Participant and group facilitator perspectives on a novel culturally tailored diabetes self-management program for African Americans.

Background: African Americans with type 2 diabetes experience disparities in their care and diabetes health-related outcomes. Diabetes self-management programs such as Healthy Living with Diabetes (HLWD) are important but do not account for the unique cultural experiences of African Americans. As well, a culturally tailored program focused on addressing sociocultural beliefs and providing race-congruent peer support, Peers LEAD (Peers Supporting Health Literacy, Self-Efficacy, Self-Advocacy, and Adherence) was implemented in two midwestern cities to improve medication adherence but does not include diabetes self-management topics included in HLWD. In attempt to fill the gaps from both HLWD and Peers LEAD, Peers EXCEL (Peers' Experience in Communicating and Engaging in Healthy Living) was designed to integrate both programs. Methods: Our study explored the perceptions of African American participants and facilitators of the separate HLWD and Peers LEAD programs, on the proposed new Peers EXCEL program using focus groups and interviews. Findings were analyzed by research assistants trained in qualitative research using deductive and inductive open coding approaches. Results: Participants described the lack of cultural fit of the current HLWD program for African American communities and proposed strategies to enhance Peers EXCEL's impact in African American communities. They shared the need to include topics such as the relationships between systemic racism and diabetes. Conclusion: Participants' feedback of Peers EXCEL reveals the importance of including various community member perspectives in the design of new diabetes self-management programs tailored for African Americans.

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness of Implementation of Long-acting Injectable Antiretrovirals: A National Survey of Ryan White Clinics in the United States.

Background: The approval of long-acting injectable cabotegravir/rilpivirine (LAI CAB/RPV) heightened the urgency of ensuring effective implementation. Our study assesses readiness and barriers to implement LAI CAB/RPV across Ryan White-funded clinics in the United States. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey between December 2020 and January 2021 using validated 4-item measures: acceptability of intervention measure (AIM), intervention appropriateness measure (IAM), and feasibility of intervention measure (FIM). Associations between measures and clinic characteristics were evaluated via Spearman rank correlations. A 5-point Likert scale ranked potential barriers of implementation responses. Open-ended questions were analyzed through a thematic approach. Results: Of 270 clinics, 44 (16%) completed the survey: 38% federally qualified health centers, 36% academic, 20% community-based organizations, 14% hospital outpatient, and 9% nonprofit. Means (SD; range) were as follows: AIM, 17.6 (2.4; 12-20); IAM, 17.6 (2.4; 13-20); and FIM, 16.8 (2.9; 7-20). Twenty percent were not at all ready to implement LAI CAB/RPV, and 52% were slightly or somewhat ready. There was a significant association between AIM and the proportion of Medicaid patients (AIM, rho = 0.312, P = .050). Community-based organizations scored the highest readiness measures (mean [SD]: AIM, 19.50 [1.41]; IAM, 19.25 [1.49]; FIM, 19.13 [1.36]) as compared with other clinics. Implementation barriers were cost and patients' nonadherence to visits. Conclusions: There is variability of readiness yet high levels of perceived acceptability and appropriateness of implementing LAI CAB/RPV among Ryan White clinics, necessitating tailored interventions for successful implementation. A special focus on addressing the barriers of adherence and the cost of implementation is needed.

Impact of Teaching Social Determinants of Health on PIF in the Health Professions.

OBJECTIVE: To address the lack of methods for assessing learning on social determinants of health, particularly from a health systems perspective. Using a conceptual framework of professional identity formation applied across 3 professions (athletic training, occupational therapy, and pharmacy), the study aimed to describe students' level of professional identity when applying knowledge of structural factors' impact on health. METHODS: This study was a deductive content analysis of students' written reflections. Identified themes explored how students explained sociopolitical influences on health as well as their assessed level of professional identity. RESULTS: Students were inclined to author narratives focused on the ways in which structural factors influence individual outcomes and aspects within the health care system. Most students were assessed to be at the initial levels of professional identity formation, but those with a comparatively higher level of professional identity expressed a commitment to professional behaviors that address social determinants of health. CONCLUSION: This analysis created a foundation for future pedagogical work in health care system-related structural learning outcomes within and between different health professions. Findings suggest that across professions, most first-year students demonstrated the ability to reconcile different perspectives and were in the early stages of aligning personal values with professional values. The use of reflection has the potential to assess professional identity formation among a range of health professional students.

A qualitative exploration of the experiences of peer leaders in an intervention to improve diabetes medication adherence in African Americans.

