Prognosis for major abdominal surgeries based on intraoperative low-dose nutrition: A metabolic perspective.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The optimal nutrition intake during surgery is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of low-dose nutrition during laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: In the glucose and amino acids (GA) group, 20 patients were infused with glucose (75 g/L) and amino acids (30 g/L) at 60 mL/h and bicarbonate Ringer's solution. However, 20 patients in the control (C) group were infused with bicarbonate Ringer's solution without GA. The length of hospital stay was determined, and measurements were taken before (TI) and after (T2) the surgery under general anesthesia. RESULTS: The lengths of hospital stay were comparable between the GA (13 days) and C (16 days) groups. Ketone body levels were 294 (C group) and 33 (GA group) µmol/L at T2. Nitrogen balance was 0.32 g (GA group) and -1.60 g (C group) at T2. CONCLUSIONS: Although the lengths of hospital stay were comparable, ketone body levels, and nitrogen balance were significantly different (P < 0.01) between the two groups after surgery.

Continuing versus withholding angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/calcium channel blocker (CCB) combination tablets during perioperative periods in patients undergoing minor surgery: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: This trial was conducted to compare effects of continuing versus withholding single-pill combination tablets consisting of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on perioperative hemodynamics and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing minor abdominal or urological surgery (n = 106) were randomly assigned to Group C, in which ARB/CCB combination tablets were continued until surgery, or Group W, in which they were withheld within 24 h of surgery. Perioperative hemodynamics and clinical outcomes were compared between the Groups. RESULTS: The incidence of hypotension during anesthesia requiring repeated treatment with vasoconstrictors was higher in Group C than Group W (p = 0.0052). Blood pressure during anesthesia was generally lower in Group C than Group W (p < 0.05) despite significantly more doses of ephedrine and phenylephrine administrated in Group C (p = 0.0246 and p = 0.0327, respectively). The incidence of postoperative hypertension did not differ between Groups (p = 0.3793). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on the preoperative day did not differ between Groups (p = 0.7045), while eGFR was slightly lower in Group C than Group W on the first and third postoperative days (p = 0.0400 and p = 0.0088, respectively), although clinically relevant acute kidney injury did not develop. CONCLUSIONS: Continuing ARB/CCB combination tablets preoperatively in patients undergoing minor surgery increased the incidence of hypotension during anesthesia, increased requirements of vasoconstrictors to treat hypotension, and might deteriorate postoperative renal function, albeit slightly. These results suggest that withholding ARB/CCB tablets preoperatively is preferable to continuing them. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) at Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (Trial ID: jRCT1031190027).

Effects of sivelestat on bronchial inflammatory responses after esophagectomy.

Post-operative pulmonary complications such as systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are strongly associated with morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy. Post-operative administration of sivelestat sodium hydrate (sivelestat), a selective inhibitor of neutrophil elastase (NE), has been shown to improve the post-operative clinical course after esophagectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of prophylactic administration of sivelestat on bronchial inflammatory responses. We randomized 24 patients into two groups. One group received 0.2 mg/kg/h sivelestat from the induction of anesthesia to post-operative day 1 (sivelestat group) and the other group received the same amount of physiological saline (control group). Bronchial alveolar epithelial lining fluid (ELF) samples were obtained from both groups at the induction of anesthesia and at the end of surgery. The serum and ELF levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-8 were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and NE activity was spectrophotometrically determined using the same samples. Although IL-6 levels in the ELF significantly increased at the end of surgery compared with the pre-operative levels in both groups, the IL-8 levels and NE activity did not significantly increase at the end of the surgery compared to the corresponding pre-operative values in the sivelestat group. Moreover, IL-8 levels and NE activity in the ELF were significantly reduced at the end of surgery in the sivelestat group compared with corresponding values in the control group. The durations of ALI and ARDS were apparently shorter in the sivelestat group and the duration of SIRS was significantly shorter in the sivelestat group compared to the control group. We demonstrated that prophylactic use of sivelestat mitigated bronchial inflammation by suppressing NE activity and IL-8 levels in the ELF and shortened the duration of SIRS after transthoracic esophagectomy.

In-vitro and clinical evaluation of an oral mucosal adhesive film containing indomethacin.

To develop a new mucoadhesive film containing an analgesic combining clinical efficacy and patient comfort, we prepared and evaluated a two-layered film consisting of an adhesive layer containing indomethacin (IM) as the active ingredient and carboxyvinyl polymer (CP) as a bonding agent and a nonadhesive layer containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) to improve film texture. In in vitro and in vivo adhesive tests, the optimal concentration of CP that could be applied to the mucous membrane was 0.2% or 0.3%. Stability testing determined that the optimal storage conditions and expiration period were 4 degrees C without shade and 4 weeks, respectively. The film was clinically evaluated in patients with oral pain. IM at concentrations of 0.5% and 1% provided optimum analgesic effects, and the effects were the greatest in the 1% IM group. The addition of PEG to the nonadhesive layer reduced the number of patients experiencing discomfort at the site where the film was applied. Therefore this film formulation may be useful for local analgesic application due to its low dose requirement, moderate adhesion, and comfortable texture.