Correction: Zhao et al. Hypermethylation of UCHL1 Promotes Metastasis of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Suppressing Degradation of Cortactin (CTTN). Cells 2020, 9, 559.

In the original publication [...].

Prognostic value of pre-treatment [18F] FDG PET/CT in recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma without distant metastasis.

BACKGROUND: [18 F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has the ability to detect local and/or regional recurrence as well as distant metastasis. We aimed to evaluate the prognosis value of PET/CT in locoregional recurrent nasopharyngeal (lrNPC). METHODS: A total of 451 eligible patients diagnosed with recurrent I-IVA (rI-IVA) NPC between April 2009 and December 2015 were retrospectively included in this study. The differences in overall survival (OS) of lrNPC patients with and without PET/CT were compared in the I-II, III-IVA, r0-II, and rIII-IVA cohorts, which were grouped by initial staging and recurrent staging (according to MRI). RESULTS: In the III-IVA and rIII-IVA NPC patients, with PET/CT exhibited significantly higher OS rates in the univariate analysis (P = 0.045; P = 0.009; respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that with PET/CT was an independent predictor of OS in the rIII-IVA cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.476; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.267 to 0.847; P = 0.012). In the rIII-IVA NPC, patients receiving PET/CT sacns before salvage surgery had a better prognosis compared with MRI alone (P = 0.036). The recurrent stage (based on PET/CT) was an independent predictor of OS. (r0-II versus [vs]. rIII-IVA; HR = 0.376; 95% CI: 0.150 to 0.938; P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: The present study showed that with PET/CT could improve overall survival for rIII-IVA NPC patients. PET/CT appears to be an effective method for assessing rTNM staging.

Radiotherapy alone versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage II and T3N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma with adverse features: A propensity score-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy would provide survival benefits in patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse factors remains unclear in IMRT era. We aimed to assess the value of concurrent chemotherapy compared to IMRT alone in stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 287 patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse factors were retrospectively analyzed, including 98 patients who received IMRT alone (IMRT alone group) and 189 patients who received cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT group). The possible prognostic factors were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the survival rates, and log-rank tests were employed to compare differences between groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 90.8 months (interquartile range = 75.6-114.7 months). The IMRT alone and the CCRT group were well matched; however, for all survival-related endpoints, there were no significant differences between them (5-year failure-free survival: 84.3% vs. 82.7%, P value = 0.68; 5-year overall survival: 87.3% vs. 90.6%, P value = 0.11; 5-year distant metastasis-free survival: 92.8% vs. 92.5%, P value = 0.97; 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival: 93.4% vs. 89.9%, P value = 0.30). The incidence of acute toxicities in the IMRT alone group was significantly lower than that in the CCRT group. CONCLUSION: For patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse features treated using IMRT, no improvement in survival was gained by adding concurrent chemotherapy; however, the occurrence of acute toxicities increased significantly. For those combined with non-single adverse factors, the comprehensive treatment strategy needs further exploration.

Reduced-Volume Irradiation of Uninvolved Neck in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Updated Results From an Open-Label, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We previously reported comparable 3-year regional relapse-free survival (RRFS) using elective upper-neck irradiation (UNI) in N0-1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) compared with standard whole-neck irradiation (WNI). Here, we present the prespecified 5-year overall survival (OS), RRFS, late toxicity, and additional analyses. In this randomized trial, patients received UNI (n = 224) or WNI (n = 222) for an uninvolved neck. After a median follow-up of 74 months, the UNI and WNI groups had similar 5-year OS (95.9% v 93.1%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.35]; P = .24) and RRFS (95.0% v 94.9%, HR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.43 to 2.13]; P = .91) rates. The 5-year disease-free survivors in the UNI group had a lower frequency of hypothyroidism (34% v 48%; P = .004), neck tissue damage (29% v 46%; P < .001), dysphagia (14% v 27%; P = .002), and lower-neck common carotid artery stenosis (15% v 26%; P = .043). The UNI group had higher postradiotherapy circulating lymphocyte counts than the WNI group (median: 400 cells/µL v 335 cells/µL, P = .007). In conclusion, these updated data confirmed that UNI of the uninvolved neck is a standard of care in N0-1 NPC, providing outstanding efficacy and reduced long-term toxicity, and might retain more immune function.

Transcription factor ATMIN facilitates chemoresistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Despite that the docectaxel-cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy has greatly improved patients' survival and became the first-line treatment for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), not all patients could benefit from this therapy. The mechanism underlying the TPF chemoresistance remains unclear. Here, by analyzing gene-expression microarray data and survival of patients who received TPF chemotherapy, we identify transcription factor ATMIN as a chemoresistance gene in response to TPF chemotherapy in NPC. Mass spectrometry and Co-IP assays reveal that USP10 deubiquitinates and stabilizes ATMIN protein, resulting the high-ATMIN expression in NPC. Knockdown of ATMIN suppresses the cell proliferation and facilitates the docetaxel-sensitivity of NPC cells both in vitro and in vivo, while overexpression of ATMIN exerts the opposite effect. Mechanistically, ChIP-seq combined with RNA-seq analysis suggests that ATMIN is associated with the cell death signaling and identifies ten candidate target genes of ATMIN. We further confirm that ATMIN transcriptionally activates the downstream target gene LCK and stabilizes it to facilitate cell proliferation and docetaxel resistance. Taken together, our findings broaden the insight into the molecular mechanism of chemoresistance in NPC, and the USP10-ATMIN-LCK axis provides potential therapeutic targets for the management of NPC.

Patterns and Prognosis of Local Recurrence of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy.

Objective: To investigate the patterns of local failure and prognosis in patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) after primary intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods: The data of 298 patients with locally rNPC after IMRT were retrospectively analyzed. Magnetic resonance images of the initial and recurrent tumors were reviewed and, for patients with extra-nasopharyngeal local recurrence, the gross tumor volume of local recurrence was transferred to the original IMRT plan for dosimetry analysis. Significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were selected by multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results: The commonest recurrence sites were the nasopharynx (93%, 277/298) and skull base (53.7%, 160/298). Of the 21 patients with extra-nasopharyngeal recurrence (19 cases valid), 12 had in-field failures, 4 had marginal failures, and 3 had out-field failures. The ethmoid sinus (57.1%, 4/7) and nasal cavity (28.6%, 2/7) were the most frequent sites of marginal and out-field failures. After median follow-up of 37 months, the 3-year and estimated 5-year OS rates were 57.3% and 41.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age, recurrence interval, plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA level, and recurrent T stage were independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: Local failure after IMRT occurs most commonly in the nasopharynx and skull base. In patients with extra-nasopharyngeal recurrence, in-field failure remains the main failure pattern, and marginal and out-field failures mainly occur in the ethmoid sinus and nasal cavity. Elder age, shorter recurrence interval, detectable plasma EBV DNA, and advanced recurrent T stage are negative predictors of OS in patients with rNPC.

Refining the 8th edition TNM classification for EBV related nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

The AJCC/UICC TNM classification describes anatomic extent of tumor progression and guides treatment decisions. Our comprehensive analysis of 8,834 newly diagnosed patients with non-metastatic Epstein-Barr virus related nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) from six Chinese centers indicates certain limitations in the current staging system. The 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM classification inadequately differentiates patient outcomes, particularly between T2 and T3 categories and within the N classification. We propose reclassifying cases of T3 NPC with early skull-base invasion as T2, and elevating N1-N2 cases with grade 3 image-identified extranodal extension (ENE) to N3. Additionally, we suggest combining T2N0 with T1N0 into a single stage IA. For de novo metastatic (M1) NPC, we propose subdivisions of M1a, defined by 1-3 metastatic lesions without liver involvement, and M1b, characterized by >3 metastatic lesions or liver involvement. This proposal better reflects responses of NPC patients to the up-to-date treatments and their evolving risk profiles.

Evaluation and analysis of risk factors of hearing impairment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Treating nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with radiotherapy frequently causes hearing impairment (HI). HI risk data haven't been evaluated quantitatively. This study aimed to analyze the probability of HI and sever HI (SHI), develop a nomogram to quantify individual prediction, and provide dose limitation suggestions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This single-center, retrospective study was conducted based on 588 adolescents and young adults with non-metastatic NPC treated using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between 2010 and 2016. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression model and univariate analysis were used to screen potential risk factors. The concordance index and a calibration curve evaluated the nomogram models' predictive ability, with bootstrap resampling validation. RESULTS: We analyzed 588 patients with NPC, with a median follow-up of 103.4 months. HI occurred in 39.5 % of patients, with 29.7 % experiencing SHI. Two factors were classified as precursors for HI (volume 45 Gy of the inner ear (IEV45) and volume 50 Gy of the internal auditory canal (IACV50)), and IACmin and IACV60 for SHI, respectively. Prognostic nomograms were developed to predict HI and SHI probabilities, showing excellent discriminative abilities (c-index values = 0.806 and 0.793, respectively). We also suggested IEV45 < 50 % and/or IACV50 < 40 % as rational dose limitations for HI, and IACmin < 44 Gy and/or the IACV60 < 40 % for SHI. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive analysis could predict the risk of HI and SHI in NPC after IMRT, proposing rational dose limitations and improving long-term quality of life.

Oral chemotherapy versus observation alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with persistently detected circulating cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA during follow-up.

AIM: Despite the high risk of tumor recurrence, patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with persistently (at least twice) detected circulating cell-free Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels during follow-up are routinely recommended to keep observation. For these patients, whether administering more aggressive treatment could improve survival outcomes remains unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively included 431 patients with nonmetastatic NPC with persistently detected EBV DNA during follow-up, who do not have clinical or imaging evidence of recurrence. Among these patients, 79 were administered oral chemotherapy, and the remaining 352 underwent observation alone. Baseline characteristics were balanced with propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. The primary endpoint was modified disease-free survival (mDFS), defined as time from detectable EBV DNA result to tumor recurrence or death. The secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: One-to-three PSM resulted in 251 eligible patients (oral chemotherapy group, 73; observation group, 178). In the matched cohort, the oral chemotherapy group had higher median mDFS (12.9 months [95 % confidence interval [CI] 9.6-16.3] vs. 6.8 months [95 % CI 5.8-7.8], p = 0.009) and DFS (24.1 months [95 % CI 18.5-29.7] vs. 16.7 months [95 % CI 14.4-19.1], p = 0.035) than the observation group. The median OS was numerically higher in the oral chemotherapy group than in the observation group (57.9 months [95 % CI 42.5-73.3] vs. 50.8 months [95 % CI 39.7-61.9], p = 0.71). A consistent benefit favoring oral chemotherapy was observed for mDFS in all subgroups analyses for male, <45 years, stage III-IVa disease, pretreatment EBV DNA load ≥ 4,000 copies/mL, no induction chemotherapy, or a detectable EBV DNA load ≥ 1,200 copies/mL. After adjusting for other confounders in the multivariate analysis, oral chemotherapy remained a significantly favorable factor for both mDFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95 % CI 0.50-0.89; p = 0.006) and DFS (HR 0.68, 95 % CI 0.51-0.91; p = 0.01), but not a significant factor for OS (HR 0.89, 95 % CI 0.62-1.27; p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with NPC having persistently detected EBV DNA levels but without clinical or imaging evidence of recurrence during follow-up, oral chemotherapy significantly prolongs mDFS and DFS. Employing oral chemotherapy as a more aggressive treatment option, as opposed to mere observation, could potentially benefit these patients, although further prospective validation is necessitated.

A tumor microenvironment-associated circRNA predictor for tumor relapse and chemotherapy vulnerability in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Accurate risk stratification for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) is crucial for prognosis and treatment decisions. Here, we develop a tumor microenvironment-associated circular RNA (circRNA) signature that can stratify LA-NPC patients with different risks of relapse and vulnerability to induction chemotherapy (IC). Relapsed-related circRNAs are identified by comparing expression profiles between patients with and without relapse, followed by quantitative validation in the training cohort (n = 170). A nine-circRNA signature is constructed to classify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Low-risk patients have significantly favorable clinical survivals, which is validated in the internal (n = 170) and external (n = 150) cohorts. They are characterized by an immune-active microenvironment and can derive benefits from IC. Meanwhile, high-risk patients characterized with pro-relapse and DNA repair-associated features, are vulnerable to chemoresistance. Overall, the circRNA-based classifier serves as a reliable prognostic tool and might guide chemotherapy decisions for patients with LA-NPC.

The value of integrating tumor volume and plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA load during sequential chemoradiotherapy for prognostic prediction and therapeutic guidance in high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the value of integrating primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) and gross tumor volume of nodes (GTVn) after induction chemotherapy (IC) and dynamic changes in plasma cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA (cfEBV DNA) during sequential chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 988 patients with LA-NPC undergoing IC plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) between 2014 and 2018. The entire cohort was divided into four subgroups according to tumor volume and the cfEBV DNA load. Using a supervised statistical clustering approach, we stratified the subgroups into three clusters. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and inter-group differences were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: We observed that GTVp & GTVn and cfEBV DNApostIC & cfEBV DNApostCRT were powerful prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). The survival curves of the three clusters were significantly different. The 5-year OS for the low-risk, intermediate-risk and high-risk clusters were 97.0%, 86.2% and 77.1% (all P values < 0.001), respectively. The risk stratification system showed better predictive performance than the current tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification for OS (area under curve [AUC]: 0.653 versus 0.560, p < 0.001), DFS (AUC: 0.639 versus 0.540, p < 0.001), DMFS (AUC: 0.628 versus 0.535, p < 0.001) and LRRFS (AUC: 0.616 versus 0.513, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both tumor volume and the cfEBV DNA level during sequential CRT are effective prognostic indicators for patients with high-risk LA-NPC. The developed risk stratification system incorporating above factors improved survival prediction and demonstrated potential value in decision-making.

The tumor immune microenvironment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma after gemcitabine plus cisplatin treatment.

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy is the standard of care for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the mechanisms underpinning its clinical activity are unclear. Here, using single-cell RNA sequencing and T cell and B cell receptor sequencing of matched, treatment-naive and post-GP chemotherapy NPC samples (n = 15 pairs), we show that GP chemotherapy activated an innate-like B cell (ILB)-dominant antitumor immune response. DNA fragments induced by chemotherapy activated the STING type-I-interferon-dependent pathway to increase major histocompatibility complex class I expression in cancer cells, and simultaneously induced ILB via Toll-like receptor 9 signaling. ILB further expanded follicular helper and helper type 1 T cells via the ICOSL-ICOS axis and subsequently enhanced cytotoxic T cells in tertiary lymphoid organ-like structures after chemotherapy that were deficient for germinal centers. ILB frequency was positively associated with overall and disease-free survival in a phase 3 trial of patients with NPC receiving GP chemotherapy ( NCT01872962 , n = 139). It also served as a predictor for favorable outcomes in patients with NPC treated with GP and immunotherapy combined treatment (n = 380). Collectively, our study provides a high-resolution map of the tumor immune microenvironment after GP chemotherapy and uncovers a role for B cell-centered antitumor immunity. We also identify and validate ILB as a potential biomarker for GP-based treatment in NPC, which could improve patient management.

Genetic associations of leisure sedentary behaviors and the risk of 15 site-specific cancers: A Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Leisure sedentary behavior (LSB) is associated with the risk of cancer, but the causal relationship between them has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to assess the potential causal association between LSB and risk of 15 site-specific cancers. METHODS: The causal association between LSB and cancer were assessed with univariate Mendelian randomization (UVMR) and multivariate Mendelian randomization (MVMR). 194 SNPs associated with LSB (from the UK Biobank 408,815 individuals) were adopted as the instrument variables. Sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the robustness of the results. RESULTS: UVMR analysis revealed that television watching significantly increased the risk of endometrial cancer (OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02-1.64, p = 0.04) (mainly the endometrioid histology [OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.02-1.60, p = 0.031])，breast cancer (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.04-1.30, p = 0.007) (both ER+ breast cancer [OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.03-1.33, p = 0.015], and ER- breast cancer [OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.26-1.89, p = 2.23 × 10-5 ]). Although causal association was not found between television watching and ovarian cancer, it was seen in low grade and low malignant potential serous ovarian cancer (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.07-2.08, p = 0.018). However, significant results were not obtained in the UVMR analysis between driving, computer use and the 15 types of cancer. Further MVMR analysis indicated that the above results are independent from most metabolic factors and dietary habits, but mediated by educational attainment. CONCLUSION: LSB in form of television watching has independent causal association with the risk of endometrial cancer, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer.

VIRMA promotes nasopharyngeal carcinoma, tumorigenesis, and metastasis by upregulation of E2F7 in an m6A-dependent manner.

The N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification possesses new and essential roles in tumor initiation and progression by regulating mRNA biology. However, the role of aberrant m6A regulation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains unclear. Here, through comprehensive analyses of NPC cohorts from the GEO database and our internal cohort, we identified that VIRMA, an m6A writer, is significantly upregulated in NPC and plays an essential role in tumorigenesis and metastasis of NPC, both in vitro and in vivo. High VIRMA expression served as a prognostic biomarker and was associated with poor outcomes in patients with NPC. Mechanistically, VIRMA mediated the m6A methylation of E2F7 3'-UTR, then IGF2BP2 bound, and maintained the stability of E2F7 mRNA. An integrative high-throughput sequencing approach revealed that E2F7 drives a unique transcriptome distinct from the classical E2F family in NPC, which functioned as an oncogenic transcriptional activator. E2F7 cooperated with CBFB-recruited RUNX1 in a non-canonical manner to transactivate ITGA2, ITGA5, and NTRK1, strengthening Akt signaling-induced tumor-promoting effect.

