Evaluating the Structural and Construct Validity of the Pain Understanding and Confidence Questionnaire for Assessing Physical Therapists' Pain Management Competence: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background The Pain Understanding and Confidence Questionnaire (PUnCQ) comprises two parts: the first assesses clinical judgments based on contemporary pain knowledge, and the second consists of items querying confidence in pain management for the presented vignette. In contrast to existing measures, PUnCQ can evaluate a therapist's capacity to make appropriate clinical decisions within a specific vignette. Thus, PUnCQ may be a promising measure to assess the clinical competence of physical therapists in pain management. This study evaluated the structural and construct validity of PUnCQ. Methodology Eligible participants were two cohorts of physical therapists managing patients with pain. PUnCQ and Knowledge and Attitudes of Pain (KNAP) data were collected using an anonymous survey. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted for both parts of the PUnCQ, and an exploratory factor analysis was conducted when multidimensionality was suspected. Construct validity was assessed with the hypothesis that Pearson's r values to KNAP scores, indicating knowledge about modern pain science and biopsychosocial attitudes toward pain, were expected to be 0.3-0.5 in part one and >0.5 in part two. Results Data from 112 participants were analyzed. PUnCQ part one fully satisfied the predetermined criteria for unidimensionality, but part two did not. Exploratory factor analysis for part two revealed a two-factor structure: a 14-item Factor 1 labeled "pain management" and a seven-item Factor 2 labeled "medication guidance and pain mechanism," while Cronbach's alpha was 0.98 across all items. Statistically significant correlations were detected with the KNAP in each part of the PUnCQ (r = 0.26 in part one and r = 0.41 in part two). Conclusion PUnCQ has structural validity and an aspect of construct validity.

Female teleworkers with pain have the highest presenteeism, where its primary contributing variable was not those of musculoskeletal disability.

Presenteeism, among desk workers with pain can be affected by musculoskeletal disabilities (MSDs), working styles, and gender. In this study, teleworkers were defined as those who teleworked >70% of the time at home, while others were defined as non-full teleworkers. This study aimed to (1) compare the magnitude of presenteeism among four groups: male and female teleworkers with pain and male and female non-full teleworkers with pain, and (2) create a regression model of presenteeism with 66 independent biopsychosocial variables for each group. Data were collected through an anonymous online survey. Presenteeism was evaluated using the work functioning impairment scale. The 66 independent biopsychosocial variables included four disability measures, namely, stiff neck/shoulders, low back pain, and upper or lower limb problems, along with other factors relevant to presenteeism in previous studies, such as age, body mass index, comorbidities, work-related variables, pain catastrophizing, and various psychological distress measures. Data from 1068 male non-full teleworkers, 1,043 female non-full teleworkers, 282 male teleworkers, and 307 female teleworkers were analyzed. Presenteeism was the highest among female teleworkers with pain. Furthermore, in all models, overall psychological distress, rather than the four MSD measures, was the primary contributing factor for presenteeism.

KOJI AWARENESS, a self-rating whole-body movement assessment system, has intersession reliability and comparability to external examiner rating.

KOJI AWARENESS is a newly developed self-rating whole-body movement assessment system that includes 11 domains and 22 tests. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the intersession reliability of KOJI AWARENESS, and the secondary aim was to determine whether a fixed bias existed between self-rating and external examiner rating. Fifty university students rated their movement ability in two separate sessions; an external examiner also rated the students' movement ability. Participants were blinded to their scores at the first session as well as the external examiner's rating scores. The primary analysis included examining the intersession reliability of the total score with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). ICC values were interpreted as follows: insufficient, < .7 and sufficient, ≥ .7. To achieve the secondary aim, Bland-Altman analysis was performed. ICC for the intersession reliability was .86 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of .77 to .92 and a minimum detectable change (MDC) of 5.15. Bland-Altman analysis revealed fixed bias as the 95% CIs of the mean difference between the two different rating scores (-3.49 to -2.43 and -3.94 to -2.98 in the first and second sessions, respectively) did not include 0 in the data of each session. However, no proportional bias was identified because no statistically significant Pearson's correlation (P > .05) was noted between the means of the two methods and the mean difference between the two different methods in each session. This study identified that KOJI AWARENESS has sufficient intersession reliability among relatively young and healthy participants. External examiner rating tended to have lower total scores than self-rating; however, the bias was below the MDC and seemed not to be clinically significant.

Research Priorities in the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy Among Diploma Therapists: An International Delphi Study.

Introduction Mechanical diagnosis and therapy (MDT) is the most researched approach in musculoskeletal physical therapy and involves classifying patients into sub-groups based on their response to loading strategies. MDT diploma therapists (Dip-MDTs) fully recognize the value of MDT in musculoskeletal physical therapy. MDT is updating its system based on the latest research, but the system has not yet been fully established. Therefore, more research is required to increase the comprehensibility of the system. Thus, we aimed to identify future research priorities of MDT. Methods We conducted a modified Delphi study with three rounds. The Research Advisory Committee (RAC) members (n=7) of the McKenzie Institute International were invited to participate in the initial idea generation round. In the subsequent two consensus rounds, Dip-MDTs (n=299) were asked to indicate their level of agreement with the results of the idea generation round using a five-point Likert scale. The criteria for consensus were mean score ≥4.0, coefficient of variation ≤30%, percent agreement ≥75%, and quartile deviation ≤1. A post-hoc analysis of the consensus was conducted when the number of participants from a certain country exceeded one-third of the total number of participants. Results The participation rates for each round were 57.1%, 52.2%, and 49.8%. The USA accounted for 43.6% and 44.3% of all participants at the two consensus rounds, respectively. Finally, nine items reached consensus in the second consensus round. After the post-hoc analysis, eight items reached consensus: (1) cost-effectiveness, (2) cervical and thoracic spine, (3) extremity classifications, (4) filtered randomized controlled trials (RCTs), (5) spinal source classification, (6) centralization and directional preferences, (7) predictive factors for recurrence, and (8) patient education. Conclusion In this study, we identified the research priorities of MDT that would enhance the completion of the MDT system.

Confirmation of the Unidimensionality of the Satisfaction and Recovery Index Among Those With Various Musculoskeletal Disorders.

Background A semistructured patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) wherein patients rate the importance of structured items and the magnitude of the psychometric properties to be investigated (e.g., disability and satisfaction) facilitates patient engagement in their treatment and patient-centered clinical practice. The Satisfaction and Recovery Index (SRI) is one such semistructured PROM that was originally developed to measure recovery from a whiplash injury. Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated a one-factor structure among ambulatory community-dwelling people with traumatic musculoskeletal injuries. However, a confirmatory factor analysis has not been conducted among patients with various musculoskeletal disorders, and the internal structure of the SRI has not been established yet. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the internal structure of the SRI among patients with diverse musculoskeletal disorders. Methodology An anonymous survey was performed for patients who were referred for physical therapy for musculoskeletal disorders at a local orthopedic clinic. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. The goodness-of-fit criteria were as follows: chi-square/degree of freedom < 3, goodness-of-fit index > 0.90, adjusted goodness-of-fit index > 0.95, and root mean square error of approximation < 0.08. Results Data from 217 participants were analyzed. All goodness-of-fit criteria were satisfied. Conclusion This study confirmed the acceptable internal structure of the SRI among patients with diverse musculoskeletal disorders.

Early-onset herpes simplex encephalitis type 1 triggered by COVID-19 disease: A case report.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a systemic inflammatory response and a temporary immunosuppression of hosts. Several reports have showed that reactivation of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is strongly associated with COVID-19. We present a case of a 66-year-old female, who developed HSV-1 encephalitis, showing impaired consciousness and typical MRI findings such as hyperintense lesions in the temporal lobe, insular cortices, bilateral medial frontal lobe on diffusion-weighted imaging, 7 days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. The number of cases of encephalitis in patients with COVID-19 is increasing. However, there has been limited reports of HSV-1 encephalitis following COVID-19, especially for cases with an interval of 7 days or less from the onset of COVID-19 symptoms to the onset of HSV-1 encephalitis. Our case highlights the importance of considering HSV-1 encephalitis in the differential when managing a patient with COVID-19-associated neurologic complications, even if it is in the early stages of COVID-19.

