New concept in selecting blue dye injection site effect on clinical outcome of early-stage breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Clinico-anatomical review and pilot studies demonstrated that intraparenchymal injection at any site, even those not containing the index lesion, or periareolar injections should provide concordant outcomes to peritumoral injections. METHOD: This was a single-center retrospective cohort at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. The electronic medical records of patients were characterized into conventional and new injection concept groups. The inclusion criteria were patients who had either a mastectomy or BCS along with SLNB. We excluded patients who underwent ALND, received neoadjuvant therapy, or had non-invasive breast cancer. The primary outcome was the 5-year rate of breast cancer regional recurrence. Additionally, we reported on the re-operation rate, disease-free period, distant disease-free period, mortality rate, and recurrence rates both locoregional and systemic. Recurrences were identified through clinical assessments and imaging. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: 3 ml of 1%isosulfan blue dye was injected, with the injection site varying according to the specific concept being applied. In cases of SSM and NSM following the new concept, the blue dye was injected at non-periareolar and non-peritumoral sites. After the injection, a 10-minute interval was observed without massaging the injection site. Following this interval, an incision was made to access the SLNs, which were subsequently identified, excised, and sent for either frozen section analysis or permanent section examination. RESULT: There were no significant differences in DFS, DDFS or BCSS between the two groups (p = 0.832, 0.712, 0.157). Although the re-operation rate in the NI group was approximately half that of the CI group, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.355). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that tailoring isosulfan blue dye injection site based on operation type rather than tumor location is safe and effective approach for SLN localization in early-stage breast cancer. However, this study has limitations, including being a single-center study with low recurrence and death cases. Future studies should aim to increase the sample size and follow-up period.

Double versus Single Primary Malignant Neoplasm of Breast and Colorectal Cancer: A Case-Control Study.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) are common in female. This study compared survival time between women affected with both cancers with ones with single BC or single CRC. METHOD: Medical records of subjects with both BC & CRC (June 1, 2010, to June 30, 2021) were reviewed. Age-matched subjects who had BC or CRC alone were used as control. Survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier method was performed. RESULT: There were 63 double cancers [40 BC first (DBC): 23 CRC first (DCRC), mean age±SD 60.5±9.9 and 60.9±12.2 years] and 76 subjects in single cancer group [53 SBC: 23 SCRC, mean age 57.4±11.3 and 61.1±12.5 years]. The 5-year survival rate of the double cancer group was 74.6% and the single cancer group was 63.2%. D-group had slightly longer survival time than S-group (116.5±4.0 vs. 101.3±5.5, p=0.055). In D-group, the occurrence of addition of other primary cancers were more common (p=0.015). The second cancer occurred 61.7±45.3 months later in DBC group, and 39.1±26.6 months later in DCRC group (p=0.016). SCRC had shorter survival time vs. DCRC group (p=0.031). SBC and DBC had no different in mean survival time. CONCLUSION: BC and CRC could occur as a part of multiple primary cancers. Detection of more than one cancer did not lead to decrease survival if the second cancer was early detected and treated. The occurrence of the second cancer might be beyond 5 years after the diagnosis of the first cancer. Thus, longer surveillance may be warranted. Awareness and provision of early screening should be offered to individuals diagnosed with either primary cancer. Detection of more than one cancer did not lead to shorter survival.

Reconsidering the Role of Frozen Section in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Mastectomy Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Axillary lymph node dissection was recommended for mastectomy patients with more than two nodal metastases from sentinel lymph node biopsy. Conventionally, intraoperative frozen section was sent routinely to reduce the need for second-stage axillary lymph node dissection; however, recent global trend has seen decreasing usage of the intraoperative analyses. This pilot study conducted in Thailand aimed to evaluate the role of intraoperative frozen section of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy. METHODS: A 5-y retrospective study of 1773 patients was conducted in Thailand. The inclusion criteria were early-stage breast cancer patients with either radiologically negative nodes, or radiographically borderline nodes found to be negative on fine needle aspiration who underwent mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Reoperations were indicated when three or more nodal metastases were detected on the pathological analysis. The reoperation rate prevented by frozen section and the reoperation rate needed for those with permanent section alone were reported. RESULTS: Among 265 patients, 202 patients underwent concomitant intraoperative frozen section while the remaining 63 patients underwent permanent section alone. Six patients (3.0%) from the frozen section group and one patient (1.6%) from the permanent section group were found with more than two nodal metastases. Despite using intraoperative frozen sections, only one patient from each group required reoperation. There was no significant difference in the number of patients requiring reoperation between the frozen section group and the permanent section group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides strong evidence to all surgeons that in early breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy with permanent section analysis alone may not lower the standard of care compared to using additional intraoperative frozen section analysis. Adopting this practice may lead to decreased operation costs, operative time, and anesthetic side effects.

Improving surgical skills with feedback: directly-observed versus video-recorded practice.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare two methods of feedback: verbal face-to-face feedback after direct observation (F2F-feedback) versus electronic-written feedback after observation of recorded-VDO of student's performance (VDO-feedback), in terms of effectiveness in improving skill, effects on motivation and satisfaction. BACKGROUND: Medical schools are responsible for teaching and ensuring proficiency of basic surgical skills. Feedback is effective in developing psychomotor skills; by providing information of learner's current performance, how to improve, and enhancing motivation. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Fifty-eight medical students (3rd- 4th year) were trained to perform vertical mattress suture in small groups. Then, during 6-week period of self-directed practice, students were randomized into group1 VDO-feedback (male:female = 21:8) and group 2 F2F-feedback (male:female = 20:9). Feedbacks were provided once every 2 weeks (Week2, Week4). End-of-rotation OSCE was at Week6, and retention tested was at Week8. Performance checklist (Cronbach's Alpha 0.72) was used to assess skill at 4 timepoints; pre- and post- small group learning, OSCE, and retention phase. Questionnaire was used to assess motivation, learning strategies and satisfaction (Cronbach's Alpha 0.83). RESULT: After in-class learning, further significant improvement of skills could be gained by both F2F- and VDO- feedbacks (p < 0.0001). Both could similarly retain skill for at least 4 weeks later without additional practice. Self-efficacy, test anxiety, and cognitive strategies scores were significantly increased in both groups (p < 0.05). Extrinsic motivation was increased in VDO-feedback group. No difference in satisfaction between groups was observed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: VDO-feedback could be alternative to F2F-feedbacks for basic surgical skill training when limitation for simultaneous meeting of teacher and students occurs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study has been registered to Thai Clinical Trial Registry (WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform) on 11/07/2023 (TCTR20230711005).

Is Routine Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis of Sentinel Lymph Nodes Necessary in Every Early-Stage Breast Cancer?

Purpose: Clinical application of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial results allows clinically node-negative breast cancer patients who meet criteria to avoid axillary dissection even when 1-2 sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are positive for metastatic disease. Intraoperative frozen section (iFS) analyses of SLNs were thought to reduce re-operation rates despite variable reported sensitivity and possibility of a false negative result. This study evaluated the rate of re-operations prevented by SLN iFS in a tertiary care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, over a 6-year time-frame. Patients and Methods: From April 2016 to April 2022, 1284 sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) procedures were performed. Of these, 214 cases were breast-conserving surgery in accordance with the ACOSOG criteria with concomitant usage of iFS. Clinicopathological features of these cases were collected and analyzed. Re-operation rates prevented by the additional intervention were reported. Results: Only five additional operations were prevented with the usage of 214 iFS. The discordance rate between frozen and permanent sections in terms of presence of metastatic disease and number of total lymph nodes was around 15%. Tumor staging, node staging, Nottingham histologic grading and lymphovascular invasion are significant predictors of SLN metastasis. Conclusion: iFS results in a very low prevention rate for follow-up ALND in patients with preoperative clinically negative axillary nodes and is associated with a non-negligible discordance rate with permanent sections. Our study suggests iFS may be avoided in most cases of early-stage clinically and radiographically node-negative breast cancer patients. Doing so may reduce surgical costs and total operative time without a significant impact on the overall quality of treatment and standard of care.

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy without frozen section in early stage breast cancer sufficient in accordance with ACOSOG-Z0011? A retrospective review from King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.

