Position of Coracoid Button Predicts Loss of Reduction in Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation Patients Treated With the Suture-Button.

BACKGROUND: Loss of reduction is the most common complication after acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation treated with the suture-button. Some predictors of it are known, but finding new predictors is an ongoing process. In this study, we evaluate the importance of the position of the coracoid button. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 2010 and February 2017, 186 patients with AC joint dislocation were identified. All patients were managed with the same surgical technique and postoperative protocol. The position of the coracoid button was determined immediately after surgery by anterior-posterior views of the operated shoulder and was classified as medial (Group A, 42 cases), central (Group B, 85 cases) and lateral (Group C, 59 cases) positions. The main outcome measurement was loss of reduction. The main analysis was the association between the coracoid button position and loss of reduction. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the baseline characteristics among 3 groups. During follow-up, there were 15 cases (35.7%) developing loss of reduction in Group A, 5 cases (5.9%) in Group B and 26 cases (44.1%) in Group C. The rate of loss of reduction in Groups A and C were higher than that in Group B (p < .05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the rate of reduction loss between lateral and medial positions of the coracoid buttons (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that both lateral and medial positions of the coracoid buttons could predict loss of reduction in AC joint dislocation patients treated with the suture-button.

Detection of dorsal screw penetration during volar plating of the distal radius fractures: A comparison of different fluoroscopic views and screw sizes.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare different screw lengths combined with different fluoroscopic views to detect intraoperative dorsal screw penetration in distal radius fractures treated with volar locked plating. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From April 2014 to October 2018, one hundred and eighty patients were included. We divided the patients into four groups. Intraoperative AP and lateral views were taken and sizes of the screws were chosen based on actual measurement (Group A, 45 patients). AP, lateral and tangential views were taken and sizes of the screws were also chosen based on actual measurement (Group B, 45 patients). Intraoperative AP and lateral views were taken and the selected screws were 2mm shorter than actual measurement (Group C, 45 patients). AP, lateral and tangential views were taken and the selected screws were 2mm shorter than actual measurement (Group D, 45 patients). Prominent screws were changed intraoperatively according to each view. A computed tomography (CT) was taken postoperatively to identify residual prominent screws. RESULTS: The number of dorsally prominent screws exceeding 1mm was 6 of 301 in Group A (2.0%), 15 of 290 (5.2%) in Group B, 2 of 289 in Group C (0.7%), and 2 of 282 (0.7%) in Group D. All these prominent screws (25 screws) were exchanged for shorter screws during surgery. Group A and Group B had significant difference in detecting intraoperative dorsal screw penetration (p<0.05). Group C and Group D had no significant difference in detecting intraoperative dorsal screw penetration (p>0.05). Postoperative CT identified 12 additional prominent screws with≥1mm dorsal penetration in Group A, 2 screws in Group B, 1 screw in Group C and 0 screw in Group B respectively. Significant difference was found between Group A and Group B of CT results (p<0.05) while no statistical difference was found between Group C and Group D of CT results (p>0.05). DISCUSSIONS: Tangential view helped identify screw penetration. If tangential view was not available intraoperatively, screw penetration could also be avoided by downsizing the distal locking screw by 2mm shorter than actual measurement.

Projection of the Most Anterior Line of the Spinal Canal on Lateral Radiograph: An Anatomic Study for Percutaneous Kyphoplasty and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.

ABSTRACTPurpose: To measure the projection of the most anterior line of the spinal canal on lateral radiographs of the vertebra (C3-L5) and evaluate the efficacy of the safety line (SL) in preventing intraspinal cement leakage in percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Materials and Methods: Fifteen adult dry-bone spine specimens were analyzed. The projection of the SL was viewed on lateral radiographs. The distance between the SL and the posterior vertebral body line (PVBL) was measured. Two groups of patients were treated by PKP, and cement injection was stopped either before the PBVL (group 1) or before the SL (group 2) under lateral fluoroscopy. The rate of cement leakage was compared between the two groups. Results: The largest distance between the SL and PVBL was at L1 (5.22 ± 0.62 mm). From L1 to L5, the distance decreased progressively to 1.05 ± 0.64 mm. Similar variation was also observed from L1 to T1 (0.19 ± 0.18 mm). The postoperative computed tomography scan was more sensitive and accurate in detecting intraspinal leakage than radiography in group 1 (p = 0.000); however, there was no significant difference in sensitivity or accuracy between methods in group 2 (p = 0.063). The rate of intraspinal cement leakage was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 (p = 0.000). Conclusions: The operator should frequently check to ensure that cement injection has stopped upon reaching the SL. Surgeons may benefit from this quantitative anatomical study of PKP and PVP.

Inhibition of EZH2 ameliorates cartilage endplate degeneration and attenuates the progression of intervertebral disc degeneration via demethylation of Sox-9.

BACKGROUND: Cartilaginous endplate (CEP) degeneration is considered as one of the major causes of intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) which causes low back pain. Recent studies have proved that epigenetic alteration is involved in a variety of diseases. This work explored the role of histone methyltransferase enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) in CEP degeneration, as well as its underlying epigenetic mechanisms, and confirmed the effect of EZH2 knockdown on delaying IVDD development. METHODS: Western blotting, immunofluorescence staining, and ChIP assay were applied to demonstrate the molecular mechanism of EZH2 in CEP tissue. The therapeutic potential of EZH2 was investigated using puncture-induced rat models. FINDINGS: The EZH2 expression was upregulated in human and rat CEP tissue. It was also found that the overexpression of EZH2 suppressed the expression of Collagen II, aggrecan and Sox-9, and promoted the expression of ADTAMTS5 and MMP13 in rat endplate chondrocytes (EPCs), which could be reversed by EZH2 silencing. The correlation between EZH2 and Sox-9 was further explored, while overexpression of Sox-9 could reverse the effect of EZH2 in rat EPCs. Moreover, inhibition of EZH2 upregulated the level of Sox-9 by demethylating H3K27me3 at Sox-9 promoter sites, revealing the regulatory mechanism of EZH2 on Sox-9. Meanwhile, puncture-induced rat models showed that EZH2 knockdown exerted a protective effect on CEP and disc degeneration. INTERPRETATION: This study reveals that EZH2 inhibition is a promising strategy for mitigating the symptoms and progression of IVDD. FUNDING: This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Y16H060034). Authors declare that the funders had no involvement in the study design, data analysis and interpretation of the results.

Factors associated with the decision for operative versus conservative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of senile distal radius fractures had not been clearly defined. The objective of this study was to identify the factors associated with the decision for operative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged over 55 years. METHODS: Data of 318 patients with displaced distal radius fractures were collected on patient-, fracture- and surgeon-related characteristics that were plausibly related to the decision for operation. Mean comparisons or chi-squared test were used for univariate analysis of the above-mentioned factors, and then multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with the decision for operation. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that age, osteoporosis, Charlson score, associated orthopaedic injuries requiring surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO) and Fernandez classification, radial height, volar tilt, volar/dorsal comminution, ulnar variance, intra-articular displacement/step-off, associated distal radioulnar joint instability or radiocarpal joint dislocation and subspecialty of treating surgeons had statistically significant association with operative intervention. In the multivariate analysis, the predictors of operative intervention were younger patient age (P = 0.028), associated orthopaedic injuries requiring surgery (P = 0.020), higher AO classification (P = 0.037), higher Fernandez classification (P = 0.041), radial shortening >5 mm (P = 0.020), volar tilt > -10° (P = 0.020), volar/dorsal comminution (P = 0.020), ulnar variance >5 mm (P = 0.023), intra-articular displacement/step-off >2 mm (P = 0.004), associated distal radioulnar joint instability or radiocarpal joint dislocation (P = 0.047) and treatment by an upper extremity specialist (P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: The decision for surgery was predominantly influenced by the characteristics and severity of the fracture. Patients' age and treatment by an upper extremity specialist were also significant factors associated with a higher likelihood of operative intervention.

Minimally invasive procedure of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation: one suture-button device versus two suture-button devices.

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical results of patients treated with either one suture-button device or two suture-button devices for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations. Eighty patients were randomized to operative stabilization either by one suture-button device (OSB, 40) or by two suture-button devices (TSB, 40). Postoperative complications, the Constant, VAS and SST scores, patient subjective satisfaction result were reviewed. The total incidence of complications was similar in both groups (16/40 vs. 17/40, P =0 .820). There were no significant differences in the length of hospitalization, the Constant, VAS and SST scores, and the ability to return to previous work between the two groups. However, the patients of TSB group had longer incision length, more blood loss, more operative and radiation time and more hospitalization costs (P < 0.01). The radiological evaluation showed no significant difference in the CC distance between the two groups (P = 0.557). Our results indicated that one suture-button device could achieve the same good radiological and clinical results as two suture-button devices did.

Analysis of risk factors for loss of reduction after acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with the suture-button.

BACKGROUND: The most commonly reported complication after acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation treated with the Suture-button is loss of reduction. Loss of reduction is a major factor influencing the patient's joint function and subjective satisfaction. The objective of this study is to analyze the risk factors causing loss of reduction after AC joint dislocation treated with the Suture-button. METHODS: One hundred and thirty patients with AC joint dislocation who were surgically treated the Suture-button in our hospital from February 2009 to February 2015, were recorded their age, sex, BMI, time from injury to surgery, Rockwood's classification, with or without osteoporosis, double or triple button technique, position of the clavicle tunnel, tunnel diameter, coracoid button position, alignment of the button, acromioclavicular ligament repair or not, different methods of postoperative limb immobilization, and so on. Mean comparisons or chi-square test was used for univariate analysis of the above factors, and then multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to predict risk factors. RESULTS: Reduction was lost in 23.1% of the patients. Univariate analysis showed that button alignment, double or triple button technique, coracoid button position, position of the clavicle tunnel, acromioclavicular ligament repair or not and osteoporosis had statistically significant association with loss of reduction for AC joint (P = 0.031, 0.034, 0.000, 0.042, 0.047 and 0.000 respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that osteoporosis (P = 0.003), position of the clavicle tunnel (P = 0.032) and coracoid button position (P < 0.001) were the risk factors that significantly associated with the loss of reduction after AC joint dislocation treated with the Suture-button. CONCLUSIONS: Clavicle tunnel location using relative ratio method, accurate placement of button plate under coracoid process (inside or outside deviation <20°), various reinforcement operations for patients with osteoporosis are important factors in preventing loss of reduction.

Acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with tightrope : Mini-open versus percutaneous stabilization.

The purpose of this study was to compare prospecti- vely the radiographic and clinical results of patients treated with tightrope through either mini-open or percutaneous stabilization for acute AC joint injuries. Eighty patients were included in this study and were randomly divided into two groups. Group A included 40 injuries treated with mini-open repair. Group B consisted of 40 injuries treated with percutaneous stabilization. Demographic and clinical data were comparable between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05). Peri-operative data, complications and clinical outcomes between the two groups were compared. The average follow-up time of Group A, was 26.5±4.3 months and Group B, was 25.2±5.6 months (P>0.05). The mean operative time was 63.2±9.6 minutes and 45.6±7.1 minutes, and the mean incision length was 6.0±1.5 cm and 4.0±0.8 cm, respectively. The operative time and incision length were significantly longer in Group A (both P<0.05). However, the radiological assessment revealed no significant difference in the coracoclavicular (CC) distance between the two groups (P>0.05). The rate of loss of reduction in the Group A was similar to that in Group B (6/40 vs. 5/40, P>0.05). Both methods were efficient methods for acute AC joint dislocation. However, percutaneous fixation had the advantages of a shorter surgical time and smaller incision length.

Management of pin tract infection in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: a comparative study of three methods.

The objective of this study was to prospectively compare the incidence of pin tract infection in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures managed with pin care daily or every other day or weekly. We hypothesized that there were some differences between these three methods. From June 2012 to May 2015, 135 children with supracondylar humerus fractures were randomized to postoperative pin care by cleaning pin tracts daily (group A, 45 cases) or cleaning every 2 days (group B, 45 cases) or cleaning weekly (group C, 45 cases). The three groups were comparable with respect to age, gender, affected side, body mass index (BMI), fracture type, injury to surgery time, number of intraoperative percutaneous pinning, and follow-up time. We collected data on pin retention time, union time, and pin tract infection. The average follow-up time of group A was 4.5 ± 1.3 and 4.2 ± 1.6 months in group B and 4.3 ± 1.4 months in group C. The patient demographics and intraoperative variables of three groups were comparable. No significant difference between these three groups was found in union time and pin fixation time. Of the 135 children, 48 (35.6%) cases had pin tract infection. Grade I infections (Checketts-Otterburns classification) occurred around 28.9% of 270 pin and grade II around 6.7%. We found no differences between three groups as regards frequency and severity of pin tract infections (both P > 0.05). However, complain of pain was more frequent in group A than other two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: All of the three methods were effective for the management of pin site infection in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. However, excessive frequent care as well as pin care daily had the disadvantages of child's fear and parental anxiety. What is Known: • Pin site infection is a common complication after fracture fixation and bone lengthening using percutaneous pins or wires. • Closed reduction and percutaneous K-wires fixation are the mainstay of treatment in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. What is New: • All of the three methods were effective for the management of pin site infection. • Excessive frequent care as well as pin care daily has the disadvantages of child's fear and parental anxiety.

The outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures treated surgically by different types of orthopedists.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of pediatric femoral shaft fractures treated with titanium elastic nail (TEN) by pediatric orthopedists and non-pediatric orthopedists. METHODS: From May 2006 to June 2014, 88 children with femoral shaft fractures were randomized to operative stabilization either by pediatric orthopedists (Group A, 44 cases) or by non-pediatric orthopedists (Group B, 44 cases). Demographic data and clinical characteristics (age, sex, weight, fracture side and type, cause of injury, associated injuries and interval from injury to surgery) were comparable between the two groups before surgery. Peri-operative data, clinical and functional outcomes between the two groups were recorded. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 20.9±4.5months for Group A and 20.0±3.6months for Group B (P=0.356). There was no significant difference in the time to union, length of hospitalization, full weight-bearing time and TEN scores between the two groups (P=0.785, P=0.835, P=0.803, P=0.940, respectively). However, the mean operating time and radiation time was longer in Group B than in Group A (P=0.001 and P=0.047, respectively). Also, there was a trend for patients of Group B to have a higher rate of open reduction (P=0.047). When comparing the total complications, no significant difference existed between the groups (P=0.978). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that both pediatric and non-pediatric orthopedists provided satisfactory clinical and functional results in treating these common injuries.

Comparison of 3 Minimally Invasive Methods for Distal Tibia Fractures.

This study compared the results of external fixation combined with limited open reduction and internal fixation (EF + LORIF), minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO), and intramedullary nailing (IMN) for distal tibia fractures. A total of 84 patients with distal tibia shaft fractures were randomized to operative stabilization using EF + LORIF (28 cases), MIPPO (28 cases), or IMN (28 cases). The 3 groups were comparable with respect to patient demographics. Data were collected on operative time and radiation time, union time, complications, time of recovery to work, secondary operations, and measured joint function using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. There was no significant difference in time to union, incidence of union status, time of recovery to work, and AOFAS scores among the 3 groups (P>.05). Mean operative time and radiation time in the MIPPO group were longer than those in the IMN or EF + LORIF groups (P<.05). Wound complications after MIPPO were more common compared with IMN or EF + LORIF (P<.05). Anterior knee pain occurred frequently after IMN (32.1%), and irritation symptoms were encountered more frequently after MIPPO (46.4%). Although EF + LORIF was associated with fewer secondary procedures vs MIPPO or IMN, it was related with more pin-tract infections (14.3%). Findings indicated that EF + LORIF, MIPPO, and IMN all achieved similar good functional results. However, EF + LORIF had some advantages over MIPPO and IMN in reducing operative and radiation times, postoperative complications, and reoperation rate. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(4):e627-e633.].