BACKGROUND: African Americans chronically managing their diabetes benefit from receiving support from peers with shared experiences. Peer support is known to improve the well-being of individuals receiving support, however, there is limited literature on the experiences of those providing the support. The Peers Supporting Health Literacy, Self-efficacy, Self-Advocacy, and Adherence (Peers LEAD) program pairs Peer Ambassadors who are adherent to their diabetes medication, with Peer Buddies who need support with their medication adherence. Peer Ambassadors engage with Peer Buddies as they receive diabetes information, develop the skills and motivation to address identified psychosocial/sociocultural issues to enhance their diabetes medication adherence. This study qualitatively explores the experiences of African Americans who provided peer support in the Peers LEAD medication adherence intervention. METHODS: Two focus groups were conducted with twelve Peer Ambassadors to explore their experiences of providing peer support in the Peers LEAD medication adherence intervention. Qualitative content analysis was conducted using an inductive open coding approach. RESULTS: Emergent themes provided insight into Peer Ambassador' rationale for providing peer support and the benefits and challenges they experienced in their roles. Themes regarding their rationale included: their desire to receive support for their diabetes self-management as well as to contribute to their communities in reducing the stigma associated with diabetes. The perceived benefits they gained centered on creating interpersonal connections, experiencing personal growth as they adapted to their roles, and experiencing opportunities to contribute to an intervention regardless of professional training. Peer Ambassadors reflected on the challenges which included difficulties on coming to terms with their role as Peer Ambassadors, seeing African Americans experience complications associated with diabetes, and navigating supporting Peer Buddies who are also burdened with the challenges their family members are experiencing with managing their diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides unique insight to what motivates individuals to provide peer support and what they gain from these experiences despite the challenges. Understanding the experiences of peers participating in such interventions may help inform the structure and content of programs that use peer support to focus on the benefits of and the motivation for participating in the program.

A qualitative inquiry into the patient-related barriers to linkage and retention in HIV care within the community setting.

Background: People with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PWH) experience barriers to care within the community that impedes their progress from when they discover that they are HIV positive to becoming virally suppressed. For individuals with HIV to achieve sustained viral suppression, they must be linked to care to start receiving anti-retroviral therapy and remain retained in care for continuous treatment. However, HIV surveillance data shows that many PWH are not linked to care and become lost to continuous follow-up care. Although pharmacists, PWH, and social workers interact with one another and are aware of their roles in HIV care, their perspectives on barriers to linkage and retention in care have not been investigated collectively. Objectives: Explore the perspectives of PWH, pharmacists, and social workers on barriers to linkage and retention of HIV care within the community setting. Methods: Convenience sampling was used to recruit 15 stakeholders (five PWH, five community pharmacists, and five social workers) who participated in 1-h, semi-structured interviews based on three domains of the Patient-centered Medical Home Model including (1) experiences (individual and system-level barriers to care experienced by PWH), (2) activities (social workers and pharmacists initiatives that impact adherence to care)and (3) interventions (critical issues pharmacists can address in the community to engage PWH in their HIV care). We conducted a directed content analysis based on deductive coding. To establish rigor, we focused on Lincoln and Guba's criteria of rigorous qualitative methodology: credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability. Similarities and divergences of themes were discussed during data analysis and agreement was reached before interpretation. Results: Emergent themes uncovered barriers to linkage and retention in HIV care as HIV-related stigma, having mental health illnesses including a history of substance abuse and social determinants of health such as homelessness, food insecurity, and insurance issues. Conclusion: The perspectives of pharmacists, social workers, and PWH can provide insight into barriers that should be identified and addressed in people living with HIV to enhance their linkage and retention in care.

What makes a home? Designing home personas to represent the homes of families caring for children with medical complexity.

Personas are widely recognized as valuable design tools for communicating dimensions of individuals, yet they often lack critical contextual factors. For those people managing chronic health conditions, the home is a critical context of their patient work system (PWS). We propose the development of 'home personas' to convey essential aspects of the home context to those tasked with designing technologies and interventions to fit it. We used an iterative, multi-stakeholder design process to design 'home personas' for a model population, families caring for children with medical complexity. Each of the four resultant home personas-Multi-level, Customized, Ranch, and Rental-has a unique home layout, pain points, and are described on three dimensions that emerged from the data. This study builds on a foundation of work in the emerging field of Patient Ergonomics, describing a mechanism for distilling rich descriptions of the PWS into brief yet informative design tools.

Examining the relationships between trust in providers and information, mistrust, and COVID-19 vaccine concerns, necessity, and intentions.

To facilitate maximum uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine, the roles of medical trust and mistrust of healthcare professionals must be examined. Previous work suggests that trust and mistrust may have differential impacts on vaccination intention via vaccine necessity and concerns. Multigroup structural equation modeling was utilized to test whether vaccine necessity and concerns mediated the associations between trust in providers and health information, mistrust of providers, and willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine. The model was found to be invariant across Black and White respondents. Trust in providers and trust in healthcare information exerted indirect effects on intentions through vaccine necessity, while mistrust of providers exerted indirect effects through vaccine concerns. Unlike previous work, the forms of trust did not influence vaccine concerns. The findings have implications for future communication efforts from healthcare professionals and health messengers.

