Hunter and New England HealthPathways: a 4-year journey of integrated care.

Objective This paper describes the 4-year journey of Hunter and New England HealthPathways - a password-protected web-based portal designed to provide localised evidence-informed clinical and referral information to support general practice at the point of care. Methods A process evaluation was conducted in 2013, with a case study comparison performed in 2014 to assess impact of HealthPathways on patient referral and access to specialist care, followed by a review in 2016 of utilisation of the online portal to assess whether healthcare providers continued to access HealthPathways. Results Increased utilisation was correlated with an increase in the number of pathways published online. Clinical leadership and the process of developing pathways built relationships between primary care and specialist teams. Case studies indicated that a comprehensive approach to pathway implementation accompanied by service redesign resulted in higher pathway use and improved access to specialist care. Senior management support and a formal partnership between major health care providers led to strong governance of HealthPathways and the delivery of other integrated care initiatives. There was significant growth in utilisation over the 4 years, increasing to an average of 6679 sessions per month in 2016 and more general practices reported use of HealthPathways. Conclusions HealthPathways is a vehicle for building strong foundations to support system change and integrated care. The critical elements for acceptability, growth and sustainability are the strong relationships between primary care and specialist clinicians, as well as formal partnerships that are built from the processes used to develop HealthPathways. What is known about the topic? HealthPathways and similar web-based evidence-informed guidelines aimed at improving system integration are increasing in Australia. There are few published papers that describe approaches to inform the ongoing implementation of such programs. What does this paper add? This paper describes iterative methodology for evaluating complex programs, such as HealthPathways, that identifies the critical factors required to build sustainable models of integrated care. What are the implications for practitioners? The 4-year experience of Hunter and New England HealthPathways provides an approach to improve the implementation, sustainability and spread of similar programs and associated integrated care initiatives.

Skin antiseptics and the risk of operating theatre fires.

BACKGROUND: Following press reports of patients catching fire or receiving chemical burns in the operating theatre, a review was conducted on the flammability of skin antiseptics. The purpose of the paper was to clarify confusion regarding povidine-iodine (Betadine), which had been reported as being flammable, and also to determine the use of alcohol-based solutions in the Hunter Area Health Service. A risk assessment was conducted and risk reduction strategies outlined. METHODS: Risk assessment was made following a literature review and an audit of 10 operating theatres in the Hunter Area Health Service. RESULTS: Risk for operating room fires from alcohol-based skin antiseptics was confirmed. Antiseptics in aqueous solutions only smoulder. The Hunter Health survey indicated that although alcohol-based solutions were not used in operating theatres, they were used in anaesthetic bays for insertion of epidural and central line catheters. Strategies to reduce the risk of fire include discontinuation of use of alcohol-based skin antiseptics in operating theatres; using fire retardant surgical drapes; installing over-current protection devices on electrical equipment; minimizing flammable conditions by avoiding nitrous oxide and using the lowest required concentration of inspired oxygen; use of non-flammable cuffed endotracheal tubes; education and training of operating theatre personnel in fire hazards. CONCLUSIONS: Operating theatre fires continue to be a major risk for patient safety. In order to reduce this risk, the strategies outlined here should be followed.

Elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a seven-year experience.

INTRODUCTION: The seven-year experience of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair of a vascular surgical unit in a teaching hospital was reviewed to determine the factors associated with in-hospital mortality. METHODS: All patients who underwent elective open repair of an AAA between July 1, 1991, and June 30, 1998, were identified using International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Twenty-four variables were selected for investigation by reviewing the published literature and by discussion with local vascular surgeons. Data were obtained by retrospective medical record review. Variables were first analysed by univariate analysis, and those with a p-value up to 0.25 were included in multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the 219 patients reviewed, 8 (3.7%, 95% confidence interval, 1.6%, 7.1%) died during the admission. The mean age of patients was 69.9 years, and 81% of them were male. Univariate analysis found that female sex, renal artery involvement in the aneurysm, and aortic cross-clamp duration of 90 min or greater were significantly associated with mortality. Multivariate analysis found that female sex, use of a bifurcated graft, and performance of an additional procedure at the time of operation were the only variables independently associated with mortality. DISCUSSION: Use of a bifurcated graft was a significant prognostic variable on logistic regression analysis confirming that the technical difficulty of the operation and the morphology of the aneurysm are important factors in determining mortality. Why women may be at higher risk for death is unclear. This study also highlights that caution is required when interpreting raw audit data.