A comparative study of two closed reduction methods for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures.

BACKGROUND: No randomized controlled studies have confirmed the advantages of the joystick technique over the traditional manual traction. The objective of this study was to compare the results of the joystick technique and the traditional manual traction for facilitating closed reduction of pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. METHODS: From February 2009 to December 2012, sixty eight children were included in this study. Group A included 34 fractures reduced by the joystick technique. Group B consisted of 34 fractures reduced by the traditional manual traction. Preoperative demographic data were comparable between the two groups. The operative time, fluoroscopy time, hospitalization time, time to bone union, complications were recorded in both groups. Radiologic and functional results were assessed using the Flynn scoring system. RESULTS: Closed reduction was successfully done in all the fractures of Group A while traditional closed manipulation was successfully done in 25 fractures of Group B and 9 fractures failed. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the rate of failed closed reduction (P = 0.004). The mean operative time was 30.5 ± 9.0 and 48.2 ± 16.4 min, and the mean fluoroscopy time was 25.4 ± 10.5 s and 55.0 ± 21.2 s in Group A and Group B, respectively. Both the operative time and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in Group B (P < 0.001 and 0.001, respectively). However, there was no significant difference in terms of the mean hospitalization time, mean union time, total complications, the Flynn scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The joystick technique should be chosen to facilitate closed reduction if traditional manual traction failed to yield an acceptable reduction.

A comparative study of less invasive stabilization system and titanium elastic nailing for subtrochanteric femur fractures in older children.

The objective of this study was to compare prospectively the complications and the radiographic and clinical outcomes of reverse less invasive stabilization system (LISS) and titanium elastic nailing (TEN) for the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures in older children. From April 2004 to February 2012, 52 children aged from 10 to 15 years old with subtrochanteric fractures were included in this study. 26 patients were treated with reverse LISS (LISS group) and 26 children treated with titanium elastic nails (TEN group) respectively. Perioperative care was standardized. Surgical time, blood loss, length of hospitalization, hospital costs, fracture union time, full weight-bearing time and complications were analyzed. The radiologic results as well as hip functional outcomes were evaluated. The average follow-up time of LISS group was 36.5±9.3 months and TEN group was 40.2±10.6 months. No significant difference between these two groups was found in union time, full weight-bearing time and average length of hospitalization. However, the patients of LISS group had longer operation time (60.0±10.6 min vs. 40.5±7.4 min, p<0.01), more blood loss (130.0±45.0 ml vs. 15.5±10.2 ml, p<0.01), and more hospital costs (25000±700 RMB vs. 10800±500 RMB, p<0.01). The overall complication rate was significantly higher in the LISS group than in the TEN group (12/26 vs. 5/26, p=0.039). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of early and late radiological results. Using the Sanders score system, there were 13 excellent, 6 good and 7 fair results in the LISS group compared with 22 excellent and 4 good results in the TEN group. The excellent and good rate was significantly different between the two groups (p=0.010). Our results indicated that TEN fixation of subtrochanteric femur fractures in older children was associated with better function scores and a lower overall complication rate when compared with reverse LISS.

[Triple-Endobutton technique for the treatment of Tossy type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of Triple-Endobutton plates in treating Tossy type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation. METHODS: From January 2011 to January 2013,45 patients with Tossy type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation were treated with Triple-Endobutton plates. There were 35 males and 10 females with an average age of 30.5 (ranged from 19 to 60) years old. At the final follow-up, VAS, DASH, Constant-Murley criterion were used to evaluate shoulder function. RESULTS: All patients were followed up from 15 to 36 months. No neurovascular injury, wound infection and stress fractures were found,but 3 patients had a re-dislocation. At the final follow-up,the mean VAS score was decreased from (5.7±1.6) preoperatively to postoperative (0.2±0.1); DASH score was significantly decreased from (19.6±4.3) preoperatively to (0.3±0.1) postoperatively; Constant-Murley score was improved from (34.4±4.3) before operation to (94.8± 3.5) after operation. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes of treating Tossy type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation with Triple-Endobutton plates is satisfactory. However, re-dislocation is still the most common complication. Careful perioperative management is an important factor in preventing re-dislocation.

Risk factors for limb overgrowth after the application of titanium elastic nailing in the treatment of pediatric femoral fracture.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to discuss the risk factors of postoperative limb overgrowth after the application of titanium elastic nailing (TEN) in the treatment of pediatric femoral fractures as well as analyze the causes and provide guidance for clinical treatment. METHODS: The study included children with femoral fractures who were treated with TEN at our hospital from February 2005 to December 2009. Their age, gender, weight, cause of injury, having head trauma or not, fracture site, fracture type and nail-canal diameter (NCD) ratio were recorded. Student's t-test, chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for univariate analysis of the above factors, and then multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the possible risk factors in order to determine which ones are associated with limb overgrowth after the application of TEN to treat children with femoral fractures. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that the age, gender, weight, cause of injury, having head trauma or not, and the fracture site did not have a statistically significant association with limb overgrowth (P = 0.741, 0.900, 0.253, 0.739, 0.967 and 0.105, respectively). The fracture type and NCD ratio were significantly associated with limb overgrowth (P = 0.003 and 0.000, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the fracture type (P = 0.021, OR = 2.757) and NCD ratio (P = 0.002, OR = 2.422) were independent risk factors for limb overgrowth. CONCLUSIONS: The main factors affecting postoperative limb overgrowth are the fracture type and NCD ratio. In order to avoid limb overgrowth, unstable fractures should be fixed as firmly as possible, and the NCD ratio should be ≥0.8.

A randomised prospective study of two different combined internal and external fixation techniques for distal tibia shaft fractures.

BACKGROUND: External fixation combined with limited open reduction and internal fixation (EF + LORIF) is a well-accepted and effective method for distal tibia shaft fractures, but it was also related to complications. The objective of this study was to compare external fixation combined with closed reduction and internal fixation (EF + CRIF) with EF + LORIF in the treatment of distal tibia shaft fractures, and explore the benefits and defects of these two techniques. METHODS: Fifty-six patients were randomised to operative stabilisation either by an external fixator combined with two closed titanium elastic nails or by external fixation combined with limited open reduction and internal fixation. Pre-operative variables included the patients' age, sex, the affected side, cause of injury, Tscherne classification of soft tissue injury, fracture pattern, and time from injury to surgery. Peri-operative variables were the operating time and the radiation time. Postoperative variables were wound problems and other complications, union time, time of recovery to work, the functional American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle surgery (AOFAS) score. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean operating time (72.6 ± 11.5 vs. 78.5 ± 16.4 min, P = 0.125), the time to union (21.2 ± 11.0 vs. 22.5 ± 12.3 weeks, P = 0.678), the time of recovery to work (25.0 ± 14.5 vs. 26.4 ± 13.6 weeks, P = 0.711), pin track infection (3/28 vs. 4/28, P = 1.000), delayed union (2/28 vs. 3/28, P = 1.000), pain (38.3 ± 1.6 vs. 38.7 ± 1.5, P = 0.339), function (44.4 ± 6.0 vs. 45.0 ± 5.5, P = 0.698), and total AOFAS scores (91.5 ± 7.4 vs. 93.4 ± 6.8, P = 0.322) between the two groups. However, the mean radiation time was longer in the EF + CRIF group than in the EF + LORIF group (2.0 ± 1.2 vs. 0.3 ± 0.1 min, P < 0.01). The EF + CRIF group had no wound complications while the EF + LORIF group had five wound complications, though the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.052). Acceptable alignment was obtained in 50 patients (22 in EF + CRIF vs. 28 in EF + LORIF, P = 0.023). Two cases with EF + CRIF had a 6 degrees of recurvatum deformity and four had 6­9 degrees of valgus deformity. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that both EF + CRIF and EF + LORIF were reliable methods in treatment of distal tibia shaft fractures. EF + CRIF had fewer wound complications and broader indications while EF + LORIF had lower radiation exposure and better alignment.

