Anticholinergic exposure and its association with dementia/Alzheimer's disease and mortality in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Use of anticholinergic (ACH) medications is associated with increased risk of cognitive decline in the elderly. However, little is known about this association from a health plan perspective. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Humana Research Database to identify individuals with at least one ACH medication dispensed in 2015. Patients were followed until incidence of dementia/Alzheimer's disease, death, disenrollment or end of December 2019. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the association between ACH exposure and study outcomes, adjusting for demographics and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 12,209 individuals with no prior ACH use or dementia/Alzheimer's disease diagnosis were included. As ACH polypharmacy increased (i.e., from no ACH exposure, to one, two, three, and four or more ACH medications), there was a stair-step increase in the incidence rate of dementia/Alzheimer's disease (15, 30, 46, 56 and 77 per 1,000 person-years of follow-up) and in the incidence of mortality (19, 37, 80, 115 and 159 per 1,000 person-years of follow-up). After adjusting for confounders, ACH exposure to one, two, three and four or more ACH medications was associated with a 1.6 (95% CI 1.4-1.9), 2.1 (95% CI 1.7-2.8), 2.6 (95% CI 1.5-4.4), and 2.6 (95% CI 1.1-6.3) times, respectively, increased risk of a dementia/Alzheimer's disease diagnosis compared to periods of no ACH exposure. ACH exposure to one, two, three and four or more medications was associated with a 1.4 (95% CI 1.2-1.6), 2.6 (95% CI 2.1-3.3), 3.8 (95% CI 2.6-5.4), and 3.4 (95% CI 1.8-6.4) times, respectively, increased risk of mortality compared to periods of no ACH exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing ACH exposure may potentially minimize long-term adverse effects in older adults. Results suggest populations which may benefit from targeted interventions to reduce ACH polypharmacy.

Heart Failure Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Carfilzomib-Based Versus Non-Carfilzomib-Based Regimens in the United States by Race.

BACKGROUND: Carfilzomib treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) can increase heart failure risk. Whether this risk differs by race is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We sought to estimate the incidence rates (IRs) of heart failure hospitalization among mostly 65-years-and-older US patients with MM by race treated with carfilzomib- and non-carfilzomib-based regimens in the real-world using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Medicare Fee-for-Service data, Optum Clinformatics Data Mart, and Humana Research Database. The risk of heart failure hospitalization associated with a carfilzomib-based regimen was evaluated using propensity score matching among Black and White patients receiving second or later lines of therapy. RESULTS: Most patient-episodes (88%) were in persons 65 years or older for the 3 cohorts combined. The IR (95% CI) of heart failure hospitalization was higher for patient-episodes treated with a carfilzomib-based regimen than those with a non-carfilzomib-based regimen for both White (14.5 [12.2-17.0] vs. 10.7 [10.3-11.2] events per person-years) and Black patients (15.8 [10.1-23.5] vs. 12.1 [10.9-13.4] events per person-years) in the Medicare cohort. After propensity score matching, the hazard ratio (95% CI) of increased heart failure hospitalization comparing carfilzomib-based to non-carfilzomib-based regimens for White patients (1.6 [1.3-2.0]) was similar to that of Black patients (1.7 [1.0-2.9]) in the Medicare Database, and in the Humana Database (1.4 [0.8-2.6] and 1.2 [0.4-3.5], respectively). CONCLUSION: Although the IR of heart failure among patients with MM treated with a carfilzomib-based regimen was slightly higher, no evidence suggested the relative risk was different between White and Black patients with MM.

Real-world treatment, clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization among persons with hemophilia A by age.

Aim: Examine real-world characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes among treated persons with hemophilia A (PwHA) stratified by age. Patients & methods: This study utilized US claims data from 1 January 2007-31 July 2018 from the Humana Research Database. Unadjusted comparisons were conducted across PwHA (<18, 18-55, 56-89 years) enrolled in commercial or Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plans. Results: A total of 294 PwHA were identified; 21.1% experienced ≥1 bleeding event, and 41.2 and 53.1% had evidence of arthropathy or related disorders, and pain, respectively. Along with all-cause and hemophilia-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), these were highest among PwHA aged 56-89 years. Conclusion: Insights into treatment, outcomes and HCRU may identify opportunities for enhanced disease management, particularly in older PwHA.

