Study Protocol: Efficacy and Safety of Radioembolization (REM) as an Early Modality (EM) Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (BR) to the Liver with Y90 (REMEMBR Y90).

PURPOSE: The primary objective of the REMEMBR Y90 study is to evaluate the efficacy of Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization in patients with breast cancer metastases to the liver as a 2nd or 3rd line treatment option with systemic therapy by assessing liver-specific and overall progression-free survival. Secondary objectives include quality of life, overall survival benefit, and toxicity in relation to patients' tumor biology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This trial is a multi-center, prospective, Phase 2, open-label, IRB-approved, randomized control trial in the final phases of activation. Eligible patients include those over 18 years of age with metastatic breast cancer to the liver with liver-only or liver-dominant disease, and history of tumor progression on 1-2 lines of chemotherapy. 60 patients will be randomized to radioembolization with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Permissible regimens include capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, and gemcitabine within 2 weeks of enrollment for every patient. Patients receiving radioembolization will receive lobar or segmental treatment within 1-6 weeks of enrollment depending on their lesion. After final radioembolization, patients will receive clinical and imaging follow-up every 12-16 weeks for two years, including contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography. DISCUSSION: This study seeks to elucidate the clinical benefit and toxicity of Y90 in patients with metastatic breast cancer to the liver who are receiving minimal chemotherapy. Given previous data, it is anticipated that the use of Y90 and chemotherapy earlier in the metastatic disease course would improve survival outcomes and reduce toxicity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1b, Randomized Controlled Trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05315687 on clinicaltrials.gov.

Physician Communication and Patient Understanding of Molecular Testing Terminology.

BACKGROUND: The use of molecular testing in oncology is rapidly expanding. The aim of this study was to determine how oncologists describe molecular testing and whether patients understand the terminology being used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty conversations between oncologists and patients about molecular testing were observed, and the used technical terms were noted by the researcher. Patients were interviewed post-conversation to assess their understanding of the noted technical terms. A patient understanding score was calculated for each participant. Comparisons of the terms were conducted using χ2 tests, Fisher's exact tests, or ANOVA when appropriate. RESULTS: Sixty-one unique technical terms were used by oncologists, to describe seven topics. "Mutation" was a challenging term for patients to understand with 48.8% (21/43 mentions) of participants correctly defining the term. "Genetic testing" and "Gene" were understood a little more than half the time (53.3%; 8/15 and 56.4%; 22/39 respectively). "DNA" was well understood (80%; 12/15). There was no correlation between the terms being defined by the oncologist in the conversation, and the likelihood of the patient providing a correct definition. White participants were significantly more likely to understand both "mutation" and "genetic testing" than non-White participants. Forty-two percent (n = 25) of participants had an understanding score below 50%, and a higher family income was significantly correlated with a higher score. CONCLUSION: Our results show that oncologists use variable terminology to describe molecular testing, which is often not understood. Because oncologists defining the terms did not correlate with understanding, it is imperative to develop new, improved methods to explain molecular testing. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The use of molecular testing is expanding in oncology, yet little is known about how effectively clinicians are communicating information about molecular testing and whether patients understand the terminology used. The results of this study indicate that patients do not understand some of the terminology used by their clinicians and that clinicians tend to use highly variable terminology to describe molecular testing. These results highlight the need to develop and implement effective methods to explain molecular testing terminology to patients to ensure that patients have the tools to make autonomous and informed decisions about their treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of 7 Days on/7 Days off Versus 14 Days on/7 Days off Schedules of Capecitabine in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Review.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: The administration schedule of capecitabine for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in clinical trials has been 14 days of drug with 7 days off in a 21 day cycle (14/7). In an effort to improve tolerability, an alternative every other week treatment (7/7) is often administered. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of administering 7/7 compared with 14/7 capecitabine dosing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, mCRC patients received capecitabine on a 7/7 or 14/7 schedule. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability of the respective dosing schedules, defined according to frequency of dose reductions and treatment delays. Secondary objectives included comparisons of objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety of dosing strategies. RESULTS: Of 175 included patients, 73 (41.7%) received the capecitabine 7/7 schedule and 102 (58.3%) received the 14/7 schedule. There was a statistically significant difference between the 7/7 and 14/7 groups with regard to dose reductions (4% vs. 29%; P < .001) and treatment delays (22% vs. 43%; P = .004). The incidence of any adverse effects (45% vs. 72%; P < .001) and specifically, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (18% vs. 45%; P < .001), were significantly higher in the 14/7 group. No significant difference was seen with regard to ORR, PFS, or OS. CONCLUSION: Patients with mCRC who received the 7/7 schedule had significantly fewer dose reductions and treatment delays compared with patients who received the 14/7 schedule. Although no difference in efficacy outcomes were observed, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Overall survival comparison between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) vs ADT plus EBRT with brachytherapy boost in clinically node-positive prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Optimal therapy for clinically node-positive, nonmetastatic (cN1) prostate cancer (PC) patients remains controversial, ranging from aggressive local therapy to palliative systematic therapy alone. Despite guideline support, it is unclear if a brachytherapy (BT) boost should be considered for cN1 patients as these patients were excluded from randomized trials establishing its benefit. Herein, we compare definitive radiation therapy (RT) with or without a BT boost in cN1 PC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify men with cN1 PC treated with definitive RT and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy between 2004 and 2013. Overall survival (OS) was compared between those who received external beam RT (EBRT) or combination EBRT plus BT boost (EBRT + BT) using Kaplan-Meier with propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: With a median followup of 48.5 months, 1,650 patients were eligible for this analysis, 103 (6.2%) of whom received EBRT + BT. Younger age, no medical comorbidities, and Gleason score of six were associated with higher likelihood of receiving EBRT + BT over EBRT alone. The mean (median) OS for EBRT and EBRT + BT was 99.0 (110.6) months vs 109.2 (not reached) months, respectively (p = 0.048). However, no significance difference in OS was observed between the groups after propensity score matching. On multivariable analysis, EBRT + BT was not significantly associated with improved OS (adjusted HR 0.67, 95% CI, 0.41-1.07, p = 0.098). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective, observational study of patients with cN1 PC treated with definitive RT and concomitant androgen deprivation therapy, EBRT + BT had an unadjusted improvement in OS compared with EBRT alone that lost statistical significance after multivariable adjustment and propensity score matching.

Targeted Exome Sequencing of the Cancer Genome in Patients with Very High-risk Bladder Cancer.

We completed targeted exome sequencing of the tumors of 50 patients with pTis-pT4b bladder cancer. Mutations were categorized by type, stratified against previously identified cancer loci in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer and The Cancer Genome Atlas databases, and evaluated in pathway analysis and comutation plots. We analyzed mutation associations with receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, nodal involvement, metastatic disease development, and survival. Compared with The Cancer Genome Atlas, we found higher mutation rates in genes encoding products involved in epigenetic regulation and cell cycle regulation. Of the pathways examined, PI3K/mTOR and Cell Cycle/DNA Repair exhibited the greatest frequencies of mutation. RB1 and TP53, as well as NF1 and PIK3CA were frequently comutated. We identified no association between mutations in specific genes and key clinical outcomes of interest when corrected for multiple testing. Discovery phase analysis of the somatic mutations in 50 high-risk bladder cancer patients revealed novel mutations and mutational patterns, which may be useful for developing targeted therapy regimens or new biomarkers for patients at very high risk of disease metastasis and death. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report we found known, as well as previously unreported, genetic mutations in the tumors of patients with high-risk bladder cancer. These mutations, if validated, may serve as actionable targets for new trials.

Antiemetic guideline consistency and incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in US community oncology practice: INSPIRE Study.

PURPOSE: Consensus guidelines for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are variably implemented in practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of guideline-consistent/guideline-inconsistent CINV prophylaxis (GCCP/GICP) on the incidence of no CINV after cycle 1 of highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC or MEC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled chemotherapy-naive adult outpatients who received single-day HEC or MEC at four oncology practice networks, all using electronic health record (EHR) systems, in Georgia, Tennessee, and Florida. Results from the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Antiemesis Tool, a validated tool to measure CINV, administered 5 to 8 days postchemotherapy, were merged with EHR data. The primary end point, no CINV, defined as no emesis and no clinically significant nausea (score < 3 on 0-10 scale), was compared between cohorts using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 1,295 patients were enrolled (mean age, 59.3 years; 70.0% female; 35.5% HEC). The overall prevalence of GCCP was 57.3%. When corticosteroids were prescribed on days 2 to 4 after all HEC, GCCP for HEC increased from 28.7% to 89.8%; when NK1-receptor antagonists were prescribed after all MEC, GCCP for MEC increased from 73.1% to 97.8%. Over 5 days postchemotherapy, the incidence of no CINV was significantly higher in the GCCP cohort than the GICP cohort (53.4% v 43.8%; P < .001). The adjusted odds of no CINV with GCCP was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.69; P = .037). CONCLUSION: Increased adherence to antiemetic guidelines could significantly reduce the incidence of CINV after HEC and MEC.

Activity of the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib in patients with advanced melanoma: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial.

BACKGROUND: MEK is a member of the MAPK signalling cascade that is commonly activated in melanoma. Direct inhibition of MEK blocks cell proliferation and induces apoptosis. We aimed to analyse safety, efficacy, and genotyping data for the oral, small-molecule MEK inhibitor trametinib in patients with melanoma. METHODS: We undertook a multicentre, phase 1 three-part study (dose escalation, cohort expansion, and pharmacodynamic assessment). The main results of this study are reported elsewhere; here we present data relating to patients with melanoma. We obtained tumour samples to assess BRAF mutational status, and available tissues underwent exploratory genotyping analysis. Disease response was measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and adverse events were defined by common toxicity criteria. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00687622. FINDINGS: 97 patients with melanoma were enrolled, including 81 with cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma (36 BRAF mutant, 39 BRAF wild-type, six BRAF status unknown), and 16 with uveal melanoma. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash or dermatitis acneiform (n=80; 82%) and diarrhoea (44; 45%), most of which were grade 2 or lower. No cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas were recorded. Of 36 patients with BRAF mutations, 30 had not received a BRAF inhibitor before; two complete responses (both confirmed) and ten partial responses (eight confirmed) were noted in this subgroup (confirmed response rate, 33%). Median progression-free survival of this subgroup was 5·7 months (95% CI 4·0-7·4). Of the six patients who had received previous BRAF inhibition, one unconfirmed partial response was recorded. Of 39 patients with BRAF wild-type melanoma, four partial responses were confirmed (confirmed response rate, 10%). INTERPRETATION: Our data show substantial clinical activity of trametinib in melanoma and suggest that MEK is a valid therapeutic target. Differences in response rates according to mutations indicate the importance of mutational analyses in the future. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline.

Association between African American race and outcomes in patients with nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective analysis by using results from the Georgia Cancer Specialist Database.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate, in a real-world context, the impact of race on disease recurrence and survival in patients with nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study selected patients from the 2003-2008 Georgia Cancer Specialist Database with stage I-III confirmed TNBC who had received adjuvant chemotherapy. These patients were followed-up from initial diagnosis to death, cancer recurrence, or loss to follow-up. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Kaplan-Meier curves compared DFS and recurrence between African American and non-African American groups. The impact of African American status was examined further through multivariate Cox models by adjusting for age, comorbidity, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, initial TNBC stage, surgery, and radiation therapy. RESULTS: Among 209 patients with TNBC, 89 (42.6%) were African American. The 2 groups (African American vs. non-African American) were similar in mean age at diagnosis (53.2 vs. 54.4 years; P =.487) and with surgery and radiation rates (98.9% vs. 100%; P = .244; 68.5% vs. 62.5%; P = .365, respectively). Compared with non-African Americans, African American patients had a higher BMI (30.4 vs. 28.6 kg/m(2); P = .0477) and were less likely to be diagnosed at stage I (31.5% vs. 51.7%; P = .0107). The African American patients had a lower 5-year DFS rate (45.2% vs. 79.7%; P = .0005) and a higher 5-year recurrence rate (42.5% vs. 7.0%; P = .0005) compared with the non-African American patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with TNBC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, African American race was associated with a worse outcome irrespective of later stage at presentation or higher BMI.

