RESUMO
Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the available literature evaluating surgical outcomes after chronic distal biceps tendon rupture. Surgical techniques, including primary repair, autograft reconstruction, and allograft reconstruction, were compared, as well as subjective and objective clinical outcomes and complication rates. Methods: A systematic literature search of Level I-IV studies reporting outcomes of surgically treated chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures were performed via PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. Twenty-two papers were identified in the review, with 236 patients. A Modified Coleman Methodological Score (CMS) was determined for every article to assess study quality. Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative range of motion, flexion and supination strength, and postoperative complications were recorded. MAYO elbow scores (MEPS) were reported more consistently than the other outcome tools. Results: No Level I or level II studies were identified in our search, and the heterogeneity of outcome measures precluded meta-analysis. Studies demonstrated mean MEPS scores ranging between 86 and 100, regardless of the surgical technique utilized. All studies reported a mean flexion-extension arc equal to or greater than 5-130°. The reported mean postoperative flexion strength was within 10% of the unaffected contralateral side. The most common complication for both direct repair and reconstruction groups was paresthesia of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve [direct repair: 18-16.8%; reconstruction: 8-6.2% (allograft: 4-6%; autograft: 4-7%)]. Rerupture was uncommon and occurred in three patients who had undergone direct repair and in one patient after autograft reconstruction. Conclusions: Surgical treatment of chronic distal biceps injuries yields favorable objective and subjective outcomes. Currently, available evidence suggests that direct repair, autograft reconstruction, or allograft reconstruction are all viable treatment options with similar outcomes.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to investigate the current disparities for major lower extremity amputation in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) and infection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's database for the years 2011 to 2017 was conducted. Multivariate models were used to isolate the effect of race and ethnicity on the likelihood of a below-knee or above-knee amputation (BKA and AKA, respectively) for CLI secondary to type 2 diabetes mellitus, atherosclerosis, peripheral vascular disease, chronic osteomyelitis, and deep soft-tissue infections. RESULTS: For all diagnoses, blacks were 93.3%, and Hispanics were 61.9% more likely to undergo a BKA than white patients (P < 0.001). In addition, black patients had a 133.0% higher risk of an AKA than white patients (P < 0.001). Disparities were greatest with blacks undergoing surgery for CLI secondary to atherosclerosis (BKA odds ratio 2.093; AKA: odds ratio 2.625). Black patients also had an elevated risk of amputation secondary to diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and deep soft-tissue infections (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: This nationally representative, cohort-based study demonstrates that notable racial and ethnic disparities for lower extremity amputations persist, with a higher proportion of black and Hispanic patients undergoing amputation compared with limb salvage procedures for atraumatic CLI and infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III prognostic.