RESUMO
Background and Aims: Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are associated with significant morbidity and poor quality of life (QOL). Compression therapy and wound dressing are the mainstay treatment options. Technology Lipido-Colloid Impregnated with Silver (TLC-Ag) reduces bacterial load and Technology Lipido-Colloid Nano-Oligosaccharide Factor (TLC-NOSF) reduces elevated matrix metalloproteinases and improve wound healing. However, evidence is scarce on the role of sequential therapy. This study aims to evaluate if sequential treatment with TLC-Ag and TLC-NOSF improves VLU wound healing and QOL. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study from May 2020 to October 2021 on patients with VLUs who received sequential therapy, consisting of 2 weeks of TLC-Ag followed by two-layer compression bandage (2LB) with TLC-NOSF until complete wound healing. Participants were followed-up with weekly dressing changes. Our primary outcomes were wound area reduction (WAR) and Pressure Ulcer Scale of Healing (PUSH) score. Our secondary outcomes were QOL measures. Results: There were 28 patients with 57.1% males (n = 16) with a mean age of 65.3 years. Mean duration of VLU was 13.9 ± 11.7 weeks before the initiation of sequential therapy. Mean baseline wound area was 8.44 cm2. Median time to wound healing was 10 weeks. 57.1% of patients achieved complete wound closure at 3 months. There was significant WAR after 1 month (mean area 8.44-5.81 cm2, 31.2% decrease) and after 3 months (mean area 8.44-2.53 cm2, 70.0% decrease). Mean monthly WAR was 28.9%. PUSH score also decreased at 1 month (16.5% decrease, p < 0.001) and 3 months (63.3% decrease, p < 0.001) marks following the sequential therapy. EuroQol Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) improved following sequential therapy (baseline: 69.0 ± 15.0, week 13: 80.2 ± 13.2, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Sequential therapy with TLC-Ag followed by TLC-NOSF and 2LB is feasible, with good wound healing and improvement in QOL of patients with VLUs.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are both chronic and recurrent. The treatment of such ulcers often require multiple outpatient visits and dressing changes. Several reports on the costs of treating such VLUs have been reported in the west. We prospectively evaluated the clinical and economic burden of VLUs in a population of Asian patients in the tropics. METHODS: Patients from a prospective two-center study conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Singapore, as a part of the Wound Care Innovation in the Tropics program, between August 2018 and September 2021 were recruited. The patients were followed up for 12 weeks (visit 1 to visit 12), until index ulcer healing, death, or lost to follow-up (whichever came first). These patients were then followed up 12 weeks later to determine the longer term outcome of the wound (healed, recurrence, remained unhealed). The itemized costs derived from the medical service were retrieved from the relevant departments of the study sites. The patients' health-related quality of life was assessed at baseline and the last visit of the 12-week follow-up period (or until index ulcer healing), using the official Singapore version of the EuroQol five-dimension-5L questionnaire, which also includes a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). RESULTS: A total of 116 patients were enrolled; 63% were men, and the mean patient age was 64.7 years. Of the 116 patients, 85 (73%) had a healed ulcer at 24 weeks (mean duration to ulcer healing, 49 days), and 11 (12.9%) had experienced ulcer recurrence within the study period. Within the 6-month follow-up period, the mean direct healthcare cost per patient was USD$1998. The patients with healed ulcers had significantly lower costs per patient compared with those with unhealed ulcers (USD$1713 vs USD$2780). Regarding health-related quality of life, 71% of the patients had a lower quality of life at baseline, which had improved at 12 weeks of follow-up, with only 58% of the patients reported to have a lower quality of life. Also, the patients with healed ulcers scored higher for both utilities (societal preference weights) and EQ-VAS at follow-up (P < .001). In contrast, patients with unhealed ulcers only scored higher EQ-VAS at follow-up (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this exploratory study provide information on the clinical, quality of life, and economic burden of VLUs in an Asian population and suggest the importance of healing VLUs to reduce the effects on patients. The present study provides data as a basis for economic evaluation as a consideration for the treatment of VLUs.