Supervised Exercise Therapy Reduces Presenteeism to Greater Extent Than Unsupervised Self-Care in Workers with Musculoskeletal Pain: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Presenteeism is defined as the loss of work productivity due to health issues in workers, which can be measured subjectively. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of supervised exercise therapy and unsupervised self-care in reducing presenteeism in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for various keywords from their inception to January 2023. Two examiners independently assessed the eligibility of studies: (1) studies involving workers suffering from musculoskeletal pain, (2) those involving supervised exercise therapy intervention with interactive communication, and (3) those in which the comparison group was subjected to interventions other than supervised exercise therapy, and (4) those including patient-reported outcome measures of presenteeism or work productivity or ability. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were calculated using a random effects model, with higher scores indicating reduced presenteeism in the intervention group compared with that in the comparison group. The GRADE assesses the overall certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Only the short-term effects of interventions on presenteeism could be obtained using four studies. The intervention group showed statistically significant short-term effects on presenteeism compared with the comparison group (p < 0.001; SMD, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.77). The GRADE score was downgraded by two levels from high to low due to concerns for indirectness. CONCLUSIONS: Although the certainty of the evidence was low, it was assumed that supervised exercise therapy was more effective than unsupervised self-care in reducing presenteeism in workers with musculoskeletal disorders.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the pain understanding and confidence questionnaire into Japanese.

[Purpose] This study aimed to develop a culturally adapted Japanese version of the Pain Understanding and Confidence Questionnaire (PUnCQ). The first-factor structure describes management from 12 perspectives for a case vignette of chronic pain and determines whether the management is based on a biomedical or biopsychosocial perspective. The second-factor structure evaluates the confidence level in management skills for the same case from 21 perspectives. [Participants and Methods] We conducted a cross-cultural adaptation based on five stages according to Beaton's guidelines (two forward translations, creation of an integrated forward translation version, two backward translations, creation of a provisional Japanese version, and a pilot test). In the pilot test, we asked 40 Japanese physical therapists to rate their understanding of the PUnCQ descriptions on a five-point Likert scale (1, not at all understandable; 5, completely understandable) and provide comments when they rated 1 to 3. We repeated revisions and pilot tests until less than 10% of the respondents rated 1 for all descriptions. [Results] By conducting two rounds of the pilot test, all items of descriptions satisfied the preestablished criteria. [Conclusion] A Japanese version of the PUnCQ was developed.

Predictors of 1-Year Perceived Recovery, Absenteeism, and Expenses Due to Low Back Pain in Workers Receiving Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

This multicenter prospective cohort study aimed to preliminarily explore statistically relevant modifiable and predetermined factors for 1-year perceived recovery, absenteeism, and personal expenses in workers who received Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy (MDT) for low back pain (LBP). Three stepwise multiple regression models were explored with 42 independent variables, including (1) socio-demographic factors; (2) risk stratification; (3) pain-related variables, psychological variables, and behavioral variables at baseline and changes after a month; (4) therapeutic alliance and exercise adherence at 1-month follow-up; and (5) MDT classification and therapist levels. Data from 58 participants were analyzed, after which a model with a medium effect size was developed for 1-year perceived recovery only. Consequently, patients with derangement syndrome were expected to have improved 1-year perceived recovery, with expected predetermined prognostic factors including shorter symptom duration, self-management skills to lead a healthy life, and less pain catastrophization at baseline. A stronger therapeutic alliance between patient and therapist during the 1-month MDT intervention was identified as an expected modifiable prognostic factor. It may be difficult to accurately predict the annual absenteeism and personal expenses due to LBP given the weak to low effect sizes of the developed models.

Research activities contributing to evidence-based practice implementation in Japanese rehabilitation professionals.

[Purpose] This study aimed to determine whether certain research activities improve the attitude of rehabilitation professionals towards evidence-based practice and its implementation in Japan. [Participants and Methods] We included physical, occupational, and speech therapists currently working in clinical settings. We employed hierarchical multiple regression analyses to assess the attitude of rehabilitation professionals towards evidence-based practice and research activities. Scores of the five dimensions of the Health Sciences-Evidence Based Practice questionnaire were considered the dependent variables. The five dimensions were as follows: Dimension 1, attitude towards evidence-based practice; Dimensions 2-4, evidence-based practice implementation; and Dimension 5, work environment related to evidence-based practice barriers-facilitators. The four sociodemographic variables (gender, academic degree, clinical experience, and the number of therapists at work) were initially included, following which self-reported research achievements were supplemented as independent variables (the number of case studies, literature reviews, cross-sectional studies, and longitudinal studies). [Results] We analyzed data from 167 participants. In addition to sociodemographic variables, the research achievements that statistically increased F-values of the modeling were case study achievements in Dimensions 2-3, cross-sectional study achievements in Dimensions 2 and 4, and longitudinal study achievements in Dimension 5. [Conclusion] Case studies and cross-sectional studies could improve evidence-based practice implementation among rehabilitation professionals in Japan.

Immediate neck hypoalgesic effects of craniocervical flexion exercises and cervical retraction exercises among individuals with non-acute neck pain and a directional preference for retraction or extension: preliminary pretest-posttest randomized experimental design.

BACKGROUND: Selective deep neck flexor muscle activation through craniocervical flexion exercises has been considered to be different from cervical retraction exercises. OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate analgesic effect of craniocervical flexion versus cervical retraction exercises in individuals with nonacute, directional preference (DP) for cervical retraction or extension. METHODS: A two-arm, assessor-blinded, pretest-posttest randomized experiment was conducted. Participants were randomly assigned to either craniocervical flexion or cervical retraction exercises and those who were confirmed at the post-intervention examination to have a DP for cervical retraction or extension were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was pressure pain thresholds at the C2 and C5-C6 levels. RESULTS: A total of 10 (mean age = 20.6 years) and nine participants (mean age = 19.4 years) undertook craniocervical flexion and retraction exercises, respectively. One-way analysis of variance demonstrated no statistically significant (p > 0.05) interaction effect regardless of the neck level. In the pre-post change percentages, retraction exercises provided greater analgesic effects compared to craniocervical flexion exercises at the C2 (Hedges' g = 0.679) and C5-C6 levels (g = 0.637). CONCLUSION: This study showed a comparable or greater immediate neck analgesic effect from cervical retraction exercises compared to craniocervical flexion exercises in individuals with a DP for cervical retraction or extension.

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Japanese Health Locus of Control scales among people with musculoskeletal disorders.

[Purpose] To determine whether the 25-item Japanese Health Locus of Control (25-JHLC) scale satisfies a 5-factor structure among Japanese with musculoskeletal disorders. [Participants and Methods] The primary inclusion criterion was people undergoing physical therapy for musculoskeletal disorders in two medical facilities. The 25-JHLC scale and demographic data were obtained by conducting an anonymous survey. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to analyze data from the 25-JHLC scale in 200 patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Fits for the 5-factor structure (1-internal; 2-family; 3-professional; 4-chance; and 5-supernatural) and the 2-factor structure (1-internal; and 2-external, including family, professional, chance, and supernatural) were studied. The goodness-of-fit criteria included chi-squared/degree of freedom, goodness-of-fit index, adjusted goodness-of-fit index, and root mean square error of approximation. [Results] The mean (standard deviation) age of the participants was 46.3 (18.3) years of age. The 2-factor structure satisfied no criteria; however, the 5-factor structure satisfied two criteria for acceptable fit (chi-squared/degree of freedom, and root mean square error of approximation). [Conclusion] This study found that the 5-factor structure of the 25-JHLC scale can be accepted to some extent among Japanese with musculoskeletal disorders without comorbidities.

Possible solutions to enhance evidence-based practice proposed by rehabilitation professionals in Japan: a Delphi study.

[Purpose] We aimed to identify possible solutions to enhance evidence-based practice (EBP) in rehabilitation professionals in Japan. [Participants and Methods] A three-round Delphi method was undertaken among a cohort of clinical therapists (328 physical therapists, 55 occupational therapists, and 6 speech therapists). In the first round, the participants listed possible solutions for promoting EBP, other than 12 solutions presented in a previous study; subsequently, a new list was created. In the second round, a newly-created list of solutions was presented, and the participants responded on a 5-point Likert scale on how much they agreed with the solutions promoting EBP in Japanese rehabilitation professionals. In the third round, the distribution of responses obtained in the second round was presented, and participant's agreement was again assessed on a 5-point Likert scale. [Results] Across the three rounds, data were collected from 33.7% to 47.0% of all eligible participants. After the first round, 17 possible solutions were developed, and a list of 29 solutions was used in the second round. After the third round, 10 solutions reached the predetermined criteria for consensus. [Conclusion] In this study, ten possible solutions to promote EBP were proposed by the Japanese rehabilitation professionals.

Preseason Prognostic Factors for Injuries and Match Loss in Collision Sports: A Systematic Review.

