Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 50(7): 821-824, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37496229

RESUMO

Recent developments in chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies have improved treatment results in patients and promoted long-term survival. However, various adverse events caused by long-term chemotherapy are still being observed. Here, we report a case of myelodysplastic syndrome that developed during chemotherapy for recurrent ovarian cancer and progressed to acute myeloid leukemia. However, chemotherapy for ovarian cancer was continued while maintaining the quality of life under certain conditions, such as maintenance of platelet levels in collaboration with a hematologist. A 69- year-old woman(gravida 3, para 2)was diagnosed with stage ⅢC ovarian cancer in our department. After 6 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin plus bevacizumab(TC plus Bev), we performed a simple abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, sigmoid colon resection, and low anterior resection. Postoperatively, 3 cycles of TC plus Bev and 6 cycles of Bev monotherapy were completed for stage ⅢC ovarian cancer (ypT3cNXM0, high-grade serous carcinoma). However, the cancer recurred, and the patient received 3 cycles of gemcitabine plus Bev and 3 cycles of doxorubicin plus Bev. Precursor cells and prolonged neutropenia were observed, and myelodysplastic syndrome was diagnosed. One month later, the condition progressed to acute myeloid leukemia. The patient's neutrophil count recovered spontaneously, and subsequently, 7 cycles of weekly paclitaxel plus Bev therapy were completed along with symptomatic treatment. Unfortunately, she died of septic shock against the background of acute myeloid leukemia. It is important to monitor the appearance of blasts for early detection of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes occurring during chemotherapy, as in the case in this report. Additionally, it is important to maintain platelet count and continue chemotherapy for the primary disease.


Assuntos
Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Bevacizumab , Paclitaxel , Carboplatina , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/cirurgia , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/tratamento farmacológico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos
2.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 27(6): 1084-1092, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35287187

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study is to assess the oncologic outcomes of elderly patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer across three variables: hysterectomy approach, lymph node resection, and adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Hospital records of patients aged ≥ 70 years who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer were obtained from 19 institutions. Patients were categorized into three risk groups: low, intermediate, and high. In each group, disease-free survival and overall survival were compared according to hysterectomy approach, lymph node resection, and adjuvant therapy using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis with a 95% confidence interval was performed to estimate relative risk (RR) of death. RESULTS: A total of 1246 patients were included. In the low-risk group, the adjusted RR for death for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus laparotomy and lymph node resection versus no lymph node resection were 0.64 (0.24-1.72) and 0.52 (0.24-1.12), respectively. In the intermediate-risk group, the adjusted RR for death for MIS versus laparotomy, lymph node resection versus no lymph node resection, and adjuvant therapy versus no adjuvant therapy were 0.80 (0.36-1.77), 0.60 (0.37-0.98), and 0.89 (0.55-1.46), respectively. In the high-risk group, the adjusted RRs for death for lymph node resection versus no lymph node resection and adjuvant therapy versus no adjuvant therapy were 0.56 (0.37-0.86) and 0.60 (0.38-0.96), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MIS is not inferior to laparotomy in uterine-confined diseases. Lymph node resection improved the outcome for all disease stages and histological types. In contrast, adjuvant therapy improved the outcomes only in high-risk patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Histerectomia , Idoso , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Japão , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA