Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Biomedicines ; 12(6)2024 Jun 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38927561

RESUMO

We explored differences in the DNA methylation statuses of PSMA6, PSMB5, HIF1A, and KEAP1 gene promoter regions in patients with type 1 diabetes and different diabetic retinopathy (DR) stages. Study subjects included individuals with no DR (NDR, n = 41), those with non-proliferative DR (NPDR, n = 27), and individuals with proliferative DR or those who underwent laser photocoagulation (PDR/LPC, n = 46). DNA methylation was determined by Zymo OneStep qMethyl technique. The methylation of PSMA6 (NDR 5.9 (3.9-8.7) %, NPDR 4.5 (3.8-5.7) %, PDR/LPC 6.6 (4.7-10.7) %, p = 0.003) and PSMB5 (NDR 2.2 (1.9-3.7) %, NPDR 2.2 (1.9-3.0) %, PDR/LPC 3.2 (2.5-7.1) %, p < 0.01) differed across the groups. Consistent correlations were observed between the methylation levels of HIF1A and PSMA6 in all study groups. DNA methylation levels of PSMA6, PSMB5, and HIF1A genes were positively correlated with the duration of diabetes, HbA1c, and albuminuria in certain study groups. Univariate regression models revealed a significant association between the methylation level z-scores of PSMA6, PSMB5, and HIF1A and severe DR (PSMA6: OR = 1.96 (1.15; 3.33), p = 0.013; PSMB5: OR = 1.90 (1.14; 3.16), p = 0.013; HIF1A: OR = 3.19 (1.26; 8.06), p = 0.014). PSMB5 remained significantly associated with DR in multivariate analysis. Our findings suggest significant associations between the severity of DR and the DNA methylation levels of the genes PSMA6, PSMB5, and HIF1A, but not KEAP1 gene.

2.
PeerJ ; 10: e13715, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35873915

RESUMO

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common complication of diabetes, being the most prevalent reason for blindness among the working-age population in the developed world. Despite constant improvement of understanding of the pathogenesis of DR, identification of novel biomarkers of DR is needed for improvement of patient risk stratification and development of novel prevention and therapeutic approaches. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is the primary protein quality control system responsible for recognizing and degrading of damaged proteins. This review aims to summarize literature data on modifications of UPS in diabetes and DR. First, we briefly review the structure and functions of UPS in physiological conditions. We then describe how UPS is involved in the development and progression of diabetes and touch upon the association of UPS genetic factors with diabetes and its complications. Further, we focused on the effect of diabetes-induced hyperglycemia, oxidative stress and hypoxia on UPS functioning, with examples of studies on DR. In other sections, we discussed the association of several other mechanisms of DR (endoplasmic reticulum stress, neurodegeneration etc) with UPS modifications. Finally, UPS-affecting drugs and remedies are reviewed. This review highlights UPS as a promising target for the development of therapies for DR prevention and treatment and identifies gaps in existing knowledge and possible future study directions.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Experimental , Retinopatia Diabética , Animais , Humanos , Citoplasma/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/tratamento farmacológico , Retinopatia Diabética/etiologia , Complexo de Endopeptidases do Proteassoma/metabolismo , Ubiquitina/metabolismo
3.
J Clin Med ; 11(10)2022 May 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35628895

RESUMO

The aim of the study was to compare telomere lengths and circulating proteasome concentrations in patients with different stages of diabetic retinopathy and type 1 diabetes in Latvia and Lithuania. Methods. Patients with no diabetic retinopathy and with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy were included in the NDR/NPDR group (n = 187). Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy and status post laser-photocoagulation were included int the PDR/LPC group (n = 119). Telomeres were evaluated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Proteasome concentration was measured by ELISA. Results. Telomeres were longer in PDR/LPC (ΔCT 0.21 (0.12−0.28)) vs. NDR/NPDR (ΔCT 0.18 (0.1−0.28)), p = 0.036. In NDR/NPDR, telomeres were correlated negatively with age (R = −0.17, p = 0.019), BMI (R = −0.21, p = 0.004), waist/hip ratio (R = −0.21, p = 0.005), total cholesterol (R = −0.18, p = 0.021), and low-density cholesterol (R = −0.20, p = 0.010), and positively with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (R = 0.28, p < 0.001). None of the above correlations were observed in PRD/LPC. Proteasome concentrations were lower in PDR/LPC (130 (90−210) ng/mL) vs. NDR/NPDR (150 (100−240) ng/mL), p = 0.024. This correlated negatively with eGFR (R = −0.17, p = 0.025) in the NDR/NPDR group and positively with age (R = 0.23, p = 0.014) and systolic blood pressure (R = 0.20, p = 0.032) in the PRD/LPC group. Telomere lengths did not correlate with proteasome concentrations. Conclusion. Longer telomeres and lower circulating proteasome concentrations are observed in patients with type 1 diabetes and advanced diabetic retinopathy.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA