Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) to Topical Products in Orthopedic Surgery: Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Strategies.

The potential for many of the commonly used surgical site wound adhesives, skin antiseptic solutions, topical antibiotics, and suture materials to sensitize and subsequently result in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) has become increasingly recognized within orthopedic surgery. Particularly with subsequent exposure to the offending allergen, the cutaneous allergic reaction may present in a similar fashion to cellulitis, thus making early differentiation between the two etiologies to initiate the appropriate and timely treatment crucial. Recognition of the characteristic appearance and severity of ACD surrounding a surgical wound often drives the initial management. This typically consists of anti-histamines, topical corticosteroids, and possible removal of the offending allergen for low grade findings and oral steroids and prophylactic oral antibiotics for the more severe reactions. Multidisciplinary care, including the expertise of a dermatologist or wound care specialist when faced with this challenging clinical scenario is critical and elective patch testing may be indicated to ascertain the exact allergen involved, particularly in patients with a prior history of wound issues. Finally, any clinical cases of ACD following an orthopedic procedure should be documented in the patient's chart so that exposure can be avoided with any future surgery.

Elbow Arthroplasty: A Concise Literature Update.

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is increasingly used, especially in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and distal humerus fractures (DHFs). This narrative review of the recent literature published in 2022 reached the following conclusions: 1) Age greater than 80 is not a contraindication for TEA. 2) The estimated 10-year survival reported for linked TEAs is 92%, and unlinked TEAs 84%. 3) For DHFs in the elderly, regarding the flexion/extension arc, TEA gives substantially better results than open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The reoperation and elbow stiffness rates are substantially lower in TEA than in ORIF. 4) Comparing distal humeral hemiarthroplasty (DHH) vs. TEA in individuals over 65 years with a non-reconstructable DHF favors DHH regarding the range of motion but with a similarly high rate of adverse events in the two surgical techniques. 5) The rate of eradication of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is 69-76% with two-stage, 71% with resection arthroplasty, 67% with one-stage, 58% with DAIR, and 40% with elbow arthrodesis.

Does Morbid Obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m2) Impact Operative Time, Blood Loss, Length of Stay, or Complications Following Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Objectives: There have been conflicting reports regarding the effects of obesity on both surgical time and blood loss following anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. Varying categories of obesity has made comparison amongst existing studies difficult. Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive anatomic shoulder arthroplasty cases (aTSA) was undertaken. Demographic data, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), age-adjusted Charleson Comorbidity Index (ACCI), operative time, hospital length of stay (LOS), and both POD#1 and discharge visual analogue score (VAS) was collected. Intra-operative total blood volume loss (ITBVL) and need for transfusion was calculated. BMI was categorized as non-obese (<30 kg/m2), obese (30-40 kg/m2) and morbidly obese (≥40 kg/m2). Unadjusted associations of BMI with operative time, ITBVL and LOS were examined using Spearman correlation coefficients. Regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with hospital LOS. Results: There were 130 aTSA cases performed, including 45 short stem and 85 stemless implants, of which 23 (17.7%) were morbidly obese, 60 (46.2%) were obese and 47 (36.1%) were non-obese. Median operative time for the morbidly obese cohort was 119.5 minutes (IQR 93.0, 142.0) versus 116.5 minutes (IQR 99.5, 134.5) for the obese cohort versus 125.0 minutes (IQR, 99.0, 146.0) for the non-obese cohort. (P=0.61) The median ITBVL for the morbidly obese cohort was 235.8 ml (IQR 144.3, 329.7) versus 220.1 ml (IQR 147.7, 262.7) for the obese cohort versus 216.3 ml (IQR 139.7, 315.5) for the non-obese cohort. (P=0.72). BMI ≥40kg/m2 (IRR 1.32, P=0.038), age (IRR 1.01, P=0.026), and female gender (IRR 1.54, P<0.001) were predictive of increased LOS. There was no difference with regards to in-hospital medical complications (P=0.13), surgical complications (P=1.0), need for re-operation (P=0.66) and 30-day return to the ER (P=0.06). Conclusion: Morbid obesity was not associated with increased surgical time, ITBVL and perioperative medical or surgical complications following aTSA, though it was predictive of increased hospital LOS.

