RESUMO
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is mandatory before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software in automatically analyzing cardiac parameters from pre-procedural CCTA to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in TAVR patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing pre-TAVR CCTA were retrospectively included. AI software automatically extracted 34 morphologic and volumetric cardiac parameters characterizing the ventricles, atria, myocardium, and epicardial adipose tissue. Clinical information and outcomes were recorded from institutional database. Cox regression analysis identified predictors of MACE, including non-fatal myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, unstable angina, and cardiac death. Model performance was evaluated with Harrell's C-index, and nested models were compared using the likelihood ratio test. Manual analysis of 170 patients assessed agreement with automated measurements. RESULTS: Among the 648 enrolled patients (77 ± 9.3 years, 58.9% men), 116 (17.9%) experienced MACE within a median follow-up of 24 months (interquartile range 10-40). After adjusting for clinical parameters, only left ventricle long axis shortening (LV-LAS) was an independent predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05 [95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.11]; p = 0.04), with significantly improved C-index (0.620 vs. 0.633; p < 0.001). When adjusted for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score, LV-LAS was also predictive of MACE (HR, 1.08 [95%CI, 1.03-1.13]; p = 0.002), while improving model performance (C-index: 0.557 vs. 0.598; p < 0.001). All parameters showed good or excellent agreement with manual measurements. CONCLUSION: Automated AI-based comprehensive cardiac assessment enables pre-TAVR MACE prediction, with LV-LAS outperforming all other parameters.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A recent simulation study proposed that stenosis measurements on coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography are influenced by the improved spatial resolution of photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the impact of ultrahigh-spatial-resolution (UHR) on coronary stenosis measurements and Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) reclassification rates in patients undergoing coronary CT angiography on both PCD-CT and energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT and to compare measurements against quantitative coronary angiography. METHODS: Patients with coronary calcification on EID-CT (collimation, 192×0.6 mm) were prospectively enrolled for a research coronary CT angiography with UHR PCD-CT (collimation, 120×0.2 mm) within 30 days (between April 1, 2023 and January 31, 2024). PCD-CT was acquired with the same or lower CT dose index and equivalent contrast media volume as EID-CT. Percentage diameter stenosis (PDS) for calcified, partially calcified, and noncalcified lesions were compared between scanners. Patient-level reclassification rates for CAD-RADS were evaluated. The accuracy of PDS measurements was validated against quantitative coronary angiography in patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography. RESULTS: In total, PDS of 278 plaques were quantified in 49 patients (calcified, 202; partially calcified, 51; noncalcified, 25). PCD-CT-based PDS values were lower than EID-CT measurements for calcified (45.1±20.7 versus 54.6±19.2%; P<0.001) and partially calcified plaques (44.3±19.6 versus 54.9±20.0%; P<0.001), without significant differences for noncalcified lesions (39.1±15.2 versus 39.0±16.0%; P=0.98). The reduction in stenosis degrees led to a 49.0% (24/49) reclassification rate to a lower CAD-RADS with PCD-CT. In a subset of 12 patients with 56 lesions, UHR-based PDS values showed higher agreement with quantitative coronary angiography (mean difference, 7.3%; limits of agreement, -10.7%/25.2%) than EID-CT measurements (mean difference, 17.4%; limits of agreement, -6.9%/41.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional EID-CT, UHR PCD-CT results in lower PDS values and more accurate stenosis measurements in coronary plaques with calcified components and leads to a substantial Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System reclassification rate in 49.0% of patients.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the impact of different quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) levels on objective and subjective image quality of ultra-high resolution (UHR) coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images and to determine the effect of strength levels on stenosis quantification using photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT. METHOD: A dynamic vessel phantom containing two calcified lesions (25 % and 50 % stenosis) was scanned at heart rates of 60, 80 and 100 beats per minute with a PCD-CT system. In vivo CCTA examinations were performed in 102 patients. All scans were acquired in UHR mode (slice thickness0.2 mm) and reconstructed with four different QIR levels (1-4) using a sharp vascular kernel (Bv64). Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), sharpness, and percent diameter stenosis (PDS) were quantified in the phantom, while noise, SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), sharpness, and subjective quality metrics (noise, sharpness, overall image quality) were assessed in patient scans. RESULTS: Increasing QIR levels resulted in significantly lower objective image noise (in vitro and in vivo: both p < 0.001), higher SNR (both p < 0.001) and CNR (both p < 0.001). Sharpness and PDS values did not differ significantly among QIRs (all pairwise p > 0.008). Subjective noise of in vivo images significantly decreased with increasing QIR levels, resulting in significantly higher image quality scores at increasing QIR levels (all pairwise p < 0.001). Qualitative sharpness, on the other hand, did not differ across different levels of QIR (p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The QIR algorithm may enhance the image quality of CCTA datasets without compromising image sharpness or accurate stenosis measurements, with the most prominent benefits at the highest strength level.