for depression and baseline IIEF-EF. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 48 months. Patients with a preoperative IIEF-EF of ⩾22 had substantially higher EF recovery rates compared with those with a lower IIEF-EF (P<0.001). Patients with a CES-D of <16 had significantly higher EF recovery rates compared to those with depression (60.8 vs 49.2%; P=0.03). Patients receiving postoperative aRT had lower rates of EF compared with their counterparts left untreated after surgery (40.7 vs 59.8%; P<0.001). These results were confirmed in multivariable analyses, where preoperative IIEF-EF (P<0.001), depression (P=0.04) and aRT (P=0.03) were confirmed as significant predictors of EF recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative functional status and depression should be considered when counseling PCa patients regarding the long-term side effects of BNSRP. Moreover, the administration of aRT has a detrimental effect on the probability of recovering EF after BNSRP. This should be taken into account when balancing the potential benefits and side effects of multimodal therapies in PCa patients.

Effects of Difaprost® on voiding dysfunction, histology and inflammation markers in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who are candidates for surgical treatment.

AIM: Although previous studies assessed the effects of Serenoa repens, quercetin and ß-sitosterol on inflammatory parameters, no randomized studies have tested the combination of these agents neither on BPH symptoms nor on the inflammatory pattern. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effects of Difaprost® on voiding dysfunction, histological inflammatory alterations and apoptotic molecular mechanisms in BPH patients. METHODS: We included 36 patients affected by BPH with obstructive symptoms eligible for surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: 18 patients received Difaprost® for three months before surgery, and 18 patients did not receive any additional therapy and were scheduled for surgery. All patients receiving Difaprost® were evaluated with uroflowmetry with post-void residual volume (PVR) evaluation, serum PSA, and IPSS questionnaire before and after treatment. Moreover, we evaluated inflammatory patterns in prostatic specimens at final pathology. RESULTS: Even without statistically significant differences on inflammatory pattern between patients receiving Difaprost® and controls, patients receiving Difaprost® had lower presence of edema and angiectasia at histological evaluation of prostate specimens. Moreover, patients included in the treatment group had a clinically significant reduction of PVR (46.1 vs. 25.2 mL; P=0.1) and a slight increase in Qmed (5.6 vs. 6.5 mL/s; P=0.9) after three months of chronic treatment with Difaprost®. No statistically significant differences were recorded in other clinical parameters between patients receiving Difaprost® and controls. CONCLUSION: Although not statistically significant, patients treated with Difaprost® showed an improvement in voiding function compared to controls (namely, an increase in Qmed and a reduction of PVR). Future trials with a larger number of patients and a longer treatment period could be necessary to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Difaprost®.

Prevalence and predictors of concomitant low sexual desire/interest and new-onset erectile dysfunction - a picture from the everyday clinical practice.

Prevalence and risk factors of concomitant primary low sexual desire/interest (LSD/I) and subsequent new-onset erectile dysfunction (ED) in men have been only partially investigated. We looked at the sociodemographic and clinical predictors of the concomitant condition of primary LSD/I - defined as the reduction in the usual level of SD/I which precedes ED or another sexual dysfunction - and new-onset ED (LSD/I + ED) in a cohort of consecutive Caucasian-European patients seeking their first medical help for sexual dysfunction at a single outpatient clinic in the everyday clinical practice setting. Data from 439 sexually active patients were analysed. Health-significant comorbidities were scored with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Patients' LSD/I were evaluated according to the findings of a comprehensive sexual history. Moreover, patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the prevalence and predictors of LSD/I + ED as compared with ED only. Of the 439 men, LSD/I + ED was observed in 33 (4.2%) individuals. One of three men with LSD/I + ED was younger than 40 years. Patients complaining of LSD/I + ED or ED alone did not differ in terms of hormonal milieu. No significant differences emerged between groups in terms of sexual orientation, rates of stable sexual relationships, educational status, recreational habits and comorbid sexual dysfunctions. Patients with LSD/I + ED had significantly lower IIEF-sexual desire and IIEF-overall satisfaction scores than ED-only individuals (all p ≤ 0.003). At multivariable analysis younger age and severe CCI scores emerged as independent predictors of LSD/I + ED (all p ≤ 0.04). These findings showed that primary LSD/I is concomitant with new-onset ED in less than 5% of men seeking first medical help. Younger age and severe CCI emerged as independent predictors of LSD/I + ED. Patients with both conditions reported an impaired overall sexual satisfaction.

Preoperative erectile function is the only predictor of the use of a high number of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

It is well known that the administration of phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) may improve erectile function (EF) recovery after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (BNSRP). The aim of our study was to identify predictors of the use of a high number of PDE5-Is (one or more per week) after surgery among 184 patients taking proerectile medications on demand. At a mean follow-up of 22.7 months, 116 patients (63%) recovered EF. Overall, EF recovery rates at 1- and 2- year follow-up were 47.3% and 65.4%, respectively. Overall, 43 (23.4%) patients used one or more PDE5-Is per week. Preoperative EF was the only predictor of the use of one or more PDE5-Is per week after BNSRP. This held true even after adjusting our analyses for age at surgery, body mass index and EF at 1 month after surgery. Particularly, patients fully potent before surgery had roughly 2.1-fold higher probability of using one or more pills per week compared with their counterparts with some degree of preoperative erectile dysfunction (ED; odds ratio: 2.16; 95% confidence interval: 1.03-4.37). In conclusion, preoperative EF represents the only determinant of the use of a higher number of PDE5-Is after surgery. Patients with better preoperative EF might represent individuals more motivated to achieve satisfactory sexual function after surgery. These observations should provide physicians with better preoperative patient counseling and management of postoperative ED.

Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: a 20-year audit in a single center.

BACKGROUND: We set to assess the impact of stage migration in prostate cancer (PCa) on the evolution of the pN1 rate and tumor characteristics in pN1 patients over the last two decades. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 5274 PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy and anatomically extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) between 1990 and 2010. Year-per-year trends of clinical and pathological characteristics were examined. Logistic regression analyses addressed predictors of pN1. RESULTS: The median number of lymph nodes (LNs) removed was 16.0. Overall, the pN1 rate was 13.8% and it decreased from 26.1% to 15.6% between 1990 and 2010 (P < 0.001). For the same period, the pN1 rate changed from 0% to 3% in the low-risk PCa, from 20% to 7% in the intermediate-risk PCa, and from 33% to 44% in the high-risk PCa (P ≤ 0.01). In pN1 patients, pre-operative cancer characteristics and the median number of positive LNs (three in 1990 versus two in 2010) did not significantly change overtime (all P ≥ 0.1). Year of surgery was not an independent predictor of pN1 (all P ≥ 0.06). CONCLUSION: Based on ePLND outcomes, contemporary patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa's still harbor a significant LNI risk. In consequence, stage migration does not justify omitting or limiting the extent of PLND in these individuals.

Clinical and diagnostic assessment for therapeutic decisions in prostate cancer.

Due to the heterogeneity of prostate cancer (PCa) outcomes, there is a need for individualized treatment plans based on clinical and cancer characteristics. Recent advances in sophisticated imaging modalities have improved the ability to stratify patients according to their risk of PCa diagnosis and progression. This, in turn, has positively influenced the clinical decision making process. However, there is also an overuse of diagnostic imaging in the evaluation of PCa patients. Baseline diagnostic and re-staging evaluations need to be indeed personalized, in order to maximize the results and reduce unnecessary, lengthy and costly procedures. The aim of this review was to critically evaluate current international guidelines in order to identify clinical and diagnostic markers that might help clinicians in the selection of the most appropriate imaging approach. For this aim, different imaging modalities were analyzed in patients with newly diagnosed PCa, focusing on local, nodal and distant staging. Every step of staging was taken into consideration based on patient individualized risk, as defined by routinely available clinical variables. Second, different imaging techniques were also reviewed in the context of relapse after primary treatment, highlighting their utility and impact in the clinical decision making process. This review focuses mainly on conventional established imaging techniques, with an eye also to novel approaches that still need to be validated on large patient series.

Does diabetes mellitus increase the risk of high-grade prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy?

