Comparable Results of Single and Two-Stage Exchange for Select Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Although two-stage exchange has been the standard of care for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the United States, single-stage exchange is emerging as an option in select patients. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients undergoing single-stage and two-stage exchange using strict surgical indications. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 196 patients with diagnosed PJI undergoing revision total knee and hip arthroplasty from 2017 to 2021. Patients were excluded if they had PJI history, plastic surgery coverage, or extensive bone loss requiring endoprosthesis. We compared the number of patients PJI-free at 1-year follow-up using MusculoSkeletal Infection Society criteria and patients requiring re-revision between the single-stage and two-stage groups. RESULTS: In total, 126 patients met inclusion criteria. Of 61 knee patients (48.4%), 22 underwent single-stage (36%) and 39 underwent two-stage (63.9%). Of 65 hip patients (51.6%), 38 underwent single-stage (58.5%) and 27 underwent two-stage (41.5%). At a mean follow-up of 1.95 ± 0.88 years, a higher rate of knee patients were classified as having treatment success in the single-stage group (77.3% versus 69.2%, P = 0.501), however with comparable septic failure rates (18.1% single-stage versus 17.9% two-stage; P = 0.982). At a mean follow-up of 1.81 ± 0.9 years, a higher rate of hip patients were classified as having treatment success in the single-stage group (94.7% versus 81.5%, P = 0.089), and more patients had septic failures in the two-stage group (18.5% versus 5.3%; P = 0.089). No differences were observed in the microorganism profile. More total complications (P = 0.021) and mortalities were found in the single-stage knee cohort than in the two-stage cohort (22.7% versus 2.6%; P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Single-stage arthroplasty is a viable alternative to standard two-stage exchange in patients with PJI without a history of infection and with no bone or soft-tissue compromise. Additional studies with longer term follow-up are needed to evaluate its efficacy.

Mini-open Femoroacetabular Osteoplasty in Patients With Tönnis Grade 2 or Higher Osteoarthritis is Associated With a Higher Risk of Subsequent Conversion to THA.

