Risk factors for remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a retrospective database review.

Background: The number of patients with remnant gastric cancer (RGC) following gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) is increasing due to the increasing number of patients undergoing function-preserving gastrectomy and improved outcomes for patients with GC. A few studies involving a small number of cases reported male sex, old age, differentiated type, tumor depth and synchronous multiple GC were associated with RGC development. However, the risk factors for RGC development had not been fully understood. This study aimed to examine the clinicopathological features, followed up patients with GC after they underwent distal gastrectomy (DG), and evaluated the potential risk factors for RGC development. Methods: A retrospective database review of 438 patients who underwent DG for GC at a single institution, from 2006 to 2017, was conducted. We investigated the relationship of clinicopathological features, operative findings, and postoperative course with RGC development was estimated using Cox proportional hazard analysis. The cumulative incidences of RGC were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We retrospectively analyzed 405 cases. The median patient age was 69 years, and the patient cohort consisted of 263 men and 142 women. The Billroth-I reconstruction method was used in 204 cases, Billroth-II method was used in 3 cases, and Roux-en Y method was used in 198 cases. RGC was diagnosed in 11 of the 405 patients. The median follow-up period was 5 years. The cumulative incidences of RGC calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method were 3.0%, 4.1%, and 10.5% at 5, 10, and 15 years after DG, respectively. During the initial surgery, differentiated type was significantly associated with RGC development [hazard ratio (HR): 4.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-21.80, P=0.05]. Male sex (HR: 2.97, 95% CI: 0.64-13.75, P=0.16), old age (≥70 years) (HR: 2.72, 95% CI: 0.78-9.47, P=0.11), and synchronous multiple GC (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 0.28-6.08, P=0.73) were not associated with RGC development. Conclusions: Patients who have undergone DG for differentiated type GC were statistically significantly associated with developing RGC. Intensive endoscopic surveillance would be needed for the patients who underwent DG for differentiated type GC.

[A Case of Double Cancer of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Gastric Carcinoma with Difficult Diagnosis of the Primary Tumor with Peritoneal Metastasis].

Double cancer of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gastric cancer is rare. A 62-year-old man underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The pathological findings were tub1>tub2, m, ly0, v0, n0, Stage I A. Two years and a month later, a liver tumor(diameter of 3 cm)and a pelvic mass(diameter of 2.5 cm)were observed. Metastasis from gastric cancer was suspected and chemotherapy(SOX)was administered. However, after 5 courses, CT revealed worseningof the liver tumor (diameter of 12 cm)and pelvic mass(diameter of 3 cm). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its peritoneal metastasis were also suspected. There was a limit to treatment with chemotherapy, and it was difficult to judge whether to target gastric cancer or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma for chemotherapy. In addition, the lesions were localized in the right lobe of the liver and the pelvis. Therefore, we decided to perform resection. As a second-stage operation, pelvic mass extraction and portal vein embolization were performed first. The pathological result of the pelvic mass assessment was mucinous carcinoma. Subsequently, expansive right hepatectomy was performed. The pathological findings were also suggestive of mucinous carcinoma, which was finally diagnosed as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and peritoneal dissemination. Six months after the surgery, several recurrent nodules were observed in the pelvis and GEM plus CDDP was initiated. Currently, 1 year after surgery, there are no restrictions in the activities of daily life of the patient and he is treated on an outpatient basis.

Intragastric surgery using laparoscopy and oral endoscopy for gastric submucosal tumors.

We review the techniques and outcomes of the intragastric resection for gastric submucosal tumors (GSTs) using laparoscope and oral endoscope. In the literature, the mean operation time, intraoperative blood loss, pathological size of the tumor and postoperative hospital stay were 134 min, minimal, 31 mm and 6.4 d, respectively. There were no particular perioperative complications during the follow-up period (mean: 121.3 mo). Intragastric surgery using laparoscopy and oral endoscopy can be considerably beneficial for patients with GSTs locating in the upper third of the stomach between 2-5 cm in diameter and < 8 cm(2) in cross-sectional area and located in the upper third of the stomach.