Optimized radiotherapy treatment strategy for early glottic carcinoma.

The local control rates of T1 bulky and T2 glottic carcinoma treated via radiation therapy alone are unsatisfactory; thus, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of our treatment protocol for early glottic carcinoma. Patients with early glottic squamous cell carcinoma treated via radiation therapy from January 2007 to November 2019 were reviewed. Patients were treated with: 63-67.5 Gy/28-30 fractions of radiation therapy alone for T1 non-bulky; concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and 60 Gy/30 fractions for T1 bulky and T2 favorable; and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high-dose cisplatin and 66-70 Gy/33-35 fractions for T2 unfavorable glottic carcinoma. Local failure rates were estimated using the cumulative incidence function, overall and disease specific survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and adverse events were evaluated. Eighty patients were analyzed; the median age was 69.5 (range, 26-90) years, the median follow-up time for survivors was 40.1 (range, 1.9-128.4) months, and the 3-year local failure, disease specific survival, and overall survival rates were 5.8%, 98.3%, and 94.4%, respectively. In T1 bulky and T2 cases, the local failure rate was significantly lower in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy than in the radiation therapy alone group. Grade 3 acute dermatitis and mucositis were noted in nine and four patients, respectively. There were no acute adverse events of Grade 4 or higher, or late adverse events of Grade 2 or higher. The treatment protocol was effective and well-tolerated; thus, the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy was suggested in T1 bulky and T2 cases.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a study comparing 3-year genitourinary toxicity between CyberKnife and volumetric-modulated arc therapy by propensity score analysis.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the rate of stereotactic body radiation therapy-related (SBRT-related) genitourinary (GU) toxicity is lower in patients with prostate cancer treated with CyberKnife. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer at two institutions between 2017 and 2020. We analyzed 70 patients who were extracted by propensity score matching based on age, pre-treatment International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and prostate volume. The patients were treated with SBRT, with a total dose of 36.25 Gy in five fractions over five consecutive weekdays, using CyberKnife or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). RESULTS: The low-, medium-, and high-risk patients were 2, 19, and 14, respectively, in the CyberKnife group and 4, 17, and 14, respectively, in the VMAT group. The median follow-up time in both groups was 3 years. One patient with CyberKnife died of unrelated causes. No biochemical or clinical recurrence, distant metastases, or death from prostate cancer was observed. The peak values of IPSS in the acute phase (< 3 months) were significantly lower in the CyberKnife than in the VMAT group (CyberKnife:16.2 vs VMAT:20.2, p = 0.025). In multiple regression analyses, the treatment modality (p = 0.03), age (p = 0.01), bladder medication pre-irradiation (p = 0.03), and neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (p = 0.04) contributed to the peak value of the acute-phase IPSS. The incidence of treatment-related grade 2 acute GU toxicity tended to be lower in the CyberKnife than the VMAT group (CyberKnife: 22.9% vs. VMAT: 45.7%, p = 0.077). No difference was noted between the groups with regard to late IPSS or GU toxicity and gastrointestinal toxicity in all phases. Toxicities of grade ≥ 3 have not been observed to date. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of treatment modality, SBRT is effective in treating prostate cancer without serious toxicity. However, CyberKnife has an advantage over VMAT in terms of acute prostate symptoms.

Poor local control of ulcerative T1 glottic cancer treated with 2.25-Gy per fraction radiotherapy.

The Tokai Study Group for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (TOSTRO) started managing T1 glottic cancer using 2.25 Gy/fraction radiotherapy in 2011. The aim was to evaluate the local control (LC) rate and toxicity with 2.25-Gy radiotherapy in clinical practice and identify prognostic factors.The eligibility criteria were T1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma patients with age ≥20 years, treated with 2.25 Gy/fraction without chemotherapy between 2011 and 2017. LC rates were evaluated based on age, performance status, sex, T-category, tumor type (ulcerative or non-ulcerative), presence of anterior commissure invasion, tumor size, X-ray beam energy, and overall treatment time. Acute and late adverse events were evaluated using CTCAE version 4.0. A total of 202 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up period was 34.2 months. The 2- and 4-year LC rates were 93.8% and 93.1%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the LC rate between non-ulcerative type and ulcerative type (95.2% vs. 74.1% at 2 years, 94.4% vs. 74.1% at 4 years; p = 0.01). On univariate analysis, only tumor type was significantly correlated with a poor LC rate (hazard ratio 4.3; 95% confidence interval 1.2-15.4; p = 0.03). Acute grade 3 adverse events occurred in 17 patients. However, no late adverse events of grade 3 or higher have occurred to date. T1 glottic cancer treatment outcomes using hypofractionated radiotherapy with 2.25 Gy/fraction in clinical practice were comparable to previously reported results. However, ulcerative type tumor was associated with a poor LC rate.

