Metallic Stents for Hepatic Venous Outflow Obstruction After Living-Donor Liver Transplantation and their Therapeutic Effects.

BACKGROUND: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is established as a standard therapy for end-stage liver disease; however, vessel reconstruction is more demanding due to the short length and small size of the available structures compared with deceased-donor whole liver transplantation. Interventional radiology (IR) has become the first-line treatment for vascular complications after LDLT. Hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) is a life-threatening complication after LDLT. The aim of this study of 592 adult-to-adult LDLT cases was to investigate the safety and efficacy of stent implantation for HVOO after LDLT. METHODS: Records of patients who developed HVOO requiring any treatment were collected with special reference to the metallic stent implantation. There were 232 left-side grafts and 360 right-side grafts. Sixteen cases developed HVOO after LDLT with an incidence rate of 2.7%, 5 with a left liver graft (2%), and 11 with a right-side graft (3%). The IR was attempted for 14 cases; among those, 8 cases were treated by stent implantation. RESULTS: The technical success rate of the initial stent implantation was 100%. The pressure gradient at the stenotic site significantly improved from 12.2 (range, 10.9-20.4 cm H2O) to 3.9 cm H2O (range, 1.4-8.2 cm H2O; P = .03). The volume of the congested graft liver decreased significantly from 1448 (range, 788-2170 mL) to 1265 mL (range, 748-1665 mL; P = .01), and the serum albumin level improved significantly from 3.3 (range, 1.7-3.7 g/dL) to 3.7 g/dL (range, 2.9-4.1 g/dL; P = .02). No procedure-related complication was noted, and the long-term stent patency was 100%. CONCLUSION: Metallic stent implantation for stenotic venous anastomosis after LDLT is a safe and effective treatment.

The impact of the covalently closed circular DNA level on recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after initial hepatectomy: an analysis of patients with resolved hepatitis B virus infection.

BACKGROUND: We assessed whether or not covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) levels in the background liver influence the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. METHODS: Among 425 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for HCC between 2010 and 2018, a retrospective review was performed in 44 with resolved HBV infection. The clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed for correlation with tumor recurrence. The HBV cccDNA levels were tested via a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction assay. RESULTS: HBV cccDNA was detected in 27 of 44 patients (61%), and the median level was 1.0 copies/1000 ng (range, 0-931.3 copies/1000 ng). Anti-HBc ≥8.9 S/CO was associated with cccDNA detection (odds ratio, 11.08; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.48-49.46; P = 0.002). Twenty-eight patients (64%) developed HCC recurrence after hepatectomy. The overall 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 45.7% and 34.3%, respectively.19 HBV cccDNA levels was not significantly associated with HCC recurrence, while the presence of multiple tumors was an independent risk fact or (hazard ratio, 6.53; 95% CI, 2.48-17.19; P < 0.001. CONCLUSION: HBV cccDNA levels did not influence HCC recurrence after hepatectomy. Anti-HBc levels may be used as a surrogate marker for cccDNA.

Risk factors for hepatitis B virus recurrence after living donor liver transplantation: A 22-year experience at a single center.

The factors associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have not been fully clarified. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors associated with HBV recurrence after LDLT. From January 1996 to December 2018, a total of 609 LDLT operations were performed at our center. A retrospective review was performed of 70 patients (male, n = 59; female, n = 11; median age = 54 years) who underwent LDLT for HBV-related liver disease. The virologic and biochemical data, tumor burden, antiviral and immunosuppressive therapy were evaluated and compared between the HBV recurrence and non-recurrence groups. Eleven of 70 patients (16%) developed post-LDLT HBV recurrence. The overall actuarial rates of HBV recurrence at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 years were 0%, 13%, 16.7%, 18.8%, and 18.8%, respectively. The median interval between LDLT and HBV recurrence was 57 months (range, 18-124 months). Based on the univariate and multivariate analyses, a serum HBV DNA level of ≥ 4 log copies/mL (hazard ratio [HR], 4.861; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.172-20.165; P = 0.029), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Milan criteria (HR, 10.083; 95% CI, 2.749-36.982; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for HBV recurrence after LDLT. In LDLT patients, high pre-LT HBV DNA levels and HCC beyond the Milan criteria were risk factors for HBV recurrence. With the current expansion of the LT criteria for HCC, we should remain cautious regarding the risk of HBV recurrence, particularly in these groups.