Assuntos
Úlcera da Perna , Úlcera Varicosa , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Úlcera , Qualidade de Vida , Estresse Financeiro , Úlcera Varicosa/terapia , Úlcera Varicosa/tratamento farmacológico , Úlcera da Perna/terapiaRESUMO
Present guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) care, but relevant data from Asia are lacking. We aim to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes of an MDT approach in a lower extremity amputation prevention programme (LEAPP) for DFU care in an Asian population. We performed a case-control study of 84 patients with DFU between January 2017 and October 2017 (retrospective control) vs 117 patients with DFU between December 2017 and July 2018 (prospective LEAPP cohort). Comparing the clinical outcomes between the retrospective cohort and the LEAPP cohort, there was a significant decrease in mean time from referral to index clinic visit (38.6 vs 9.5 days, P < .001), increase in outpatient podiatry follow-up (33% vs 76%, P < .001), decrease in 1-year minor amputation rate (14% vs 3%, P = .007), and decrease in 1-year major amputation rate (9% vs 3%, P = .05). Simulation of cost avoidance demonstrated an annualised cost avoidance of USD $1.86m (SGD $2.5m) for patients within the LEAPP cohort. In conclusion, similar to the data from Western societies, an MDT approach in an Asian population, via a LEAPP for patients with DFU, demonstrated a significant reduction in minor and major amputation rates, with annualised cost avoidance of USD $1.86m.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Pé Diabético , Úlcera do Pé , Amputação Cirúrgica , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Pé Diabético/prevenção & controle , Pé Diabético/cirurgia , Humanos , Extremidade Inferior , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
There is a lifetime risk of 15% to 25% of development of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in patients with diabetes mellitus. DFUs need to be followed up on and assessed for development of complications and/or resolution, which was traditionally performed using manual measurement. Our study aims to compare the intra- and inter-rater reliability of an artificial intelligence-enabled wound imaging mobile application (CARES4WOUNDS [C4W] system, Tetsuyu, Singapore) with traditional measurement. This is a prospective cross-sectional study on 28 patients with DFUs from June 2020 to January 2021. The main wound parameters assessed were length and width. For traditional manual measurement, area was calculated by overlaying traced wound on graphical paper. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was analysed using intra-class correlation statistics. A value of <0.5, 0.5-0.75, 0.75-0.9, and >0.9 indicates poor, moderate, good, and excellent reliability, respectively. Seventy-five wound episodes from 28 patients were collected and a total of 547 wound images were analysed in this study. The median wound area during the first clinic consultation and all wound episodes was 3.75 cm2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.40-16.50) and 3.10 cm2 (IQR 0.60-14.84), respectively. There is excellent intra-rater reliability of C4W on three different image captures of the same wound (intra-rater reliability ranging 0.933-0.994). There is also excellent inter-rater reliability between three C4W devices for length (0.947), width (0.923), and area (0.965). Good inter-rater reliability for length, width, and area (range 0.825-0.934) was obtained between wound nurse measurement and each of the C4W devices. In conclusion, we obtained good inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of C4W measurements against traditional wound measurement. The C4W is a useful adjunct in monitoring DFU wound progress.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Pé Diabético , Aplicativos Móveis , Inteligência Artificial , Estudos Transversais , Pé Diabético/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
Chronic venous insufficiency is a chronic disease of the venous system with a prevalence of 25% to 40% in females and 10% to 20% in males. Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) result from venous insufficiency. VLUs have a prevalence of 0.18% to 1% with a 1-year recurrence of 25% to 50%, bearing significant socioeconomic burden. It is therefore important for regular assessment and monitoring of VLUs to prevent worsening. Our study aims to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a machine learning-based handheld 3-dimensional infrared wound imaging device (WoundAide [WA] imaging system, Konica Minolta Inc, Tokyo, Japan) compared with traditional measurements by trained wound nurse. This is a prospective cross-sectional study on 52 patients with VLUs from September 2019 to January 2021 using three WA imaging systems. Baseline patient profile and clinical demographics were collected. Basic wound parameters (length, width and area) were collected for both traditional measurements and measurements taken by the WA imaging systems. Intra- and inter-rater reliability was analysed using intra-class correlation statistics. A total of 222 wound images from 52 patients were assessed. There is excellent intra-rater reliability of the WA imaging system on three different image captures of the same wound (intra-rater reliability ranging 0.978-0.992). In addition, there is excellent inter-rater reliability between the three WA imaging systems for length (0.987), width (0.990) and area (0.995). Good inter-rater reliability for length and width (range 0.875-0.900) and excellent inter-rater reliability (range 0.932-0.950) were obtained between wound nurse measurement and each of the WA imaging system. In conclusion, high intra- and inter-rater reliability was obtained for the WA imaging systems. We also obtained high inter-rater reliability of WA measurements against traditional wound measurement. The WA imaging system is a useful clinical adjunct in the monitoring of VLU wound documentation.