Cardiovascular Risk in Users of Mirabegron Compared with Users of Antimuscarinic Treatments for Overactive Bladder: Findings from a Non-Interventional, Multinational, Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: During clinical trials, mirabegron, a ß3-adrenoreceptor agonist, was associated with increased vital signs vs placebo in patients with overactive bladder. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare incidence rates of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes following mirabegron or antimuscarinic use. METHODS: We conducted an observational post-marketing safety study utilising real-world data. The study population was identified within five sources: Danish and Swedish National Registers, Clinical Practice Research Datalink (UK), Optum (USA) and Humana (USA). Episodes of time when patients were new users of mirabegron or antimuscarinics (October 2012-December 2018) were sourced from prescriptions and matched on propensity scores. Occurrences of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, CV mortality and all-cause mortality were identified. Outcome incidence rates and hazard ratios from Cox models were estimated. RESULTS: Overall, 152,026 mirabegron and 152,026 antimuscarinic episodes were matched. The population consisted of 63.1% women and 72.6% were ≥ 65 years old. There were no appreciable differences in the incidence rates of MACE, AMI or stroke between users of mirabegron and antimuscarinics. Incidence rates of CV mortality (hazard ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.73-0.95) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.76-0.84) were no higher with mirabegron vs antimuscarinics. Results restricted to episodes at high risk for CV events or stratified by age (< 65 years, ≥ 65 years) or prior overactive bladder medication use were consistent with overall findings. CONCLUSIONS: This large, multinational study found no higher risk of MACE, AMI, stroke, CV mortality or all-cause mortality among users of mirabegron relative to users of antimuscarinics.

During clinical trials, mirabegron, which is a treatment for overactive bladder, was associated with small increases in heart rate and blood pressure. This study was conducted to compare the frequency of cardiac events following the use of mirabegron or antimuscarinics, a group of treatments also used to treat overactive bladder. We obtained the data for this study from four countries: Denmark, Sweden, the UK and the USA. We identified people who were new users of mirabegron or antimuscarinics from 2012 to 2018 using prescription or dispensing records. Occurrences of major cardiac events, heart attack, stroke, death due to cardiac events and death from any cause were evaluated. Overall, we identified 152,026 times when mirabegron or antimuscarinics were each used as new treatments. Most of the people in the study were women (63.1%) and at least 65 years old (72.6%). There were no notable differences between the treatment groups with regard to how often major cardiac events, heart attack or stroke occurred. Further, death due to cardiac events and death from any cause were no higher with mirabegron compared with antimuscarinics. We obtained similar results when the data were assessed for patients who were at high risk for cardiac events or split by age (less than 65 years or at least 65 years) or a history of overactive bladder medication use. In conclusion, this large study involving data from several countries found no higher risk of major cardiac events, heart attack, stroke or death among people prescribed mirabegron compared with antimuscarinics.

Novel Approach Using Administrative Claims to Evaluate Trends in Oncology Multigene Panel Testing for Patients Enrolled in Medicare Advantage Health Plans.

PURPOSE: To develop an approach to identify and evaluate recent use of multigene panel testing over time. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective database analysis using medical and pharmacy claims data. Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan members diagnosed with select malignant solid tumors were identified. The pattern of somatic genetic testing for each patient was evaluated from January 2016 through December 2018. Tests were classified by the number of genes tested in the panel: < 50 (small or medium) and ≥ 50 (large). RESULTS: An initial feasibility study using our novel approach for identifying panel tests resulted in 2.4 and 1.2 times more large and medium panels, respectively, identified compared with using procedure codes alone. A total of 121,675 eligible patients were identified, with 131,915 unique cancer cases. Overall, 5,457 (4.5%) patients received any panel test from 2016 to 2018. We found the number of tests performed each quarter increased from 238 in Q1 of 2016 to 755 in Q4 of 2018. The highest number of cases were genitourinary cancers; however, the highest proportion of cancer-related genetic testing was among patients with respiratory cancer. Across all tumor types, the proportion of large-panel tests performed as a function of all multigene panel tests increased from 20.7% of tests in Q1 of 2016 to 46.4% of tests in Q4 of 2018. The three cancer categories with the highest count of cancer-related panel tests, respiratory cancer, GI cancer, and female reproductive cancer, had a consistently greater proportion receiving a panel test at any point postindex. CONCLUSION: Across a variety of cancers, use of somatic, large-panel cancer-related genetic testing, as a proportion of all somatic cancer-related genetic testing, increased from 2016 to 2018, although testing overall was low.

The Relationship Between Anticholinergic Exposure and Falls, Fractures, and Mortality in Patients with Overactive Bladder.