Hepatitis B virus recurrence after living donor liver transplantation of anti-HBc-positive grafts: A 22-year experience at a single center.

The use of hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive grafts is one strategy for expanding the donor pool for liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after living donor LT (LDLT) of anti-HBc-positive grafts. From January 1996 to December 2018, a total of 609 LDLT procedures were performed at our center. A retrospective review was performed for 31 patients (23 males and 8 females; median age = 47 years) who underwent LDLT for HBV-unrelated liver disease from anti-HBc-positive donors. The factors associated with HBV recurrence were evaluated and compared between the HBV recurrence and non-recurrence groups. The median follow-up period after LT was 135 months (range, 6-273 months). Four of 31 patients (12.9%) developed post-LT HBV recurrence. All four cases were HBV-naïve patients (anti-HBc-negative and Hepatitis B surface antibody-negative). The median interval between LDLT and HBV recurrence was 42 months (range, 20-51). The overall actuarial rates of HBV recurrence at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 years were 0%, 7.2%, 15.7%, 15.7%, and 15.7%, respectively. Although there were no significant differences between the HBV recurrence and non-recurrence groups, HBV recurrence tended to occur in HBV-naïve recipients (P = 0.093). HBV-naïve status may contribute to HBV recurrence after LDLT for HBV-unrelated liver disease from anti-HBc-positive donors. Careful monitoring for serological HBV markers is needed, particularly in this group.

A selective oral vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist for patients with end-stage liver disease awaiting liver transplantation: a preliminary study.

Administration of the selective arginine vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan to cirrhotic patients is controversial. There are no reports of tolvaptan use for patients with far-advanced end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and refractory ascites awaiting liver transplantation. Between 2013 and 2016, 64 patients awaiting adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) were screened for enrollment. Patients with refractory ascites and on dual conventional diuretics (≥ 50 mg/day of spironolactone and ≥ 20 mg/day of a loop diuretic) were enrolled and assigned to the tolvaptan (TOL) group (n = 10), and low-dose tolvaptan, 3.75 mg/day, was started. The remaining patients who had no or little ascites on conventional diuretic therapy (CDT) were assigned to the CDT group (n = 23). The median model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Pugh scores were 16 (range 7-41) and 10 (7-15), respectively. The median dose of spironolactone in the TOL group was 88 mg (range 50-200) vs. 50 (0-100) in the CDT group (p < 0.01). The median dose of loop diuretics in the TOL group was 70 mg (20-120) vs. 20 (0-80) in the CDT group (p = 0.03). No significant liver damage was detected during tolvaptan therapy. Tolvaptan demonstrated favorable effects in 60% (6/10) of the patients, decreasing the body weight by at least 1.5 kg during the 7 day treatment. These findings suggest that low-dose of tolvaptan may be safe for patients having far-advanced ESLD patients with apparent and refractory ascites taking dual conventional diuretics for a short period before LDLT.

Proximal total splenic artery embolization for refractory hepatic encephalopathy.

A Japanese woman with a history of Kasai operation for biliary atresia had living-donor liver transplantation at the age of 22. The first episode of refractory HE and late cellular rejection was treated by a high dose of methylprednisolone. The second episode of refractory HE was treated by balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for a spleno-renal shunt. However, the third episode of refractory HE occurred 11 years after liver transplantation. The liver cirrhosis and hypersplenism were present with a Child-Pugh score of C-10. Although portal vein flow was hepatopetal, superior mesenteric vein flow regurgitated. We performed proximal total splenic artery embolization (TSAE). Superior mesenteric vein flow changed to a hepatopetal direction and she became clear. At a year after proximal TSAE, her spleen volume had decreased to 589 mL (20% decrease) on computed tomography. She is well and has a Child-Pugh score of 8 without overt HE. We report the first case of refractory HE treated by proximal TSAE that is a possible less invasive treatment option for a selected patient.

Safety and efficacy of venous reconstruction in liver resection using cryopreserved homologous veins.