The importance of choosing the right strategy to treat small cell carcinoma of the cervix: a comparative analysis of treatments.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatments for small cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCCC) have not been established. In this study, we aimed to estimate the optimal treatment strategy for SCCC. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Medical records of patients with pathologically proven SCCC treated between 2003 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the differences in survival according to stage, treatment strategy, and chemotherapy regimen. RESULTS: Data of 78 patients were collected, and after excluding patients without immunohistopathological staining, 65 patients were evaluated. The median age of the included patients was 47 (range: 24-83) years. The numbers of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stages I-IIA, IIB-IVA, IVB were 23 (35%), 34 (52%), and 8 (12%), respectively. Of 53 patients who had undergone chemotherapy, 35 and 18 received SCCC and non-SCCC regimens as their first-line chemotherapy regimen, respectively. The 5-year OS for all patients was 49%, while for patients with FIGO stages I-IIA, IIB-IVA, IVB, it was 60, 50, and 0%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates for patients who underwent treatment with SCCC versus non-SCCC regimens were 59 and 13% (p < 0.01), respectively. This trend was pronounced in locally advanced stages. Multivariate analysis showed that FIGO IVB at initial diagnosis was a significant prognostic factor in all patients. Among the 53 patients who received chemotherapy, the SCCC regimen was associated with significantly better 5-year OS in both the uni- and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the application of an SCCC regimen such as EP or IP as first-line chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced SCCC may play a key role in OS. These findings need to be validated in future nationwide, prospective clinical studies.

Early glottic cancer treatment with concurrent chemoradiotherapy with once-daily orally administered S-1.

Glottic carcinoma is the most common laryngeal cancer. The outcomes for T1 bulky Glottic carcinoma and T2N0 Glottic carcinoma after radiation therapy alone are unsatisfactory. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of unique concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimen using S-1 for early glottic cancer. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy consisted of 60 Gy in 30 fractions with once-daily, orally administered S-1 exclusively within three to six hours prior to each irradiation. Twenty-one consecutive patients treated with this regimen were retrospectively reviewed. Initial complete remission was achieved in all patients without any subsequent local and/or regional recurrences to the last follow-up. The 4-year local control, overall survival, and disease-free survival rates were all 100%. No significant toxicities were observed, except for three cases with Grade 3 acute dermatitis.This regimen is highly effective and well-tolerated, and these results encourage further research to long-term efficacy and functional preservation.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for Japanese patients with localized prostate cancer: 2-year results and predictive factors for acute genitourinary toxicities.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to report the 2-year results of stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer and identify the clinical and dosimetric factors that predict acute genitourinary toxicities. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer treated at Toyota Memorial Hospital between 2017 and 2020. The patients were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy with a total dose of 36.25 Gy in five fractions on consecutive weekdays. While low-risk patients received radiotherapy alone, intermediate- to high-risk patients also received androgen deprivation therapy. RESULTS: We analysed a total of 104 patients, including 10, 60 and 34 low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 2 years. We did not observe biochemical/clinical recurrence, distant metastasis or death from prostate cancer. One patient died of another cause. Grade 2 acute genitourinary toxicity was observed in 40 (38%) patients. Age (P = 0.021), genitourinary toxicity of grade ≥1 at baseline (P = 0.023) and bladder mean dose (P = 0.047) were significantly associated with the incidence of grade 2 acute genitourinary toxicity. The cut-off value of 65 years for age and 10.3 Gy for the bladder mean dose were considered the most appropriate. Grade 2 acute gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in five (5%) patients. None of the patients experienced grade ≥3 acute or late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiation therapy is feasible for Japanese patients with prostate cancer, with acceptable acute toxicity. Age, genitourinary toxicity at baseline and bladder mean dose predict grade 2 acute genitourinary toxicity.