BACKGROUND: Understanding risk factors associated with falls is important for optimizing care and quality of life for older patients. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the relationship between anticholinergic exposure and falls, fractures, and all-cause mortality. METHODS: An observational retrospective cohort study was conducted using administrative claims data from 1 January 2007 to 30 September 2015. Individuals aged 65-89 years newly diagnosed or treated for overactive bladder (OAB) were identified. Index date was the first OAB diagnosis or OAB medication prescription claim. Follow-up began on the index date and continued until death, disenrollment, or end of study period. The Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale was used to define and quantify daily anticholinergic exposure and intensity. The primary study outcome was a combined endpoint of falls or fractures. All-cause mortality was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: There were 113,311 patients with mean age of 74.8 ± standard deviation (SD) 6.2 years included. Current anticholinergic exposure was associated with a 1.28-fold increased hazard of a fall/fracture (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.32) compared with unexposed person-time, and past exposure was associated with a 1.14-fold increased hazard of a fall/fracture (95% CI 1.12-1.17). Compared with unexposed person-time, low-, moderate-, and high-intensity anticholinergic exposure was associated with a 1.04-fold (95% CI 1.00-1.07), 1.13-fold (95% CI 1.09-1.17), and 1.31-fold (95% CI 1.26-1.36) increased hazard of falls/fractures, respectively. A similar pattern was observed for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Anticholinergic exposure is associated with an increased risk of falls or fractures in older patients and is an important consideration when evaluating treatment options for such patients with OAB.

Impact of Coexisting Overactive Bladder in Medicare Patients With Dementia on Clinical and Economic Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients with dementia commonly suffer from symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB); however, limited research exists on the clinical impact of coexisting OAB among patients with dementia. As such, the objective of this study was to examine the impact of OAB on clinical outcomes, health-care resource use, and associated costs among patients with dementia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with dementia using 3861 matched pairs of patients with and without OAB. Analyses were based on administrative claims data from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2015, and compared clinical outcomes, health services use, and associated costs. RESULTS: Patients with dementia and OAB were more likely than those without OAB to have least one fall (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.68, P < .001), fracture (IRR: 1.23, 95% CI, 1.05-1.44, P = .008), combined fall/fracture (IRR: 1.25, 95% CI, 1.11-1.42, P < .001), or urinary tract infection (IRR: 2.75, 95% CI, 2.55-2.96, P < .001). Patients with dementia and OAB demonstrated greater utilization of all-cause encounter types compared to similar patients without coexisting OAB (P < .01). All-cause and dementia-related total health-care costs were approximately 23% (95% CI, 0.19-0.28, P < .001) and 13% (95% CI, 0.05-0.20, P = .001), respectively, greater than similar patients without coexisting OAB. CONCLUSION: Coexisting OAB was associated with impacts on clinical outcomes, health-care resource utilization, and costs in patients with dementia.

A prospective study of elderly initiating mirabegron versus antimuscarinics: Patient reported outcomes from the Overactive Bladder Satisfaction Scales and other instruments.

AIMS: To understand differences in patient reported outcomes (PRO) between patients initiating mirabegron or an antimuscarinic using a validated PRO instrument, OAB-Satisfaction (OAB-S). METHODS: This prospective observational study used real-time prescription claims from Humana to identify Medicare patients initiating mirabegron or an antimuscarinic to participate in a series of three phone surveys over ninety days. RESULTS: A total of 1897 mirabegron and 2444 randomly selected antimuscarinic initiators were identified; 174 mirabegron and 193 antimuscarinic initiators completed all three surveys. Among responders, mirabegron initiators were slightly older (76 vs 75 years, P = 0.032), included more males (32% vs 23%, P = 0.044), more likely to have prior OAB treatment (21% vs 13%, P = 0.048), and had greater medication burden (number of unique medications: 10.0 vs 8.7, P = 0.014). There were no between-group differences at any time or on any OAB-S scale. There were significant within-group differences at follow-up compared to baseline for OAB-S scales: "impact on daily living," with improvement over the 90-day survey period for both mirabegron (P = 0.008) and antimuscarinic (P < 0.001); "interruption of day-to-day life," with improvement for both mirabegron (P < 0.001) and antimuscarinic (P < 0.001); and improvement in "OAB control" for mirabegron (P < 0.001) and antimuscarinic (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron initiators tended to be older, had a greater number of unique medications and previously tried prescriptions to treat OAB; nonetheless, mirabegron, and antimuscarinic initiators reported similar trends in improvement in PROs over the first 90 days of treatment. Significant improvement in daily impact of OAB was observed after treatment initiation; however, no significant differences between groups were observed.

Impact of coexisting overactive bladder in Medicare patients with osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis and overactive bladder (OAB) are prevalent conditions in older adults and are independent risk factors for falls and fractures. A paucity of evidence exists examining the impact of coexisting OAB in patients with osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of OAB on healthcare resource utilization (HRU), clinical outcomes, and healthcare costs among older adult patients with osteoporosis. METHODS: This retrospective analysis compared patients with osteoporosis with and without OAB. Patients with an osteoporosis diagnosis, enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan, and aged 65-89 inclusive were eligible. Incident OAB among patients with prevalent osteoporosis was identified. A comparison group of patients with osteoporosis but no evidence of OAB was propensity score matched on baseline characteristics. Fall and/or fracture outcomes, HRU and healthcare costs were evaluated during 12 months of follow-up. Bivariate comparisons of outcomes were conducted. Ordinary least squared regression was used to examine the relationship between OAB and total healthcare costs. RESULTS: After matching, 5,526 patients in each group were included. Patients with osteoporosis and OAB demonstrated greater all-cause HRU across all encounter types compared to patients without OAB (all P values<0.001). Patients with osteoporosis and OAB had a greater frequency of any fall/fracture (17.7% vs. 14.9%, P<0.001). Patients with osteoporosis and OAB had 35% greater all-cause total healthcare costs than patients without OAB (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OAB and osteoporosis had significantly greater all-cause HRU and costs. Falls and fractures were significantly more common in patients with osteoporosis and OAB compared to patients with osteoporosis without OAB.

Association of obesity with healthcare utilization and costs in a Medicare population.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association of obesity with healthcare resource utilization and costs in a Medicare population. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study using Humana Medicare Advantage (MA) claims data. Body mass index (BMI) was assessed using ICD-9-CM status codes (V85 hierarchy) that have been validated in the data source to classify patients into BMI categories: normal (N), overweight (Ow), obese class I (ObI), obese class II (ObII), and obese class III (ObIII). Healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs were determined based on claims data. Descriptive statistics were used to examine baseline characteristics and HRU across BMI classes. Multivariable analysis was used to examine the association between BMI class and outcome measures. RESULTS: Among the 172,866 patients aged ≥65 years that were identified, BMI distribution was: N, 21%; Ow 37%; ObI, 24%, ObII, 10%; and ObIII, 9%. Inpatient, emergency department and outpatient utilization increased with greater BMI level, and greater BMI level was associated with higher total healthcare, medical and pharmacy costs. Greater prevalence of several cardiometabolic conditions, total medication use, and use of specific medication classes was observed with increasing BMI class. CONCLUSIONS: Greater BMI was associated with greater HRU and costs and observed increase in prevalence of cardiometabolic conditions. These results reflect an urgent need to address the epidemic of obesity and the resulting excessive clinical and economic burden on the healthcare system.

Impact of 2015 Update to the Beers Criteria on Estimates of Prevalence and Costs Associated with Potentially Inappropriate Use of Antimuscarinics for Overactive Bladder.

BACKGROUND: Research has demonstrated that the use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) is highly prevalent among older individuals and may lead to increased healthcare costs, adverse drug reactions, hospitalizations, and mortality. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the 2015 updates to the Beers Criteria on estimates of prevalence and cost associated with potentially inappropriate use of antimuscarinic medications indicated for treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: A retrospective database analysis was conducted using a historical cohort design and including data collected between 2007 and 2013. Claims data were used to identify Medicare Advantage patients aged ≥65 years newly initiated on antimuscarinic OAB treatment. Patients were classified with potentially inappropriate use of antimuscarinic OAB drugs based on either the 2012 Beers Criteria or the 2015 Beers Criteria. Prevalence of PIM at the time of antimuscarinic initiation was determined. Bivariate comparisons of healthcare costs and medical condition burden were conducted to compare the marginal groups of patients (who qualified based on the 2012 Beers Criteria only or the 2015 Beers Criteria only). Differences in healthcare costs for patients with and without potentially inappropriate use of urinary antimuscarinics based on the 2012 and 2015 Beers Criteria were also examined. RESULTS: Of 66,275 patients, overall prevalence of potentially inappropriate use of OAB antimuscarinics was higher using 2015 Beers Criteria than when using the 2012 Beers Criteria (25.0 vs. 20.6%). Dementia was the most common PIM-qualifying condition under both versions. The 2015 Beers Criteria identified more females, more White people, and a younger population with PIM. Comorbid medical condition burden was lower using the 2015 Beers Criteria. The 2015 Beers Criteria only group had lower median unadjusted healthcare costs ($7104 vs. 8301; p < 0.001). The incremental net cost associated with potentially inappropriate use of antimuscarinic medication was higher under the 2012 Beers Criteria than under the 2015 Beers Criteria. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients newly initiated on antimuscarinic OAB treatment, substantial overlap of patients identified with PIM based on the 2015 Beers Criteria compared with the 2012 Beers Criteria was observed. In addition, the findings suggest that, when applied to antimuscarinic initiators, the 2015 Beers Criteria result in a greater prevalence of PIM and the identification of patients with less overall medical morbidity than the 2012 Beers Criteria.

