Screening and treatment of hepatitis C virus in prisons: 10 years of experience / A hepatitis C-vírus szurésének és kezelésének 10 éves tapasztalata a börtönökben

Introduction and objective: Two-thirds of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are unaware of their infection in the European Union. The WHO aims to reduce the number of new cases of chronic hepatitis by 90% by 2030. The proportion of people infected with HCV in prisons can be up to ten times higher compared to the general population. This article is a summary of the results of the HCV screening carried out in the Hungarian prisons between 2007 and 2017. Method: Screening of anti-HCV antibodies has been performed on a voluntary basis followed by HCV PCR and genotyping in positive cases. After obtaining written informed consent from the patients, treatment was started. Treatments were performed under the guidance of hepatologists in collaboration with prison medical staff. Results: HCV screening programs and treatments are in place in 84% of Hungarian prisons. A total of 25 384 patients underwent anti-HCV screening. Anti-HCV positive result was detected in 6.6% and HCV PCR positivity was confirmed in 3.8% of the screened inmates. 55.2% patients from the HCV PCR positive population were put on treatment. Only 143 patients received full treatment, while 162 (42.6%) treatments were terminated prematurely, and the duration of treatment was unknown in 75 patients. Based on the results available on the 24th week after the end of treatment, sustained virologic response rate was 88%. Discussion: Education of patients and collaboration between hepatologists and prison medical staff play an important role in the successful result of treatment. Conclusion: Our experience demonstrates that the test and treat principle is feasible and effective at microeliminating HCV in prisons.

[Efficacy and safety of boceprevir based triple therapy in Hungarian patients with hepatitis C genotype 1 infection, advanced stage fibrosis and prior treatment failure]. / Bocepreviralapú hármas kezelés hatékonyságának és biztonságosságának retrospektív elemzése elorehaladott fibrosisstádiumú, hepatitis C-vírus 1-es genotípussal fertozött, korábban sikertelenül kezelt magyar betegeknél.

INTRODUCTION: During 2011 and 2013, 155 Hungarian hepatitis C genotype 1 infected patients, mostly with advanced liver fibrosis, who did not respond to prior peginterferon + ribavirin dual therapy, started boceprevir based triple therapy in an early access program. AIM AND METHOD: Efficacy and safety of the therapy was retrospectively assessed based on sustained virologic responses, as well as on frequency and type of serious adverse events and of those leading to therapy discontinuation. RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis 39.4% patients (61/155) reached sustained virologic response. Amongst pervious relapsers, partial responders and null-responders 59.5%, 41.4 % and 22.9% (p<0.05 compared to the other two categories) reached sustained virologic response, respectively, while amongst non-cirrhotics and cirrhotics 52.5% and 31.3% (p<0.05 compared to the non-cirrhotics) achieved sutained virologic response, respectively. Six out of the 33 most difficult to cure patients (previous null responder and cirrhotic) have reached sustained virologic response (18.2%). Frequency of early discontinuations due to insufficient virologic response was 31.1%, while due to adverse event 10.3%. Reported frequency of serious adverse event was 9.8%. These events represented anemia, diarrhoea, depression, agranulocytosis, elevated aminotransferases, generalized dermatitis and severe gingivitis with loss of teeth, prolonged QT interval on ECG, generalized oedema and severe dyspnoea, uroinfection, exacerbation of Crohn's disease, Campylobacter pylori infection and unacceptable weakness and fatigue. Eight patients received transfusion, 4 patients erythropoietin and 1 granulocyte colony stimulating factor during therapy. No death has been reported. CONCLUSIONS: With boceprevir based triple therapy, one of the bests available in 2011-2013 in Hungary, a relevant proportion of hepatitis C infected patients with advanced liver fibrosis achieved sustained viral response. In this cohort, side-effects resembled those reported in registration studies, and resulted in therapy discontinuation with consequent treatment failure in a relevant number of patients. Efficacy and tolerability of boceprevir-based triple therapy are suboptimal, particularly in the most difficult to cure patient population. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(34), 1366-1374.

When do psychiatric side effects emerge during antiviral treatment of hepatitis C?

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study aimed to determine the time-frame regarding the first appearance of psychiatric side effects in the course of antiviral treatment and the subsequent referral to consultation-liaison psychiatric services. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients receiving combined antiviral treatment with alpha interferon and ribavirin for hepatitis C at a hepatology outpatient clinic and referred to psychiatric consultation between April 2000 and July 2011 were scrutinized. RESULTS: Time between the initiation of antiviral treatment and the first appearance of psychiatric symptoms was 10.64±10.68 weeks. Patients were referred to psychiatric examination 16.1±12.7 weeks after antiviral treatment had been commenced. The time frame of the emergence of psychiatric symptoms and the referral for psychiatric consultation did not correlate with the patients' age or sex. No relationship between substance/alcohol abuse and psychiatric history and the timing of psychiatric side effects and their assessment were found. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that psychiatric side effects appear late in the course of combined antiviral treatment arising after 10.64±10.68 weeks the treatment started. The results also showed that some patients' psychiatric symptoms appeared immediately after the beginning of the antiviral therapy. This finding underlines the importance of monitoring patients' psychiatric condition as soon as antiviral treatment commences.