Comparison of Physician-recorded Toxicities and Patient-reported Outcomes of Five Different Radiotherapy Methods for Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare five radiotherapy methods for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 2005-2018, the data of patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer were retrospectively analysed. Patients were treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT); low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT); or external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), including conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT), moderate-hypofractionated radiotherapy (MHRT), and ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (UHRT). RESULTS: In total, 496 patients (149, HDR-BT; 100, LDR-BT; 100, CFRT; 97, MHRT, and 50, UHRT) with a median follow-up of 4.3 years were enrolled. The incidence of grade ≥2 acute genitourinary toxicities was significantly lower with HDR-BT (p<0.001) than with any other radiotherapy. The cumulative incidence of late grade ≥2 genitourinary toxicities was the highest with UHRT and significantly higher (p=0.005) with UHRT than with HDR-BT. Higher symptom score peaks were noted 4 weeks after therapy for LDR-BT than for EBRT. CONCLUSION: Physician-recorded toxicities were slightly lower with HDR-BT and patient-reported outcomes tended to be worse with LDR-BT.

Study Protocol: Prospective Study of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Outpatients with Early Glottic Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Background: The recommended treatment strategies for early glottic carcinoma with intent of larynx preservation are primarily radiotherapy. However, the outcomes of radiotherapy for bulky T1 or T2 glottic carcinoma are unsatisfactory. We designed a protocol consisting of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using S-1 as the radiosensitizer. We have performed this protocol in patients with favorable T2 lesions and demonstrated its efficacy and safety. In contrast, we have treated non-bulky T1 glottic carcinomas with 2.25 Gy per fraction, for a total of 25-28 fractions, starting in 2011 to improve efficacy and shorten the treatment period. Since this treatment strategy was implemented for T1 disease, no local failure has occurred to date, and it appears to be almost as safe as radiotherapy using 2.0 Gy per fraction. With the aim of improving the local control rate and shortening the treatment period primarily for favorable T2 disease, we changed the dose of radiation in our protocol from 2.0 Gy to 2.25 Gy per fraction, for a total of 25 fractions (from 30 fractions). The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this new protocol. Methods: This study will be conducted as a clinical, prospective, single-armed, non-randomized trial. Patients are to receive S-1 (55.3 mg /m2 /day, once daily) and radiotherapy (2.25 Gy per fraction, for a total of 25 fractions). S-1 and radiotherapy are started on the same day that radiotherapy is performed, 3-6 hours after oral administration of S-1. The primary study aim is the 3-year local control rate. The secondary study aims are overall survival, voice-preservation survival, disease-free survival, complete response rate, completion rate, and toxicity. Result and conclusion: This is the first single-center, non-randomized, prospective study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and hypofractionated radiotherapy to be conducted. The trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of our protocol.

Optimized treatment strategy of radiotherapy for early glottic squamous cell carcinomas: An initial analysis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of radiotherapy for patients with T1/T2 glottic carcinoma. Patients with T1/T2 glottic carcinoma histopathologically diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma and treated at our hospital between 2007 and 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. Our strategy for T1/T2 glottic carcinoma was as follows: radiotherapy alone with 2.25 Gy per fraction to a total of 25-28 fractions for patients with non-bulky T1 glottic carcinoma; concurrent chemoradiotherapy with oral S-1 and radiotherapy with 2 Gy per fraction to a total of 30 fractions for patients with T1 bulky/T2 favorable glottic carcinoma; or chemoradiotherapy with high-dose cisplatin and radiotherapy with 2 Gy per fraction to a total of 35 fractions for T2 unfavorable glottic carcinoma. Forty-eight patients were eligible. The median follow-up period among surviving patients was 38 months (range, 11-107). The disease was T1a in 23%, T1b in 13%, and T2 in 65% of patients. The 3-year local control rate in all patients, T1a, T1b, and T2 was 96.7%, 100%, 100%, and 96.0%, respectively. Of the 46 patients, one with T2 glottic carcinoma developed recurrent disease at the primary site, and one with T2 glottic carcinoma had lymph node recurrences in the neck. Acute Grade 3 dermatitis occurred in 8 (17%) patients and late Grade 2 hypothyroidism occurred in 2 (4%) patients. This retrospective study shows that our optimized treatment strategy of radiotherapy depending on the stage of early glottic carcinoma is not only effective but also well-tolerated.