BACKGROUND: The severity of degenerative changes of the hip is known to adversely impact the outcomes of the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Although the operative indications for FAI have expanded to include patients with moderate degrees of hip osteoarthritis, the exact stage of hip osteoarthritis at which surgery for FAI can offer clinical benefits is still uncertain. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How does the survivorship free from conversion to THA and survivorship free from revision differ between patients with preexisting Tönnis Grades 2 or 3 changes and those without advanced degenerative changes (Tönnis Grade 0 or 1) after mini-open femoroacetabular osteoplasty? (2) What are the differences in hip-specific and general-health outcome scores between the two groups after mini-open femoroacetabular osteoplasty? METHODS: From December 2003 to April 2019, we treated 901 patients for FAI, and their clinical data were systematically recorded in a longitudinally maintained database. Mini-open femoroacetabular osteoplasty was our preferred surgical approach because of the surgeon's extensive experience with the technique. Among the entire dataset, 6% of patients (51 individuals) had Tönnis Grade 2 or higher hip osteoarthritis, while the remaining 94% (850 patients) had no or mild degenerative changes (Tönnis Grade 0 or 1). In the Tönnis Grade 2 or 3 group, three patients were lost before the minimum 2-year follow-up duration, leaving 4% (48 patients) who qualified for inclusion in the study. For the matched group with Tönnis Grade 0 or 1, 5% (45 patients) were excluded because of incomplete data, and a further 7% (58 patients) were excluded because they did not have 2 years of follow-up, leaving 83% (747 patients) who were eligible for the matching process. Matching was based on patient age (within 1 year), gender, and BMI (within one unit). Matching resulted in the inclusion of 144 randomly selected control patients in this retrospective, comparative study. General indications for femoroacetabular osteoplasty included symptoms of pain and restricted hip motion in young, active patients with signs of FAI evident on physical examination and radiographs. Patient demographics, medical history, radiographic parameters, and intraoperative findings were compared between the two groups to establish baseline differences and identify potential confounding variables. There was no difference in the mean ± standard deviation age between the cohort of interest and control group (39 ± 10 years and 38 ± 11 years, respectively; p = 0.67). There was no difference in the mean follow-up duration (7 ± 3 years versus 8 ± 2 years; p = 0.25) or the preoperative symptomatic period between the study and control groups (2 ± 2 years versus 3 ± 6 years; p = 0.09). There was no difference in the prevalence of dysplasia, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, Perthes disease, or avascular necrosis of the hip between the two groups. Intraoperatively, the groups did not differ in terms of labral repair (65% [31 of 48] versus 78% [113 of 144]; p = 0.08) and labral transplantation (2%; p > 0.99 for both); however, labral resection was performed more frequently in the study group (63% [30 of 48] versus 42% [60 of 144]; p = 0.002). At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, survivorship free from conversion to THA and survivorship free from revision surgeries, as well as the latest clinical and functional outcome scores (SF-36, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and modified Harris hip score), were compared between groups. RESULTS: Survivorship free from conversion to THA at 5 years was lower among patients with preexisting Tönnis Grades 2 or 3 changes than it was among patients matched for age, gender, and BMI who did not have advanced degenerative changes (Tönnis Grade 0 or 1) after mini-open femoroacetabular osteoplasty (75% [95% confidence interval 64% to 88%] versus 92% [95% CI 87% to 96%]; p < 0.001). No patients in either group underwent reoperation other than conversion to THA. Although the groups did not differ at baseline in terms of their outcomes scores, the group with more visible arthritis had lower postoperative Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores than the control group (60 ± 21 points versus 86 ± 11 points, mean difference 26 points [95% CI 10 to 41]; p =0.004). There were no other between-group differences in outcome scores after surgery. CONCLUSION: In our study, approximately 25% of patients undergoing mini-open femoroacetabular osteoplasty with Tönnis Grade 2 or higher osteoarthritis underwent conversion to THA within 5 years. Some postoperative functional scores were lower in patients with advanced arthritis than in matched patients with no or mild arthritis. We emphasize the importance of exercising caution when considering femoroacetabular osteoplasty in patients in whom advanced arthritis is already evident at the time of presentation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Patients Requiring Both Total Hip Arthroplasty and Lumbar Spinal Fusion Have Lower Hip Functional Outcome Scores: A Matched Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: While patients who undergo both lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) have increased complication rates compared to patients who have not undergone LSF, there is a paucity of literature evaluating THA functional outcomes in patients with a history of LSF. This study was conducted to determine whether patients undergoing THA with a history of LSF have inferior functional outcomes compared to patients having no history of LSF. METHODS: A retrospective matched case-control study was conducted at an academic center. Patients who underwent both THA and LSF (cases) were matched with controls who underwent THA without LSF. Inclusion criteria required a minimum of 1-year follow-up for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement [HOOS-JR]. Following propensity matching for age, sex, race, body mass index, and comorbidities, 291 cases and 1,164 controls were included, with no demographic differences. RESULTS: Patients who underwent both THA and LSF had a significantly lower preoperative HOOS-JR (47 versus 50; P < .001), postoperative HOOS-JR (77 versus 85; P < .001), a significant lower rate of achieving the patient acceptable symptom state (55 versus 67%; P < .001), with no significant difference in delta HOOS-JR (34 versus 34; P = .834). When comparing patients undergoing THA before LSF or LSF before THA, no differences existed for preoperative HOOS-JR (50 versus 47; P = .304), but patients undergoing THA before LSF had lower postoperative HOOS-JR scores (74 versus 81; P = .034), a lower-delta HOOS-JR (27 versus 35; P = .022), and a lower rate of reaching the HOOS-JR minimal clinically important difference (62 versus 76%; P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have a history of LSF experience a similar improvement in hip function when undergoing THA compared to patients who do not have a history of LSF. However, due to lower preoperative function, they may have a lower postoperative functional outcome ceiling. Additionally, patients undergoing THA before LSF have worse hip functional outcomes than patients undergoing LSF before THA.

Allograft reconstruction of acetabular labrum has comparable outcomes to labral refixation.