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have reported the resection and reconstruction of major hepatic veins during hepatectomy. Here, we present our strategy and techniques for venous reconstruction with cryopreserved homologous veins, and describe the surgical outcome. METHODS: Among 2,387 hepatectomy patients, 39 patients who required hepatic venous reconstruction were reviewed retrospectively. Venous reconstruction was performed to secure a non-congested liver remnant volume of at least 40% of the total liver volume. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality, and the severe morbidity rate was 5% in this series. A total of 41 veins were reconstructed; 30 with homologous veins (73.2%) and 11 with autologous veins (26.8%), with the middle hepatic vein being the most frequent (n = 23, 56%). Interposition grafting was performed more often (P = 0.003), the length of the venous resection was longer (P = 0.007), and pathologic wall infiltration of the vein was revealed more often (P = 0.002) in the homologous graft group than in the autologous graft group. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall patency of the reconstructed veins was 55.4%, 46.3%, and 46.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive venous reconstruction during hepatectomy using cryopreserved homologous veins is a feasible option with satisfactory short-term outcomes, and may be warranted to improve operative safety.

Safety and efficacy of cryopreserved homologous veins for venous reconstruction in pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: There are several techniques for reconstructing the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein during pancreatoduodenectomy. The aim of the present study was to present our results with portal vein-superior mesenteric vein reconstruction using cryopreserved homologous veins during pancreatoduodenectomy for patients with pancreatic head cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer were reviewed retrospectively. In patients with portal vein-superior mesenteric vein resection, the detailed method of reconstruction and clinical outcomes were reviewed. Clinical characteristics, patient survival, and portal vein-superior mesenteric vein patency were compared between those with and without homologous vein grafts. Factors affecting the patency of reconstructed veins were assessed by univariate analysis. RESULTS: Among 144 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy, portal vein-superior mesenteric vein resection was performed in 36 patients (25%); 18 (50%) underwent reconstruction with homologous veins, and the other 18 (50%) underwent reconstruction without homologous veins. The extent of portal vein-superior mesenteric vein involvement, operative time, duration of clamping of portal vein-superior mesenteric vein, intraoperative blood loss, and length of the venous resection were greater (P ≤ .013 each) in those with homologous vein grafts. There was no significant difference in postoperative morbidity/mortality, patient survival, or portal vein-superior mesenteric vein patency. The 1- and 2-year overall patency of portal vein-superior mesenteric vein was 76% and 71%, respectively, while the 2-year patencies were 67% and 67% in those with homologous veins and 87% and 73% in those without homologous veins without difference between the groups. Circumferential resection and pathologic portal vein-superior mesenteric vein involvement were associated with the patency of the reconstructed vein (P = .002 and P = .028, resp). CONCLUSION: Use of homologous venous grafts for portal vein-superior mesenteric vein reconstruction are feasible alternatives during pancreatoduodenectomy for advanced pancreatic head cancer.

Pharmacokinetics of a Once-Daily Dose of Tacrolimus Early After Liver Transplantation: With Special Reference to CYP3A5 and ABCB1 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms.

BACKGROUND The aim of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of the once-daily tacrolimus formulation (QD form) in relation to polymorphisms of the donor cytochrome P450 family 3 sub-family A polypeptide 5 (CYP3A5) gene and recipient adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette sub-family B member 1 (ABCB1) gene. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 80 consecutive living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients were started on the QD form of tacrolimus (day 1), and 60 patients were completely followed for 7 days early after liver transplantation in order to evaluate the pharmacokinetics. RESULTS The concentration/dose (C/D) ratio in recipients with the donor CYP3A5 *1 allele was significantly lower throughout the observation period compared with those with the CYP3A5 genotype *3/*3 (p<0.001), while no effect of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of ABCB1 was observed. The administered doses required to achieve the target trough level were significantly higher on day 7 than on day 1 among all groups, regardless of the differences in the SNPs, especially among those with donor CYP3A5 *1 allele. The tacrolimus concentration was kept within the targeted level all through the study regardless of SNPs. CONCLUSIONS The donor CYP3A5 *1 allele correlated with the lower C/D ratio after administration of the QD form, and higher doses of QD-form tacrolimus and careful monitoring for the trough level should be considered, especially in recipients with the donor CYP3A5 *1 allele.

Risk factors for acute liver allograft rejection and their influences on treatment outcomes of rescue therapy in living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Several clinical factors are reportedly correlated with acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation. However, the factors that determine the response to rescue therapies remain unclear. METHODS: A prospective database of 413 consecutive adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was reviewed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine (24%) patients developed ACR after LDLT. A multivariate analysis revealed that a positive T-lymphocytotoxic test (odds ratio [OR], 3.85; P=.017), HLA-DR mismatch (OR, 2.99; P=.013), autoimmune disease (OR, 2.61; P=.001), and a younger recipient age (OR, 0.60 for +10 years; P<.001) were independent risk factors for ACR. Among these, autoimmune disease was significantly correlated with refractoriness to the standard rescue therapy (53% vs 30%, P=.02) and relapse of cellular rejection (34% vs 16%, P=.04). After rescue therapy, 98 of the 99 (99%) patients eventually recovered from ACR and graft loss was observed in only one patient. None of the risk factors for ACR impaired both graft survival and overall survival after LDLT. CONCLUSIONS: Autoimmune liver disease is associated with refractoriness to rescue therapy for ACR and the relapse of rejection. However, ACR does not affect the long-term outcomes of LDLT if it is well controlled.

Daclatasvir and asunaprevir for recurrent hepatitis C following living donor liver transplantation with HIV co-infection.

Antiviral treatment in liver transplant recipients co-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV remains a challenge. We herein report a case of HCV recurrence that was successfully treated using interferon-free anti-HCV therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir. A 48-year-old man underwent antiviral therapy with a 24-week course of daclatasvir and asunaprevir for biopsy-proven recurrent HCV 15 months after living donor liver transplantation, following non-response to pre-emptive antiviral treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Anti-HIV and immunosuppressive regimens were modified safely. Renal function was feasibly preserved. The anti-HCV effect was remarkable with an undetectable viral load confirmed within 2 weeks, and this patient achieved a sustained virological response after 12 weeks of post-transplantation treatment. No serious adverse events were observed. This case indicates that daclatasvir and asunaprevir for recurrent HCV in a HIV co-infected recipient after liver transplantation is safe and effective.

Interleukin-2 receptor antagonist immunosuppression and consecutive viral management in living-donor liver transplantation for human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C-co-infected patients: a report of 2 cases.

Management of immunosuppression for human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C (HIV/HCV) in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has not been established. We performed LDLT for two patients with HIV/HCV-co-infected end-stage liver disease. The immunosuppression protocol consisted of early calcineurin inhibitor-free and interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2Ra) induction and methylprednisolone. Maintenance low-dose tacrolimus was started and anti-retroviral therapy for HIV was re-started 1 week after LDLT. Consecutively, pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy were successfully added as pre-emptive therapy for HCV. HIV-RNA and HCV-RNA were undetectable on anti-retroviral therapy and HCV treatment at 17 and 8 months after LDLT, respectively, with normal liver function. This study is the first report of early calcineurin inhibitor-free and IL2Ra induction with methylprednisolone immunosuppression in LDLT for HIV/HCV-co-infected patients with a favorable outcome. Consecutive HIV/HCV treatment was well tolerated.

One-year extended, monthly vaccination prophylaxis combined with hepatitis B immune globulin for hepatitis B after liver transplantation.

AIM: The feasibility of vaccination in liver transplant recipients is highly controversial, and the present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of a 1-year extended, monthly vaccine prophylaxis protocol of a second-generation recombinant vaccine for transplant recipients. METHODS: The recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (10 µg) was administrated s.c. every month for 12 months as the vaccination protocol to 39 liver transplant recipients in stable condition, including those with hepatitis B-related chronic liver disease (n = 30), those with acute hepatitis B liver failure (hepatitis B surface antibody [HBsAb], n = 4), and those with hepatitis B core antibody positive grafts (n = 5). A fixed dose of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) was administrated during the study based on the monoprophylaxis approach, and the increase in the hepatitis B surface antibody titer was measured to evaluate the efficacy of the vaccination. RESULTS: The vaccination protocol was initiated a mean of 54 months (range, 13-124) after liver transplantation, and all patients tolerated the vaccination well without adverse effects. The overall hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence rate was 5% (2/39) based on hepatitis B surface antigen positivity, and 2% (1/39) based on HBV DNA detectability. Six (15%) patients showed a good response to vaccination with an increase in the HBsAb titer greater than 100 IU/L at the end of vaccination, but only three (8%) maintained an adequate HBsAb level to spare HBIG during the 2-year observation period. CONCLUSION: While a few patients demonstrated an adequate response to vaccination, the clinical indication for the HBV vaccination for liver transplant recipients is currently minimal.