BACKGROUND: In 2021, there is an increased global trend for sending sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) specimens for permanent section (PS) without intraoperative frozen sections (FS). This pilot study conducted in Thailand determines the re-operation rate for SLNB without FS. METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed 239 SLNB cases without FS at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from April 2016 to April 2021. The patients were diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer with clinically negative nodes. The clinical nodal status was assessed from physical examination. The re-operation rate was determined by the number of positive SLNs; where 3 more nodal metastases were subjected to a second surgical procedure. RESULT: Between April 2016 and April 2021, 239 patients who had undergone SLNB in accordance with ACOSOG Z0011 criteria with PS alone was enrolled. A total of 975 SLNs were removed from these 239 patients, with an average of 4.15 nodes per patient. Out of 239 patients, 21 (8.8%) and 6 (2.5%) had metastatic disease in 1 and 2 nodes, respectively. The remaining 212 (88.7%) patients had no nodal metastasis. None of the patients were subjected to a second surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the implementation of SLNB with PS analysis alone in patients who satisfy the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria, with a re-operation rate of 0%, does not have outcomes that would be altered by the standard of care additional FS analysis. With ommision of FS analysis, operation cost, operative time and anesthetic side effects are projected to decrease.

Effects of preoperative endoanal ultrasound on functional outcome after anal fistula surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) is a recommended preoperative investigation for fistula-in-ano (FiA) which aims to provide the best chance of healing and preservation of continence function. This study aims are (1) to assess effect of EAUS on functional outcome and (2) to determine factors associated with clinical outcomes after FiA surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of subjects with cryptogenic FiA between January 2011 and December 2016, in a tertiary hospital, was performed by comparing EAUS and no-EAUS groups. Postoperative change in St. Mark's faecal incontinence severity score (cFISS=FISS at 6 months after surgery-FISS before surgery) were compared. General linear model was used to determine factors associated with cFISS. Binary logistic regression was used to assess factors related to clinical outcomes. A p-value of <0.05 is considered significant. RESULTS: We enrolled 339 subjects; 109 (M:F 91:18, mean age 41.7±13.6 years) of 115 in EAUS group and 230 in no-EAUS group (M:F 195:35, mean age 42.6±13.0 years). There were higher proportions of recurrent cases (24.8% vs 13.9%, p=0.014) and complex FiA (80.7% vs 50.4%, p=0.001) in EAUS group. Postoperative FISS (mean±SE) were increased in both groups; preoperative versus postoperative FISS were 0.36±0.20 versus 0.59±0.25 in EAUS group (p=0.056) and 0.31±0.12 versus 0.76±0.17 in no-EAUS group (p<0.001). EAUS had significant effects on cFISS in both univariate analysis, F(1,261)=4.053, p=0.045; and multivariate analysis, F(3,322)=3.147, p=0.025, Wilk's Lambda 0.972. Other associated factors included recurrent fistula (F(3,322)=0.777, p=0.007, Wilk's Lambda 0.993) and fistula classification (F(3,322)=16.978, p<0.001, Wilk's Lambda 0.863). After a mean follow-up of 33.6±28.6 weeks, success rate was 63.3%(EAUS) and 60% (no-EAUS), p=0.822. Factors associated with clinical outcomes were fistula complexity, number of tracts, recurrence, number of previous surgery and type of operations. Accuracy of EAUS was 90.8% and not related to clinical outcomes (p=0.522). CONCLUSION: EAUS had favourable effects on functional outcome after FiA surgery while multiple factors were associated with clinical outcomes. EAUS is useful, accurate, inexpensive and can be the first tool for planning of complex and recurrent FiA.

Hands-On Surgical Training Workshop: an Active Role-Playing Patient Education for Adolescents.

Most patient education involves passive learning. To improve patient education regarding surgery, an active learning workshop-based teaching method is proposed. The objective of this study was to assess level of patient surgical knowledge, achievement of workshop learning objectives, patient apprehension about future surgery, and participant workshop satisfaction after completing a surgical training workshop. A four-station workshop (surgical scrub, surgical suture, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic surgery) was developed to teach four important components of the surgical process. Healthy, surgery-naive adolescents were enrolled to attend this 1-h workshop-based training program. Training received by participants was technically and procedurally identical to training received by actual surgeons. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires were used to assess learning outcomes. There were 1312 participants, with a mean age 15.9 ± 1.1 years and a gender breakdown of 303 males and 1009 females. For surgical knowledge, mean pre-workshop and post-workshop scores were 6.1 ± 1.5 and 7.5 ± 1.5 (out of 10 points), respectively (p < 0.001). Out of 5 possible points, achievement of learning objectives, decreased apprehension about future surgery, and overall workshop satisfaction scores were all higher than 4.5. Active, hands-on patient education is an effective way to improve understanding of surgery-related processes. This teaching method may also decrease apprehension that patients or potential patients harbor regarding a future surgical procedure.