Patients, Social Workers, and Pharmacists' Perceptions of Barriers to Providing HIV Care in Community Pharmacies in the United States.

Retaining people living with HIV (PLWH) in clinical care is a global priority to end the HIV epidemic. Community pharmacies in the United States have structural influences on the success or failure of retention in HIV care by supporting patients' complex needs. However, to date, barriers to retention in care in the community pharmacy setting have not been examined beyond pharmacy services of medication therapy management. We utilized the patient-centered medical home model to examine the barriers to HIV care in the community pharmacy setting. We utilized semi-structured interviews to collect data from 15 participants: five PLWH, five community pharmacists, and five social workers from a midwestern state. Interview data were transcribed and analyzed using directed content analysis. Four key themes emerged regarding the barriers that impact utilization of community pharmacy services by PLWH: the perception of the role of community pharmacists in HIV care, perceptions of pharmacists' HIV knowledge, perceptions of pharmacy operation and services, and negative experiences within the community pharmacy space. Participants' perceptions of solutions for improving HIV care in the community pharmacy focused on improving the relationship between pharmacists and patients, ensuring that the community pharmacy is a private and safe space for patients, and having a diverse pharmacy staff that is equipped to take care of the diverse and marginalized HIV population, such as transgender people.

Examining the Inclusion of Race and Ethnicity in Patient Cases.

Health disparities continue to exist in the United States, with the most significant differences in care occurring between racial groups. Racial health disparities are largely a result of the strong association between race and structural inequities, (differentials in the distribution of power, resources, opportunities). The use of case-based learning is common practice in pharmacy education, and the race of the patient who is the subject of the case is often included out of convention. In some cases, race is included to inform treatment based on guidelines developed from epidemiological and clinical studies that link race to disease by conferring biological significance to race categories. This continuing use of race and ethnicity to guide treatment contributes to racial health disparities and may further perpetuate existing provider implicit bias. This paper discusses the pedagogical approach of using patient cases and the convention, propriety, and implications of including race in patient cases, and guides pharmacy educators in how to use information on race.

Preliminary engagement of a patient advisory board of African American community members with type 2 diabetes in a peer-led medication adherence intervention.

BACKGROUND: The Peers Supporting Health Literacy, Self-efficacy, Self-Advocacy, and Adherence (Peers LEAD) program is a culturally tailored educational-behavioral 8-week intervention that addressed psychosocial and sociocultural barriers to diabetes medication adherence in African Americans. A brief 3-week version of the Peers LEAD intervention used a community engagement approach to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention amongst patient stakeholders. MAIN BODY: African Americans who were adherent to their diabetes medicines were paired with those who were non-adherent to their medicines. Together, they participated in the group and phone-based medication adherence intervention. Input from this brief intervention was important for the design of the remainder weeks of the 8-week program. The intervention targeted negative beliefs about diabetes, use of diabetes medicines, and offering culturally tailored peer support to improve medication adherence in African Americans. To receive input in the development and implementation of the program, we worked with community advisors and a peer ambassador board of African Americans who were adherent to their diabetes medicines. The peer ambassador board and community advisors reviewed intervention materials to ensure they were understandable and appropriate for the community. As well, they provided feedback on the process for intervention delivery. CONCLUSION: The active engagement of the peer ambassador board and community advisors led to a revised intervention process and materials for a medication adherence program for African Americans with type 2 diabetes.

A content validity and cognitive interview process to evaluate an Illness Perception Questionnaire for African Americans with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ) is the only available and empirically validated tool used to gain insight into patient illness beliefs. However, the IPQ has reliability and validity problems when used with African Americans (AAs) and needs to be culturally-adapted and validated for use with this group. This study aimed to utilize findings from focus groups to culturally adapt the IPQ for use in AAs with diabetes. Ten cognitive interviews among AAs with type 2 diabetes explored patients' interpretation and understanding of the adapted IPQ. RESULTS: Forty-four new survey items were added to the IPQ. Twenty-nine of the forty-four items were determined as the appropriate number of questions to be tested because of time, and to reduce respondent burden. After the first round of interviews, an item-by-item review of the new items identified problems related to AA comprehension of certain items, their applicability, and wording/tone. Five items identified as problematic were related to AAs understanding of a cure for diabetes, their perception of how food influences their diabetes, how their identity as AAs influence diabetes control, and the dialogue about diabetes within their families and/or community. Findings support the newly developed illness perception questions as culturally specific to AAs with diabetes after being tested for content validity and participant understanding using cognitive interviews.