Mutation and copy number detection in human cancers using a custom genotyping assay.

Identification of biomarkers for positive and negative predictors of response to cancer therapeutics can help direct clinical strategies. However, challenges with tissue availability and costs are significant limiting factors for diagnostic assays. To address these challenges, we have customized a high-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping assay with the objective of simultaneously surveying known somatic mutations and copy number alterations for translational studies in cancer. As constructed, this assay can interrogate 376 known somatic mutations and quantify copy number alterations of genes commonly implicated in tumorigenesis or progression. Validation of this assay on a panel of 321 cell lines demonstrates sensitivity to accurately detect mutations, robust accuracy in the presence of infiltrating normal tissue, and the ability to detect both DNA copy number amplifications and deletions. This technology, with its high sensitivity, small DNA requirements, and low costs is an attractive platform for biomarker exploration in cancer.

Likelihood of a subsequent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) event in patients receiving low, moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (LEC/MEC/HEC).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the likelihood of subsequent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) events following a first chemotherapy administration CINV event in patients receiving single-day low, moderately, or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (LEC, MEC, or HEC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing Georgia Cancer Specialists, Florida Cancer Specialists, and ACORN electronic medical records databases (April 2006 through July 2009). Patients were included who received more than one single-day LEC, MEC, or HEC administration (oral or intravenous) with no chemotherapy 3 months prior to the first LEC, MEC, or HEC administration. Two cohorts, patients with a first administration CINV and no first administration CINV, were created and followed for 6 months. A multivariate logistic regression assessed the likelihood of subsequent CINV, controlling for age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, cancer type, number of chemotherapy administrations, gap between LEC, MEC, or HEC administrations, and number of different LEC, MEC, or HEC agents administered. RESULTS: A total of 10,586 patients met the inclusion criteria (LEC = 3099; MEC = 5172; HEC = 2315). Of those patients, 4.4% (n = 136), 7.8% (n = 402), and 13.8% (n = 320) experienced a CINV event with their initial single-day LEC, MEC, or HEC administration, respectively. The unadjusted subsequent CINV rate was higher in the cohorts with first LEC, MEC, or HEC administration CINV for all groups receiving LEC (33.1% vs. 16.0%; p < 0.0001), MEC (46.5% vs. 18.9%; p < 0.0001), or HEC (59.1% vs. 26.9%; p < 0.0001). After controlling for covariates, patients with first LEC, MEC, or HEC administration CINV were 3.1, 3.8, and 3.7 times more likely to have a subsequent CINV compared to patients without a first LEC, MEC, or HEC administration CINV (Odds Ratio: 3.05 [95% CI: 2.08-4.48, p < 0.0001]; 3.77 [95% CI: 3.04-4.68, p < 0.0001]; and 3.70 [95% CI: 2.88-4.74, p < 0.0001], respectively). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis, patients receiving single-day LEC, MEC, or HEC who had a prior CINV were at increased risk of subsequent CINV. Further studies assessing increased risk of a subsequent CINV events are warranted given this study represents an assessment of electronic medical record data within select community-based populations under usual care.

The genome and transcriptomes of the anti-tumor agent Clostridium novyi-NT.

Bacteriolytic anti-cancer therapies employ attenuated bacterial strains that selectively proliferate within tumors. Clostridium novyi-NT spores represent one of the most promising of these agents, as they generate potent anti-tumor effects in experimental animals. We have determined the 2.55-Mb genomic sequence of C. novyi-NT, identifying a new type of transposition and 139 genes that do not have homologs in other bacteria. The genomic sequence was used to facilitate the detection of transcripts expressed at various stages of the life cycle of this bacterium in vitro as well as in infections of tumors in vivo. Through this analysis, we found that C. novyi-NT spores contained mRNA and that the spore transcripts were distinct from those in vegetative forms of the bacterium.