This study aimed to identify which preseason factors had strong evidence of risks for physical injury during the season of collision sports including rugby, American football, and Australian rules football using qualitative synthesis. Pubmed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were reviewed. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies were: studies involving the collision sports; prospective cohort studies; and studies with outcomes of relative risks, odds ratios, and correlations between players' preseason conditions and injury during the season. The risk of bias based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network quality checklists for cohort studies was assessed in 57 studies. The current study identified strong evidence that 1) anthropometric characteristics (body mass index and estimated mass moment of inertia of the body around a horizontal axis through the ankle), which are calculated with weight and height; 2) physical function, in particular for the trunk and lower limb (trunk-flexion hold and wall-sit hold); and 3) Oswestry Disability Index disability, which is a patient-reported outcome measure for disability due to low back pain, were positive prognostic factors for injury during the collision sports season, regardless of playing experience.

The effectiveness of exercise with behavior change techniques in people with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to examine the effectiveness of exercise with behavior change techniques (BCTs) on core outcome sets in people with knee osteoarthritis. LITERATURE SURVEY: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in eight databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PEDro, ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov) up to November 4, 2021. METHODOLOGY: Eligible participants were people with knee osteoarthritis. The intervention was exercise with BCTs. Primary outcomes included physical function, quality of life (QOL) 6 to 12 months after intervention, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were knee pain, exercise adherence, mobility, and self-efficacy 3 months or more after intervention. The bias risk was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool. The random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. SYNTHESIS: We found 16 individual BCTs, and 37.7% of trials used a single BCT. For meta-analysis, we included 21 RCTs (n = 1623). Most outcomes had a very low certainty of evidence, and the risk of bias was the consistent reason for downgrading evidence levels. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 0.00 (-0.24, 0.24) in physical function, 0.33 (-0.51, 1.17) in exercise adherence, and 0.04 (-0.39, 0.47) in self-efficacy. The risk ratio (95% CI) of adverse events was 3.6 (0.79, 16.45). QOL was not pooled due to insufficient data (very low certainty of evidence). In contrast, the SMD (95% CI) for knee pain reduction and mobility improvement was -0.33 (-0.53, -0.13) and 0.21 (-0.05, 0.47) with moderate and low certainty of evidence, respectively. CONCLUSION: The evidence is inconclusive regarding the effectiveness of BCTs with exercises on core outcome sets. Further research should explore the effectiveness of BCTs with valid design. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020212904).

Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Knowledge and Attitude of Pain into Japanese and Test-retest Reliability in Undergraduate Students.

Objectives: Pain neuroscience education (PNE) has been shown to be effective in reducing pain in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Knowledge of pain physiology is necessary to undertake PNE, and a measure for such knowledge is necessary. The Knowledge and Attitudes of Pain (KNAP), a comprehensive assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding pain for healthcare practitioners, was developed in 2020 through the assessment of construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness in Dutch and English. This study aimed to conduct cross-cultural adaptation of the KNAP into Japanese and to verify test-retest reliability among Japanese undergraduate physical therapy and occupational therapy students. Methods: Cross-cultural adaptation was performed using Beaton's five-step process. Subsequently, the KNAP was completed by participants with a 2-week interval. The study included second-, third-, and fourth-year undergraduate physical therapy and occupational therapy students. Results: A total of 50 students participated in the pilot test and a Japanese version of KNAP was created. Thirty-nine students completed the Japanese version of KNAP twice. Of the 30 items on the KNAP, the quadratic weighted kappa value was less than 0.4 for only one item (item 15), but reliability was interpreted as sufficient for the overall score, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) for the total score of 0.89 (0.80-0.94). Conclusions: This study has developed the Japanese KNAP, which has shown preliminary evidence of adequate test-retest reliability in Japanese undergraduate physical therapy and occupational therapy students.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Satisfaction and Recovery Index among Japanese people with musculoskeletal disorders.

[Purpose] The primary aim was to cross-culturally adapt the Satisfaction and Recovery Index (SRI) among Japanese people. The secondary aim was to preliminarily investigate the convergent validity of the SRI with the SF-12v2® Health Survey among ambulatory patients with musculoskeletal disorders. [Participants and Methods] A provisional Japanese SRI was developed after forward and backward translations and confirmation from its original developer. This study included 30 outpatients diagnosed with musculoskeletal disorders at an orthopedic clinic in Japan. All participants underwent the SF-12v2® Health Survey and the provisional Japanese SRI. They were then asked to provide comments about the provisional Japanese SRI. Pearson's r was calculated to examine the convergent validity between the SF-12v2® Health Survey scores and the provisional Japanese SRI scores. [Results] The provisional Japanese SRI was accepted as the final version due to no serious concerns raised by the participants. Only the mental component scores of the SF-12v2® Health Survey had a statistically significant correlation (r=0.45), indicating partial evidence of the convergent validity of the provisional Japanese SRI. [Conclusion] This study developed the Japanese SRI with preliminary validity evidence among ambulatory patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