Tutoring Trainees to Suture: An Alternative Method for Learning How to Suture and a Way to Compensate for a Lack of Suturing Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Tutoring in suturing was developed to compensate for a shortage of suturing cases. The objective of this study was to compare ideal suturing score (ISS; 9 points), suturing time (min:sec), and suture placement error (mm) between medical students completing the suturing tutoring program and medical students attending ordinary medical school training program. METHODS: Participants consisted of 2 groups of medical students who had never performed suturing. The study group had the role of suturing tutor to teach interested high school students. The control group consisted of volunteers from the ordinary medical school program. Skills measurement was performed by having students from both the groups perform 3 vertical mattress sutures on a model. The study group was tested at weeks 1, 9, and 10 to assess improvement. Both the groups were tested at week 10 to compare final learning outcome. RESULTS: There were 41 and 40 participants in the study group and the control group, respectively. ISS was significantly improved in the study group from week 1-week 10 (7.0 ± 1.3 vs. 8.2 ± 0.9, p = 0.01). At week 10, the study group had a higher mean ISS than the control group (8.2 ± 0.9 vs. 7.8 ± 1.1, p = 0.68). Mean suturing time and mean placement error were also lower in the study group at the end of suturing training (5:1 ± 1:0 vs. 5:2 ± 1:2, p = 0.13; 7.4 ± 7.4 vs. 8.0 ± 10.8, p = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Tutoring trainees to suture can improve a student's ability to learn how to suture.

Factors determining low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer resection: A study in Thai patients.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Defective defecation function, also known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), is a common problem after surgical treatment of rectal cancer that has a detrimental effect on quality of life. This study aimed to look for the incidence of LARS in patients whose native rectum could not be kept and determine factors influencing major LARS. METHODS: Rectal cancer patients who underwent tumor removal with mesorectal excision and colorectal anastomosis by a colorectal surgeon during the years 2004-2013 were asked to participate a structured interview using the verified version of the Low Anterior Resection Score questionnaire. Clinical parameters were analyzed against the incidence of major LARS. The cut-off anastomotic level that corresponded to the risk of major LARS was calculated by using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Anorectal physiology was compared between those with major LARS and those without LARS by anorectal manometry. RESULTS: This study included 129 patients (67 men and 62 women). Incidences of minor LARS (LAR score 21-29) and major LARS (LARS score ≥ 30) score 21een those with major LARS and those univariate analysis, factors associated with major LARS were extent of operation, presence of temporary ostomy, and chemoradiation therapy. Major LARS was found at 28.2% in those who underwent low anterior resection, which was significantly higher than the incidence of 5.2% in the anterior resection group (p < 0.01). Radiation therapy was the only factor independently associated with major LARS at an odds ratio of 6.55 (95% confidence interval: 2.37-18.15). The receiver operating characteristic curve plot between sensitivity and specificity of the anastomotic level in determining major LARS showed an area under the curve of 0.73. The cut-off anastomotic level that best predicted major LARS was at 5 cm, which gave a negative predictive value of 89%. Individual defecation symptoms that were significantly associated with major LARS included pain on defecation, difficulty holding stool, and needing to use a pad. Anorectal manometry showed a significant difference in the resting anal pressure and squeeze pressure, which suggests that derangement in sphincteric function caused by surgery and postoperative adjuvant treatment may contribute to the LARS. CONCLUSION: LARS is a significant problem found in about one third of rectal cancer patients after colorectal anastomosis. Symptoms of concern include pain on defecation and decreased ability to hold. Risk of having major LARS increases with adjuvant treatment and lower anastomotic level.

