Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Heart Fail ; 14(4): 351-6, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22308012

RESUMO

Today, continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (cf-LVADs) are implanted more often in patients with end-stage heart failure. Because of greater durability they can be implanted for an extended period of time. As a result of increased numbers of patients on cf-LVAD support, healthcare professionals should be aware of the potential complications inherent to this therapy. Both bleeding and thrombosis may occur, and also complications related either to the device itself or to the ensuing altered haemodynamics, valvular pathology, and rhythm disturbances such as ventricular tachycardias and fibrillation. Accurate clinical evaluation, together with an electrocardiogram and, if necessary, combined with an echocardiogram, is obligatory in these situations. This review summarizes common complications complemented by a few clinical cases.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Infecções/etiologia , Adulto , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiologia , Progressão da Doença , Insuficiência Cardíaca/patologia , Coração Auxiliar/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemodinâmica , Hemorragia/etiologia , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
2.
Neth Heart J ; 15(2): 45-50, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17612659

RESUMO

BACKGROUND.: Due to the shortage of donor hearts, mechanical circulatory support is increasingly being used as a bridge to transplantation. In order to allow for more widespread use of ventricular assist devices it is mandatory that patients are not continuously hospitalised. We present the results of our experience with patients with end-stage heart failure, discharged from hospital after implantation of a ventricular assist device and followed in an outpatient setting. METHODS.: After an intensive training and education programme, focusing on the management of the percutaneous driveline and instructions on how to handle in case of an alarm or malfunction of the device, patients were discharged. They were followed in the outpatient department. All regular and unplanned visits were registered, including readmissions. RESULTS.: Twenty-seven patients treated with a ventricular assist device were discharged from hospital. There were 37 extra visits, of these, 27 were device related resulting in 21 readmissions (0.78/patient). We treated eight infectious episodes in four patients, all device related. Furthermore seven thromboembolic episodes occurred in four patients. One patient died because of multiorgan failure seven weeks after he was readmitted with an urosepsis. In our experience of 11.4 patient years at home while on the device, only 5% of the time was spent in hospital for complications. In comparison with patients on an assist device who stayed in hospital until transplantation, there were no more complications. CONCLUSION.: This study demonstrates that patients with end-stage heart failure, treated with a ventricular assist device, can be safely discharged from hospital, with an acceptable rate of readmissions. It results in a fair quality of life, with a high degree of independence of the patient. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:45-50.).

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA