Provider Perceptions of Antibiotic Initiation Strategies for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia.

Background: The practice of rapidly initiating antibiotic therapy for patients with suspected infection has recently been criticized yet remains commonplace. Provider comfort level has been an understudied aspect of this practice. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that there would be no significant differences in provider comfort level between the two treatment groups. Methods: We prospectively surveyed critical care intensivists who provided care for patients enrolled in the Trial of Antibiotic Restraint in Presumed Pneumonia (TARPP), which was a multicenter cluster-randomized crossover trial that evaluated an immediate antibiotic initiation protocol compared with a protocol of specimen-initiated antibiotic initiation in ventilated patients with suspected new-onset pneumonia. At the end of each enrollment arm, physicians at each center were surveyed regarding their overall comfort level with the recently completed treatment arm, and perception of adherence. Both a paired and unpaired analysis was performed. Results: We collected 51 survey responses from 31 unique participants. Providers perceived a higher rate of adherence to the immediate initiation arm than the specimen-initiated arm (Always Adherent: 37.5% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.045). Providers were less comfortable waiting for objective evidence of infection in the specimen-initiated arm than with starting antibiotic agents immediately (Very Comfortable: 83.3% vs. 40.7%; p = 0.004). For the smaller paired analysis, there was no longer a difference in comfort level. Conclusions: There may be differences in provider comfort levels and perceptions of adherence when considering two different antibiotic initiation strategies for suspected pneumonia in ventilated patients. These findings should be considered when planning future studies.

Lessons Learned: Utilization of a Reference Laboratory for Targeted Sequencing of Pediatric Tumors at a Single Institution.

Our study aims to report the prevalence of potentially actionable oncogenic variants in a sample of pediatric tumors from a single institution using a reference laboratory for tumor profiling. We investigated genomic alterations and immunotherapy biomarkers such a tumor mutation burden, microsatellite instability, and programmed death-ligand 1. Patients treated in the Cook Children's Health Care System who had tumor profiling performed by Foundation Medicine between January 1, 2013, and May 1, 2019, were included. Demographic variables, results of tumor profiling, and subsequent use of targeted therapies were captured. Eighty-one patients were in our final data set; patients had diagnoses of central nervous system tumors (n=5), leukemia and lymphoma (n=4), neuroblastoma (n=32), and other solid tumors (n=40). One or more genomic alterations were identified in 68 (84%) of patients, 34 of which had potential targeted therapies available. In all, 44/51 patients tested for tumor mutation burden had low tumor burden, and the rest had intermediate burden. All 41 patients tested for microsatellite instability status were microsatellite stable. Six of 34 patients tested for programmed death-ligand 1 status were positive. Twelve patients received targeted therapy. This study highlights a subset of pediatric tumors harboring targetable genetic alterations and describes the use of a reference laboratory for tumor profiling.

Multidisciplinary Multiagent Treatment of Complex Lymphatic Anomalies with Severe Bone Disease: A Single-Site Experience.

Background: Complex lymphatic anomalies (CLA) are a group of conditions that pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their rarity and overlapping clinical findings. This case series describes the complex pathology and novel combination therapies of three patients diagnosed with various types of CLA. Methods and Results: A retrospective review of medical records was performed for three patients treated for CLA between 2011 and 2019. Diagnostics, imaging, treatment, and follow-up were reviewed in the electronic medical record and combined with the literature review within the analysis. One patient had involvement of her skull base and ear canals, diagnosed after ear canal abnormalities were detected on computed tomography following meningitis. The second patient had involvement of her posterior ribs and T7-T12 vertebral bodies, with thoracic instability requiring a back brace. The third patient had involvement of his left lower extremity and hemipelvis, necessitating a left above the knee amputation. Case 1 progressed on sirolimus and pamidronate but responded to zoledronic acid (ZA). She developed flares of coagulopathy and cellulitis that required reinforcement with vincristine and steroid pulses. Similarly, case 2 progressed on sirolimus and ZA alone, but achieved stable disease with added vincristine. Upon further disease progression, stabilization was obtained by the reinforcement of ZA. Case 3 required a combination of surgery as well as medical management with sirolimus and pamidronate. All three patients now have stable disease. Conclusion: This case series depicts a multidisciplinary and multiagent approach to the management of CLA with severe bony involvement using sirolimus, bisphosphonates, vincristine, and steroids.