A Historical Retrospective Analysis of the Impact of Diabetes Quality Measure Attainment on Outcomes in Medicare Advantage Members.

The objective of this study was to assess achievement of 4 diabetes mellitus (DM)-related quality measures (QMs) and examine the relationship between QM attainment, concurrent health care costs, and DM complications over 1 year by conducting a retrospective analysis of claims data for Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plan members with DM. Claims and member-level quality data were used to assess QM achievement, concurrent health care costs, and presence of new or worsening DM complications during the QM year. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the relationship between QM achievement and outcome measures controlling for potentially confounding baseline characteristics. QM attainment rates ranged from 54.2% for DM Treatment measure to 83.4% for Cholesterol Screening measure. Odds of new or worsening complications were greater for members who did not meet the Blood Sugar Controlled performance goal (odds ratio [OR]: 1.12, P < 0.001), DM Treatment goal (OR: 1.40, P < 0.001), or Cholesterol Screening goal (OR: 1.32, P < 0.001). Failure to attain the DM Medication Adherence goal was associated with lower odds of new or worsening complications (OR: 0.94, P < 0.001). In the regression models, all-cause health care costs were greater for members who achieved the Blood Sugar Controlled quality goal (P < 0.001), but lower for members who attained DM Treatment (P < 0.001) and low-density lipoprotein Cholesterol Screening goals (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant relationship between attaining the DM Medication Adherence measure and all-cause costs. Achievement rates for individual QMs varied across the study population and relationships between QM attainment, health care costs, and DM complications during the QM measurement year were mixed.

Impact of Overactive Bladder Step Therapy Policies on Medication Utilization and Expenditures Among Treated Medicare Members.

BACKGROUND: The impact of formulary management strategies on utilization and expenditures in overactive bladder (OAB) treatment has not been extensively investigated. In 2013, step therapy (ST) policies for 2 branded OAB treatments, mirabegron and fesoterodine, were removed from Humana Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plans and Medicare prescription drug plans (PDP), allowing for an examination of the effect of ST policies on OAB medication use patterns and costs. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of removal of formulary restriction policies for mirabegron and fesoterodine on medication utilization patterns and costs associated with OAB treatment in Medicare patients. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study design was utilized. Subjects included individuals enrolled in Humana MAPD plans or PDPs, aged ≥ 65 years, with ≥ 1 prescription for an OAB medication in 2013. Patient demographic characteristics, OAB medication utilization, and pharmacy cost trends in 2013 were described. OAB medication use was calculated as the number of 30-day-supply equivalent medication claims and reported as a percentage of the total number of 30-day-supply equivalent claims across all OAB products. OAB medication expenditures were calculated as a percentage of the sum of pharmacy costs for OAB medications and reported separately for each month and drug during 2013. Temporal trends of OAB medication utilization and expenditures in 2013 were calculated using ordinary least squares regression. RESULTS: Of 194,511 patients, trends in utilization of OAB medications indicated that on average, there was a statistically significant monthly increase in utilization of mirabegron (regression coefficient [B] = 274; P < 0.001; 95% CI: 218, 330), fesoterodine (B = 167; P < 0.001; 95% CI = 129, 205), oxybutynin extended release (ER; B = 357; P = 0.011; 95% CI = 99, 614), and trospium ER (B = 33; P = 0.001; 95% CI = 17, 50) and statistically significant decreases in utilization of solifenacin (B = -202; P = 0.048; 95% CI = -402, -2), tolterodine ER (B = -287; P = 0.002; 95% CI = -437, -137), darifenacin (B = -94; P < 0.001; 95% CI = -128, -61), and trospium immediate release (IR; B = -22; P = 0.001; 95% CI = -32, -12). Total OAB medication expenditures significantly increased an average of 0.12% for each month during the course of 2013 (B = 0.12; P = 0.026; 95% CI = 0.017, -0.223). While monthly oxybutynin IR utilization did not change significantly throughout 2013 (B = 228; P = 0.169; 95% CI = -114, -570), it demonstrated the largest average monthly expenditure increase (B = 0.082; P < 0.001; 95% CI = 0.056, 0.108). When removing oxybutynin IR costs from the total OAB medication costs, the trend in total OAB medication average monthly expenditures was not significant (B = 0.038; P = 0.365; 95% CI = -0.051, -0.126). An over 4-fold per-unit-cost increase for oxybutynin IR was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of 2 branded OAB products increased in the months after ST removal with minimal cost impact. One of the possible reasons total OAB expenditures increased may have been due to the increased cost of the largest-volume generic product, oxybutynin IR. DISCLOSURES: This research was funded by Astellas Pharma Global Development and was conducted as part of the Astellas-Humana Research Collaboration. Ng, Kristy, Schermer, and Bradt are employees of Astellas. Astellas manufactures mirabegron (Myrbetriq) and solifenacin (VESIcare). Abbass, Caplan, Collins, and Suehs are employees of Comprehensive Health Insights, a subsidiary of Humana, which received funding from Astellas for this study. Suehs owns stock in Humana. Chan is an employee of Humana Pharmacy Solutions. Portions of this study were presented as a poster at Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2015; October 26-29, 2015; Orlando, Florida. Study concept and design were contributed by Ng, Chan, Suehs, and Abbass, along with Collins. Abbass took the lead in data collection, along with Collins and with assistance from Caplan, Chan, and Suehs. Data interpretation was provided by Kristy and Bradt, along with Abbass, Caplan, Ng, Suehs, Collins, and Chan. The manuscript was written primarily by Caplan, along with Schermer, Suehs, and Abbass, and revised by Caplan, Schermer, and Ng, along with the other authors.

Effect of Potentially Inappropriate Use of Antimuscarinic Medications on Healthcare Use and Cost in Individuals with Overactive Bladder.

OBJECTIVES: To examine potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in older adults initiating an antimuscarinic medication for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. SETTING: Medical and pharmacy claims data. PARTICIPANTS: Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan members aged 65 and older newly initiated on an antimuscarinic OAB treatment were identified and assigned to PIM and non-PIM comparison groups based on 2012 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria and/or the presence of an anticholinergic medication interaction at the time of initiation of treatment (N = 66,275). MEASUREMENTS: Healthcare costs and OAB medication use. RESULTS: Of members initiated on an antimuscarinic OAB medication, 31.1% had a drug-drug or drug-disease or syndrome interaction. Dementia was the most common disease or syndrome interaction (11.3%), followed by constipation (8.6%) and delirium (2.9%). Paroxetine (2.6%), amitriptyline (2.2%), cyclobenzaprine (1.7%), and meclizine (1.6%) were the most common interacting medications. Subjects in the PIM group had greater healthcare costs over 12 months of follow-up ($12,001) than those in the non-PIM group ($9,373) after controlling for baseline characteristics (P < .001). There was no difference between the PIM and the non-PIM groups in odds of discontinuing OAB treatment at 12 months after controlling for baseline characteristics (odds ratio = 0.98, 95% confidence interval = 0.89-1.07, P = .63). CONCLUSION: Potentially inappropriate medication use was highly prevalent and was associated with greater total healthcare costs. Providers should carefully consider medical history and concurrent medication use when initiating antimuscarinic medication for the treatment of OAB. Development of interventions to reduce potentially inappropriate use of antimuscarinics in individuals with OAB is warranted.

Impact of a Step Therapy for Guanfacine Extended-Release on Medication Utilization and Health Care Expenditures Among Individuals Receiving Treatment for ADHD.

BACKGROUND: While step therapy (ST) policies are generally effective at reducing cost through the managed utilization of targeted medications, the clinical implications of ST policies are not clear and may vary across therapeutic areas. Guanfacine extended-release (GXR) is approved by the FDA for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as both monotherapy and adjunctive to stimulant treatment. At the introduction of GXR to the market, Humana implemented an ST policy on GXR requiring the documentation of previous treatment, intolerance, or contraindication to generic clonidine or guanfacine. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of a GXR ST coverage determination (i.e., approved vs. denied) on medication utilization and health care costs among members of a commercial health plan with an ST policy for GXR.  METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study of administrative claims data. Humana commercial members prescribed GXR who had an ST coverage determination review were identified. All members included in this analysis were required to be aged 6-17 years, have a diagnosis of ADHD or be receiving stimulant medication, have an ST coverage determination (index event) between September 1, 2009, and May 30, 2012, and have 6 months of pre- and post-index continuous enrollment. Members were assigned to either the approved or denied group based on the outcome of the ST coverage determination. Medical and pharmacy claims data were used to measure baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and to measure medication utilization and health care costs. Outcomes assessed during follow-up included ADHD medication use, proportion of days covered (PDC) with any ADHD medication treatment, time to first observed post-index ADHD treatment, and all-cause and mental health (MH)-related health care costs. Administrative costs associated with the coverage determination process were also estimated. Bivariate and multivariable adjusted analyses were conducted to compare medication utilization and health care costs between the approved and denied groups. RESULTS: A total of 642 members were included in the analysis (denied group n = 395 [61.5%], approved group n = 247 [38.5%]). The approved and denied groups were similar in terms of baseline demographics, provider characteristics, and baseline MH diagnoses, with the exception of anxiety disorders being more prevalent in the approved group compared with the denied group (18.2% vs. 10.6%, P = 0.006). A denied GXR coverage determination was associated with a greater percentage of members receiving no ADHD treatment post-index (13.9% vs. 3.2%, P less than 0.001), greater mean [SD] number of days between index and first observed post-index ADHD medication claim (44.5 [59.6] vs. 17.6 [33.4], P less than 0.001), and lower mean [SD] PDC with any ADHD medication post-index (0.59 [0.33] vs. 0.75 [0.26], P less than 0.001). These findings remained statistically significant in multivariable regression models. Unadjusted pre-index median total health care costs and MH-related costs were greater among the approved group compared with the denied group (total health care: $1,582 vs. $1,465, P = 0.033; MH-related: $993 vs. $981, P = 0.020). Likewise, post-index median total health care and MH-related costs were greater among the approved group compared with the denied group (total: $2,056 vs. $1,420, P less than 0.001; MH-related: $1,543 vs. $946, P less than 0.001). After adjustment for potentially confounding covariates including pre-index costs, there were no statistically significant differences between the approved and denied groups in all-cause total health care (P = 0.393) or MH-related health care costs (P = 0.054).  CONCLUSIONS: The current study found that GXR coverage denial was associated with lower rate of ADHD medication utilization, greater delay in receiving ADHD medication, and lower PDC with ADHD medication. There were no differences observed between the approved and denied group in terms of all-cause total health care or MH-related total health care costs after controlling for potentially confounding variables. Prior to implementation in the ADHD therapeutic area and others, payers should consider the potentially unintended consequences of ST policies, including delay in treatment and undertreatment.

A Comparative Assessment of Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership and Mini-Sentinel Common Data Models and Analytics: Implications for Active Drug Safety Surveillance.

INTRODUCTION: An often key component to coordinating surveillance activities across distributed networks is the design and implementation of a common data model (CDM). The purpose of this study was to evaluate two drug safety surveillance CDMs from an ecosystem perspective to better understand how differences in CDMs and analytic tools affect usability and interpretation of results. METHODS: Humana claims data from 2007 to 2012 were mapped to Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) and Mini-Sentinel CDMs. Data were described and compared at the patient level by source code and mapped concepts. Study cohort construction and effect estimates were also compared using two different analytical methods--one based on a new user design implementing a high-dimensional propensity score (HDPS) algorithm and the other based on univariate self-controlled case series (SCCS) design--across six established positive drug-outcome pairs to learn how differences in CDMs and analytics influence steps in the database analytic process and results. RESULTS: Claims data for approximately 7.7 million Humana health plan members were transformed into the two CDMs. Three health outcome cohorts and two drug cohorts showed differences in cohort size and constituency between Mini-Sentinel and OMOP CDMs, which was a result of multiple factors. Overall, the implementation of the HDPS procedure on Mini-Sentinel CDM detected more known positive associations than that on OMOP CDM. The SCCS method results were comparable on both CDMs. Differences in the implementation of the HDPS procedure between the two CDMs were identified; analytic model and risk period specification had a significant impact on the performance of the HDPS procedure on OMOP CDM. CONCLUSIONS: Differences were observed between OMOP and Mini-Sentinel CDMs. The analysis of both CDMs at the data model level indicated that such conceptual differences had only a slight but not significant impact on identifying known safety associations. Our results show that differences at the ecosystem level of analyses across the CDMs can lead to strikingly different risk estimations, but this can be primarily attributed to the choices of analytic approach and their implementation in the community-developed analytic tools. The opportunities of using CDMs are clear, but our study shows the need for judicious comparison of analyses across the CDMs. Our work emphasizes the need for ongoing efforts to ensure sustainable transparent platforms to maintain and develop CDMs and associated tools for effective safety surveillance.

A retrospective, matched cohort study of potential drug-drug interaction prevalence and opioid utilization in a diabetic peripheral neuropathy population initiated on pregabalin or duloxetine.