Translumbar and transsacral magnetic neurostimulation for the assessment of neuropathy in fecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Neurologic dysfunction causes fecal incontinence, but current techniques for its assessment are limited and controversial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to investigate spino-rectal and spino-anal motor-evoked potentials simultaneously using lumbar and sacral magnetic stimulation in subjects with fecal incontinence and healthy subjects and to compare motor-evoked potentials and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency in subjects with fecal incontinence. DESIGN: This was a prospective, observational study. SETTINGS: The study took place in 2 tertiary care centers. PATIENTS: Subjects included adults with fecal incontinence and healthy subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Translumbar and transsacral magnetic stimulations were performed bilaterally by applying a magnetic coil to the lumbar and sacral regions in 50 subjects with fecal incontinence (1 or more episodes per week) and 20 healthy subjects. Both motor-evoked potentials and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency were assessed in 30 subjects with fecal incontinence. Stimulation-induced, motor-evoked potentials were recorded simultaneously from the rectum and anus with 2 pairs of bipolar ring electrodes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Latency and amplitude of motor-evoked potentials after lumbosacral magnetic stimulation and agreement with pudendal nerve terminal motor latency were measured. RESULTS: When compared with control subjects, 1 or more lumbo-anal, lumbo-rectal, sacro-anal, or sacro-rectal motor-evoked potentials were significantly prolonged (p < 0.01) and were abnormal in 44 (88%) of 50 subjects with fecal incontinence. Positive agreement between abnormal motor-evoked potentials and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency was 63%, whereas negative agreement was 13%. Motor-evoked potentials were abnormal in more (p < 0.05) subjects with fecal incontinence than pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, in 26 (87%) of 30 versus 19 (63%) of 30, and in 24% of subjects with normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. There were no adverse events. LIMITATIONS: Anal EMG was not performed. CONCLUSIONS: Translumbar and transsacral magnetic stimulation-induced, motor-evoked potentials provide objective evidence for rectal or anal neuropathy in subjects with fecal incontinence and could be useful. The test was superior to pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and appears to be safe and well tolerated.

Marsupialization for simple fistula in ano: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Marsupialization of anal fistulotomy results in less raw-surface wound and may improve postoperative outcomes. The present study was designed to test the benefit of marsupialization for simple fistula in ano. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This was a randomized controlled study conducted at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Fifty patients with simple uncomplicated fistula in ano were allocated into either fistulotomy group or fistulotomy with marsupialization group. Patients with complex fistula in ano, prior incontinence, immuno-compromised status and bleeding tendency were excluded from the present study. The postoperative pain score, the pain score after the first defecation, total amount of the analgesic usage and complications were evaluated. Recurrence was also assessed RESULTS: There was no difference in the postoperative pain score between the treatment groups. However, there was a significant difference (p = 0.017) in the number of patients who needed pethidine injection (4 patients of the fistulotomy with marsupialization group versus 13 patients of the fistulotomy group). There was no statistical significant difference in the pain score after the first defecation and the amount of paracetamol usage in seven days. Five complications were found only in the fistulotomy group but the significant level was marginal (p = 0.0501). There was no recurrence of thefistula and none of the patients developed anal incontinence after the surgery. CONCLUSION: Marsupialization for anal fistulotomy is safe. This technique helps to improve the postoperative outcomes.

Translumbar and transsacral motor-evoked potentials: a novel test for spino-anorectal neuropathy in spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes anorectal problems, whose pathophysiology remains poorly characterized. A comprehensive method of evaluating spino-anorectal function is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the neuropathophysiology of bowel dysfunction in SCI by evaluating motor-evoked potentials (MEP) of anus and rectum following transspinal magnetic stimulation and anorectal physiology. METHODS: Translumbar and transsacral magnetic stimulations, anorectal manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) were performed in 39 subjects with SCI and anorectal problems and in 14 healthy controls, and data were compared. MEPs were recorded with an anorectal probe containing bipolar ring electrodes. RESULTS: The MEPs were significantly prolonged (P<0.05) bilaterally, and at lumbar and sacral levels, as well as at rectal and anal sites in SCI subjects compared with controls. A total of 95% of SCI subjects had abnormal MEPs and 53% had abnormal PNTML. All subjects with abnormal PNTML also demonstrated abnormal MEP, but 16/17 subjects with normal PNTML had abnormal MEP. Overall, SCI patients had weaker anal sphincters (P<0.05), higher prevalence of dyssynergia (85%), and altered rectal sensation (82%). CONCLUSIONS: Translumbar and transsacral MEPs revealed significant and hitherto undetected lumbosacral neuropathy in 90% of SCI subjects. Test was safe and provided neuropathophysiological information that could explain bowel dysfunction in SCI subjects.

Digital rectal examination is a useful tool for identifying patients with dyssynergia.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dyssynergic defecation is a common cause of chronic constipation; its diagnosis requires anorectal physiological tests that are not widely available. It is not known whether digital rectal examination (DRE) can be used to identify dyssynergia. We examined the diagnostic yield of DRE in patients with dyssynergic defecation. METHODS: Consecutive patients with chronic constipation (Rome III criteria, n = 209) underwent DREs, anorectal manometry analyses, balloon expulsion tests, and colonic transit studies. In the DRE, dyssynergia was identified by 2 or more of the following features: impaired perineal descent, paradoxic anal contraction, or impaired push effort; diagnostic yields were compared with physiological test results. RESULTS: Of the patients included in the study, 187 (87%) had dyssynergic defecation, based on standard criteria; 134 (73%) of these were identified to have features of dyssynergia, based on DREs. The sensitivity and specificity of DRE for identifying dyssynergia in patients with chronic constipation were 75% and 87%, respectively; the positive predictive value was 97%. DRE was able to identify normal resting and normal squeeze pressure in 86% and 82% of dyssynergic patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DRE appears to be a reliable tool for identifying dyssynergia in patients with chronic constipation and detecting normal, but not abnormal, sphincter tone. DREs could facilitate the selection of appropriate patients for further physiologic testing and treatment.

A comparison of early postoperative results between urgent closed hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed thrombosed hemorrhoids and elective closed hemorrhoidectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the perioperative complications, analgesics requirement, and length of hospital stay between patients undergoing urgent closed hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed thrombosed hemorrhoid and elective closed hemorrhoidectomy. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective, comparative study. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All records of the patients who underwent urgent and elective hemorrhoidectomy between January 2000 and December 2005 were reviewed. Perioperative complications (bleeding, urinary retention, post-operative thrombosis, and wound dehiscence), analgesic requirement, and length of hospital stay were analyzed. STATISTICS: Chi-Square Test and Mann-Whitney U Test. RESULTS: From 1440 patients, 1184 patients met the inclusion criteria. All were done with closed technique. The indication for urgent hemorrhoidectomy was prolapsed thrombosed hemorrhoid in 416 patients (group 1). The indication for elective hemorrhoidectomy were grade 3 and 4 internal hemorrhoid, external hemorrhoid or combined hemorrhoid in 768 patients (group 2). There was no statistically significant difference in urinary retention and bleeding complication between two groups; 31 patients (7.5%) in group 1 and 69 patients (8.9%) in group 2 experienced urinary retention p = 0.426, five patients (1.2%) in group 1 and 10 patients (1.3%) in group 2 had postoperative bleeding, p = 1.000). On the second postoperative week, wound dehiscence was found in nine patients (2.2%) from group 1 and 15 patients (2%) from group 2. On the fourth week, all the wounds were completely healed without granulation or stricture formation. Post-operative meperidine requirement was significantly lower in the urgent hemorrhoidectomy group (0.84 +/- 0.71 vs. 0.99 + 0.81 mg/kg, p < 0.001). Post-operative length of hospital stay were not statistically different (1.017 +/- 0.129 vs. 1.016 +/- 0.124, p = 0.107). CONCLUSION: Urgent closed hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed thrombosed hemorrhoids may be a preferable option for patients suffering from this condition.

Biofeedback therapy for bowel problems in adults after surgical treatment for childhood Hirschsprung's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of biofeedback therapy in management of bowel symptoms after definitive surgery for Hirschsprung's disease. METHODS: This study describes two cases that exemplify the complex nature of these problems. These patients presented with constipation and faecal seepage several years after receiving treatment for Hirschsprung's disease. The approach to management of these patients including the use of biofeedback therapy is described. RESULTS: After biofeedback therapy, there was improvement in bowel symptoms in both subjects. In case 1 (constipation), stool frequency increased from 0.5-1 time/week to 5-6 times/week together with improved stool consistency. In case 2 (faecal seepage), the number of incontinence episode decreased from >1/day to complete continence, together with decreased stool frequency. They were still satisfied with their bowel movement at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Recognition of the underlying problems and therapy directed towards correcting these abnormalities may lead to significant symptomatic improvement in these patients.

Multimedia article. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with small McBurney incision for ileal pouch construction without protective ileostomy.