The effect of cognitive functional therapy for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To apply the Bio-Psych-Social (BPS) model into clinical practice, it is important not to focus on psychosocial domains only since biomedical factors can also contribute to chronic pain conditions. The cognitive functional therapy (CFT) is the management system based on the BPS model for chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare CFT with the other interventions for CNSLBP regarding pain, disability/functional status, QoL and psychological factors. DESIGN: This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of a randomised controlled trial. METHOD: Literature Search was conducted in electronic search engines. Enrolled participants included 1) CNSLBP and 2) primary, secondary, or tertiary care patients. CFT was the interventions included. Comparisons were any types of treatment. RESULTS: Three studies met the eligibility criteria. The total number of participants was 336. For pain intensity, MD [95% CIs] was -1.38 [-2.78 - 0.02] and -1.01 [-1.92 - -0.10] at intermediate and long term for two studies, respectively. About disability/functional status, SMD [95% CIs] was -0.76 [-1.46 - -0.07] at the intermediate for three studies and MD [95% CIs] was -8.48 [-11.47 - -5.49] at long term for two studies. About fear of physical activity, MD [95% CIs] was -3.01 [-5.14 - -0.88] and -3.56 [-6.43 - -0.68] at intermediate and long term for two studies, respectively. No studies reported scores associated with QOL. All the quality of the evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Three studies were included and the quality of all the evidence was very low. Although the study found statistically significant differences in some measures, the effectiveness of the CFT will need to be re-evaluated in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42020158182 .

Initial development of a patient-reported outcome measure of disability due to Katakori via evaluating patient comprehensibility and comprehensiveness.

[Purpose] "Katakori" refers to a nonspecific symptom, including discomfort or dull pain, that is experienced around the occiput and that extends through the cervical spine to the acromion and scapular area. This study aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome measure of disability due to Katakori, namely the Katakori Disability Index, via evaluating patient comprehensibility and comprehensiveness. [Participants and Methods] We conducted a semi-structured interview among participants who had experienced Katakori consistently during the past month to examine patient comprehensibility and comprehensiveness; we particularly used the thinking-aloud method and cognitive debriefing to evaluate comprehensibility. [Results] We initially tested a provisional version of the Katakori Disability Index with 24 items using two 11-point numeric rating scales in a subset of 10 participants. Considering the issues identified concerning comprehensibility and comprehensiveness, we created a second draft of the Katakori Disability Index with two 6-point Likert scales, modified items, and four additional items. The second draft was tested in another subset of 10 participants. We eventually developed a 31-item Katakori Disability Index with modified instructions and items, two additional items, and a post-survey checklist; all these features addressed the concerns identified and suggestions obtained in the second round of interviews. [Conclusion] We developed a 31-item Katakori Disability Index with content validity.

Content validity and reliability of the modified Japanese version of the Healthcare Providers Patient-Activation Scale: self-reported adherence to patient-centered physical therapy scale.

BACKGROUND: Modifications to the Healthcare Providers Patient-Activation Scale (HP-PAS), which evaluates attitudes toward the importance of using a patient-centered approach (PCA), are required. PURPOSE: Content validity and reliabilities of a scale developed from the HP-PAS to evaluate self-reported adherence to patient-centered physical therapy were preliminarily investigated. METHODS: A total of 86 Japanese physical therapists completed the validity assessments in an anonymous survey. Among them, 53 completed the reliability assessments in a named survey. The HP-PAS was modified to mark the most suitable frequency for each item, creating an 11-point scale. For the validity assessments, the participants assigned each item to a therapist-centered approach or PCA using a 5-point scale. Content validity was considered when the proportion of scores 4 and 5 ("possibly" or "definitely" a PCA) with respect to the total number of scores was > 50%. Ceiling and flooring effects were considered when the response proportions of scores of 10 and 0, respectively, on an 11-point scale were > 20%. Items with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) < 0.4 in the test-retest reliability from the item list were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 20 items, 6 were excluded, developing a 14-item self-reported adherence to a patient-centered physical therapy scale (SAPCPTS), which exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95, 95% confident intervals [CIs] = 0.93-0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.84, 95% CIs = 0.75-0.91). CONCLUSION: This study identified that the 14-item SAPCPTS demonstrated preliminary evidence of content validity and reliability.