RESUMO
Despite advances in research and treatment modalities, colorectal cancer still accounts for around half a million deaths yearly worldwide. Traditional and even newer pharmaceutical therapeutic regimens are limited in terms of tolerance, efficacy and cross-resistance. Additional non-cross resistant therapies with non-overlapping toxicities are needed to improve the outcome for patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer vaccines, designed to activate immune effectors (T-cells and antibodies) to prevent recurrence or treat advanced cancers, have now demonstrated clinical benefit in prostate cancer and lymphoma. Because immune effector infiltration into colon tumours is associated with improved clinical outcome, vaccines intended to activate immune responses against colon cancer have generated significant interest. This review discusses data supportive of the immune responsiveness of colorectal cancer, as well as the current status of colon cancer vaccines under development including those based on whole tumour cells or lysates, peptide or protein antigens, anti-idiotype antibodies, viral vectors, and dendritic cells. We also discuss challenges to colon cancer vaccine development, such as tumour associated mechanisms for immune evasion, and how future strategies may address these challenges.
Assuntos
Vacinas Anticâncer/imunologia , Neoplasias do Colo/imunologia , Neoplasias do Colo/prevenção & controle , Células Dendríticas/imunologia , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , HumanosRESUMO
Hypofractionated irradiation has an established role in the palliative treatment of patients with advanced medically inoperable non - small cell lung cancer (NSCLC ) and poor performance status. Also hypofractionated radiotherapy merits careful consideration in the curative treatment of patients with Stage I and II disease using contemporary technology. The biological effect of radiation on tumours is increased as the overall treatment time is shortened. Hypofractionated field radiotherapy offers acceptable palliation with minimal toxicity. The rates of palliation for hemoptysis , chest pain , cough and dyspnea reported from studies with very short regimen ( 8,5 Gy x 2 ), are comparable to those of other trials that used more protracted palliative treatment . The observed toxicity is minimal, and no cases of oesophagitis, pneumonitis, or radiation myelopathy developed. The minimal toxicity is a reflection of both the low biologic total dose and the tight RT design. Therefore the radiation side effects appear to be related to the technique of RT delivered rather than the patient's PS. Hence, widely believed dogmas concerning the tolerance of critical structures to conventionally fractionated doses, such as the dose-volume effect, total dose, and time (latency) dependency, has to be re-evaluated for hypofractionated radiation therapy. As well there is data suggesting that the small stages I - II NSCLC are likely to benefit from hypofractionated regimens too. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is a new technically complex approach to the treatment of early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer. It is capable to deliver much higher doses to the cancer than is possible with standard techniques, and as a result, rates of tumour control are high and similar to what can be achieved by surgical resection. Refinements of technique and dose as well as randomized data are required before stereotactic radiotherapy can be endorsed as a standard of care for patients with inoperable peripherally located T1 non small cell lung cancer. A clear advantage of the very short hypofractionated palliative regimen is that it allows patients with a short expected survival time to spend more of their remaining time away from the hospital.