Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(6): 309, 2024 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743248

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the effect of nonsurgical periodontal treatment on Galectin-1 and -3 GCF levels in gingivitis and periodontitis stage III compared to periodontally healthy individuals, to determine whether they could serve as diagnostic markers / therapeutic targets for periodontitis and revealing their possible role in periodontal disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five systemically healthy participants were included and equally subdivided into three groups: gingivitis, periodontitis (stage III), and a periodontally healthy control group. The clinical parameters were recorded. Galectin-1 and -3 GCF levels were evaluated (before and after non-surgical treatment for periodontitis) using an enzyme linked immune-sorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was performed to reveal sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of both markers. RESULTS: The study showed statistical significance between different groups regarding Galectin-3 with higher values in periodontitis and the lowest values in healthy control. Also, Galectin-1 was significantly higher in the periodontitis/gingivitis groups than in the control group. Moreover, non-surgical periodontal treatment in periodontitis patients caused a statistical reduction in clinical parameters and biomarkers. ROC analysis revealed excellent diagnostic ability of both biomarkers in discriminating periodontitis/gingivitis against healthy individuals (100% diagnostic accuracy for Galectin-1 and 93% for Galectin-3, AUC > 0.9) and acceptable diagnostic ability between periodontitis participants against gingivitis (73% diagnostic accuracy for Gal-1 and 80% for Gal-3, AUC > 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Both Galectin-1 and Galectin-3 seem to have outstanding diagnostic accuracy for the identification of periodontal disease, an acceptable ability to measure periodontal disease activity and the severity of inflammatory status. Additionally, they could serve as therapeutic targets to monitor treatment efficiency. CLINICALTRIAL: GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: (NCT06038812).


Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Galectina 1 , Líquido do Sulco Gengival , Periodontite , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Adulto , Biomarcadores/análise , Periodontite/terapia , Periodontite/metabolismo , Líquido do Sulco Gengival/química , Galectina 1/metabolismo , Galectina 1/análise , Galectina 3/metabolismo , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gengivite/terapia , Gengivite/metabolismo , Galectinas , Índice Periodontal , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(2): 124, 2024 Jan 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286978

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This research was performed to investigate if there is a role for IL-39 in immunopathogenesis of both systemically healthy and diabetic periodontitis patients. Additionally, to explore if we can consider IL-39 and IL-35 as biomarkers for periodontitis activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 38 periodontitis patients and 19 control volunteers were included in our study. The periodontitis patients were divided equally into (Group I), 19 patients with stage III grade C periodontitis with diabetes mellitus and (Group II), 19 patients with stage III grade B periodontitis and systemically healthy. Gingival crevicular fluid levels of each interleukin were measured pre- and postoperatively for all periodontitis patients as well as control subjects using ELISA. RESULTS: Our study results showed that the highest level for IL-39 was in diabetic periodontitis patients that decreased significantly postoperatively. However, the highest level for IL-35 was revealed in control group while the lowest value was registered in diabetic periodontitis patients and statistically increased after periodontal treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of our research, both investigated biomarkers may have a potent role in pathogenesis of periodontitis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We could consider both interleukins as accurate diagnostic markers for periodontitis patients, regardless of diabetes mellitus association, as well as promising markers that can aid in the prevention and treatment of periodontitis patients worldwide.


Assuntos
Periodontite Crônica , Diabetes Mellitus , Humanos , Biomarcadores , Periodontite Crônica/terapia , Líquido do Sulco Gengival , Interleucinas
3.
BMC Oral Health ; 23(1): 994, 2023 12 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38087258

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early detection and diagnosis of malignant tumors is critical for improving the survival rate and treatment outcomes of oral cancer. Thus, the current prospective investigation was designed to verify the role, sensitivity, and specificity of salivary LINC00657 and miRNA-106a as diagnostic markers in oral squamous cell carcinoma patients as compared to oral lichen planus (as an example of oral potentially malignant disorders) and normal individuals, and to show LINC00657 relation to miR-106a. METHODS: A total of 36 participants were included, subdivided into 3 groups: Group I: 12 patients diagnosed with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Group II: 12 patients diagnosed with oral lichen planus (OLP). Group III: 12 systemically free individuals with no oral mucosal lesions. Unstimulated salivary samples were collected from all participants to evaluate level of LINC00657 and miR-106a in different groups using quantitative real-time PCR. RESULTS: OSCC showed the highest LINC00657 and lowest miR-106a fold change among included groups. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the two biomarkers for detecting OSCC revealed that LINC00657 had higher diagnostic accuracy (DA) (83.3%) compared to miR-106a (80.4%). As for detecting OLP, ROC analysis showed that miR-106a had higher (DA) (61%) compared to LINC00657 (52.5%). To discriminate OSCC from OLP, the diagnostic accuracy of both markers is the same (75%). Moreover, differentiating OSCC grades II and III, ROC analysis showed that miR-106a had lower (DA) (60%) compared to LINC00657 (DA) (83.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Salivary LINC00657 and miR-106a could be promising diagnostic markers for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Salivary LINC00657 may differentiate oral squamous cell carcinoma from oral potentially malignant disorders with considerable diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, low levels of salivary miR-106a could have the potential to indicate malignancy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered on clinicaltrial.gov with NCT05821179 (first trial registration in 26/3/2023), date of registration: 19/4/2023.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Líquen Plano Bucal , MicroRNAs , Neoplasias Bucais , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas , Humanos , Biomarcadores , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/genética , Líquen Plano Bucal/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Bucais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Bucais/genética , Saliva/química , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA