Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Child Abuse Negl ; 35(12): 979-89, 2011 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22054698

RESUMO

The UN Committee on the Rights of the Child established CRC General Comment 13 (April 2011) to address today's unabating high rates of violence against children globally despite CRC advances. GC13 provides clear interpretations and stronger detail to supplement the legal language of CRC Article 19, intended to establish protection of children from all forms of violence. Through GC13, the Committee seeks to strengthen policy and practice implementation for all children, including every nation's most vulnerable, by clearly establishing measurable indicators: structure, process and outcomes to children-through improved technical information, expertise and assistance. Based on knowledge and experience gained over the 22 years since the CRC was adopted, GC13 advances best practice approaches and technical resources for States Parties and professionals on preventing violence against children, and on strengthening protection programs, systems, services, research, monitoring, evaluation and reporting. This article addresses child rights and protection issues which have been raised during this period, as well as during the consultation and resulting dialogues, such as the rights of children in early/forced marriage, and the role of the State Party as responsible caregiver when parents or families are not capable of providing protection.


Assuntos
Proteção da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Violência , Criança , Defesa da Criança e do Adolescente/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde Global , Direitos Humanos , Humanos , Casamento , Nações Unidas/legislação & jurisprudência , Violência/legislação & jurisprudência , Violência/prevenção & controle
2.
Child Abuse Negl ; 34(1): 45-56, 2010 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20060588

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify which United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) recommended child protection (CP) measures, such as policy, reporting systems, and services for child abuse and neglect (CAN) victims, individually or in combination, were most important in establishing a basic level of child protection in 42 countries; and (2) to assess whether these measures were necessary or sufficient to achieve basic child protection in developing and industrialized countries. METHOD: Child protection and/or rights expert respondents from 42 countries completed a questionnaire on CRC Article 19 (CRC19) required CP measures implementation and rated their country's effectiveness in implementation, the current level of effectiveness of child protection, and the relevance of improvements in child protection since the CRC was adopted in 1989. Information from the Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding Observations, as well as UNICEF and WHO indicators on child health and protection issues were used to check and supplement responses. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was used to identify child protection measure implementation effectiveness. RESULTS: Results indicate that child protection judged as comparatively more successful among study countries is a result of having the following measures in place from two types of social programs: a CP infrastructure (legislation plus services) and at least one information-based intervention support program. CONCLUSIONS: Fourteen (33%) countries were determined to have established at least a basic CP system toward protection of children from violence and maltreatment. These countries reported having the three required elements described above. The study reinforces the need for governments to take a systems approach to child protection, including policy/legislation, information-based programs and social services, as well as professional training and public awareness raising. The top-ranked countries included: Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Estonia, Germany, Italy, Jordan, Lebanon, Malaysia, Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Governments need to establish CP systems with multiple, well-integrated, effective CP measures as elaborated above, working with trained professionals and also raising public awareness to ensure successful protection for all children in every country. Partial measures are not effective. Further, in addition to establishing, implementing, and evaluating the effectiveness of professional interventions, the actual outcomes for children, not studied or reported on here, need to be the priority focus for child protection going forward.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis/legislação & jurisprudência , Maus-Tratos Infantis/prevenção & controle , Defesa da Criança e do Adolescente/legislação & jurisprudência , Proteção da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Países em Desenvolvimento , Regulamentação Governamental , Nações Unidas , Violência/legislação & jurisprudência , Violência/prevenção & controle , Criança , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Serviços de Saúde da Criança/organização & administração , Comparação Transcultural , Humanos , Notificação de Abuso , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA