Transradial versus Transfemoral Access for Patients with Liver Cancer Undergoing Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy: Patient Experience and Procedural Complications.

PURPOSE: To determine whether transradial access (TRA) is a more favorable and safe method for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) than transfemoral access (TFA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective and prospective cohorts of patients with liver cancer were included. Sixty-seven patients in the retrospective cohort were divided into 2 groups: (a) TRA-HAIC (n = 24) and (b) TFA-HAIC (n = 43). Another 33 patients were prospectively enrolled to receive both TRA and TFA for HAIC in a crossover design. Prolonged arterial access was required for up to 48 hours. The primary endpoint was quality of life (QOL) using the visual analog scale. The secondary endpoints mainly included procedural success, adverse events, and operation time. RESULTS: Patient QOL measures revealed significantly lower scores of indices in the TRA-HAIC group than in the TFA-HAIC group in the retrospective cohort (all P < .001). The significant improvement of the QOL indices by TRA-HAIC, such as overall discomfort (P = .019) and pain at the access site (P = .018), was validated in the prospective cohort. The satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the TRA-HAIC group than in the TFA-HAIC group, and patients preferred TRA-HAIC (P < .001). Radial artery occlusion (RAO) as an access-related adverse event occurred more frequently in both the retrospective and prospective cohorts (38% and 33%, P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). Notably, the multivariate analysis of RAO-associated factors showed that enoxaparin use was significantly correlated with a reduced risk of postprocedural RAO (P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: TRA was superior to TFA in patient experience. However, because of the high incidence of access-related adverse events, especially for RAO with a total incidence of 35%, strategies should be optimized for patients to benefit from TRA in future procedures.

microRNA-375 inhibits the malignant behaviors of hepatic carcinoma cells by targeting NCAPG2.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Emerging evidence has revealed the vital functions of microRNAs (miRNAs) in cancer malignant progressions. miR-375 has been verified to serve as an antioncogene in tumorigenesis and a potential therapeutic target in various types of cancer. In this study, we aimed to determine the role of miR-375 in the regulation of chemoresistance and metastasis of HCC. Differentially expressed miR-375 and NCAPG2 were externally validated using expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed to detect the expression levels of miR-375 in HCC tissues and cell lines. miR-375 mimics and NCAPG2-overexpression were transfected into HepG2 and Huh7 cells to establish miR-375 overexpression models. Cell Counting Kit-8, Transwell, and flow cytometry experiments were conducted to monitor cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis. The targeting relationship between miR-375 and non-SMC condensin II complex subunit G 2 (NCAPG2) was determined by qRT-PCR, western blot, and luciferase reporter gene assay. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were conducted using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). The pathway enrichment analysis was used to predict the potential pathways for further study. miR-375 was significantly downregulated in HCC tissues and cells compared to adjacent tissue and normal hepatocyte cell line respectively while NCAPG2 was upregulated. The targeting relationship was verified by luciferase reporting assay, and miR-375 could target the 3'UTR of NCAPG2 mRNA and effectively suppress NCAPG2 protein expression. Replenishing of miR-375 significantly repressed HCC cell proliferation and migration, and induced cell apoptosis. Overexpression of NCAPG2 recovered those biological abilities in miR-375 overexpressed cells. Collective data suggested that miR-375 served as a tumor suppressor via regulating NCAPG2. Replenishing of miR-375 or knockout of NCAPG2 could be therapeutically exploited for HCC.

Prognostic value of splenic volume in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization.

BACKGROUND: Liver function is a key determinant for the survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, establishing robust prognostic indicators for liver insufficiencies and patient survival remains an unmet demand. This retrospective study evaluated the prognostic value of splenic volume (SV) in HCC patients undergoing TACE. METHODS: A total of 67 HCC patients who underwent at least two consecutive TACE procedures were retrospectively included in this study. Comprehensive clinical information and follow-up data were collected, and the SV was measured based on dynamic contrast enhanced images. Risk factors of SV enlargement were assessed. The prognostic value of SV on survival was analyzed and compared with Child-Pugh (CP) classification and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade. RESULTS: The baseline SV was 299.74±143.63 cm3, and showed a moderate and statistically significant correlation with CP classification (R=0.31, P<0.05). The SV increased remarkably after the first and second TACE procedures (330.16±155.38 cm3, P<0.01, and 355.63±164.26 cm3, P<0.01, respectively). In survival analysis, the optimal cut-off value of SV was determined as 373 cm3 using X-tile software, and the patients were divided into the small SV group and the large SV groups accordingly. Based on the pre-TACE SV, the median overall survival (mOS) for patients in the small SV group and the large SV group was 458 days and 249 days, respectively (P<0.05). After the first and second TACE, the mOS in the small SV group and the large SV group were 454 vs. 266 days (P<0.05) and 526 vs. 266 days (P<0.05), respectively. No prognostic value of CP classification and ALBI grade was identified for these patients. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the small and large SV groups in age, tumor stage, and ALBI grade, except for CP classification (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SV was correlated with CP classification and was a robust predictor for HCC patients undergoing TACE treatment.

The earlier, the better: the effects of different administration timepoints of sorafenib in suppressing the carcinogenesis of VEGF in rats.

PURPOSE: To investigate the optimal starting time point of sorafenib therapy in suppressing the tumor-promoting effects of VEGF up-regulation, which is frequently found after local therapy in clinical practice. METHODS: VEGF was intravenously injected to imitate the evaluated expression after local tumor therapy, such as TACE. A total of 40 SD rats bearing hepatic tumors were randomly divided into four groups and sorafenib was administered at different timepoints: (A) control group: VEGF injection only; (B) initiating sorafenib 72 h prior to VEGF injection; (C) initiating sorafenib simultaneously with VEGF injection; (D) initiating sorafenib 72 h post-VEGF injection. The rate of tumor growth, median survival time, expression of VEGF, and microvessel density (MVD), as determined by immunohistochemical (IHC) examination, were compared. RESULTS: The results revealed that the tumor size and median survival time were significantly different between the three sorafenib groups compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Median survival times were 19.6 ± 1.78, 31.2 ± 6.99, 27.4 ± 4.9, and 26.5 ± 4.6 days in group A, B, C, and D, respectively. Furthermore, there was a difference in statistical significance between the two sorafenib groups B and D (p = 0.04). Tumors were collected for HE staining and IHC examination. The expression levels of VEGF in B, C, and D were 42.8 ± 7.96, 71.9 ± 15.73, and 73.6 ± 13.73, and all of them were significantly lower than that in the control group (88.3 ± 13.61). Furthermore, the level of MVD was 109.2 ± 8.98 in the control group, which was significantly higher than in the three sorafenib groups (45.7 ± 16.92, 77.1 ± 16.29, and 93.6 ± 12.87, all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the most suitable regimen for the administration of sorafenib is before the increased expression of VEGF, which showed a potential advantage for controlling the tumor growth and prolonging the survival time of test animal via inhibiting VEGF-receptor expression through the bifunction of VEGF, and the reduction of tumor angiogenesis.