RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) is a common cause of breast cancer-related death. The prognostic and predictive value of receptor expression and St Gallen classification is challenged by receptor status discordance in distant metastases. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of receptor conversion from breast cancer to BCLM and the impact on survival. METHOD: Patients registered with BCLM in two Swedish national cancer registers were recruited retrospectively. Data on receptor expression in primary breast cancer and BCLM were collected, as well as information about predictive factors for survival. The rate of receptor and subtype conversion was analyzed. A Cox regression model was used to investigate predictive factors for survival. RESULTS: A cohort of 132 patients with BCLM was identified. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and HER2 converted in 17, 33 and 10%, respectively. PgR was lost in BCLM while 8/10 HER2 conversions went from negative to positive. The BC subtype was re-classified in 21% of the BCLM. Median survival after BCLM was 13 months and HER2 amplification was associated with improved survival (HR 0.28 CI 0.085-0.90). The highest predictive value (Harrell´s C-index) was obtained when including both BC and BCLM status. CONCLUSIONS: Receptor and subtype conversions are common in BCLM, and a liver biopsy is warranted to tailor BCLM treatment. HER2 amplification is associated with improved survival in a BCLM cohort.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Melanoma , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Melanoma Maligno CutâneoRESUMO
Perforated acute necrotizing esophagitis is a condition with several proposed etiological factors, hypothesized to be caused by weakened mucosal defence mechanisms and hemodynamic insult, leading to subsequent ischemia. We present a patient with acute necrotizing esophagitis, where underlying cardiovascular comorbidity and patient delay serve as potential contributing causal factors to the perforation. To prevent subsequent circulo-respiratory collapse and multi-organ failure, emergency esophagectomy was required, given that control of persistent leakage and mediastinitis was unlikely if managed conservatively.
Assuntos
Perfuração Esofágica , Esofagite , Perfuração Esofágica/diagnóstico por imagem , Perfuração Esofágica/etiologia , Esofagite/complicações , Humanos , Mucosa , NecroseRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The benefit of liver resection or ablation for breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) remains unclear. The aim of the study was to determine survival after isolated BCLM in nationwide cohorts and compare surgical versus systemic treatment regimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Swedish register for cancer in the liver and the bile ducts (SweLiv) and the National register for breast cancer (NBCR) was studied to identify patients with 1-5 BCLM without extrahepatic spread diagnosed 2009-2016. Data from the registers were validated and completed by review of medical records. A Kaplan-Meier plot and log rank test were used to analyse survival. Prognostic and predictive factors were evaluated by Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: A surgical cohort (n = 29) was identified and compared to a control cohort (n = 33) receiving systemic treatment only. There was no 90-day mortality after surgery. Median survival from BCLM diagnosis was 77 months (95% CI 41-113) in the surgical cohort and 28 months (95% CI 13-43) in the control cohort, (p = 0.004). There was a longer disease-free interval and more oestrogen receptor positive tumours in the surgical cohort. Surgery was a significant positive predictive factor in univariate analysis while a multivariable analysis resulted in HR 0.478 (CI 0.193-1.181, p = 0.110) for surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Surgery for BCLM is safe and might provide a survival benefit in selected patients but prospective trials are warranted to avoid selection bias.