Experiences and preferences of women with CAH and parents about disclosure of childhood surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Complete disclosure of childhood genital surgery to patients with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is a critical part of CAH care. There are no guidelines or uniform recommendations on the timing and content of surgical disclosure discussions. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to describe the experiences and preferences of females with CAH and parents of females with CAH who underwent childhood genital surgery regarding surgical disclosure. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional online survey of females with CAH (46XX, ≥16 years [y] old) and parents of females with CAH who underwent genital surgery before age 4y in North America. Participants reported experiences, preferences, and advice about initial ("first time you were told") and complete disclosure ("told all details"). Non-parametric statistics and qualitative analysis were used. RESULTS: Participants included 59 females with CAH (median age: 37y, 92% White, 93% non-Hispanic) and 41 parents (median: 36y, 85% White, 93% non-Hispanic, daughter median: 26y). The 76% of females who received complete disclosure were younger (median age: 33y) and underwent surgery more recently (median decade: 1980s) than the 14% who received only initial disclosure (median: 47y, 1970s) and the 10% who did not receive any disclosure (median: 60y, 1960s, p = 0.0003, Summary Figure). Females reported median ages of initial and complete disclosure as 7-10y and 11-13y, respectively. Disclosure was preferred by 98% of females with initial disclosure by age 14y and complete disclosure by 18y. Parents reported similar findings. Most disclosures were by mothers (initial: 82%, complete: 64%). Doctors were more involved in complete vs. initial disclosures (complete: 47%, initial: 13%, p < 0.001). Qualitative analysis of advice about surgical disclosure revealed 8 themes. CONCLUSIONS: Disclosure of childhood genital surgery to women with CAH has increased over time. Although timing of disclosure varied, women preferred disclosure, and that it be initiated before age 14y and completed by age 18y.

Urology HEIRS: A Feasibility and Acceptability Study for Video-Based Research on Physician-Family Communication in Pediatric Urology Visits.

PURPOSE: Patient- and family-centered communication is essential to health care equity. However, less is known about how urologists implement evidence-based communication and dynamics involved in caring for diverse pediatric patients and caregivers. We sought to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability using video-based research to characterize physician-family communication in pediatric urology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assembled a multidisciplinary team to conduct a multiphase learning health systems project and establish the Urology HEIRS (Health Experiences and Interactions in Real-Time Studies) corpus for research and interventions. This paper reports the first phase, evaluating feasibility and acceptability based on consent rate, patient diversity, and qualitative identification of verbal and paraverbal features of physician-family communication. We used applied conversation analysis methodology to identify salient practices across 8 pediatric urologists. RESULTS: We recruited 111 families at 2 clinic sites; of these 82 families (N = 85 patients, ages 0-20 years) participated in the study with a consent rate of 73.9%. The racial/ethnic composition of the sample was 45.9% non-Hispanic White, 30.6% any race of Hispanic origin, 16.5% non-Hispanic Black/African American, 4.7% any ethnicity of Asian/Asian American, and 2.3% some other race/ethnicity; 24.7% of families used interpreters. We identified 11 verbal and paraverbal communication practices that impacted physician-family dynamics, including unique challenges with technology-mediated interpreters. CONCLUSIONS: Video-based research is feasible and acceptable with diverse families in pediatric urology settings. The Urology HEIRS corpus will enable future systematic studies of physician-family communication in pediatric urology and provides an empirical basis for specialty-specific training in patient- and family-centered communication.

Usability testing of the Set Brave Goals app, a continence goal-selection app for children with spina bifida.