Use of simeprevir following pre-emptive pegylated interferon/ribavirin treatment for recurrent hepatitis C in living donor liver transplant recipients: a 12-week pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The management of recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation remains a challenge. METHODS: We prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of simeprevir in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in five patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with recurrent hepatitis due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b. RESULTS: As the immunosuppressive regimen, four received cyclosporine A (CsA) and one received tacrolimus (FK); no dose adjustment was made prior to the introduction of simeprevir, but the dose was accordingly modified afterwards. All five patients completed the intended 12-week treatment course without significant adverse events greater than grade 2, and no episodes of rejection were detected during the study period. The trough levels of CsA and FK were stably maintained. At week 12, HCV-RNA was not detectable in three of the five patients, whereas the HCV titer of the other two patients, including one with Q80L and V170I mutations at the HCV NS3 position, was at the lower level of quantification (1.2 log10 IU/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this pilot study, simeprevir-based triple therapy is safe and somewhat effective within the first 12 weeks in LDLT recipients with HCV recurrence. Further studies are warranted to obtain robust conclusions.

Impact of early reoperation following living-donor liver transplantation on graft survival.

BACKGROUND: The reoperation rate remains high after liver transplantation and the impact of reoperation on graft and recipient outcome is unclear. The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of early reoperation following living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) on graft and recipient survival. METHODS: Recipients that underwent LDLT (n = 111) at the University of Tokyo Hospital between January 2007 and December 2012 were divided into two groups, a reoperation group (n = 27) and a non-reoperation group (n = 84), and case-control study was conducted. RESULTS: Early reoperation was performed in 27 recipients (24.3%). Mean time [standard deviation] from LDLT to reoperation was 10 [9.4] days. Female sex, Child-Pugh class C, Non-HCV etiology, fulminant hepatitis, and the amount of intraoperative fresh frozen plasma administered were identified as possibly predictive variables, among which females and the amount of FFP were identified as independent risk factors for early reoperation by multivariable analysis. The 3-, and 6- month graft survival rates were 88.9% (95%confidential intervals [CI], 70.7-96.4), and 85.2% (95%CI, 66.5-94.3), respectively, in the reoperation group (n = 27), and 95.2% (95%CI, 88.0-98.2), and 92.9% (95%CI, 85.0-96.8), respectively, in the non-reoperation group (n = 84) (the log-rank test, p = 0.31). The 12- and 36- month overall survival rates were 96.3% (95%CI, 77.9-99.5), and 88.3% (95%CI, 69.3-96.2), respectively, in the reoperation group, and 89.3% (95%CI, 80.7-94.3) and 88.0% (95%CI, 79.2-93.4), respectively, in the non-reoperation group (the log-rank test, p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Observed graft survival for the recipients who underwent reoperation was lower compared to those who did not undergo reoperation, though the result was not significantly different. Recipient overall survival with reoperation was comparable to that without reoperation. The present findings enhance the importance of vigilant surveillance for postoperative complication and surgical rescue at an early postoperative stage in the LDLT setting.

Perceptions of post-transplant recidivism in liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease.

Although alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is regarded as a common indication for liver transplantation (LT), debatable issues exist on the requirement for preceding alcoholic abstinence, appropriate indication criteria, predictive factors for alcoholic recidivism, and outcomes following living-donor LT. In most institutions, an abstinence period of six months before LT has been adopted as a mandatory selection criterion. Data indicating that pre-transplant abstinence is an associated predictive factor for alcoholic recidivism supports the reasoning behind this. However, conclusive evidence about the benefit of adopting an abstinence period is yet to be established. On the other hand, a limited number of reports available on living-donor LT experiences for ALD patients suggest that organ donations from relatives have no suppressive effect on alcoholic recidivism. Prevention of alcoholic recidivism has proved to be the most important treatment after LT based on the resultant inferior long-term outcome of patients. Further evaluations are still needed to establish strategies before and after LT for ALD.

Section 4. Further expanding the criteria for HCC in living donor liver transplantation: the Tokyo University experience.

In Asia, evidence-based guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have evolved, including the option of liver transplantation. Because of the continuing serious organ shortage, however, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains the mainstream in Japan. Unlike deceased donor transplantation, living donor transplantation is not always limited by the restrictions imposed by the nationwide organ allocation system. The decision for transplantation may depend on institutional or case-by-case considerations, balancing the will of the donor, the operative risk, and the overall survival benefit. Cumulative data from the Japanese national multicenter registry analysis as well as individual center experiences suggest further expanding the criteria for LDLT for HCC from the Milan criteria is feasible with acceptable outcomes.