RESUMO
Background and Aims: With the second wave of COVID-19, India lost close to three lakh people within the span of a few months. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of anemia on the severity of COVID-19 based on the hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of the patients noted at the time of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), to mark Hb as a prognostic marker of disease severity for the future. Material and Methods: Retrospective data was collected from 784 patients admitted to the COVID adult ICU between March and June 2021. Patients were identified as anemic and non-anemic based on the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Chi-squared test was applied to see the relationship of anemia with the patient deaths. Results: Among the 784 patients, 507 succumbed to COVID-19. Of these, 49.3% had varying degrees of anemia. Significant correlation of anemia with death due to COVID-19 was found in males and females (P = 0.002106 and P = 0.033071, respectively) and in patients without any other comorbidities except anemia (P = 0.002020). This suggests that anemia is independently an important parameter that plays a role in severity of COVID-19. Conclusion: Upon observing a significant correlation between anemia and COVID-19 severity, it can be stated that anemia should be considered as an independent prognostic risk factor for COVID-19 and that hemoglobin can be used for risk stratification in patients under home or hospital care.
RESUMO
CONTEXT: Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation lead to strong sympathetic response which may precipitate arrhythmias, myocardial ischemia and cerebrovascular accidents in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease. AIMS: This study was aimed to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized controlled double-blinded study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of ninety patients were selected and randomized into three groups of thirty patients each: Group C received infusion of 20 mL 0.9% normal saline (NS) over 10 min, Group D received infusion of dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min, and Group E received infusion of esmolol 1.5 mg/kg diluted in 20 mL NS over 10 min. Three minutes after the completion of infusion, patients were induced with general anesthesia. Baseline parameters such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and rate pressure product (RPP) were recorded before administration of study drugs and at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 min after intubation. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: One-way ANOVA was used for comparison among the groups and unpaired t-test was used for comparison within the groups along with Tukey's test for post test analysis. RESULTS: Mean HR, SBP, DBP, MAP, and RPP values remained significantly lower in Group D than that of Group C and Group E at all time intervals up to 10 min after intubation. CONCLUSIONS: Both dexmedetomidine and esmolol suppressed the hemodynamic response to intubation when compared to control group, but dexmedetomidine is more effective than esmolol in maintaining hemodynamic stability following laryngoscopy and intubation.