INTRODUCTION: The Set Brave Goals app is the first digital health app (DHA) aimed at helping children with spina bifida (SB) aged 8-17 years old to select and track their urinary and fecal continence goals. Developed by children, parents, providers and researchers, its usability, or appropriateness to a purpose ("user-friendliness"), remains unknown. In an alpha testing stage, our aim was to determine the usability of the app prior to clinical use. METHODS: We recruited children with SB and their parents in clinic and via social media. A recruitment goal of 10 children exceeded industry standard of 5 participants (10 participants are expected to identify approximately 96% of usability problems). Participants downloaded and used the app for a week. They completed a questionnaire, including the System Usability Scale (SUS) and closed and open-ended questions. The SUS is a 10-item validated usability questionnaire most widely used in DHA usability testing (scores range from 0 to 100, 100 representing greatest usability). Median/mean SUS scores for DHAs are 68. Mann-Whitney-U and t-tests were used. RESULTS: Ten children with SB participated (median age: 14 years old, 6 female, 8 shunted, 8 using bladder catheterizations). Twenty parents participated (17 mothers, median age: 42 years old). Median SUS score was 77.5 for children and 73.8 for parents, corresponding to "good" to "excellent" usability (Summary Figure). There were no significant differences between child/parent scores (p = 0.69) or those for other DHAs (p = 0.11). It took a median 5-10 min to go through the app (2 parents felt it took too much time). All participants felt the app was easy to understand and use (100%). Most participants would recommend it to children and parents (children: 89%, parents: 80%), and believed it would be valuable to children (90%, 75%) and urologists (80%, 80%). Free text responses related to more varied color schemes, keeping free-text notes within the app and more flexible goal/alarm setting. These changes were incorporated into the app. COMMENT: Usability testing prior to clinical launch identified areas for app improvement. Although this study sample met industry standards, findings are limited by a small group of participants. The app will undergo further refinement during prospective beta testing. CONCLUSIONS: The Set Brave Goals app for children with SB has acceptable usability parameters. This justifies proceeding with wider use to formalize children's continence goal setting/tracking and testing its value to children with SB and their healthcare providers.

Linguistic, Content and Face Validity of the Swedish Version of a Quality-of-Life Assessment for Children, Teenagers and Adults with Spina Bifida.

Spina bifida includes a spectrum of different neural tube defects. Myelomeningocele is the most serious type and is associated with a risk of paralysis and sensory dysfunction below the affected level, bladder/bowel dysfunction, brain dysmorphology, and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The aim of this study was to describe the establishment of linguistic, content and face validity of the Swedish version of a Quality-of-Life Assessment for children (QUALAS-C, n = 10 items), teenagers (QUALAS-T, n = 10 items) and adults with spina bifida (QUALAS-A, n = 15 items) based on the original US English versions. The process included close collaboration with the original instrument developer and complied with international standards on patient-reported outcome measurements. The procedure includes forward translation, expert and patient/parent review and reconciliation, back translation, back translation review and cognitive debriefing interviews with 16 people with spina bifida aged 8 to 33, providing them with the possibility of evaluating the clarity, adequacy, and comprehensiveness of QUALAS-C, QUALAS-T and QUALAS-A, respectively. The interviews lasted a median of 15 min (range 8-16) for QUALAS-C, 10 min (range 9-15) for QUALAS-T and 24 min (range 9-38) for QUALAS-A. Four main issues/topics needed attention and discussion after both the forward and back translation. Following the back translation review, all issues were resolved. The patient feedback revealed recognition of the HRQoL issues included in QUALAS, and also difficulties in understanding some questions. After the patients' evaluation, four items were reworded for clarity. No study participant reported a wish to add to or remove questions from QUALAS. Hence, the Swedish versions of QUALAS became conceptually equivalent to the original US English versions and achieved linguistic, content and face validity. While empowering the voices of people with spina bifida, these results also enable their HRQoL to be properly assessed in research and clinical care in Sweden and in international studies.

Prevalence of sexual abuse and intimate partner violence in adults with spina bifida.

BACKGROUND: People with disabilities and chronic medical conditions are known to be at higher risk of sexual abuse (SA) and intimate partner violence (IPV). People with spina bifida (SB) are vulnerable, but little is known about the prevalence of abuse in this population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of SA and IPV in adults with SB. METHODS: An anonymous international cross-sectional online survey of adults with SB asked about history of SA ("sexual contact that you did not want") and IPV ("hit, slapped, kicked, punched or hurt physically by a partner"). RESULTS: Median age of the 405 participants (61% female) was 35 years. Most self-identified as heterosexual (85%) and were in a romantic relationship (66%). A total of 19% reported a history of SA (78% no SA, 3% preferred not to answer). SA was more frequently reported by women compared to men (27% vs. 5%, p < 0.001) and non-heterosexual adults compared to heterosexuals (41% vs. 15%, p < 0.001). Twelve percent reported a history of IPV (86% no IPV, 2% preferred not to answer). IPV was more frequently reported by women compared to men (14% vs. 9%, p = 0.02), non-heterosexuals compared to heterosexuals (26% vs. 10%, p = 0.002), and adults with a history of sexual activity versus those without (14% vs. 2%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: People with SB are subjected to SA and IPV. Women and non-heterosexuals are at higher risk of both.

