Differences between diploma and baccalaureate dental hygiene education in British Columbia: a qualitative perspective.

The British Columbia Ministry of Health in Canada approved a new registration category for dental hygienists in 2012. This category included four abilities that registrants were required to demonstrate at a 4th-year baccalaureate degree level. OBJECTIVE: To identify the differences, if any, between diploma and bachelor's degree education with regard to the 4 legislated abilities focused on the process of care for clients with complex needs and/or disabling conditions including client safety, referrals and interprofessional collaboration. METHODS: Registrants who had entered practice with a diploma and then gained a baccalaureate degree were invited to participate in an online survey including closed- and open-ended questions. The study was a mixed-method design where the qualitative data were nested concurrently in the open-ended questions; the data were analysed through thematic analysis using grounded theory methods. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Respondents (n = 123; 51%) indicated their client care had improved with baccalaureate education due to increased knowledge, increased understanding and increased abilities to make judgements with a particular emphasis on evidence-based decisions. These more advanced abilities provided them with increased confidence for taking action particularly in interprofessional contexts and increased the quality of their decision-making thus leading to better care for clients. CONCLUSION: Respondents described their dental hygiene services as generally being of a higher standard and specifically in the 4 legislated abilities as a direct result of baccalaureate education.

A discourse on dental hygiene education in Canada.

Over the past decade, the discourse on dental hygiene education has gained momentum in Canada. This review provides insights into the evolution of dental hygiene education in Canada, briefly exploring the history and professional influences for diploma and baccalaureate education within the profession. The profession in Canada has yet to implement a national standardized entry-to-practice educational model, but the recent development of national educational competencies may prove to be a promising beginning. The review also discusses efforts to advance dental hygiene education in recent years, while exploring the political and professional pressures and challenges that remain. Further discourse on education and outcomes-related research can be effective in positively influencing governmental, professional and public opinions of higher entry-level education for dental hygiene which may ultimately result in regulatory change and improved client outcomes.

Learning climate in dental hygiene education: a longitudinal case study of a Japanese and Canadian programme.

Educational climates have been found to have important influences on learning, but little feedback has been obtained from dental hygiene students. The purpose of this study was to gain an understanding of the learning climate in Japanese and Canadian dental hygiene programmes for the purpose of making positive changes. A survey instrument with 10 dimensions relating to learning climate was adapted from business and dental models, and designated as the Dental Hygiene Student Learning Climate Survey (DHS-LCS). Higher scores indicated a more positive and supportive learning climate, and lower scores indicated an environment that is potentially less desirable. Students enrolled in a Japanese and a Canadian dental hygiene programme participated in this four-year study from 2005 to 2008. A total of 402 surveys were returned for an average response rate of 62%. The mean total DHS-LCS score of Canadian students was statistically significantly higher than that of Japanese students (P < 0.001) in all years tested, indicating that the Canadian students' perceptions of their learning environment were more favourable than those of the Japanese students. Based on the analyses of the DHS-LCS data, interventions to improve learning climates were designed and implemented. There were statistically significant improvements (P < 0.01) in DHS-LCS scores of Japanese and Canadian students over the years of the study, suggesting that student-centred interventions improved the perceived learning environment. The instrument appears to be helpful in identifying student concerns and can be used to implement interventions to help support a healthier learning climate.

Surgical magnification in dental hygiene practice.

The potential for improving the occupational health of dental clinicians has expanded as increasingly sophisticated equipment enters the marketplace, yet there has been little improvement to the ergonomics with which dental hygienists operate. The use of surgical magnification has great potential to increase the quality of dental hygiene clinical care and to support the musculoskeletal health of dental hygienists. Although the research evidence to support a relationship between the use of surgical magnification and increased quality of dental hygiene care is extrapolated from parallel studies in dentistry, specific dental hygiene studies suggest that the integration of surgical magnification would be helpful in reducing the incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms experienced by dental hygienists. This is not to suggest that the integration of surgical magnification is a panacea for the musculoskeletal problems experienced by dental hygienists. In fact, improperly selected or adjusted surgical magnification systems can promote positions that place clinicians at increased risk for such problems. Clinicians must first determine the optimal working position that supports their musculoskeletal health and then select magnification systems that will support that position. The working distance, depth of field and optical declination angle of the chosen system must correspond to the musculoskeletal needs of the clinician.

The discourse of dental hygiene practice in Canada.

Recently the discourse in Canada relating to dental hygiene practice has changed. While dentistry still exercises controlling power over the public's oral cavity, dental hygienists have made inroads through legislative changes. A description of Canadian dental hygiene practice is provided to set the stage for a discussion about current discourse in the dental hygiene profession. Although power is often perceived as a shifting changing set of relations, these can be frozen in abstraction. It is rather like taking a photo of a single moment or event in an ongoing activity. This moment provides a starting point, an event that can be analysed. Four such events are evident in Canadian dental hygiene practice; they include, education, recognition of dental hygienists as primary care providers, the culture of dental hygiene and self-regulation. While all the events are important, self-regulation is critical to the viability and development of the profession. It is the central event that provides the backdrop for effecting change. With self-regulation comes responsibility and accountability for professional actions. It also provides possibilities for changing the discourse in oral care. As oral health care discourse is transformed through legislation and public awareness, the public will, hopefully, be able to directly access dental hygiene services, and dental hygienists themselves might increasingly recognise their importance as contributors in the health care system.

Declination angle and its role in selecting surgical telescopes.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians usually expect manufacturers to provide properly adjusted surgical telescope products. However, to ensure optimal selection and adjustment, the clinician must understand certain contributing factors, particularly the optical declination angle. METHODS: The authors have developed a simple, stepwise approach for determining a clinician's optimal working posture and declination angle. This information is then applied to each specific surgical telescope to assist the clinician in ascertaining whether the telescopes comply, or can be made to comply, with the individual needs of the clinician. RESULTS: After the optimal working posture and declination angle have been identified and defined, any surgical magnification system can be evaluated for suitability and proper adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Declination angle is a key feature in the selection and adjustment of surgical telescope systems, permitting telescopes to be adjusted to meet the clinician's needs instead of forcing the clinician to make compromises to fit the telescopes. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Properly selected and well-adjusted surgical telescopes can enhance dental operating postures and positions, resulting in sound clinical ergonomics. Poor selection and adjustment can result in poor postures and positions.