BACKGROUND: Anticipating and controlling drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in older patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropaty (pDPN) presents a significant challenge to providers. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of newly initiated pregabalin or duloxetine treatment on Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug (MAPD) plan pDPN patients' encounters with potential drug-drug interactions, the healthcare cost and utilization consequences of those interactions, and opioid utilization. METHODS: Study subjects required a pregabalin or duloxetine pharmacy claim between 07/01/2008-06/30/2012 (index event), ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient medical claims with pDPN diagnosis between 01/01/2008-12/31/2012, and ≥12 months pre- and ≥6 post-index enrollment. Propensity score matching was used to balance the pregabalin and duloxetine cohorts on pre-index demographics and comorbidities. Potential DDIs were defined by Micromedex 2.0 and identified by prescription claims. Six-month post-index healthcare utilization (HCU) and costs were calculated using pharmacy and medical claims. RESULTS: No significant differences in pre-index demographics or comorbidities were found between pregabalin subjects (n = 446) and duloxetine subjects (n = 446). Potential DDI prevalence was significantly greater (p < 0.0001) among duoxetine subjects (56.7%) than among pregabalin subjects (2.9%). There were no significant differences in HCU or costs between pregablin subjects with and without a potential DDI. By contrast, duloxetine subjects with a potential DDI had higher mean all-cause costs ($13,908 vs. $9,830; p = 0.001), more subjects with ≥1 inpatient visits (35.6% vs 25.4%; p = 0.02), and more subjects with ≥1 emergency room visits (32.8% vs. 20.7%; p = 0.005) in comparison to duloxetine subjects without a potential DDI. There was a trend toward a difference between pregabalin and duloxetine subjects in their respective pre-versus-post differences in milligrams (mg) of morphine equivalents/30 days used (60.2 mg and 176.9 mg, respectively; p = 0.058). CONCLUSION: The significantly higher prevalence of potential DDIs and potential cost impact found in pDPN duloxetine users, relative to pregabalin users, underscore the importance of considering DDIs when selecting a treatment.

Impact of potential pregabalin or duloxetine drug-drug interactions on health care costs and utilization among Medicare members with fibromyalgia.

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of newly initiated pregabalin or duloxetine treatment on fibromyalgia (FM) patients' encounters with potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs), the health care cost and utilization consequences of those interactions, and the impact of treatment on opioid utilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects included those with an FM diagnosis, a pregabalin or duloxetine prescription claim (index event), ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient medical claims, and ≥12 months preindex and ≥6 postindex enrollment. Propensity score matching was used to help balance the pregabalin and duloxetine cohorts on baseline demographics and comorbidities. Potential DDIs were defined based on Micromedex 2.0 software and were identified by prescription claims. RESULTS: No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between matched pregabalin (n=794) and duloxetine cohorts (n=794). Potential DDI prevalence was significantly greater (P<0.0001) among duloxetine subjects (71.9%) than among pregabalin subjects (4.0%). There were no significant differences in all-cause health care utilization or costs between pregabalin subjects with and without a potential DDI. By contrast, duloxetine subjects with a potential DDI had higher mean all-cause costs ($9,373 versus $7,228; P<0.0001) and higher mean number of outpatient visits/member (16.0 versus 13.0; P=0.0009) in comparison to duloxetine subjects without a potential DDI. There was a trend toward a statistically significant difference between pregabalin and duloxetine subjects in their respective pre- versus post-differences in use of ≥1 long-acting opioids (1.6% and 3.4%, respectively; P=0.077). CONCLUSION: The significantly higher prevalence of potential DDIs and potential cost impact found in FM duloxetine subjects, relative to pregabalin subjects, underscore the importance of considering DDIs when selecting a treatment.

Association of out-of-pocket pharmacy costs with adherence to varenicline.

BACKGROUND: Varenicline, a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, is a pharmacotherapy indicated for smoking cessation treatment. To date, no research has examined the relationship between out-of-pocket (OOP) expense and varenicline adherence among Medicare beneficiaries. OBJECTIVES: To (a) characterize medication utilization patterns of varenicline among Medicare members newly initiated on varenicline and (b) examine the relationship between member OOP expense and varenicline medication adherence. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, pharmacy claims data were used to identify Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan (MAPD) members newly initiated on varenicline. Demographic and clinical characteristics, varenicline medication utilization patterns, and pharmacy costs (total and varenicline-specific) were determined for members included in the study. Varenicline adherence was measured by calculating the proportion of days covered (PDC) over a period of 84 days (12 weeks) after initiation. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between varenicline OOP cost and varenicline medication utilization, while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, clinical factors, and nonvarenicline pharmacy costs. RESULTS: A total of 15,452 MAPD members were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) subject age was 62.6 (10.0) years; 21.1% (n = 3,256) were dual eligible; and 33.0% (n = 5,106) received a low-income subsidy. Mean (SD) initial varenicline treatment episode duration was 50.8 (37.8) days, with a mean (SD) varenicline days' supply of 47.8 (32.6) obtained by members during the initial treatment episode. Mean (SD) PDC was 0.51 (0.24), and 14.9% (n = 2,302) of members were classified as adherent to treatment (PDC ≥ 0.80). Greater varenicline OOP expense was significantly associated with lower PDC (regression coefficient = -0.058, P less than 0.001) and significantly associated with lower odds of receiving a refill for varenicline (odds ratio 0.594, 95% CI: 0.540-0.655, P less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare beneficiaries newly initiated on varenicline, medication adherence was suboptimal, and greater OOP cost was associated with lower adherence and lower odds of refilling varenicline.