Influence of seasonal variability on orthopedic surgical outcomes in pediatric patients: a review of surgical site infections.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are challenging, with highly variable reported rates for children undergoing orthopedic surgery. It has been shown in adults that there is seasonal variability in SSI rates, with peak incidences in the summer months. We reviewed 8766 pediatric orthopedic procedures completed at a quaternary children's hospital over a 43-month period. Data collected included: age, sex, BMI, season of procedure, cultures, and other variables related to risks and treatment of SSIs. Of 4875 male and 3891 female pediatric patients undergoing orthopedic procedures, 47 patients (0.54%) with an average age of 11.3 years (range: 2.0-18.6) developed an SSI. Average time between surgery and diagnosis was 27.7 ± 19.8 days. Sixty percent of SSI patients had a BMI in the 85th percentile or above, and 49% of SSI patients had a BMI above the 95th percentile. Thirty-eight patients had positive cultures, with most common infections being due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus in 11 (29%) cases, polymicrobial in 9 (24%), pseudomonas in 5 (13%), and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 5 (13%). SSI rate in winter (0.18%) was significantly lower than in autumn (0.77%, P = 0.006) and summer (0.69%, P = 0.02). The difference did not reach statistical significance from the infection rate in spring (0.53%, P = 0.06). Twenty-nine (62%) SSI cases were considered elective in nature, and the other 18 (38%) cases were for acute traumatic injuries. There is a significantly higher SSI rate in summer and autumn than winter for pediatric patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries. Most patients with SSIs were overweight or obese.

Impact of visitor restriction rules on the postoperative experience of COVID-19 negative patients undergoing surgery.

BACKGROUND: Many hospitals have implemented visitor restriction policies in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Because caregivers serve an important role in postoperative recovery, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of visitor restrictions on the postoperative experience of coronavirus disease 2019-negative patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery immediately before or after the implementation of a visitor restriction policy were enrolled. Patients were surveyed on their inpatient experience and preparedness for discharge using items adapted from validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Among 128 eligible patients, 117 agreed to participate (91.4% response rate): 58 (49.6%) in the Visitor Cohort and 59 (50.4%) in the No-Visitor Cohort. Mean age was 57.5 years (standard deviation 13.9) and 66 (56.4%) were female. Among all patients, 47.8% underwent oncologic surgery, 31.6% transplant, and 20.5% general or other. Patients in the No-Visitor Cohort were less likely to report complete satisfaction with the hospital experience (80.7% vs 66.0%, P = .044), timely receipt of medications (84.5% vs 69.0%, P = .048), and assistance getting out of bed (70.7% vs 51.7%, P = .036). No-Visitor Cohort patients were less likely to feel that their discharge preferences were adequately considered (79.3% vs 54.2%, P = .004). Qualitative analysis of patient responses highlighted the consistent psychosocial support provided by visitors after surgery (84.5%), and patients in the No-Visitor Cohort reported social isolation due to lack of psychosocial support (50.8%). CONCLUSION: The implementation of hospital visitor restriction policies may adversely impact the postoperative experience of coronavirus disease 2019-negative patients undergoing surgery. These findings highlight the urgent need for novel patient-centered strategies to improve the postoperative experience of patients during ongoing or future disruptions to routine hospital practice.