Medial retropharyngeal nodal region sparing radiotherapy versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: open label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

OBJECTIVES: To address whether sparing the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (MRLN) region from elective irradiation volume provides non-inferior local relapse-free survival versus standard radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. DESIGN: Open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. SETTING: Three Chinese hospitals between 20 November 2017 and 3 December 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (18-65 years) with newly diagnosed, non-keratinising, non-distant metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma without MRLN involvement. INTERVENTIONS: Randomisation was done centrally by the Clinical Trials Centre at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1; block size of four) to receive MRLN sparing radiotherapy or standard radiotherapy (both medial and lateral retropharyngeal lymph node groups), and stratified by institution and treatment modality as follows: radiotherapy alone; concurrent chemoradiotherapy; induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Non-inferiority was met if the lower limit of the one sided 97.5% confidence interval of the absolute difference in three year local relapse-free survival (MRLN sparing radiotherapy minus standard radiotherapy) was greater than -8%. RESULTS: 568 patients were recruited: 285 in the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group; 283 in the standard radiotherapy group. Median follow-up was 42 months (interquartile range 39-45), intention-to-treat analysis showed that the three year local relapse-free survival of the MRLN sparing radiotherapy group was non-inferior to that of the standard radiotherapy group (95.3% v 95.5%, stratified hazard ratio 1.04 (95% confidence interval 0.51 to 2.12), P=0.95) with a difference of -0.2% ((one sided 97.5% confidence interval -3.6 to ∞), Pnon-inferiority<0.001). In the safety set (n=564), the sparing group had a lower incidence of grade ≥1 acute dysphagia (25.5% v 35.1%, P=0.01) and late dysphagia (24.0% v 34.3%, P=0.008). Patient reported outcomes at three years after MRLN sparing radiotherapy were better in multiple domains after adjusting for the baseline values: global health status (mean difference -5.6 (95% confidence interval -9.1 to -2.0), P=0.002), role functioning (-5.5 (-7.4 to -3.6), P<0.001), social functioning (-6.2 (-8.9 to -3.6), P<0.001), fatigue (7.9 (4.0 to 11.8), P<0.001), and swallowing (11.0 (8.4 to 13.6), P<0.001). The difference in swallowing scores reached clinical significance (>10 points difference). CONCLUSION: Compared with standard radiotherapy, MRLN sparing radiotherapy showed non-inferiority in terms of risk of local relapse with fewer radiation related toxicity and improved patient reported outcomes in patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03346109.

