A Novel Use of the "3-Day Rule": Post-discharge Methadone Dosing in the Emergency Department.

Introduction: Methadone is a medically necessary and lifesaving medication for many patients with opioid use disorder. To adequately address these patients' needs, methadone should be offered in the hospital, but barriers exist that limit its continuation upon discharge. The code of federal regulations allows for methadone dosing as an inpatient as well as outpatient dispensing for up to three days to facilitate linkage to treatment. As a quality initiative, we created a new workflow for discharging patients on methadone to return to the emergency department (ED) for uninterrupted dosing. Methods: Our addiction medicine team changed hospital methadone policy to better allow hospitalization as a window of opportunity to start methadone. This necessitated the creation of a warm-handoff process to link patients to methadone clinics if that linkage could not happen immediately on discharge. Thus, our team created the "ED Bridge" process, which uses the "3-day rule" to dispense methadone from the ED post hospital discharge. We then followed every patient we directed through this workflow as an observational cohort for outcomes and trends. Results: Of the patients for whom ED bridge dosing was planned, 40.4% completed all bridge dosing and an additional 17.3% received at least one but not all bridge doses. Established methadone patients made up 38.1% of successful linkages, and 61.9% were patients who were newly started on methadone in the hospital. Conclusion: Improving methadone as a treatment option remains an ongoing issue for policymakers and advocates. Our ED bridge workflow allows us to expand access and continuation of methadone now using existing laws and regulations, and to better use hospitals as a point of entry into methadone treatment.

The substance use intervention team: A hospital-based intervention and outpatient clinic to improve care for patients with substance use disorders.

PURPOSE: In response to the opioid crisis, public health advocates urge hospitals to perform substance use disorder (SUD) screening, brief intervention, discharge planning with referral to treatment, and naloxone education. Universal screening makes specialized treatment available to all patients and decreases stigma around SUDs, allowing patients and providers to address SUDs during their hospitalization. Additionally, hospital and emergency department-initiated medications to treat SUD improve patient engagement with treatment and decrease opioid use, and use of medications for opioid use disorder after nonfatal overdoses decreases mortality. SUMMARY: A substance use intervention team (SUIT) service was established to offer universal screening and consultation by an interdisciplinary team at our urban academic medical center. The SUIT program provides inpatient consultation services as well as medical and behavioral clinic visits to transition patients to long-term treatment and is comprised of physicians, nurse practitioners, a clinical pharmacist, social workers, and a nurse. Successes attributed to enhanced medication use as a function of having a designated pharmacist as an integral member of the team are highlighted. Our medical center initiated screening efforts in tandem with its interdisciplinary team and clinic. The team attempts to start appropriately selected patients with SUD on medications for SUD while hospitalized. From January through December 2018, 87.2% of patients admitted to the hospital received initial SUD screening. Of the patients who screened positive, 1,400 received a brief intervention by a unit social worker; the SUIT service was consulted on 880 patients, and multiple medications for SUD were started during inpatient care. CONCLUSION: A screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment service was successfully implemented in our hospital, with the SUIT program in place to provide interdisciplinary addiction care and initiate medications for SUD in appropriate patients.

Take-Home Naloxone Program Implementation: Lessons Learned From Seven Chicago-Area Hospitals.

Despite consensus recommendations from the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the surgeon general to dispense naloxone to discharged ED patients at risk for opioid overdose, there remain numerous logistic, financial, and administrative barriers to implementing "take-home naloxone" programs at individual hospitals. This article describes the recent collective experience of 7 Chicago-area hospitals in implementing take-home naloxone programs. We highlight key barriers, such as hesitancy from hospital administrators, lack of familiarity with relevant rules and regulations in regard to medication dispensing, and inability to secure a supply of naloxone for dispensing. We also highlight common facilitators of success, such as early identification of a "C-suite" champion and the formation of a multidisciplinary team of program leaders. Finally, we provide recommendations that will assist emergency departments planning to implement their own take-home naloxone programs and will inform policymakers of specific needs that may facilitate dissemination of naloxone to the public.

An outbreak of severe coagulopathy from synthetic cannabinoids tainted with Long-Acting anticoagulant rodenticides.

Objective: To describe a large regional poison center's experience managing an outbreak of long-acting anticoagulant rodenticide (LAAR) poisoning associated with synthetic cannabinoid (SC) use.Methods: This is a retrospective review of exposures reported to the Illinois Poison Center between March 10 and August 1, 2018. All cases coded as exposure to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol homologs were identified. Patients with suspected SC use, positive LAAR testing, and coagulopathy (signs or symptoms of bleeding or international normalized ratio [INR] > 2) were included. If confirmatory LAAR testing was performed and resulted as negative, the patient was excluded from this analysis. In the absence of LAAR testing, patients with suspected SC use, an INR >2, and no alternative explanation of coagulopathy were included. Suspected SC use was defined as use suspected by a member of the treating team or reported by the patient. Presenting signs and symptoms, laboratory findings, management, healthcare utilization, outcomes, and disposition of patients affected by this outbreak were reported.Results: One hundred seventy-eight cases met inclusion criteria. Most patients were male (73%) and young to middle-aged (median age 32, IQR 25-40). Most presented to hospitals in Peoria (35%) and Cook (31%) counties. Median hospitalization was three days (IQR 2-4). Eighty-eight percent of patients presented with an INR >10. Eighteen cases had qualitative anticoagulant testing, all of which were positive for brodifacoum. Other identified LAARs included difenacoum (10/18) and bromadiolone (1/18). Sixty-three percent of patients had back, flank or abdominal pain; 70% of patients presented with hematuria. One hundred six cases received IV vitamin K1; no adverse or anaphylactoid reactions were reported. Forty-one (22%) patients left AMA. Thirty-eight patients (21%) were re-hospitalized during the study period. Patients leaving AMA were 1.6 times more likely to be re-hospitalized than patients with other dispositions. Intracranial hemorrhage, present in 3% of total cases, was present in 4 of 5 fatalities.Conclusions: We describe an outbreak of multiple LAARs contaminating SCs. Patients presented with bleeding from varied sites, often required blood products, factor replacement, and high dose vitamin K1 for stabilization.