Accuracy in reporting incontinence in adults with spina bifida: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of self-reported urinary incontinence (UI) and fecal incontinence (FI) among adults with spina bifida (SB) is unknown. We aimed to quantify the accuracy of self-reported recall incontinence in the last 4 weeks using prospective diary data. METHODS: Adults with SB were enrolled via patient advocacy groups in a larger 30-day smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment study of daily well-being and incontinence. We examined agreement between yes/no questions on exit questionnaires ("In the last 4 weeks, did you leak any urine and get your underwear, pads, pull-ups or disposable underwear wet?") and 30-day diaries. Collected data included a non-validated 4-item UI Negativity scale (UIN: 0-100, 0 = no impact). Inter-rater reliability was assessed with Cohen's kappa (>0.60 = substantial). FI was analyzed similarly. Sub-groups were too small for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Median age of 88 adults was 35 years old (70% female, 53% shunted, 71% community ambulators). Among 81 adults reporting UI in the last month, 79 (98%) had diary-documented UI (UI agreement), 2 (2%) did not (Summary Table). Among 7 adults reporting no UI in the last month, 5 (71%) did not record UI in their diaries (agreement in no UI), 2 (29%) did. Both adults reporting no UI on exit questionnaires, despite contrary diary data, experienced single UI episodes (negativity: 0 and 6). In contrast, the UI agreement group recorded UI on median 18 days (median negativity: 22). Sensitivity of the recall UI question was 0.98 (specificity 0.71, kappa 0.69). Among 66 adults reporting FI in the last month, 65 (98%) had diary-documented FI (FI agreement), 1 (2%) did not. Among 22 adults reporting no FI in the last month, 17 (77%) did not record FI in their diaries (agreement in no FI), 5 (23%) did. Five adults reporting no FI on exit questionnaires, despite contrary diary data, experienced a median single episode (median negativity: 8). In contrast, the FI agreement group recorded FI on median 5 days (median negativity: 31). Sensitivity of the recall FI question was 0.93 (specificity 0.94, kappa 0.81). Results were unchanged when analyzing the first and last 28 days of data. COMMENT: Sensitivity/specificity of single incontinence questions approach those reported for women with UI but without SB. Diaries may best serve SB adults with bothersome incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported incontinence accurately and reliably captures UI and FI among adults with SB. It may minimize less bothersome incontinence, supporting its use in screening for clinical practice and research.

Parental decision regret after pediatric urologic surgeries compared to decisions of everyday life.

INTRODUCTION: Parents are at risk of decision regret (DR) for decisions affecting their children. The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) measures medical DR but lacks context outside of healthcare. OBJECTIVE: To compare parental DR 1) between common pediatric urologic surgeries and everyday decisions and 2) with preference to make a different choice. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey of randomly selected parents >1year (y) after their children underwent: orchiopexy (males ≤10y), open ureteral reimplant (OUR, females 2-6y), open pyeloplasty (OP, ≤2y), or robotic pyeloplasty (RP, 5-17y) (2017-2021). Higher DRS scores indicate increased DR (none: 0, mild: 1-25, moderate: 30-50, strong: 55-75, very strong: 80-100). Parents completed DRS on four decisions: their child's surgery, most recent/current romantic relationship, most recent leased/purchased car, and most recent purchased meal. Parents reported if they would make the same choice (yes/no). Nonparametric statistics were used. RESULTS: We surveyed 191 parents (orchiopexy n = 52, OUR n = 50, OP n = 51, RP n = 38). The median parent age was 36y (mothers: 86%). Some DR was reported for all decisions, but with significant differences in DR severity. The lowest median DRS score was seen with surgery (orchiopexy 0 [IQR 0-10], OUR 0 [IQR 0-5], OP 0 [IQR 0-0], RP 0 [IQR 0-0]), with no difference between surgery groups (p = 0.78). This was followed by relationship (0, IQR 0-20), car (15, IQR 0-25), and meal (20, IQR 0-30, p < 0.001). Most parents did not report any DR regarding surgery (orchiopexy 69%, OUR 74%, OP 76%, RP 76%, with no difference between surgery groups p = 0.85, Summary Figure). Comparatively, 59% of parents did not have any regret about their relationship, 37% their car, and 28% their meal (p < 0.001). All surgical DR was mild or moderate. No parent (0%) would have chosen differently for their child's surgery versus 4-12% for non-surgical decisions (p < 0.001). Overall, increasing DR corresponded to increasing desire to have made a different choice (DRS≤10: 0%, DRS 45-50: 32%, DRS 55-60: 66%, DRS≥75: 100%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Parental DR varied between urological surgical and non-surgical decisions. It was lowest after surgery. Some regret was reported after every decision, but the subset of parents with regret was smallest after surgical decisions. Positive DRS scores do not necessarily correspond to parents wishing they made a different choice.