Upper-Neck Versus Whole-Neck Irradiation at the Contralateral Uninvolved Neck in Patients With Unilateral N3 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Upper-neck irradiation (UNI) at the uninvolved neck has shown similar regional relapse-free survival as standard whole-neck irradiation (WNI) in patients with N0-1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, whether UNI at the contralateral uninvolved neck is feasible in unilateral N3 disease, defined as >6 cm and/or below the caudal border of the cricoid cartilage, remains unclear. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data for 291 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma with unilateral N3 disease who were treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy from 2009 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 190 received bilateral WNI (WNI group); the remaining 101 received WNI at the involved neck and UNI at the contralateral uninvolved neck (UNI group). Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were compared using the log rank tests. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 79.4 months (interquartile range, 56.0-89.3). Twenty-five patients had regional lymph node relapses (UNI: 10.9%, 11/101 vs WNI: 7.4%, 14/190; P = .31). Of these, 23 patients relapsed within the previously involved neck regions, while only 2 patients had relapses in the contralateral uninvolved neck (1 each in the UNI and WNI groups). Five-year regional relapse-free survival rates were similar between groups (89.7% vs 92.7%, P = .29). Similar between-group findings were also observed for 5-year overall survival (76.1% vs 80.4%, P = .40), distant metastasis-free survival (74.9% vs 79.2%, P = .44), and local relapse-free survival (95.6% vs 94.7%, P = .64). Furthermore, oncologic outcomes in subgroup and multivariable analyses were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Regional control and survival outcomes were comparable in UNI at the contralateral uninvolved neck and standard WNI in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma with unilateral N3 disease. Our findings provide evidence for future radiation therapy guidelines of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Patterns and prognosis of regional recurrence in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the patterns of lymph node (LN) failure and prognosis in patients with regional recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) alone after primary intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: A total of 175 patients who were treated with IMRT between 2010 and 2015 and who experienced regional recurrence alone were included. Recurrent LNs were re-located in the initial pretreatment imaging and IMRT plan and failures were classified as in-field or out-field based on target volume delineation. All patients underwent curative salvage treatment. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were selected by multivariate Cox analysis. RESULTS: Level IIb (49.1%, 86/175) was the most frequent recurrence site, followed by level IIa (36%), level III (18.9%), level IVa (12%), the retropharyngeal region (8%), level Va (6.9%), and the parotid region (6.9%). A total of 264 recurrent LNs were recorded: 149 (56.4%) were classified as in-field failure with a prescribed dose ≥66 Gy, 60 (22.7%) with 60 to <66 Gy, 32 (12.1%) with 50 to <60 Gy, and 23 (8.7%) as an out-field failure, which mainly occurred in the parotid region and level Ib. After a median follow-up of 52.8 months, the estimated 5-year OS rate was 66.9%. Multivariate analysis showed that age, plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA level, extranodal extension, lower neck involvement, and parotid LN recurrence were independent prognostic factors of OS. CONCLUSIONS: In-field failure represented the main pattern of regional recurrence and out-field failure mainly occurred in the parotid gland and level Ib. Patients with regional rNPC alone had a good prognosis after salvage treatment.

Disparities in positive results and dissemination of randomized controlled trials in immuno-oncology.

BACKGROUND: This cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis aimed to demonstrate the disparities in positive results and dissemination patterns of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in global immuno-oncology (IO). METHODS: Phase II-IV RCTs with results reported by article publications registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in 2007-2018 studying immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), adoptive cell transfer, cancer vaccines, and immune modulators were included. RESULTS: Twenty-eight percent of trials were positive (72 of 258), most of which were pharma-sponsored and focused on ICI and multiple IO therapies in lung cancer, melanoma, and multiple cancer types. The recent period of trial start year, upfront registration, large sample size, high strictness score on corticosteroid/infection-related criteria, and survival endpoints were associated with positive results. Trials from Mainland China had a faster publication timeline of positive results but lacked study diversity or full reporting of negative results compared with US and multinational trials. Compared with phase II trials, phase III-IV trials had a higher average proportion of positive results (28.9% vs. 22.2%) and a more stable change over the past decade (23.65% vs. 49.24%). Positive trials yielded more secondary manuscripts (10 vs. 4), a shorter publication process of approximately two years (P < 0.001), and a superiority in the dissemination of journals with an h-index >90 (P < 0.001) compared with negative trials. CONCLUSION: Disparities in positive result dissemination are widespread in IO RCTs and affected by trial features. We proposed improvements in upfront registration, procedural integrity, and adequate inclusion of rival trials reporting negative results within the earlier two years in future reviews.

Immuno-oncology (IO) is a novel treatment modality utilizing the natural ability of body's immune system to fight against cancer. The acknowledged standard method to confer the best medical evidence for showing the efficacy of a new intervention is randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the publication of trial results via journal articles usually modifies medical decisions. A trial labeled negative means that the pre-specified goal was not met, but it deserves more attention rather than a simple interpretation of scientific failure. Previous studies on oncology trials indicated that negative and positive trials have different patterns of result publication and varied trial features. Although IO-related RCTs obtain a continuously increasing number, the extent and tendencies (positive or negative) of their results have not been assessed. To conduct a timely summary and a comprehensive analysis focusing on the publication details and its relationship with the properties of IO trials, we included phase II­IV IO RCTs with results reported by article publications registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in 2007­2018. We found that disparities in positive results and publication are widespread in IO RCTs and severely affected by IO category, cancer type, sponsorship, trial phase, and geographic origin. Positive trials had a significantly shorter publication timeline of approximately two years, more secondary manuscripts, and a superiority in high-quality publications over negative trials. We propose that investigators should complete registration before trial launch, improve procedural integrity, and allow an adequate inclusion of rival trials reporting negative results within the earlier two years in future IO-related reviews.