Accuracy and Reliability of Computerized Surgical Planning Software in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to assess the concordance between preoperatively determined implant parameters using CT-based planning software and surgically implanted prostheses. Secondarily, we sought to evaluate the agreement between preoperative plans performed by surgeons at different levels of training. METHODS: Patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and had a preoperative CT scan according to Blueprint (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) protocol to be used for preoperative planning were included. A cohort of short-stemmed (SS) and stemless cases performed between October 2017 and December 2018 was randomly selected from an institutional database for the study. Planning was performed separately by four observers at different levels of orthopedic training at a minimum of six months following the actual surgery. Concordance between the surgical decisions during planning and the actually utilized implants was calculated. Additionally, inter-rater agreement was analyzed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Implant parameters assessed were glenoid size, backside radius of curvature, and the need for posterior augment, in addition to humeral stem/nucleus size, head size, head height, and head eccentricity. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included (10 stemmed and 11 stemless) with a cohort comprising 12 (57%) females with a median age of 62 years (IQR 59.5,67). There was a total of 544 decision possibilities based on the above parameters. The total number of decisions that matched surgical data was 333 (61.2%). Prediction of glenoid component augmentation need and size was the variable that matched most with surgical data (83.3%), whereas nucleus/stem size was the worst (42.9%). Interobserver agreement was excellent in one variable, good in three variables, moderate in one, and poor in two. The best interobserver agreement was with regard to head height. CONCLUSION: Preoperative planning using CT-based software may be more accurate for the glenoid component when compared to humeral-sided parameters. Specifically, planning may be most helpful in determining the need and the size of glenoid component augmentation. Utilizing computerized software demonstrates high reliability, even among surgeons early in their orthopedic training.

Bridge plating in the setting of radiocarpal instability: Does distal fixation to the second or third metacarpal matter? A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Radiocarpal dislocations are rare but potentially devastating injuries. Poorer outcomes are associated with inadequate or lost reduction, such as ulnar translocation, but no consensus exists on the ideal fixation technique. Dorsal bridge plate fixation has been described for various settings in the treatment of complex distal radius fractures and can be fixed distally to the second or third metacarpal, but its application for radiocarpal dislocations has not been established. AIM: To determine whether distal fixation to the second or third metacarpal matters. METHODS: Using a cadaveric radiocarpal dislocation model, the effect of distal fixation was studied in two stages: (1) A pilot study that investigated the effect of distal fixation alone; and (2) a more refined study that investigated the effect of described techniques for distal and proximal fixation. Radiographs were measured in various parameters to determine the quality of the reduction achieved. RESULTS: The pilot study found that focusing on distal fixation alone without changing proximal fixation results in ulnar translocation and volar subluxation when fixing distally to the second metacarpal compared with the third. The second iteration demonstrated that anatomic alignment in coronal and sagittal planes could be achieved with each technique. CONCLUSION: In a cadaveric radiocarpal dislocation model, anatomic alignment can be maintained with bridge plate fixation to the second metacarpal or the third metacarpal if the described technique is followed. When considering dorsal bridge plate fixation for radiocarpal dislocations, the surgeon is encouraged to understand the nuances of different fixation techniques and how implant design features may influence proximal placement.

Musculoskeletal Literacy in Orthopedics: Associated Factors, Effects on Patient-Physician Communication and Intervention Strategies.

Health literacy is defined as the degree to which an individual obtains and processes basic health information and services so as to make appropriate and informed health decisions. Limited health literacy (LHL), as assessed by various validated instruments, remains prevalent amongst older adult patients, non-Caucasian ethnicities, and those of lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Of concern, LHL has been associated with decreased medical knowledge, disuse of preventative medical services, worse chronic disease control and increased use of emergency services. Within orthopedics specifically, LHL has been associated with lower expectations regarding outcomes and ambulation following total hip and knee surgery and fewer questions asked regarding diagnosis and treatment in the outpatient care setting. In some cases, LHL has been independently correlated with worse patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), though this finding may be due in part to the reading level required of the PROMs. There is growing evidence that active intervention by the orthopedic provider and demonstration of empathy improves patient comprehension of the nature of their musculoskeletal complaints, aids informed decision-making and, ultimately, maximizes patient satisfaction. Recognition of the associated factors for LHL will ensure improved physician-patient communication through the implementation of health literate interventions focused on those most at-risk.

The association between critical shoulder angle and revision following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a matched case-control study.