The acetabular labrum plays an important role in hip stability, intra-articular fluid pressurization and force distribution. For irreparable labral pathology, labral reconstruction is an increasingly adopted technique shown to decrease hip pain and improve function. We evaluated survivorship and clinical outcomes of allograft labral reconstruction using the mini-open anterior surgical approach. Twelve patients who underwent labral reconstruction using a semitendinosus tendon allograft (reconstruction group) were matched 1:3 based on age, gender, body mass index, year of surgery, preoperative Tönnis grade, previous hip surgery, residual hip pathology and extent of acetabular chondral lesion to a control group of 36 patients who underwent direct labral repair with anchors (refixation group). At a minimum follow-up of 2 years, patient-reported outcomes, radiological findings and failure rates were compared. The average age was 31.3 years (±13.6) for reconstruction and 34.7 (±10.2) for refixation. Both groups had similar preoperative symptomatic periods (P = 0.3), prevalence of residual hip pathology (P = 1.0) and prevalence of prior hip surgeries (P = 1.0). both groups had a significant improvement of modified Harris Hip scores and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical scores. There was no statistically significant difference in conversion rates to total hip arthroplasty (25% versus 8.3%, P = 0.2); however, time to conversion was significantly longer in the reconstruction group (3.58 years ±1.04) compared to the refixation group (1.20 years± 0.93; P = 0.04). In conclusion, at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, mini-open labrum reconstruction for severe insufficiency of acetabular labrum demonstrated comparable improvements in functional outcomes and significantly longer survivorship compared to labral refixation.

The Appropriateness of Preoperative Patient Reported Outcome Measures as an Indication for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: While Medicare requires patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for many quality programs, some commercial insurers have begun requiring preoperative PROMs when determining patient eligibility for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Concerns exist these data may be used to deny THA to patients above a specific PROM score, but the optimal threshold is unknown. We aimed to evaluate outcomes following THA based on theoretical PROM thresholds. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 18,006 consecutive primary THA patients from 2016-2019. Hypothesized preoperative Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR) cutoffs of 40, 50, 60, and 70 points were used. Preoperative scores below each threshold were considered "approved" surgery. Preoperative scores above each threshold were considered "denied" surgery. In-hospital complications, 90-day readmissions, and discharge disposition were evaluated. HOOS-JR scores were collected preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated using previously validated anchor-based methods. RESULTS: Using preoperative HOOS-JR thresholds of 40, 50, 60, and 70 points, the percentage of patients who would have been denied surgery was 70.4%, 43.2%, 20.3%, and 8.3%, respectively. For these denied patients, 1-year MCID achievement was 75.9%, 69.0%, 59.1%, and 42.1%, respectively. In-hospital complication rates for approved patients were 3.3%, 3.0%, 2.8%, and 2.7%, while 90-day readmission rates were 5.1%, 4.4%, 4.2%, and 4.1%, respectively. Approved patients had higher MCID achievement (P < .001) but higher nonhome discharge (P = .01) and 90-day readmissions rates (P = .036) than denied patients. CONCLUSION: Most patients achieved MCID at all theoretical PROM thresholds with low complication and readmission rates. Setting preoperative PROM thresholds for THA eligibility did not guarantee clinically successful outcomes.

Poor Patient Compliance Limits the Attainability of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Completion Thresholds for the Comprehensive Care for Joint Arthroplasty Model.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) links patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with hospital reimbursement in some value-based models for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study evaluates PROM reporting compliance and resource utilization using protocol-driven electronic collection of outcomes for commercial and CMS alternative payment models (APMs). METHODS: We analyzed a consecutive series of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from 2016 and 2019. Compliance rates were obtained for reporting hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement (HOOS-JR.), knee disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement (KOOS-JR.), and 12-item short form survey (SF-12) surveys preoperatively and postoperatively at 6-months, 1 year, and 2- years. Of 43,252 THA and TKA patients, 25,315 (58%) were Medicare-only. Direct supply and staff labor costs for PROM collection were obtained. Chi-square testing compared compliance rates between Medicare-only and all-arthroplasty groups. Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) estimated resource utilization for PROM collection. RESULTS: In the Medicare-only cohort, preoperative HOOS-JR./KOOS-JR. compliance was 66.6%. Postoperative HOOS-JR./KOOS-JR. compliance was 29.9%, 46.1%, and 27.8% at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Preoperative SF-12 compliance was 70%. Postoperative SF-12 compliance was 35.9%, 49.6%, and 33.4% at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. Medicare patients had lower PROM compliance than the overall cohort (P < .05) at all time points except preoperative KOOS-JR., HOOS-JR., and SF-12 in TKA patients. The estimated annual cost for PROM collection was $273,682 and the total cost for the entire study period was $986,369. CONCLUSION: Despite extensive experience with APMs and a total expenditure near $1,000,000, our center demonstrated low preoperative and postoperative PROM compliance rates. In order for practices to achieve satisfactory compliance, Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) compensation should be adjusted to reflect the costs associated with collecting these PROMs and CJR target compliance rates should be adjusted to reflect more attainable levels consistent with currently published literature.

Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Thresholds Should Not be Used for Indicating Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: While Medicare requires patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for many quality programs, some commercial insurers are requiring preoperative PROMs when determining eligibility for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Concerns exist that these data may be used to deny TKA to patients above a specific PROM score, but the optimal threshold is unknown. We aimed to evaluate TKA outcomes based on theoretical PROM thresholds. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 25,246 consecutive primary TKA patients from 2016 to 2019. Hypothesized preoperative knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint replacement cutoffs of 40, 50, 60, and 70 points were used. Preoperative scores below each threshold were considered "approved" surgery. Preoperative scores above each threshold were considered "denied" surgery. In-hospital complications, 90-day readmissions, and discharge disposition were evaluated. One-year minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement was calculated using previously validated anchor-based methods. RESULTS: For "denied" patients below thresholds 40, 50, 60, and 70 points, 1-year MCID achievement was 88.3%, 85.9%, 79.6%, and 77%, respectively. In-hospital complication rates for approved patients were 2.2%, 2.3%, 2.1%, and 2.1%, while 90-day readmission rates were 4.6%, 4.5%, 4.3%, and 4.3%, respectively. Approved patients had higher MCID achievement rates (P < .001) for all thresholds but higher nonhome discharge rates than denied patients for thresholds 40 (P < .001), 50 (P = .002), and 60 (P = .024). Approved and denied patients had similar in-hospital complication and 90-day readmission rates. CONCLUSION: Most patients achieved MCID at all theoretical PROMs thresholds with low complication and readmission rates. Setting preoperative PROM thresholds for TKA eligibility can help optimize patient improvement, but such a policy can create access to care barriers for some patients who would otherwise benefit from a TKA.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Octogenarians Compared with Septuagenarians: Is There a Real Difference?

BACKGROUND: The increasing frequency of total hip arthroplasty (THA) as well as an aging population indicate that the need for revision THA will continue to grow, especially in older and potentially medically complex patients. The purpose of this study was to compare THA revision indications, perioperative complications, and readmissions between octogenarian and septuagenarian patients. We hypothesized that patients aged 80 to 89 years would have similar outcomes to patients aged 70 to 79 years undergoing revision THA. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2019, 572 revision THAs were performed at a single tertiary care hospital. Patients were stratified by age group: 70 to 79 years (n = 407) and 80 to 89 years (n = 165). Indication for revision, perioperative medical complications, and 90-day readmission were identified for each patient. Chi-square tests and t-tests were used to compare the groups. Logistic regression was used to assess medical complications and readmissions. RESULTS: Aseptic loosening was a more common indication for revision in patients aged 70 to 79 years (33.4% versus 26.7%; p < 0.001), while periprosthetic fracture was a more common indication for revision in those aged 80 to 89 years (30.9% versus 13.0%). Perioperative medical complications occurred more often in octogenarians (10.9% versus 3.0%; p = 0.001), with arrythmia being the most common type. Patients aged 80 to 89 years were at increased risk for medical complications (odds ratio [OR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 7.3; p = 0.004) and readmission (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.3; p < 0.001) when adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and indication for revision. Octogenarians had a higher rate of reoperation following first-time revision than septuagenarians (10.3% versus 4.2%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians more commonly underwent revision THA for periprosthetic fracture and had higher rates of perioperative medical complications, 90-day readmissions, and reoperations than septuagenarians. Such findings should be considered when counseling patients on both primary and revision THAs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Are Orthopedic Fellowship Programs Giving Out Too Many Interviews? A Retrospective Analysis Suggests They Are.