Multi-stakeholder opinion statement on the care of individuals born with differences of sex development: common ground and opportunities for improvement.

BACKGROUND: In the last 15 years, the care provided for individuals born with differences of sex development (DSD) has evolved, with a strong emphasis on interdisciplinary approaches. However, these developments have not convinced some stakeholders to embrace the current model of care. This care model has also paid insufficient attention to socio-cultural differences and global inequalities. SUMMARY: This article is an opinion statement, resulting from in-depth discussions and reflection among clinicians, patients, and family support organizations based in the US and Europe, where we seek areas of common ground and try to identify opportunities to further develop resources. The product of these conversations is summarized in 10 panels. The corresponding sections provide additional discussion on some of the panel items. KEY MESSAGES: Participants identified areas of agreement and gained a deeper understanding of the reasons behind disagreements on certain matters and identified the necessary steps to foster future consensus. We offer preliminary recommendations for guiding clinical management and resource allocation. By promoting a broader consensus, we aim to enhance the quality of care and well-being for individuals of all ages who have a DSD.

Urinary and Fecal Incontinence During Sexual Activity Is Common and Bothersome Among Adults With Spina Bifida.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for urinary fecal incontinence (UI, FI) during sexual activity (UIS, FIS) among adults with spina bifida (SB). METHODS: An international online survey of adults with SB was administered through SB clinics and SB organizations via social media. Adults with a history of masturbation or partnered sexual activity were included. The primary outcome was ever experiencing UIS/FIS. Nonparametric tests and logistic regression were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 341 adults met inclusion criteria (median age: 36years, 59% female, 52% shunted, 48% community ambulators). Baseline UI in the last 4weeks was reported by 50% and FI by 41%. Nineteen (5%) had a urostomy. Eight (2%) had a colostomy. Overall, 93% had a history of partnered genital contact. Among adults without a diversion, UIS was more common than FIS (70% vs 45%, P < .001). Among adults without a urostomy, UIS was more common among women (76% vs 62%, P = .01) and those with baseline UI (84% vs 50%, P < .001). UIS was not associated with age, shunt, ambulatory, or catheterization status (P >=.32). On bivariate analysis, female sex and baseline UI were independent predictors of UIS (P <=.001). Among adults without a colostomy, FIS was associated with female sex (50% vs 39%, P = .046), baseline FI (59% vs 32%, P < .001), community ambulation (52% vs 40%, P = .04), but not age, shunt, or MACE status (P >=.27). On multivariate analysis, baseline FI was independently associated with FIS (P < .001). Among adults with UIS/FIS, 29% experienced UIS "almost always" to "always," compared to 5% for FIS (P < .001). Virtually all adults found UIS/FIS bothersome (>=96% for each), even when incontinence occurred "almost never." UIS/FIS mostly occurred before and/or during orgasm than afterward (P < .001). UIS was reported by 53% of adults with a urostomy (100% bothersome). FIS was reported by 38% of adults with a colostomy (100% bothersome). CONCLUSION: Incontinence during sexual activity is a common problem for men and women with SB. Baseline incontinence is an independent, but not absolute, predictor of both. While FIS is less frequent than UIS, both are virtually always bothersome.

Causes of death among people with myelomeningocele: A multi-institutional 47-year retrospective study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze organ system-based causes and non-organ system-based mechanisms of death (COD, MOD) in people with myelomeningocele (MMC), comparing urological to other COD. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 16 institutions in Canada/United States of non-random convenience sample of people with MMC (born > = 1972) using non-parametric statistics. RESULTS: Of 293 deaths (89% shunted hydrocephalus), 12% occurred in infancy, 35% in childhood, and 53% in adulthood (documented COD: 74%). For 261 shunted individuals, leading COD were neurological (21%) and pulmonary (17%), and leading MOD were infections (34%, including shunt infections: 4%) and non-infectious shunt malfunctions (14%). For 32 unshunted individuals, leading COD were pulmonary (34%) and cardiovascular (13%), and leading MOD were infections (38%) and non-infectious pulmonary (16%). COD and MOD varied by shunt status and age (p < = 0.04), not ambulation or birthyear (p > = 0.16). Urology-related deaths (urosepsis, renal failure, hematuria, bladder perforation/cancer: 10%) were more likely in females (p = 0.01), independent of age, shunt, or ambulatory status (p > = 0.40). COD/MOD were independent of bladder augmentation (p = >0.11). Unexplained deaths while asleep (4%) were independent of age, shunt status, and epilepsy (p >= 0.47). CONCLUSION: COD varied by shunt status. Leading MOD were infectious. Urology-related deaths (10%) were independent of shunt status; 26% of COD were unknown. Life-long multidisciplinary care and accurate mortality documentation are needed.

The feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment to understand urinary and fecal incontinence experiences in adults with spina bifida: A 30-day study.

In this paper, we evaluate the feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to understand urinary (UI) and fecal (FI) incontinence in adults with spina bifida (SB). As part of a larger 30-day prospective study to understand the incontinence in adults with SB (N = 89), participants completed end-of-day EMA diaries assessing the frequency and context of UI and FI. We used these data to assess the method feasibility across six dimensions: (a) compliance, or data entry which is consistent with study protocol and substantially complete; (b) reactivity, or behavior change attributed to study participation; (c) participant acceptability, or convenience and ease of method beneficial to compliance; (d) data capture, or the volume of incontinence behaviors collected; (e) the accuracy of incontinence reports; and f) participant-provided feedback for future studies. Participants were highly compliant with diary entry protocol and schedule: submitting 95.7% (2576/2700) of the expected total daily entries. The average completion time was two minutes. Neither the total number of submissions nor the completion time varied by demographic characteristics or health history. A sufficient volume of incontinence and affective outcomes were captured, with small downtrends in reporting of UI and affect over time. Exit survey recall was highly correlated with diary reports. Participants found the methodology to be acceptable, reported their experiences honestly, enjoyed and felt comfortable participating in the study and would engage in similar study in the future. Accurate information about the daily context of UI and FI is a key factor in the success of intervention or education programs relying on this information. Our findings demonstrate that EMA is a feasible way to describe UI and FI in adults with SB.

Translation and validation of the Korean version of the QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Teenagers (QUALAS-T-K).

PURPOSE: The Quality of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Teenagers (QUALAS-T) is a tool used to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in adolescents with spina bifida (SB). The purpose of this study was to translate the QUALAS-T into Korean and validate its Korean version (QUALAS-T-K). METHODS: Translation and validation processes were carried out in accordance with a specified protocol, including forward and back translation, a content validity study, and a main study. The tool's reliability was evaluated based on its internal consistency and stability. Factor analysis was conducted, and convergent validity was confirmed using the KIDSCREEN-27. RESULTS: Of the 59 participants, 35 had lipomyelomeningoceles. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that QUALAS-T-K had the same structure as QUALAS-T. The QUALAS-T-K showed excellent internal consistency (α: 0.872-0.893, ω: 0.875-0.885), test-retest reliability (ICC:0.84-0.92), and weak to strong correlations with the KIDSCREEN-27. CONCLUSIONS: The QUALAS-T-K, developed by reflecting on the characteristics of SB and considering the applicability of Korean cultural characteristics and clinical practice, is a convenient and reliable tool with excellent internal consistency and stability. This could be a useful tool in clinical and research settings for HRQOL evaluation of adolescents with SB.Implications for RehabilitationOptimizing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is one of the goals of individuals with spina bifida (SB), and HRQOL measures that reflect the condition specificity of SB should be performed.The QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Teenagers (QUALAS-T), developed in the USA, is a self-reported HRQOL questionnaire used in research and clinical practice for adolescents with SB.This study revealed that the QUALAS-T, translated into Korean, is a valid, convenient, and reliable tool.The Korean version of the QUALAS-T is a useful tool that can be used in clinical and research settings to optimize HRQOL in adolescents with SB.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the quality of life assessment in spina bifida for children (QUALAS-C-K).

PURPOSE: This study aimed to translate and cross-culturally adapt the QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Children (QUALAS-C) and validate the Korean version of the QUALAS-C (QUALAS-C-K). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three urologists translated the QUALAS-C into Korean. Facial and content validity were assessed in the pilot study. Back-translation into English was performed. In the main study, the QUALAS-C-K and Korean version of KIDSCREEN-27 were administered simultaneously. Test-retest reliability was confirmed by re-administering the QUALAS-C-K. Internal consistency was verified using Cronbach's alpha. Factor analysis was performed, and convergent and divergent validity were demonstrated using the Korean version of KIDSCREEN-27. RESULTS: A total of 53 children with spina bifida participated in the main study. Cronbach's alpha for the overall instrument determined good internal consistency (0.72-0.85), the intraclass correlation coefficient showed good stability (0.74-0.77), and the factor analysis converged to the same two-factor structure as in the original version. Construct validity revealed weak-to-moderate associations (r ≤ 0.57) between QUALAS-C-K and K-KIDSCREEN-27, indicating that QUALAS-C-K measures different aspects of the HRQOL than K-KIDSCEEN-27. CONCLUSIONS: The QUALAS-C-K is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the health-related quality of life of children with SB in Korea.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONHealth-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important patient-reported outcome among children with spina bifida (SB).The QUAlity of Life Assessment of Spina bifida for Children (QUALAS-C) is a self-reported, age-appropriate, and condition-specific HRQOL questionnaire for children with SB, developed in the United States.Our study demonstrated that the Korean version of the QUAlity of Life Assessment of Spina bifida for Children (QUALAS-C-K) is a valid and reliable tool.The QUALAS-C-K is a succinct and valuable questionnaire that can be used to assess HRQOL of children with SB, particularly focusing on bladder and bowel problems in clinical practice and research.

