The use of representative community samples to assess SARS-CoV-2 lineage competition: Alpha outcompetes Beta and wild-type in England from January to March 2021.

Genomic surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 lineages informs our understanding of possible future changes in transmissibility and vaccine efficacy and will be a high priority for public health for the foreseeable future. However, small changes in the frequency of one lineage over another are often difficult to interpret because surveillance samples are obtained using a variety of methods all of which are known to contain biases. As a case study, using an approach which is largely free of biases, we here describe lineage dynamics and phylogenetic relationships of the Alpha and Beta variant in England during the first 3 months of 2021 using sequences obtained from a random community sample who provided a throat and nose swab for rt-PCR as part of the REal-time Assessment of Community Transmission-1 (REACT-1) study. Overall, diversity decreased during the first quarter of 2021, with the Alpha variant (first identified in Kent) becoming predominant, driven by a reproduction number 0.3 higher than for the prior wild-type. During January, positive samples were more likely to be Alpha in those aged 18 to 54 years old. Although individuals infected with the Alpha variant were no more likely to report one or more classic COVID-19 symptoms compared to those infected with wild-type, they were more likely to be antibody-positive 6 weeks after infection. Further, viral load was higher in those infected with the Alpha variant as measured by cycle threshold (Ct) values. The presence of infections with non-imported Beta variant (first identified in South Africa) during January, but not during February or March, suggests initial establishment in the community followed by fade-out. However, this occurred during a period of stringent social distancing. These results highlight how sequence data from representative community surveys such as REACT-1 can augment routine genomic surveillance during periods of lineage diversity.

Identifying and ranking causal biochemical biomarkers for breast cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study.

BACKGROUND: Only a few of the 34 biochemical biomarkers measured in the UK Biobank (UKB) have been associated with breast cancer, with many associations suffering from possible confounding and reverse causation. This study aimed to screen and rank all UKB biochemical biomarkers for possible causal relationships with breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses on ~420,000 women by leveraging summary-level genetic exposure associations from the UKB study (n = 194,174) and summary-level genetic outcome associations from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (n = 228,951). Our exposures included all 34 biochemical biomarkers in the UKB, and our outcomes were overall, oestrogen-positive, and oestrogen-negative breast cancer. We performed inverse-variance weighted MR, weighted median MR, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO for 30 biomarkers for which we found multiple instrumental variables. We additionally performed multivariable MR to adjust for known risk factors, bidirectional MR to investigate reverse causation, and MR Bayesian model averaging to rank the significant biomarkers by their genetic evidence. RESULTS: Increased genetic liability to overall breast cancer was robustly associated with the following biomarkers by decreasing importance: testosterone (odds ratio (OR): 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.21), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.13), insulin-like growth factor 1 (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a likely causal role of genetically predicted levels of testosterone, HDL cholesterol, and IGF-1, as well as a novel potential role of ALP in breast cancer aetiology. Further studies are needed to understand full disease pathways that may inform breast cancer prevention.

Population antibody responses following COVID-19 vaccination in 212,102 individuals.

Population antibody surveillance helps track immune responses to COVID-19 vaccinations at scale, and identify host factors that may affect antibody production. We analyse data from 212,102 vaccinated individuals within the REACT-2 programme in England, which uses self-administered lateral flow antibody tests in sequential cross-sectional community samples; 71,923 (33.9%) received at least one dose of BNT162b2 vaccine and 139,067 (65.6%) received ChAdOx1. For both vaccines, antibody positivity peaks 4-5 weeks after first dose and then declines. At least 21 days after second dose of BNT162b2, close to 100% of respondents test positive, while for ChAdOx1, this is significantly reduced, particularly in the oldest age groups (72.7% [70.9-74.4] at ages 75 years and above). For both vaccines, antibody positivity decreases with age, and is higher in females and those with previous infection. Antibody positivity is lower in transplant recipients, obese individuals, smokers and those with specific comorbidities. These groups will benefit from additional vaccine doses.