Endocarditis Complicated by Severe Aortic Insufficiency in a Patient with COVID-19: Diagnostic and Management Implications.

A 38-year-old man presented with cough, shortness of breath, and fatigue. He was diagnosed with Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) as well as Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia. Imaging revealed a subaortic membrane with aortic valve endocarditis and severe aortic insufficiency. He had successful aortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis and subaortic membrane resection. This case highlights some of the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges presented by COVID-19 pandemic.

Tropical Endomyocardial Fibrosis.

Tropical endomyocardial fibrosis is a common cause of restrictive cardiomyopathy worldwide, but is relatively rare in developed countries. We present a case of tropical endomyocardial fibrosis with right ventricular involvement initially mistaken as Ebstein's anomaly. We highlight the need for timely and accurate diagnosis to ensure appropriate management. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Safety and efficacy outcomes of left atrial posterior wall isolation compared to pulmonary vein isolation and pulmonary vein isolation with linear ablation for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary wall isolation (PWI) is increasingly used as an adjunctive lesion set to compliment pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), especially in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective was to compare outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF undergoing PVI with and without adjunctive PWI. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 558 patients who underwent de novo and repeat ablation for persistent AF. Subjects were matched using propensity score adjustments. Outcomes were freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia and adverse events. RESULTS: Among 558 patients who underwent ablation for persistent AF, 78 (14%) underwent PVI + PWI, 255 (46%) underwent PVI, and 225 (40%) underwent PVI + linear ablation. Stratified logistic regression analysis with propensity matching revealed higher odds of recurrent arrhythmia with PVI + PWI when compared to PVI (odds ratio [OR] 2.25, 95% CI 1.08-4.69, P = .030) and when compared to PVI + linear (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.01-5.28, P = .048). Within the PVI + PWI group, 57.7% of subjects were in normal sinus rhythm at 6 months compared to 73.9% and 72.2% in PVI and PVI + linear groups, respectively. Adverse events were rare, with 19 events total identified across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: PVI + PWI does not appear to be as effective as PVI or PVI + linear ablation in reducing the recurrence of arrhythmia within 6 months of the index procedure in patients with persistent AF. A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing these ablation techniques is needed to clarify the role of extensive substrate modification for treatment of persistent AF. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: PWI is increasingly used as an adjunctive lesion set to compliment PVI in patients with persistent AF. We performed a retrospective study of 558 patients who underwent de novo and repeat ablation for persistent AF to compare the outcomes between PVI with and without adjunctive PWI. We found an increased incidence in recurrence of AF and other atrial arrhythmias at 6 months in the PVI + PWI cohort compared to PVI with or without additional linear ablation. A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing these ablation techniques is needed to clarify the role of extensive substrate modification for treatment of persistent AF.

Non-invasively quantified changes in left ventricular activation predict outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Changes in left ventricular (LV) activation after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) influence survival but are difficult to quantify noninvasively. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 527 CRT patients to assess whether noninvasive quantification of changes in LV activation, defined by change (Δ) in QRS area (QRSA), can predict outcomes after CRT. The study outcome was time until LV assist device(LVAD), cardiac transplant, or death. The three-dimensional QRSA was measured from clinical 12 lead ECGs which were transformed into vectorcardiograms using the Kors method. QRSA was calculated as (QRSx2 + QRSy2 + QRSz2 )1/2 ; ΔQRSA was calculated as post-QRSA minus pre-QRSA, where a negative value represents a reduction in LV activation delay. Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to relate ΔQRSA area with outcomes after stratifying the population into quartiles of ΔQRSA. The median baseline QRSA of 93.6 µVs decreased to 59.7 µVs after CRT. Progressive reductions in QRSA with CRT were associated with a lower rate of LVAD, transplant, or death across patient quartiles (P < .001). In Cox regression analyses, ΔQRSA was associated with outcomes independent of QRS morphology and other clinical variables (Q1[greatest decrease] vs Q4[smallest change=reference], HR 0.45, CI, 0.30-0.70, P < .001). There was no interaction between ΔQRSA and QRS morphology. CONCLUSIONS: CRT induced ΔQRSA was associated with clinically meaningful changes in event-free survival. ΔQRSA may be a novel target to guide lead implantation and device optimization.

HEART Failure? Episodes of Missed Major Cardiac Events When Applying the HEART Pathway to an Observation Unit Population.

OBJECTIVE: The HEART Pathway risk prediction tool (HEART score plus serial troponin measures at 0 and 3 hours post-presentation) is used to identify low-risk patients with chest pain who may qualify for safe, early discharge. We calculated the percentage of patients in our observation unit that qualified as low risk using HEART Pathway, as well as their associated outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts on 966 consecutive patients admitted to our observation unit for chest pain (January 2015 to February 2016); HEART Pathway scores were retrospectively calculated and serial cardiac troponin values logged. The primary outcome was 42-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including acute myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and all-cause death. RESULTS: The patients' mean age was 59, 42% were male, 46% white, and 68 (7.7%) had MACE. HEART Pathway defined 384 patients as low risk (39.8%) and eligible for early discharge. Applying HEART Pathway would have missed 1.2% of patients with MACE; however, all adverse cardiac events occurred in patients with a HEART Pathway score of 3 (4 of 193, 2.1%) and none in those with a HEART Pathway score ≤2 (0 of 134). CONCLUSIONS: While the HEART Pathway identifies a pooled population at low risk for MACE, risk is not homogenous within this population. Patients with a score of 3 may have higher risk of 42-day MACE that may be unacceptable to some providers, while scores ≤2 saw no events. Caution is advised for those with HEART Pathway score of 3 until more data is available to accurately estimate risk.