People with spina bifida use their MACE on long-term follow-up: A single institutional retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: While the Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE) facilitates bowel movements in patients with spina bifida (SB) and neuropathic bowel, little is known about its long-term use. We aimed to assess long-term MACE use and potential risk factors for disuse. METHODS: All patients with SB who underwent MACE procedures at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Main outcome was MACE disuse (no longer catheterizing the MACE for antegrade enemas) based on self-report on a clinic questionnaire, or medical record for patients last seen before introducing the questionnaire 5 years ago. Survival analysis used two timeframes: time after surgery (Analysis 1) and chronological age: accounting for older children reaching adulthood earlier (Analysis 2). RESULTS: Overall, 411 patients (54% female, 78% shunted, 65% augmented) underwent a MACE procedure at median 7.9 years old (median follow-up: 8.4 years). Thirty-three (8%) patients no longer used their MACE. Most common reasons for doing so were channel/stomal stenosis (61%) and excision at colostomy or other abdominal surgery (12%). Bowel management afterwards included oral agents ± enemas (55%), Chait tube (30%), colostomy (12%). After correcting for differential follow-up, 90% of participants used their MACE at 10 years and 87% at 15 years after surgery. Based on chronological age, 97% used their MACE at 15 years old, 92% at 20 and 81% at 30 (Summary Figure). On multivariate analysis, umbilical MACEs were 2.4 times more likely to be disused than right lower quadrant MACEs (p = 0.04). Without correcting for chronological age (Analysis 1), patients undergoing MACE surgery at older ages were more likely to stop MACE use (p = 0.03). However, after accounting for chronological age (Analysis 2), patients undergoing a MACE procedure at older ages were no more likely to stop its use (p = 0.47, Figure). Gender, SB type, shunt status, mobility status, bladder augmentation or a urinary catheterizable channel were not associated with stopping MACE use (p ≥ 0.10). COMMENT: Participants were regularly followed in multi-disciplinary SB clinics. We did not assess continence, satisfaction or long-term urinary channel use, making it premature to recommend optimal stomal locations. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with SB followed by a multi-disciplinary team continue using their MACE; 1% stopped MACE use annually, particularly after adolescence. This strongly suggests it is an effective bowel management method and transitioning to self-care plays a role in maintaining long-term MACE use. Umbilical MACEs may be at high risk of disuse, but all people with a MACE can benefit from support as they transition to adult care.

Sexual activity and function of adult men with spina bifida.

OBJECTIVE: Data on sexual function of men with spina bifida (SB) is limited. We aimed to assess sexual activity and erectile dysfunction (ED) in a large international sample of men with SB. METHODS: Men with SB (≥18yo) were recruited in an international online survey via clinics and social media. We collected data on demographics, ambulation (Hoffer classification), penile rigidity (Erection Hardness Score), sexual activity and ED (International Index of Erectile Function). Non-parametric tests were used. RESULTS: A total of 162 men (median age 35, 62% shunted, 38% community ambulators) reported sexual desire similar to the general population (p = 0.82), but 55% were dissatisfied with their sex life (Summary Table). Overall, 36% reported full penile rigidity with erections, more commonly with better ambulation (p = 0.01), 69% had ever experienced orgasm and 84% ejaculated. In 44 men (27%) attempting sexual intercourse in the last 4 weeks, 59% had ED (11% severe, 7% moderate, 14% mild-moderate, 27% mild). In this group, 91% of men reporting less than full penile rigidity had ED, compared to 30% with full penile rigidity (p = 0.001). Overall, partnered non-genital contact in the last 3 months was reported by 56%, solo masturbation: 62%, partnered intercourse: 48% (31% vaginal). Of 54 men who used phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5I), 80% reported improved erections, 56% improved intercourse. Overall, 40% reported non-genital erogenous zones as most pleasurable, especially with poorer ambulation (p = 0.002, chest/nipples: 73%). COMMENT: Strengths of this study include anonymous, voluntary, online participation maximizing participation of a heterogenous, international population. Whenever available, we compared findings to published values for the general population. Since romantic and sexual activity is a complex intersection of interest, opportunity and ability, a more comprehensive assessment was beyond the study's scope. Future work will focus on the interplay with issues like incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: ED was frequent among men with SB, especially in men with poorer ambulation. PDE5 inhibitors may be beneficial. Partnered sexual activity was reported by half of the men, although it may not involve penetrative intercourse.

Building a prototype of a continence goal-selection tool for children with spina bifida: Patient, parental and urology provider recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: No tools exist to help children with spina bifida (SB) describe their incontinence concerns and to help their providers account for them when evaluating management success. Our aim was to understand patients', parents', and clinicians' preferences about how a SB continence goal-selection tool (MyGoal-C) should look and function, and to create a tool prototype. METHODS: We used a qualitative research approach integrated with human-centered design methods. We recruited children with SB (8-17 years old), parents ( ≥ 18 years old) of children with SB (8-17 years old) in clinic and online, and urology healthcare providers at our institution. We surveyed children and parents, and conducted parent and provider Zoom-based prototyping sessions to iteratively design the app. Design researchers analyzed online activities using affinity diagramming, group analysis and modeling activities. Provider sessions were analyzed with qualitative thematic analysis based on grounded theory. Recruitment continued until saturation was reached. RESULTS: Thirteen children with SB participated (median age: 10 years old, 4 female, 9 shunted, 10 using bladder catheterizations). Thirty-seven parents participated (33 mothers, median age: 43 years old). Children and parents unanimously recommended an app and their comments generated 6 major theme domains: goal-setting process, in-app content, working toward goals, urology provider check-in, app customization, and using big data to improve future functionality. Twenty-one of the parents participated in 3 prototyping sessions with 6 breakout groups. The remaining 16 parents and 13 children then completed the Prototype Testing Survey, leading to a refined prototype and a visual flow map of the app experience (Figure). Feedback from 11 urology healthcare providers (7 female, 6 advanced practice providers) generated 8 themes: patient engagement/autonomy, clearly displaying results, integration into clinic workflow, not increasing clinical staff burden, potential clinician bias, parental involvement, limitations of the app, and future app adaptation. These cumulative data allowed for a construction of a final app prototype. COMMENT: Findings of our study lay the foundation for creating a goal-selection app that meets preferences and needs of children, parents, and providers. Next steps involve building the app, testing its usability and assessing it prospectively in a clinical setting. CONCLUSIONS: Children with SB and parents preferred an app to help them set and track continence goals. All stakeholders, including urology providers, offered complementary and mutually reinforcing feedback to guide the creation of an app prototype that would ultimately be integrated into a clinic visit.

Patient and Parent Perspectives on Testicular Adrenal Rest Tumors in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: Testicular adrenal rest tumors (TARTs) increase the risk of infertility in males with classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). There is no consensus regarding at what age screening testicular ultrasounds should begin and how often they should be repeated. Furthermore, it is unknown whether patients and parents are aware of the significance of TARTs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate awareness, concern, and screening rates for TARTs in males with classic CAH. METHODS: Males with CAH and parents completed an online questionnaire from 2019 to 2020. Responses to questions about TARTs were analyzed. Fisher's exact test was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Of 123 responders, 14 were males with CAH (range 16-54 years) and 109 were parents of males with CAH (son's age range infancy to 37 years). Of all responders, 74% were concerned about the possibility of TARTs, 48% had discussions about TARTs with their endocrinologist, and 42% were aware of possible infertility in males with CAH. There was no difference between responses provided by affected males and parents for these topics (p ≥ 0.08). Among male responders with CAH, 93% had at least one testicular ultrasound, and 77% had undergone more than one. Among parent responders, 30% of their sons had at least one testicular ultrasound, and 61% had more than one. The frequency, total number, and age when the first testicular ultrasound was obtained were inconsistent in both groups. Fifty percent of male responders with CAH and 11% of sons were referred to a urologist for evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Although most responders were concerned about TARTs, less than half recalled discussing this issue with their endocrinologist, and less than half were aware of the possibility of infertility. Although TARTs are most often treated medically, several responders were referred to a urologist. Standardized patient education and consensus guidelines are needed for the surveillance and management of TARTs in males with classic CAH.

Age-based risk of end-stage kidney disease in patients with myelomeningocele.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) risk after infancy in individuals with myelomeningocele (MMC) followed by urology in the modern medical era and to assess if ESKD risk was higher after surgery related to a hostile bladder. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with MMC followed by urology at our institution born ≥ 1972 (when clean intermittent catheterization was introduced) past 1 year of age (when mortality is highest, sometimes before establishing urology care). ESKD was defined as requiring permanent peritoneal/hemodialysis or renal transplantation. Early surgery related to hostile bladder included incontinent vesicostomy, bladder augmentation, detrusor Botulinum A toxin injection, ureteral reimplantation, or nephrectomy for recurrent urinary tract infections. Survival analysis and proportional hazards regression were used. Sensitivity analyses included: risk factor analysis with only vesicostomy, timing of surgery, including the entire population without minimal follow-up (n = 1054) and only patients with ≥ 5 years of follow-up (n = 925). RESULTS: Overall, 1029 patients with MMC were followed for a median of 17.0 years (49% female, 76% shunted). Seven patients (0.7%) developed ESKD at a median 24.3 years old (5 hemodialysis, 1 peritoneal dialysis, 1 transplantation). On survival analysis, the ESKD risk was 0.3% at 20 years old and 2.1% at 30 years old (Figure). This was ∼100 times higher than the general population (0.003% by 21 years old, p < 0.001). Patients who underwent early surgery for hostile bladder had higher ESKD risk (HR 8.3, p = 0.001, 6% vs. 1.5% at 30 years). On exploratory analyses, gender, birth year, shunt status and wheelchair use were not associated with ESKD risk (p ≥ 0.16). Thirty-year ESKD risk was 10% after early vesicostomy vs. 1.4% among children without one (p = 0.001). Children undergoing bladder surgery between 1.5 and 5 years old had a higher risk of ESKD. No other statistically/clinically significant differences were noted. COMMENT: Patients with MMC remain at risk of progressive renal damage throughout life. We relied on the final binary ESKD outcome to quantify this risk, rather than imprecise glomerular filtration rate formulas. Analysis was limited by few people developing ESKD, inconsistent documentation of early urodynamic findings and indications for bladder-related surgery. CONCLUSIONS: While ESKD is relatively uncommon in the MMC population receiving routine urological care, affecting 2.1% of individuals in the first 3 decades, it is significantly higher than the general population. Children with poor bladder function are likely at high risk, underlining the need for routine urological care, particularly in adulthood.

A patient- and parent-centered approach to urinary and fecal incontinence in children and adolescents with spina bifida: understanding experiences in the context of other competing care issues.

INTRODUCTION: Despite significant and known challenges to urinary and fecal incontinence (UI and FI, respectively) among children with spina bifida (SB) and their families, few studies have identified patient-centered measures and approaches to assessing them. This study represents the first stage of a larger study to develop a patient-centered goal-setting tool to guide incontinence management (Figure). Our aim was to understand patient experiences of UI and FI, and what goals should be included in the tool. METHODS: We used a qualitative research approach integrated with human-centered design methods. We recruited, in clinic and online, children with SB (8-17 years old) and parents (>=18 years old) of children with SB (8-17 years old). Online activities were analyzed by four experienced design researchers using affinity diagramming, group analysis and modeling activities (mind maps, challenge maps, experience maps). Recruitment and thematic qualitative analysis continued until saturation was reached. RESULTS: Seventeen children with SB participated (9 female, 12 shunted, 13 using bladder catheterizations, 6 using Malone antegrade continence enema, median age: 15 years old). Fifteen parents participated (13 mothers/2 fathers, median age: 42 years old), including six mother-child dyads. Five major themes each were identified for UI and FI experiences: (1) negative emotional impact of incontinence, (2) unpredictability of incontinence, (3) challenging/unpleasant incontinence management, (4) inconvenient/unreliable incontinence management, (5) UI management having unpleasant complications and FI putting much responsibility on parents. We identified six UI goal domains and five FI goal domains. Four overlapping domains included: accidents, independence, interruptions at school and social/friends. Unique domains were: urinary tract infections (UI), catheterizations (UI) and enemas (FI). COMMENT: Findings of our study improve our understanding of children's and parents' experiences associated with incontinence in SB and potential continence goals. CONCLUSIONS: Children with SB experience incontinence as distressing and unpredictable. Incontinence management can be challenging and unreliable. Patient-centered continence goals cluster in domains, indicating how incontinence intermeshes with other life areas and offering potential approaches to structure continence goals in a goals-selection tool.