Referral of intravenous drug users for antiviral treatment: effectiveness of hepatitis C case-finding programmes.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C infection (HCI) case-finding programmes aim to identify infected persons in a well-defined population. This study assessed the effectiveness of three HCI case-finding programmes for intravenous drug users by examining the rate of their referral to antiviral treatment. METHODS: The Hepatology Outpatient Clinic of Szent László Hospital examines and treats all intravenous drug users who are found positive in HCI case-finding programmes in Budapest. The medical records of patients who visited the Hepatology Outpatient Clinic of Szent László Hospital between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2008 were screened and records indicating a history of drug abuse were selected. These records were matched against the databases of the hepatitis case-finding programmes and the records that appeared in both datasets were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 234 intravenous drug users identified as hepatitis C virus positive in the Budapest case-finding programmes, only 21 attended the Hepatology Outpatient Clinic of Szent László Hospital and only two started antiviral treatment, but their hepatitis C virus positive status had already been known at the time of screening. CONCLUSION: In this study, not a single patient with drug abuse whose hepatitis C virus positive status was identified in one of the HCI case-finding programmes was referred for antiviral treatment.

Difficulties with interferon treatment in former intravenous drug users.

OBJECTIVES: Intravenous drug use accounts for most of the new hepatitis C infections worldwide. Although there is an urgent need for antiviral treatment of infected intravenous drug users (IDUs), several factors compromise their treatment including lack of treatment adherence and high dropout rate. The aim of this study was to compare antiviral treatment-related problems among former IDUs to HCV-infected patients without a history of IDU. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of HCV-infected IDUs who received combined antiviral therapy at the Hepatology Outpatient Clinic of Szent László Hospital between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2008. A control group of interferon treated patients with no history of IDU matched for age and sex was selected. RESULTS: Dropout rate was significantly higher in the IDU group (p = 0.016). Treatment response at the 12th week of treatment was significantly better in the IDU group (p = 0.004). Significantly more IDUs underwent antiviral treatment while in prison (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In this study higher dropout rate was found among IDUs. IDUs had a better response rate to antiviral therapy compared to controls. More attention should be paid to factors that worsen treatment adherence of IDUs - particularly lack of abstinence - in order to increase the effectiveness of antiviral therapy.

Difficulties with interferon treatment in former intravenous drug users

OBJECTIVES: Intravenous drug use accounts for most of the new hepatitis C infections worldwide. Although there is an urgent need for antiviral treatment of infected intravenous drug users (IDUs), several factors compromise their treatment including lack of treatment adherence and high dropout rate. The aim of this study was to compare antiviral treatment-related problems among former IDUs to HCV-infected patients without a history of IDU. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of HCV-infected IDUs who received combined antiviral therapy at the Hepatology Outpatient Clinic of Szent László Hospital between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2008. A control group of interferon treated patients with no history of IDU matched for age and sex was selected. RESULTS: Dropout rate was significantly higher in the IDU group (p = 0.016). Treatment response at the 12th week of treatment was significantly better in the IDU group (p = 0.004). Significantly more IDUs underwent antiviral treatment while in prison (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In this study higher dropout rate was found among IDUs. IDUs had a better response rate to antiviral therapy compared to controls. More attention should be paid to factors that worsen treatment adherence of IDUs - particularly lack of abstinence - in order to increase the effectiveness of antiviral therapy.

Barriers to antiviral treatment in hepatitis C infected intravenous drug users.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays intravenous drug use is the main source of hepatitis C transmission, but only a small proportion of those who acquired infection via intravenous drug use receive antiviral treatment. AIM: to assess the barriers of access to antiviral treatment of infected intravenous drug users. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was carried out in a hepatology outpatient clinic including all hepatitis C infected intravenous drug users in a 3-year period. RESULTS: Only one-third of the infected former intravenous drug users received antiviral treatment. The main barrier to antiviral treatment was the lack of abstinence. Former intravenous drug users in prison or in long-term drug rehabilitation institutes were more likely to enter antiviral treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The low proportion of patients entering antiviral treatment calls the attention to further improving the pretreatment management of this patient population. Special attention should be paid to the maintenance of abstinence.