Pyeloplasty with ureteral stent placement in children: Do prophylactic antibiotics serve a purpose?

OBJECTIVES: Ureteral stents are commonly used during pyeloplasty to ensure drainage and anastomotic healing. Antibiotic prophylaxis is often used due to concerns for urinary tract infection (UTI). Although many surgeons prescribe prophylactic antibiotics following pyeloplasty, practices vary widely due to lack of clear evidence-based guidelines. We hypothesize that the rate of stent UTI does not significantly vary between children who receive antibiotics and those who do not. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 741 patients undergoing pyeloplasty between January 2010 and July 2018 across seven institutions. Exclusion criteria were: age older than 22 years, no stent placed, externalized stents used, and incomplete records. Surgical approach, age, antibiotic use, stent duration, Foley duration, and urine culture results were recorded. Patients were categorized into two groups, those younger than four years of age and those four years and older as proxy for likely diaper use. Univariate logistic regression was conducted to identify variables associated with UTI. Multivariable backward stepwise logistic regression was used to identify the best model with Akaike information criterion as model selection criteria. The selected model was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals summarizing the association between prophylactic antibiotics and stent UTI while controlling for age, gender, and intra-operative urine cultures. RESULTS: 672 patients were included; 338 received antibiotic prophylaxis and 334 did not. These groups differed in mean age (3.91 vs. 6.91 years, P < .001), mean stent duration (38.5 vs. 35.32 days, P < .001), and surgical approach (53.25% vs. 32.04% open vs. laparoscopic, P < .001). The incidence of stent UTI was low overall (7.59%) and similar in both groups: 31/338 (9.17%) in the prophylaxis group and 20/334 (5.99%) in the non-prophylaxis group (P = .119). Although female gender, likely diaper use, and positive intra-operative urine culture were each associated with significantly higher odds of stent UTI, prophylactic antibiotic use was not associated with significant reduction in stent UTI in any of these groups. Surgical approach, stent duration, and Foley duration were not associated with stent UTI. CONCLUSION: Incidence of stent UTI is low overall following pyeloplasty. Prophylactic antibiotics are not associated with lower rates of stent UTI following pyeloplasty even after controlling for risk factors of female gender, likely diaper use, and positive intra-operative urine culture. Routine administration of prophylactic antibiotics after pyeloplasty does not appear to be beneficial, and may be best reserved for those with multiple risk factors for UTI.

Children undergoing outpatient complex penile surgery and hypospadias repair may not require opioid analgesics.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Pain control is important after penile surgery, and opioid use should be minimized as able. We sought to describe our experience performing complex penile surgeries with vs without post-operative opioids. METHODS: A retrospective review of penile surgeries, including 3998 between 2009 and 2019. We identified patients <8 years who underwent outpatient penile surgery requiring either penile degloving or hypospadias repair. Patients who were or were not prescribed opioids were matched 1:1 by age and type of penile surgery. Primary outcomes of interest were pain-related encounters, delayed opioid prescription, and predictors of pain. RESULTS: 200 children were identified, 100 per group, with mean age 1.3 ± 0.8 years. 48% were penile degloving procedures, 31% hypospadias repairs with catheters, and the remaining 21% hypospadias repairs without catheters. Perioperative features were comparable between groups(p > 0.05). 59% of patients without opioids had an impromptu post-operative encounter vs 41%, and 20% had an associated pain complaint vs 9%(p = 0.026). Two patients in both groups received delayed opioid prescription(p = 1.00). The presence of a catheter (OR 2.9) and no opioid prescription (OR 2.6) were independent predictors for pain complaint. CONCLUSIONS: Patients discharged without an opioid were more likely to contact a provider postoperatively and were more likely to endorse pain complaint (number needed to treat: 9).

Neonatal and early infancy management of prenatally detected hydronephrosis.

Hydronephrosis discovered during prenatal ultrasound will often resolve spontaneously; however, it should be evaluated in the postnatal period in a manner commensurate with its risk of renal injury. Early intervention is appropriate in cases of bladder outlet obstruction or the severely obstructed solitary kidney. In most other cases, it is both safe and reasonable to allow the possibility of spontaneous improvement with the intensity of follow-up based on the severity of the hydronephrosis. Clinical decision making should be a shared process between families and caregivers.

The "flowerpot" sign: inference of poor renal function in high grade vesicoureteral reflux by calyceal orientation.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: Modern radiographic advances have allowed for detailed and accurate imaging of not only urologic anatomy but also urologic function. The art of observational inference of subtle anatomic features and function from a static radiograph is being traded for new, more precise, and more expensive modalities. While the superiority of these methods cannot be denied, the total information provided in simpler tests should not be ignored. The relationship between high grade vesicoureteral reflux with the dilated calyces arranged cephalad to a dilated funnel-shaped renal pelvis on VCUG and reduced differential renal function has not been previously described, but has been anecdotally designated a "flowerpot" sign by our clinicians. We hypothesize that the appearance of a "flowerpot" kidney as described herein is an indicator of poor renal function in the setting of high grade VUR. STUDY DESIGN: IRB approval was obtained and 315 patients were identified from system-wide VCUG reports from 2004-2012 with diagnosed "high grade" or "severe" vesicoureteral reflux. Inclusion into the study required grade IV or V VUR on initial VCUG and an initial radionuclide study for determination of differential function. Patients with a solitary kidney, posterior urethral valve, multicystic dysplastic kidney, renal ectopia, or duplex collecting systems were excluded. Grade of reflux, angle of the inferior-superior calyceal axis relative to the lumbar spine, and differential uptake were recorded along with presence of the new "flowerpot" sign. Variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Fifty seven patients met inclusion criteria with 11 being designated as "flowerpot" kidneys. These "flowerpot" kidneys could be objectively differentiated from other kidneys with grade IV and/or grade V VUR both by inferior-superior calyceal axis (median angle, 52° [37-66] vs. 13° [2-37], respectively p < 0.001) and by differential renal uptake (median, 23% [5-49] vs. 45% [15-81], respectively p < 0.001). Likewise, there was no difference between either calyceal axis (median angle, 13° [3-20] vs. 13° [2-37]) or differential function (median, 48% [24-81] vs. 40% [15-66], p = 0.129) when comparing kidneys with grade IV and grade V VUR, respectively, that did not demonstrate the "flowerpot" sign. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Grading of VUR is used to provide a common language for scientific discussion and determine prognosis for children with similar attributes. The dysmorphic calyceal system in the "flowerpot" kidneys supports the theory of abnormal renal blastema induction associated with abnormal differentiation of the ureteral bud. Even in the absence of urinary tract infections and/or pyelonephritis, renal abnormalities and decreased differential function can be observed on renal scintigraphy. This study also confirms the male predominance and functional similarities between grade 4 and 5 refluxing renal units. Recognizing this is a limited observational study based on imaging alone, the "flowerpot" sign is an indicator of the most severe form of grade 5 VUR but is only one factor in predicting long term overall renal prognosis. However, 14% (8/57) of our cohort had a relative uptake of less than 20% with 5 of these exhibiting the "flowerpot" sign. The "flowerpot" sign on VCUG can be used as indirect evidence of poor differential renal function and, therefore, useful in guiding parental expectations prior to formal functional imaging.