PURPOSE: Restorative proctocolectomy is a standard treatment for colorectal diseases over decades. At present, this technique is frequently performed via minimal invasive approach. Most reported techniques of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy involved a Pfannenstiel incision for the major part of the operation to be performed openly; a double-stapled pouch anal anastomosis technique and protective ileostomy. This study was designed to demonstrate the modification of this technique. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of seven patients (4 had ulcerative colitis and 3 had familial adenomatous polyposis) who underwent laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between September 2004 and February 2007. The details of the procedure are shown in the video. The techniques involve the following: full mobilization of entire colon and rectum using medial to lateral approach, division of submesenteric arcades for ileal pouch elongation with preservation of three to four inner most arcades of distal ileum segment and preservation of both superior mesenteric and ileocolic trunk, ileal pouch construction via a small (3-4 cm) McBurney incision, transanal mucosectomy with removal of the entire rectum and colon transanally, and handsewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. None of the patients underwent protective ileostomy. RESULTS: Mean surgical time was 360 (270-510) minutes, and median blood loss was 230 (100-400) ml. There were neither conversions nor intraoperative surgical complications. However, one patient developed small-bowel obstruction, which was successfully treated by laparoscopic approach. Anastomotic leakage was not found in this series. All patients have good control of their bowel movement as well as a very good cosmetic result during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with small McBurney incision for ileal pouch construction, without protective ileostomy, is technically feasible and safe.

Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a new technique for fistula-in-ano surgery aimed at total sphincter preservation, and evaluate the preliminary results concerning non-healing and intact anal function. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A prospective observational study in eighteen fistula-in-ano patients treated by ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) technique, from January to June 2006. RESULTS: Fistula-in-ano in seventeen patients healed primarily (94.4%). There was one non-healing case (5.6%). The mean healing time was four weeks. None had disturbances in clinical anal continence. CONCLUSION: The early outcome of the LIFT technique is quite impressive. Results warrant a larger study with long-term evaluation. This technique has the potential to become a viable option for fistula-in-ano surgery.

Closed vs ligasure hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the operative time, postoperative complications, and analgesic requirement between closed hemorrhoidectomy and Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study was conducted in a prospectively randomized controlled fashion. Forty-seven patients with grade 3 or 4 hemorrhoids plus external component or skin tag were operated on by either hemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure (24 patients) or closed hemorrhoidectomy (23 patients). One patient in each group was lost to follow up. The operative time, postoperative verbal numeric pain score, analgesic requirement, bleeding, and wound dehiscence between the two groups were compared Unpaired t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, or Fisher's Exact tests were used where appropriate. RESULTS: Demographic and clinical data between two groups were comparable. Operative time for the Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy was significantly shorter than the closed hemorrhoidectomy group (21.70 +/- 11.76 vs 35.68 +/- 14.25 min, p < 0. 001), while the number of resected hemorrhoids in the study group were 2.91 versus 2.18 in the control group. However, there were no differences in post-operative pain score, analgesic requirement, bleeding, or wound dehiscence between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy is superior to closed hemorrhoidectomy in terms of reducing the operative time without affecting postoperative complications.

Total mesorectal excision training in soft cadaver: feasibility and clinical application.

BACKGROUND: The major problem in the treatment of rectal cancer is local recurrence. After the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME), the recurrent rate decreased from 100% to around 10%. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the quality of organ and tissue plane preservation in soft cadaver and to assess the feasibility to perform the procedure (mobilization of colon and rectum, total mesorectal excision and stapler anastomosis) in soft cadaver. SETTING: Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery and Surgical Training Center Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective descriptive study. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Seven soft cadavers were used for total mesorectal excision (TME) training. These procedures were performed by 21 participants (1 soft cadaver for 3 participants). The procedures were done under the supervision of experienced colorectal surgeons. The successfulness, satisfaction in performing the procedure and the quality of organ preservation were evaluated using standardized questionnaires. RESULTS: Participants were satisfied about TME training in soft cadaver (mean 8.24-8.71) and rated that soft cadavers were good in terms of internal organs and tissue plane preservation (mean 7.19-8.19) (0 = extremely unsatisfied, 10 = extremely satisfied). CONCLUSION: Training of TME in soft cadaver is feasible. The similarity in tissue quality (texture, consistency, color) of the preserved organs to that of the living and the good feel of performing the procedure make the trainee better understand the techniques and improve their skills.