HYPOTHESIS: The concept of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) was introduced in 2013, with studies showing that larger CSA is associated with rotator cuff tears (RCTs) and smaller CSA with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. We hypothesized outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) would differ depending on CSA. METHODS: We conducted a matched case-control study using Kaiser Permanente's Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry to identify patients who underwent primary elective anatomic TSA for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis from 2009-2018. Seventy-eight adult patients who underwent revision following the primary TSA due to glenoid component failure or rotator cuff tear comprised the case group. A control group of nonrevised patients were identified from the same source population. Two controls were matched to each case by age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, surgeon who performed the index TSA, and post-TSA follow-up time. The relationship between revision and CSA as measured on radiographs were analyzed as a 1:2 matched-pairs case-control study with use of multiple conditional multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Revised cases had a higher likelihood of a CSA ≥35° (odds ratio [OR] = 2.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-4.59). A higher likelihood of CSA ≥35° was observed for those revised for glenoid loosening (OR = 4.58, 95% CI = 1.20-17.50) and revised for rotator cuff tear (OR = 2.41, 95% CI = 1.18-4.92) compared with nonrevised controls. Every 5° increase in CSA had higher odds of overall revision (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.18-2.21), glenoid loosening (OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.27-4.92), and rotator cuff tear (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.07-2.14). CONCLUSION: In a matched case-control study of primary anatomic TSA, individuals who were revised for aseptic glenoid loosening and superior cuff failure had a higher CSA compared with nonrevised individuals. These data suggest that surgeons may consider using reverse arthroplasty in cases of primary shoulder arthritis with a CSA of 35° or greater.

The critical shoulder angle (CSA) in glenohumeral osteoarthritis: Does observer experience affect measurement reliability on plain radiographs?

BACKGROUND: The critical shoulder angle (CSA) has been associated with full-thickness rotator cuff tears both in the presence and absence of glenohumeral arthritis. It is unclear whether the CSA can be reliably measured from plain radiographs of concentric glenohumeral osteoarthritis amongst examiners at differing levels of training. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of consecutive patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The CSA was measured on a standardized AP scapular view at baseline and then 4 weeks later by fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons, a shoulder fellow and a senior orthopaedic resident. Grade of arthritis was categorized using the Samilson and Prieto method. The inter- and intra-observer reliability was then determined for all examiners, as well as for increasing severity of radiographic arthritis. The relationship between the CSA and grade of arthritis was assessed. RESULTS: There were 166 included patients comprised of 104 females (63%) and 62 males (37%) with a mean age of 65.9 ± 10.4 years. The inter- and intra-observer reliability for measuring the CSA amongst all examiners was found to be excellent, with an intra-class coefficient (ICC) of >0.9 (p < 0.0001). The ICC remained excellent even amongst radiographs with more advanced arthritis. Furthermore, there was a weak, inverse relationship between the grade of arthritis and the CSA (r = -0.377, p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The CSA can reliably be measured by examiners at varying levels of orthopaedic training, even with more advanced radiographic glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Level of evidence: Level III (Prognostic).

Patient Preferences for Plain Radiographs in the Setting of Atraumatic Shoulder Pain: Which Factors Influence Their Decision?

INTRODUCTION: Plain radiographs of the shoulder are routinely obtained for patients presenting with atraumatic shoulder pain, although the diagnostic utility of this imaging modality is unclear. Despite this, patients often prefer to obtain radiographs and may associate them with a more satisfactory visit. METHODS: New patients presenting with atraumatic shoulder pain were provided with information regarding the potential advantages and disadvantages of plain radiographs as part of their visit. Patients then decided whether to receive radiographs and baseline patient demographics were collected. A detailed physical examination and history was performed by a fellowship-trained provider, and a preliminary diagnosis and tentative treatment plan was formulated. The radiographs were then reviewed to determine whether the diagnosis and treatment plan was altered by addition of the radiographs. Patients who opted for radiographs then reported whether they felt the radiographs aided in diagnosis and treatment and whether the addition of the radiograph influenced their visit satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 220 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 121 patients (55%) requested a radiograph. The mean age was 57.1 ± 16.1 years (range, 18 to 91 years). Lack of bachelor's degree (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 6.2; P = 0.01), lack of previous contralateral shoulder pain (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.0 to 8.2; P = 0.0001), and lack of a previous shoulder radiograph (OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 4.1 to 16.9; P < 0.0001) or MRI within the last 6 months (OR, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 26.8; P = 0.01) were independently associated with patient preference to obtain radiographs for atraumatic shoulder pain. Of the 121 patients who requested radiographs, 117 (96.7%) felt that radiographs improved their satisfaction. DISCUSSION: Patients who obtained radiographs overwhelmingly reported its importance in improving visit satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy. Given the increasing emphasis on shared decision making, further study of patient factors influencing the decision to obtain routine radiographs will lead to more efficient practice management and potentially improved patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II (Diagnostic).