Pediatric femoral shaft fractures treated with titanium elastic nailing.

The objective of this study was to prospectively compare intraoperative fluoroscopy time and clinical and radiological results in pediatric femoral shaft fractures treated with titanium elastic nailing (TEN) using a small-incision, blind-hand reduction vs closed reduction. From February 2008 to December 2009, sixty-eight children were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A comprised 34 patients treated with a small-incision, blind-hand reduction technique and group B comprised 34 patients treated with a closed reduction technique. Operative time, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, fracture union time, and complications were recorded in both groups. Clinical and radiological results were assessed using the TEN scoring system. Mean operative time was 30.5±8.5 in group A and 53.0±15.0 minutes in group B, and mean fluoroscopy time was 28.4±18.5 seconds in group A and 65.0±28.5 seconds in group B. Operative time and fluoroscopy time were significantly longer in group B (P<.001). According to the TEN scoring system, the results were excellent in 31 patients and good in 3 patients in group A and excellent in 29 patients and good in 5 patients in group B. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of clinical and radiological results. There was also no significant difference in terms of fracture healing time, weight-bearing time, and complications. The small-incision, blind-hand reduction technique provided similar clinical results as closed reduction. This technique could be an alternative to closed reduction because it significantly reduced intraoperative radiation exposure and operative time.

Management of distal third tibial fractures: comparison of combined internal and external fixation with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare combined internal and external fixation (CIEF) with minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) in the treatment of distal third tibial fractures, and explore the benefits and defects of these two techniques. METHODS: From April 2004 to February 2012, a total of 44 patients were randomised to operative stabilisation either by two closed titanium elastic nails combined with an external fixator (CIEF, 22) or by minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis with a locking plate (MIPPO, 22). Pre-operative variables included the patients' age, sex, fracture side, cause of injury, Tscherne classification of soft tissue injury, fracture pattern, presence of open fracture and interval from injury to surgery. Peri-operative variables were the operating time and the radiation time. Postoperative variables were wound problems, bone union time, time of recovery to work, the functional American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle surgery (AOFAS) score and removal of hardware. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the time to union, the time of recovery to work, function, alignment and total AOFAS scores between the two groups (P = 0.704, 0.835, 0.551, 0.716 and 0.212, respectively). The mean operating time and radiation time were longer in the MIPPO group than in the CIEF group (85.3 ± 12.5 vs. 73.2 ± 12.0 minutes, P = 0.002, and 3.1 ± 1.5 vs. 2.1 ± 1.2 minutes, P = 0.019, respectively). Wound complications were more common in the MIPPO group (18.2% vs. 0% with CIEF, P = 0.105). There was a trend for patients with MIPPO to have a higher incidence of ankle pain (31.8% vs. 9.1% with CIEF, P = 0.135). Painful implants were removed in 31.8% of patients with MIPPO versus 9.1% with CIEF (P = 0.135). Of the 165 self-tapping locking screws of the locking plates seven (four patients) were removed with some difficulty because of stripping of the hexagonal recess. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that both CIEF and MIPPO were all efficient methods for treating distal third tibial fractures. However, CIEF had the advantages of a shorter operating and radiation time, less wound complication and ankle pain, less secondary operations for implant removal and easier removal of the implants.