Pathophysiologic and prognostic importance of cardiac power output reserve in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a syndrome characterized by multiple cardiac reserve limitations during exercise. Cardiac power output (CPO) is an index of global cardiac performance and can be estimated non-invasively by echocardiography. We hypothesized that CPO reserve during exercise would be associated with impaired cardiovascular reserve, exercise intolerance, and adverse outcomes in HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Exercise stress echocardiography was performed in 425 dyspnoeic patients [217 HFpEF and 208 non-heart failure (HF) controls] to estimate CPO at rest and during exercise. We classified patients with HFpEF based on the median value of changes in CPO from rest to peak exercise (ΔCPO >0.49 W/100 g). Patients with HFpEF and a lower CPO reserve had poorer biventricular systolic function, impaired chronotropic response during exercise, and worse aerobic capacity than controls and those with a higher CPO reserve. During a median follow-up of 358 days, a composite outcome of all-cause mortality or HF events occurred in 30 patients. Patients with a lower CPO reserve had four-fold and nearly 10-fold increased risks of the outcomes compared with those with a higher CPO reserve and controls, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 4.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-10.1, P = 0.003 and HR 9.61, 95% CI 3.58-25.8, P < 0.0001]. We further found that a lower CPO reserve had an incremental prognostic value over the H2FPEF score and exercise duration. In contrast, resting CPO did not predict clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. CONCLUSION: A lower CPO reserve was associated with biventricular systolic dysfunction, chronotropic incompetence, exercise intolerance, and adverse outcomes in patients with HFpEF.

Acute pulmonary thromboembolism after messenger RNA vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019: A case report.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is defined as thrombosis after inoculation of adenovirus vector vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). VITT rarely occurs with messenger RNA vaccines, and the use of heparin for VITT is also controversial. A 74-year-old female patient with no risk factors for thrombosis was brought to our hospital after loss of consciousness. Nine days before admission, she had received the third vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (mRNA1273, Moderna). Immediately after transport, cardiopulmonary arrest occurred, prompting extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Pulmonary angiography showed translucent images of both pulmonary arteries, resulting in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary thromboembolism. Unfractionated heparin was administered, but D-dimer subsequently became negative. Pulmonary thrombosis remained in large volume, indicating that heparin was ineffective. Treatment was shifted to anticoagulant therapy using argatroban, which increased D-dimer level and improved respiratory status. The patient was successfully weaned from ECMO and ventilator. Anti-platelet factor 4 antibody examined after treatment initiation showed negative results; however, VITT was considered as an underlying condition because of the time of onset after vaccination, the ineffectiveness of heparin, and the absence of other causes of thrombosis. In case heparin is not effective, argatroban can be an alternative therapy against thrombosis. Learning objective: During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, treatment with vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has been widely performed. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia is the most common thrombosis after adenovirus vector vaccines. However, thrombosis can also occur after messenger RNA vaccination. Though commonly used for thrombosis, heparin may be ineffective. Non-heparin anticoagulants should be considered.