BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE)-A study protocol on personalised risk-based breast cancer screening programme.

Routine mammography screening is currently the standard tool for finding cancers at an early stage, when treatment is most successful. Current breast screening programmes are one-size-fits-all which all women above a certain age threshold are encouraged to participate. However, breast cancer risk varies by individual. The BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE) study aims to assess acceptability of a comprehensive risk-based personalised breast screening in Singapore. Advancing beyond the current age-based screening paradigm, BREATHE integrates both genetic and non-genetic breast cancer risk prediction tools to personalise screening recommendations. BREATHE is a cohort study targeting to recruit ~3,500 women. The first recruitment visit will include questionnaires and a buccal cheek swab. After receiving a tailored breast cancer risk report, participants will attend an in-person risk review, followed by a final session assessing the acceptability of our risk stratification programme. Risk prediction is based on: a) Gail model (non-genetic), b) mammographic density and recall, c) BOADICEA predictions (breast cancer predisposition genes), and d) breast cancer polygenic risk score. For national implementation of personalised risk-based breast screening, exploration of the acceptability within the target populace is critical, in addition to validated predication tools. To our knowledge, this is the first study to implement a comprehensive risk-based mammography screening programme in Asia. The BREATHE study will provide essential data for policy implementation which will transform the health system to deliver a better health and healthcare outcomes.

Beliefs about medicines and adherence in women with breast cancer on adjuvant endocrine therapy.

The Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) and Adherence Starts with Knowledge (ASK-12) questionnaire were originally developed and validated in Western populations to assess beliefs and barriers to medication adherence. The study aim is to validate the BMQ and ASK-12 questionnaire for use in a Singapore population with early stage breast cancer. English-speaking women on adjuvant endocrine therapy (n = 157) were recruited. The BMQ-Specific showed good internal consistency with structural validity. The internal consistency of BMQ-General and ASK-12 Behaviour scale improved with the new factor structure obtained from exploratory factor analysis. Further studies are needed to confirm these factor structures.

Facilitators and barriers to medication adherence with adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with breast cancer: a structural equation modelling approach.

PURPOSE: To identify a structure to explain the relationship between socio-clinico factors, necessity-concerns beliefs, and perceived barriers to adherence with adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) amongst women with breast cancer. METHODS: Participants were 244 patients with early-stage breast cancer recruited from two tertiary hospitals from May 2015 to December 2018 who completed questionnaires on medication adherence (Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire), necessity-concerns beliefs (Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire), and barriers to adherence (Adherence Starts with Knowledge Questionnaire). Socio-clinico variables were collected via interview and medical records review. Structural equation modelling was applied to examine the relationships between these variables and possible mediating effects of necessity-concerns beliefs on adherence to AET. RESULTS: The median age of the study participants was 61 (range 32-80) years and the median duration on AET was 1.6 (IQR 1.2-2.6) years. Adherence was positively associated with age (ß = 0.145, 95% CI: 0.011 to 0.279, p = 0.034) and negatively associated with barriers (ß = - 0.381, 95% CI: - 0.511 to - 0.251, p < 0.001). There was no effect of Necessity (ß = 0.006, 95% CI: - 0.145 to 0.158, p = 0.933) or Concerns (ß = 0.041, 95% CI: - 0.117 to 0.199, p = 0.614) on adherence. Necessity-concerns beliefs were also not significant mediators in the relationship between socio-clinico factors and medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Older age and lower barriers to adherence were associated with higher adherence scores. Necessity-concerns beliefs did not have a significant effect on adherence as majority of the patients identified forgetfulness as a reason for non-adherence.

Improving medication adherence with adjuvant aromatase inhibitor in women with breast cancer: A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of short message service (SMS) reminder.

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence is crucial for improving clinical outcomes in the treatment of patients. We evaluate the effect of short message service (SMS) reminder on medication adherence and serum hormones in patients with breast cancer on aromatase inhibitors. METHODS: An open-label, multi-centre, prospective randomised controlled trial of SMS versus Standard Care was conducted. Medication adherence was assessed via self-report using the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire at baseline, 6 month, and 1 year. Androstenedione, estradiol, and estrone were measured at baseline and 1 year. The χ2 test and mixed effects logistic regression was performed to compare medication adherence between groups. Difference in androstenedione and estrone levels were assessed using analysis of covariance, whereas χ2 test and logistic regression was used for estradiol. Analysis was based on intention-to-treat. RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were randomised to receive weekly SMS reminder (n = 123) or Standard Care (n = 121) between May 2015 and December 2018. The odds of adherence was higher at 6-month in SMS (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.04-3.05, p = 0.034), and not significantly different at 1-year (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.67-1.96 p = 0.617). Mixed effects logistic regression analysis showed higher odds of adherence in SMS over the 1-year period (OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.01-5.49, p = 0.048). There was no difference in serum hormone levels between groups. CONCLUSION: SMS reminder improved medication adherence in the short-term but had no effect on serum hormones levels in the longer term. Future studies could investigate the use of tailored SMS intervention according to patient preference to improve its sustainability.

Diagnosing phyllodes tumours of the breast: how successful are our current preoperative assessment modalities?

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy of the diagnostic modalities used in the preoperative assessment of phyllodes tumours. METHODS: In this retrospective study of patients treated at Princess Alexandra Hospital, 51 phyllodes tumours in 49 patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2016 were reviewed with regard to their preoperative findings to assess which modalities, including clinical findings, mammography, ultrasound, fine needle aspiration and core biopsy, were most diagnostically discriminating. Data on demographics and management were also collected. RESULTS: While 90.2% of lesions were clinically palpable and an abnormality was seen in 86.1% of lesions subjected to mammography, the findings in relation to these two modalities were essentially those of non-discriminatory masses. Furthermore, although 100% of the phyllodes lesions were sonographically visible, suspicion of a phyllodes tumour was only noted in 21.6% of cases. Fine needle aspiration yielded results suspicious for phyllodes in 21.1% of cases while core biopsy resulted in confirmed or suspected phyllodes tumour diagnoses in 69.2% of instances. Serial measurements of phyllodes tumours yielded an average growth rate of 8.04 mm per 365 days. CONCLUSION: In the preoperative diagnosis of phyllodes tumours of the breast, ultrasound was a more discriminating imaging modality compared to mammography, and core biopsy demonstrated a superior accuracy of diagnosis over fine needle biopsy. A significant increase in lesion size over a short timeframe should also alert to the possibility of a phyllodes tumour.

Improving medication adherence with adjuvant aromatase inhibitor in women with breast cancer: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of short message service (SMS) reminder.

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence refers to whether a patient takes medication according to the frequency prescribed, or continues to take a prescribed medication. Inadequate adherence to medication may cause alterations in risk-benefit ratios, resulting in reduced benefits, increased risks or both, and is significantly associated with adverse clinical outcomes and higher healthcare costs. We aim to examine the effect of a computer generated short message service (SMS) reminder in improving medication adherence, and inhibiting the aromatisation process amongst breast cancer women receiving oral aromatase inhibitor therapy. METHODS/DESIGN: In this randomised controlled trial, eligible patients will be equally allocated to receive either SMS reminder or standard care. The former receives weekly SMS reminder to take medication while the latter does not receive any. The primary endpoint of medication adherence at 1-year is assessed using the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire, and compared using the χ2 test. Adjustment for baseline covariate and potential confounders will be made using the logistic regression. Secondary outcomes involving estrone and androstenedione levels will be compared using the analysis of covariance, whereas the estradiol levels (< 18.4 pmol/L versus ≥18.4 pmol/L) will be compared using the χ2 test, and the logistic regression. Further, the assessment of knowledge, attitude, behaviour, and barriers and facilitating factors of medication adherence will be made via logistic regression. DISCUSSION: This will be the first study to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes from SMS reminder for breast cancer patients on aromatase inhibitor therapy. Random allocation to SMS reminder or control arm ensures that patients in both arms will be comparable with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics, and any difference in outcomes can be attributed to the intervention. Participants are not blinded to the assignment of intervention, thus there may be potential for bias in outcome assessments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02524548 . Retrospectively registered on 17 August 2015.