The objective was to test the hypothesis that in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP), diabetic patients are at a higher risk of harboring a high-grade tumor than non-diabetic patients. We examined 2060 consecutive men who underwent RP between 2001 and 2009. Of them, 7.1% had type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). A high-grade tumor was defined as having a Gleason score ≥ 8. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to test the relationship between type 2 DM and high-grade tumor. Mean patient age was 64 years (range: 45-85). Mean total PSA level was 9 ng ml(-1) (range: 1-89.5). A significantly higher percentage of diabetic patients had high-grade tumor on biopsy (16.3 vs 7.6%; P = 0.001) and on RP specimen (21.1 vs 11.7%; P = 0.001) in comparison with non-diabetic patients. In multivariable analyses, DM was an independent predictor of high-grade tumor on biopsy (odds ratio = 2.31, P = 0.001) and on final pathological specimen (odds ratio = 2.22, P = 0.002). In patients undergoing RP, those with type 2 DM had a higher risk of harboring a poorly differentiated tumor on final pathological examination.

Prophylaxis of erectile function after radical prostatectomy with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors.

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most challenging complications associated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for clinically localized prostate cancer. Currently, a broad spectrum of therapeutic options are available to improve sexual health after surgical treatment. Several basic science reports highlighted a potential role for phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in the prevention of endothelial damage related to ischemia reperfusion and/or denervation following surgery. Recent studies have shown that pharmacological prophylaxis soon after RP can significantly improve the rate at which erectile function is recovered after surgery. Use of on-demand treatments for ED in patients who have undergone RP has been shown to be highly effective. In this context, pharmacological prophylaxis potentially may have a significantly expanded role in future strategies aimed at preserving postoperative erectile function. We analyzed the factors affecting erectile function after RP and evaluated the evidence suggesting the role of pharmacological prophylaxis and treatment of ED after surgery.

Open prostatectomy and the evolution of HoLEP in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and other minimally invasive therapies are the most common surgical procedures used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia today. However, many patients with a markedly enlarged prostate are often not amenable to these treatment options. In these patients open prostatectomy has been representing a viable and preferred treatment. Despite the morbidity of open enucleation is substantial, until recently no other options were available when the size of the prostate approached 100 g and beyond. The use of holmium laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia was first reported in 1996. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has been proposed as an alternative to TURP and to open prostatectomy for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to large benign prostatic enlargement. In this manuscript, the development of HoLEP from the initial reports to the long-term follow-up data which demonstrate the effectiveness of the technique in treating patients affected by LUTS secondary to large adenomas has been reviewed. HoLEP seems to represent a valid alternative to both TURP and OP, with valid long-term functional results, a low rate of short-term and long-term complications, and very low rates of reintervention. In conclusion, HoLEP can be offered as the size-independent gold standard treatment of patients with LUTS due to benign prostatic enlargement.

Partin Tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: The Partin Tables represent the most commonly used staging tool for radical prostatectomy (RP) candidates. The Partin Tables' predictions are used to guide the type (nerve preserving RP) and/or the extent (RP with wide resection) of RP. We examined the ability of the Partin Tables' predictions incorrectly assigning the stage at RP. METHODS: The testing of the Partin Tables (external validation) was based on 3105 patients treated with RP at a single European institution. Standard validation metrics were used (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, AUC) to test the three endpoints predicted by the Partin Tables, namely the presence of extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and lymph node invasion (LNI). RESULTS: Ideal predictions are denoted with 100% accuracy vs. 50% for entirely random predictions. For the 2001 version of the Tables the accuracy defined by the AUC was 79.7, 77.8, and 73.0 for ECE, SVI, and LNI, respectively. For the 2007 version of the Tables the corresponding accuracy estimates were 79.8, 80.5, and 76.2. The relationship between predicted probabilities and observed rates was poor. CONCLUSION: The Partin Tables are meant to guide clinicians about the safety of nerve bundle preservation at RP, about the need for seminal vesicle resection or for lymphadenectomy. Therefore, the use of the Partin Tables predictions may significantly affect the type and/or the extent of RP. In their present format the Partin Tables are not accurate enough to influence the pre-operative decision making regarding the type or extent of RP.