Retrospective Analysis of Specimen Quality in Temporal Artery Biopsies for Giant Cell Arteritis and Disease Association in North Midlands, England.

Background Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is the recommended index diagnostic method for giant cell arteritis (GCA). Per the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) guidelines, we assessed our procedural performance. Additionally, we evaluated the occurrence of GCA diagnosis in immunosuppressed patients and other comorbidities. Methods Following the audit registration, a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted from 2017 to 2022 at a large university hospital in North Midlands, England. Data on demographics and comorbidities were gathered. The study's primary outcome was adherence to BSR guidelines and our service provisions. Secondary outcomes included examining the relationship between biopsy-confirmed GCA and other comorbidities. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 29 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, New York, United States of America). Two-sample t-test and Chi-square/Fisher exact test were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Holm-Bonferroni method was incorporated to adjust for multiple comparisons. Results A total of 156 patients who underwent temporal artery biopsy (TAB) were included in the study, with a male-to-female ratio of 0.44:1. The median age was 73. Among the patients, 19% were smokers. The procedures were performed by either a vascular surgeon (119, 76%) or by an ophthalmologist (37, 24%). Two-thirds of the patients underwent TAB within seven days of referral. In 73, 47% of cases, the post-fixation biopsy sample size exceeded 10 mm. Positive biopsy results were found in 45 patients (29%). GCA was confirmed in 39% of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), 24% with diabetics, 20% with hypothyroidism, 29% with hypertension, 32% with hyperlipidaemia, and 26% with other inflammatory diseases. However, the p-value was below the statistically significant threshold. The biopsy outcome was also not dependent on the speciality, time from referral to biopsy, nor on the length of the post-fixation specimen. Conclusions Temporal artery biopsy remains a valuable and crucial diagnostic tool in challenging equivocal cases of giant cell arteritis (GCA), although it is limited by its sensitivity, but there is also room for improvement. There is still uncertainty regarding the relationship between biopsy positivity, post-fixation sample size, and the interval between referral and procedure. Additionally, the speciality of the clinician performing the biopsy does not appear to significantly influence the likelihood of a positive result. We still do not fully understand why this is, but the association of the GCA with other comorbidities was unpredictably insignificant.

Reconfiguring the health-promoting hospital: the role of chaplaincy in England.

This paper seeks to explore how hospitals can be reconfigured to adopt more 'health-promoting' approaches and values. Specifically, the paper focuses on the role of hospital chaplaincy and argues that spiritual care should be considered alongside other health domains. Using semi-structured interviews, the aim of the paper is to explore the experiences of patients who accepted (n = 10) and declined (n = 10) hospital chaplaincy services. Data were analysed drawing on principles of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). The findings suggested that participants who accessed chaplaincy services reported using the chaplains for pastoral, religious and spiritual care which contributed positively to their sense of well-being. This included religious rituals and supportive conversations. The majority of these participants had existing links with a faith institution. Participants who declined chaplaincy services reported having personal religious or spiritual beliefs. Other reasons cited, included: that the offer was made close to discharge; they had different support mechanisms; they were unaware of what the chaplaincy service offered. Participants identified a number of skills and attributes they associated with chaplains. They perceived them as being religious but available to all, somebody to talk to who was perceived as impartial with a shared knowledge and understanding. The paper concludes by highlighting the important role of chaplaincy as part of a holistic health-promoting hospital. This has implications not only for the design, delivery and promotion of chaplaincy services but also for health promotion more broadly to consider spiritual needs.

A state health service and funded religious care.

This paper analyses the role chaplaincy plays in providing religious and spiritual care in the UK's National Health Service. The approach considers both the current practice of chaplains and also the wider changes in society around beliefs and public service provision. Amid a small but growing literature about spirituality, health and illness, I shall argue that the role of the chaplain is changing and that such change is creating pressures on the identity and performance of the chaplain as a religiously authorised health worker. I shall question whether either orthodox belief or religious belonging have any significant bearing on the patients' demand for chaplaincy services. Utilising an example of chaplaincy work I shall argue that patient need constitutes the strongest platform for both practice development and an articulated understanding of what chaplains bring to health care. Drawing on a case study the definition and interpretation of spiritual need will be discussed in relation to chaplaincy practice. In conclusion, I shall set out the case for effective research to establish with greater precision the detail of the chaplain's practice within a state-funded health system.

Nursing attitudes towards recording of religious and spiritual data.

Poor recording of patients' religious and spiritual information is known anecdotally and occasionally referred to in publications. Chaplains in particular encounter lack of data entries or errors in records on a routine basis. While novel forms of spiritual assessment have been discussed, the only previously published United Kingdom research on nurses' responses to patients' spiritual needs uses the approach of critical incident analysis. This article reports on the findings of a nurse focus group used to generate issues likely to resonate with staff as to why poor assessment and recording occurs. Apart from clinical factors, nurses cited the intrusiveness of questions about spirituality and the feeling that assessment was 'unnecessary' as major reasons for non-recording. The most significant finding was the correlation between clinical area and the incidence of assessment. Nurses who admitted patients and always asked for religious and spiritual information were three times more likely to work in complex clinical areas. Further training is indicated as most likely to enhance accurate recording. More research is needed to establish whether these findings are matched in practice, and to identify whether the results found in one teaching hospital are equally true for other types of hospital in the UK.