Background: The orthopedic surgery fellowship match process is associated with substantial stress and expense, yet the optimal number of interviews for fellowships to offer has not been evaluated. Purpose: We sought to evaluate the number of orthopedic surgery fellowship interviews given and construct a model to determine the appropriate number of interviews to offer based on specialty and program size. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 6 orthopedic fellowship specialties; data were obtained from San Francisco Match and covered the 5-year period from 2014 to 2018. The orthopedic fellowship subspecialties included adult reconstruction/oncology, foot and ankle, pediatrics, spine, sports medicine, and trauma. We excluded shoulder and elbow (less than 5 years of data) and hand and upper extremity (alternative matching process). Parameters included number of programs, number of spots per program, number of ranked applicants per program (mean ± SD), and difference in number of interviews offered and ranked applicants per program (mean ± SD). Multiple regression analysis was used to create an equation for determining the optimal number of interviews for the programs. Results: Of 1377 orthopedic fellowship programs analyzed, 1370 (99.50%) conducted interviews beyond the number of ranked applicants. Programs ranked an overall mean of 20.10 ± 10.17 applicants with an overall mean of 11.60 ± 8.62 additional interviews offered. Sports medicine had the highest mean ranked applicants (23.21 ± 9.77) and pediatrics had the lowest mean ranked applicants (15.74 ± 7.76). The most additional interviews were given in adult reconstruction (14.80 ± 9.92) and the least were given in pediatrics (8.32 ± 7.17). The predictive equation was reported as Y = ß1x1 + ß2x2 (Y = ranked applicants, x1 = spots open, and x2 = last rank). Conclusion: Programs in 6 orthopedic subspecialties in the fellowship match process appear to consistently offer more interviews than necessary. We have developed a model to help programs predict the optimal number of fellowship applicants to interview. Future studies need to validate the model, especially with anticipated increases of the virtual interview format.

Patients Who Have Had Three or More Levels Fused During Lumbar Spinal Fusion Have Worse Functional Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spinal fusion (LSF) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) are commonly performed in patients who have concomitant spine and hip pathology. While patients who have three or more levels fused during LSF have increased postoperative opioid consumption after undergoing THA, it is unknown whether the number of levels fused during LSF affects THA functional outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary academic center for patients who underwent LSF first and then had a primary THA performed with a minimum of one-year follow-up for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR). Operative notes were reviewed to determine the number of levels fused during LSF. There were 105 patients who underwent one-level LSF, 55 patients underwent two-level LSF, and 48 patients underwent three-or-more-level LSF. No significant differences existed in age, race, body mass index, and comorbidities between the cohorts. RESULTS: While preoperative HOOS-JR was similar among the three cohorts, patients who had three-or-more-level LSF had significantly lower HOOS-JR scores than patients who had two-level or one-level LSF (71.4 versus 82.4 versus 78.2; P = .010) and a lower delta HOOS-JR (27.2 versus 39.4 versus 35.9; P = .014). Patients who had three-or-more-level LSF had a significantly lower rate of achieving minimal clinically important difference (61.7% versus 87.2% versus 78.7%; P = .011) and the patient acceptable symptom state (37.5% versus 69.1% versus 59.0%; P = .004) for the HOOS-JR, compared to patients who had two-level or one-level LSF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should counsel patients who have had three-or-more-level LSF that they may have a lower rate of hip function improvement and symptom acceptability after THA, compared to patients who have had a less number of levels fused during LSF.

Acetabular Retroversion: Dysplasia in Disguise that Leads to Early Arthritis of the Hip.

We aimed to assess the prevalence of acetabular retroversion (AR) in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THA) based on age. We retrospectively compared preoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of patients younger than 40 years of age who underwent THA with the age- and body mass index-matched control of 40 years and older patients. Retroversion was determined based on the presence of cross-over sign, ischial spine sign, posterior wall sign, and elephant's ear sign with data stratified based on presence of dysplasia.

Activity Measure for Post-acute Care Mobility Scoring System: Comparison of Nursing and Physical Therapy Evaluation for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing resource utilization after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has become increasingly vital. The Activity Measure for Post-acute Care (AM-PAC) "6-clicks" scoring system is a validated, physical therapist (PT)-administered metric of patient basic mobility and predicts discharge disposition. This study aimed to determine whether the use of AM-PAC scoring by nurses in the postoperative period could (1) substitute for AM-PAC scoring by therapists and (2) predict 90-day outcomes in TJA patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all primary TJAs conducted by two surgeons at a single institution from 2019 to 2021. Patients underwent postoperative AM-PAC evaluation by nursing and physical therapy within 24 hours of surgery, and specific timing of nursing and PT scores was determined. Inter-rater reliability between therapy and nursing scores was analyzed. Multiple regression was used to determine the association between AM-PAC scores and readmissions, complications, length of stay, and nonhome discharge. RESULTS: In total, 1,119 patients were included. Agreement testing between therapy and nursing scores was weak for all six AM-PAC components, with a Spearman correlation of 0.437. Nursing scores were typically conducted earlier than therapist scores (204.0 ± 249.9 minutes versus 523.5 ± 449.4 minutes; P < 0.001). Therapy and nursing scores were not notable predictors for 90-day complications or readmissions. However, higher therapy and nursing scores were predictors of less than 2-day hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.63, P < 0.001; OR 0.88, P < 0.001) and fewer nonhome discharges (OR 0.62, P < 0.001; OR 0.84, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although nursing-driven mobility assessments could potentially improve efficiency of patient discharge and control costs, nursing AM-PAC scoring did not serve as an appropriate substitute for PT scoring in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty at our institution.

Lateral femoral distraction is a safe and necessary adjunct for articulator visualization during the operative treatment of tibial plateau fractures.

Introduction: Recent evidence suggests use of lateral femoral distractor (LFD) to aid in visualization during surgery for tibial plateau fractures (TPF) may result in an unacceptably high rate of iatrogenic peroneal nerve palsy. We sought to evaluate femoral distractor use for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of TPF and quantify the incidence of peroneal nerve palsy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all patients undergoing ORIF of TPF between 2014 and 2019 by a single fellowship trained orthopaedic traumatologist at a single Level 1 trauma center. Inclusion criteria were use of a LFD during ORIF of TPF. Exclusion criteria were preoperative neurovascular injury in the operative extremity and distraction via pre-existing external fixator. Parameters included patient demographic variables, intraoperative techniques, postoperative outcomes, and fracture classification. Documented clinical exam was used to evaluate peroneal nerve status and injuries were classified as complete or incomplete. Incomplete injuries were classified as sensory or motor. Results: Of 303 patients undergoing ORIF for a TPF, femoral distraction was used in 254 (83.8%) cases, with 201 utilizing applied intraoperative femoral distraction and 53 utilizing pre-existing knee-spanning external fixation for distraction. Three patients were excluded for preoperative sensory peroneal nerve palsy with 175 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The most common fracture type was lateral split depression (n = 130). Zero patients developed complete or incomplete peroneal nerve palsy. Discussion: Our study found no incidence of peroneal nerve palsy when using lateral femoral distraction. This study supports the utilization of lateral distraction for articular visualization and reduction during ORIF of TPF.

Cumulative Intraarticular Injections Are Not a Risk Factor for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: While injections within 90 days prior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are associated with an increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), there is a paucity of literature regarding the impact of cumulative injections on PJI risk. This study was conducted to assess the association between cumulative corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid (HA) injections and PJI risk following TKA. METHODS: This retrospective study using an injection database included patients undergoing TKA with a minimum 1-year follow-up from 2015 to 2020. Patients with injections within 90 days prior to surgery were excluded. The sum of corticosteroid and HA injections within five years prior to TKA was recorded. The primary outcome was PJI within 90 days following TKA. Area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated for a cumulative number of injections. RESULTS: 648 knees with no injections and 672 knees with injections prior to TKA were included, among whom 243 received corticosteroids, 151 received HA, and 278 received both. No significant differences in early PJI rates existed between patients who received injections (0.60%) or not (0.93%) (P = .541). No significant differences existed in early PJI rates between patients injected with corticosteroids (0.82%), HA (0.66%), or both (0.36%) (P = .832). No cutoff number of injections was predictive for PJI. DISCUSSION: A cumulative amount of steroid or HA injections, if given more than 90 days prior to TKA, does not appear to increase the risk of PJI within 90 days postoperatively. Multiple intraarticular corticosteroid injections and HA injections may be safely administered before TKA, without increased risk for early PJI.

Aspirin Administered for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis May Protect Against Stiffness Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin has become the main agent for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study assessed whether aspirin is associated with less knee stiffness compared to warfarin and other chemoprophylaxis agents. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all primary and revision TKAs performed between January 2009 and October 2020 at a high volume institution. Demographics, comorbidity data, and operative variables were extracted from medical records. VTE prophylaxis administered during this time period included aspirin, warfarin, and "others" (factor Xa, unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin, fondaparinux, adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor, and direct thrombin inhibitor). The primary outcome assessed was manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) performed within 6 months of index surgery. Secondary outcome included major bleeding events. Univariate followed by multivariate regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 15,903 cases were included in the study, of which 531 (3.3%) patients developed stiffness that required MUA. The rates of MUA were 2.7% (251/9223) for patients receiving aspirin, 4.2% (238/5709) for patients receiving warfarin, and 4.3% (42/971) for all others (P's < .001). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed that aspirin is associated with lower rates of VTE compared to warfarin (adjusted odds ratio 1.423, 95% confidence interval 1.158-1.747, P < .001) and compared to other anticoagulation medications (adjusted odds ratio 1.742, 95% confidence interval 1.122-2.704, P = .013). Major bleeding events were also significantly lower in patients who received aspirin compared to the other 2 groups (P's = .001). CONCLUSION: Aspirin prophylaxis is associated with lower rates of MUA following TKA compared to warfarin and other VTE chemoprophylactic agents when grouped together.

Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients With Body Mass Index ≥35 kg/m2: A Contemporary Analysis of 812 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to have higher failure rates in obese patients, and cementless TKA may provide more durable fixation. This study compared outcomes and survivorship of obese patients undergoing cemented and cementless TKA of the same modern design. METHODS: We identified a consecutive series of 406 primary cementless TKA performed in obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 in 2013-2018. Each case was matched 1:1 with 406 cemented TKA based on age, sex, BMI, bearing surface, and year of surgery. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Short Form-12 were collected preoperatively, at 6 months and 2 years. Implant survivorship was recorded at mean 4.0 years (range 2.0-7.8). RESULTS: There was no difference in mean BMI between the cemented (38.6 ± 3.4 kg/m2; range, 35-60) and cementless cohorts (38.7 ± 3.3 kg/m2; range, 35-54; P = .706). Both groups had similar final postoperative scores and improvement in scores at 2 years. Furthermore, a similar percentage met the minimal clinically important difference (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, 70.0% vs 71.2%, P = .700; Short Form-12 Physical, 74.1% vs 70.4%, P = .240). Both groups demonstrated high 7-year survivorship free from aseptic revision (99.0% vs 99.5%, P = .665). CONCLUSION: Obese patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 undergoing cementless and cemented TKA of the same modern design had similar outcomes and survivorship at early to mid-term follow-up. Continued surveillance of this high-risk population is necessary.

A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis of Simultaneous Versus Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although studies have compared the claims costs of simultaneous and staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whether a simultaneous procedure is cost-effective to the facility remains unknown. This study aimed to compare facility costs and perioperative outcomes of simultaneous vs staged bilateral THA and TKA. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 560 bilateral THA (170 staged and 220 simultaneous) and 777 bilateral TKA (163 staged and 451 simultaneous). Itemized facility costs were calculated using time-driven activity-based costing. Ninety-day outcomes were compared. Margin was standardized to unadjusted Medicare Diagnosis Related Group payments (simultaneous, $18,523; staged, $22,386). Multivariate regression was used to determine the independent association between costs/clinical outcomes and treatment strategy (staged vs simultaneous). RESULTS: Simultaneous bilateral patients had significantly lower personnel, supply, and total facility costs compared with staged patients with no difference in 90-day complications between the groups. Multivariate analyses showed that overall facility costs were $1,210 lower in simultaneous bilateral THA (P < .001) and $704 lower in TKA (P < .001). Despite lower costs, margin for the facility was lower in the simultaneous group ($6,569 vs $9,225 for THA; $6,718 vs $10,067 for TKA; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous bilateral TKA and THA had lower facility costs than staged procedures because of savings associated with a single hospitalization. With the increased Medicare reimbursement for 2 unilateral procedures, however, margin was higher for staged procedures. In the era of value-based care, policymakers should not penalize facilities for performing cost-effective simultaneous bilateral arthroplasty in appropriately selected patients.

Orthopedic Specialty Hospital Reasons for Transfer and Subsequent Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Surgical specialty hospitals provide patients, surgeons, and staff with a streamlined approach to elective surgery but may not be equipped to handle all complications arising postoperatively. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immediate postoperative and 90-day outcomes of patients who were transferred from a high-volume specialty hospital following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: All patients who were admitted to one orthopedic specialty hospital for primary THA or TKA between January 2015 and December 2019, and subsequently transferred to a tertiary care hospital, were identified and propensity matched to nontransferred patients. Emergency department visits, complications, readmissions, mortality, and revisions within 90 days of surgery were identified for each group. RESULTS: There were 26 TKAs (0.78%) and 20 THAs (0.48%) transferred, representing 0.62% of all primary THAs and TKAs performed over the study duration. Arrhythmia and chest pain were the most common reasons for transfer. Ninety-day readmissions were significantly higher in the transfer group (15.2% vs 4.3%, P = .020) with an odds ratio for readmission after transfer of 3.9 (95% confidence interval 1.3-12.4). Overall complications and orthopedic complications did not differ significantly, although transferred patients had a higher rate of medical complications (13.0% vs 2.2%, P = .008) with an odds ratio of 6.7 (95% confidence interval 1.6-28.2). CONCLUSION: Transfer from a specialty hospital is rarely required following primary TKA and THA. Although not at increased risk for orthopedic complications, these transferred patients are at increased risk for readmissions and medical complications within the first 90 days of their care, necessitating increased vigilance.

Total Hip and Knee Revisions are Really Outpatient Procedures? Implications of the Removal From the Inpatient Only List.

BACKGROUND: In 2021, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) removed over 200 procedures from the Inpatient Only (IPO) list including revision total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasties (TKA). The purpose of this study is to determine if some revision TKA and THA procedures may be appropriate for outpatient status. METHODS: We reviewed a consecutive series of 1026 revision THA and TKA patients at our tertiary academic institution from 2015 to 2020. An outpatient procedure was defined as a length of stay of <2 midnights. We queried our prospectively collected arthroplasty database and compared demographics, comorbidities, surgical indication, type of procedure, discharge disposition, readmissions, and complications between the outpatient and inpatient groups. RESULTS: There were only 166 revision patients (16%) who met outpatient criteria. Revision THA outpatients were more likely to have a head and liner exchange (49% vs 25%, P < .001) and an indication of instability (93% vs 44%, P < .001). Revision TKA outpatients were more likely to have an isolated liner exchange (34% vs 14%, P < .001) and have an indication of instability (67% vs 25%, P < .001). Patients undergoing a revision for infection and aseptic loosening were more likely to require an inpatient stay than other revision indication (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The vast majority of revision TKA and THA patients met CMS inpatient criteria. In addition to a projected decrease in facility reimbursement, concerns exist for the safety of early discharge and access to care for these complex patients if CMS removes all revisions from the Inpatient Only list.