Cubital vein access provides a practical alternative to internal jugular vein access for coronary sinus catheter placement.

Background: Insertion of electrode catheters into the coronary sinus (CS) through the right internal jugular vein (RIJV) carries risks of pneumothorax and severe hematoma formation. This study was performed to compare the safety and feasibility of catheterization through the left cubital superficial vein versus the RIJV. Methods: This prospective nonrandomized study involved consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation from September 2021 to February 2023. Blind puncture techniques were used in the left cubital vein group; ultrasound-guided insertion was performed in the RIJV group. The success rates of sheath insertion and CS catheterization, the procedure and fluoroscopy times of CS cannulation, and complications were compared between groups. Results: The left cubital vein group comprised 152 patients, and the RIJV group comprised 58 patients. The sheath insertion success rate was significantly lower in the cubital vein group than in the RIJV group (84.9% vs 100%, respectively; p = .0008). In the cubital vein group, blind puncture attempts failed in 20 patients; three patients developed guidewire-induced venous injury. One arterial puncture occurred in the RIJV group. After successful sheath insertion, no significant differences were observed in the CS cannulation success rate (97% vs 100%, p = .55), procedure time (median [range], 93 [51-174] vs 74 [44-129] s; p = .19), or fluoroscopy time (median [range], 66 [36-134] vs 48 [30-92] s; p = .17). No serious complications requiring procedural discontinuation occurred. Conclusion: The left cubital vein approach is practical, offering a viable alternative to the RIJV approach.

Asymmetric remodeling between the left and right atria in patients with advanced interatrial block and atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Advanced interatrial block (A-IAB) on electrocardiography (ECG) represents the conduction delay between the left and right atria. We investigated the association of A-IAB with left and right atrial (LA/RA) remodeling in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We enrolled 74 patients who underwent ECG, cardiac computed tomography (CCT), and echocardiography during sinus rhythm before catheter ablation of AF. A-IAB was defined as P-wave duration ≥120 ms with a biphasic morphology in leads III and aVF or notched morphology in lead II. We compared the maximum and minimum LA/RA volume indices (max and min LAV/RAVI), LA/RA expansion index (LAEI/RAEI), and total, passive, and active LA/RA emptying fraction (LAEF/RAEF) between patients with and without A-IAB. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients (mean age, 64.3 ± 9.6 years), 35 (47%) showed A-IAB. Patients with A-IAB had a significantly higher likelihood of hypertension and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction than those without. Patients with A-IAB had significantly larger max (69.2 [60.7-79.7]mL/m2 vs. 60.9 [50.4-68.3]mL/m2, P < 0.01) and min (44.0 [37.2-52.1]mL/m2 vs. 34.1 [29.2-43.5]mL/m2, P < 0.01) LAVI than those without. The max and min RAVI were not significantly different between groups. LAEI (55.1 [48.2-78.5]% vs. 72.1 [57.8-84.8]%, P < 0.05), total LAEF (35.5 [32.5-44.0]% vs. 41.9 [36.6-45.9]%, P < 0.05), and passive LAEF (12.2 [10.0-14.4]% vs. 15.5 [11.2-19.6]%, P < 0.05) were significantly lower in patients with A-IAB than without. CONCLUSIONS: A-IAB was associated with LA, but not RA enlargement, in patients with AF. A-IAB may indicate LA functional remodeling in the reservoir and conduit phases.

Asymptomatic Coarctation of the Aorta in Adults with Preserved Exercise Capacity.

We herein report a case of coarctation of the aorta (CoA) in an asymptomatic adult who had a preserved exercise capacity. A 56-year-old man with mild hypertension exhibited left ventricular hypertrophy on an electrocardiogram during an annual medical checkup. Echocardiography showed a bicuspid aortic valve and cor triatriatum sinister, and subsequent computed tomography revealed CoA with developed collaterals. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing showed a good exercise capacity. He refused surgical repair and has been asymptomatic for five years. This case is of special interest, as CoA is usually rarely noticed during adulthood if there are no severe congenital anomalies, and in addition, this patient had good exercise capacity.

Utility of P-wave abnormalities for distinguishing embolic stroke from non-embolic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to analyze the incidence of P-wave abnormalities in embolic and non-embolic strokes, and evaluate its clinical usefulness for predicting stroke etiology. METHODS: We included 376 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute ischemic stroke from January 2015 to September 2021. Among the patients in sinus rhythm at admission, 31 had ischemic stroke due to atrial fibrillation (AF)-related embolism, 59 had embolic stroke of unknown source (ESUS), and 143 had non-embolic stroke. P-wave abnormalities were defined as 1. P-wave axis abnormality (PWAA); 2. P-wave terminal force in V1 (PTFV1) ≤ -4000 µV*ms; 3. advanced inter-atrial block (A-IAB). RESULTS: The prevalence of each type of abnormality was consistently lower in patients with non-embolic stroke than in those with AF-related embolism (AF-related vs. ESUS vs. non-embolic; PWAA, 45% vs. 20% vs. 14%; PTFV1, 36% vs. 37% vs. 15%; and A-IAB, 55% vs. 31% vs. 13%, respectively). The identification of at least one type of P-wave abnormality improved the sensitivity compared to using a single abnormality parameter (sensitivity 72%, specificity 62%), while at least two types of abnormality had low sensitivity, but high specificity (sensitivity 29%, specificity 95%). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that identification of at least one type of P-wave abnormality was independently associated with embolic stroke (odds ratio 3.11, 95%CI 1.46-6.63). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of each type of P-wave abnormality was significantly lower in patients with non-embolic stroke. A combination of PWAA, PTFV1, and A-IAB parameters could be useful for distinguishing embolic from non-embolic stroke.

Wide QRS complex tachycardia and alternating bundle branch block aberration: What is the mechanism?

A 70-year-old man was referred for evaluation and treatment of wide QRS complex tachycardia with left bundle branch block morphology. Electrocardiography showed atrial bigeminy with an alternating bundle branch block (ABBB) aberration. Atrial burst stimulation reproducibly demonstrated ABBB. What is the mechanism?

Comparison of Radiofrequency and Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Ablation for the Early and Late Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation.

Objective Early recurrence (ER) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is expected to resolve within the recommended 3-month blanking period, irrespective of the ablation device used. To compare the occurrence and relationship of AF within the blanking period and subsequent late recurrence (LR) with radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) ablation. Methods A retrospective analysis of 294 patients (mean age=62±9, 70.0% male) undergoing PVI for drug-refractory paroxysmal AF was done. After categorizing the patients into the RF group (n=152) and the CB group (n=142), a group-wise comparison was done to investigate the impact of ER on LR throughout a 2-year follow-up. Results The groups were similar regarding the occurrence of ER (RF=22.4%, CB=24.6%, p=0.62), while LR was significantly higher in the RF group (p=0.003). ER was associated with LR in the RF group (p<0.01) but not in the CB group (p=0.08), while a significant independent association with an increased LR risk was observed [hazard ratio (HR) 6.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.56-10.51, p<0.01]. RF ablation also significantly increased the risk of LR (HR=2.93; 95% CI=1.64-5.23, p<0.01). Conclusion A recurrence of atrial arrhythmia is more frequent with RF-PVI than with CB-PVI for patients with paroxysmal AF. ER and RF-ablation are strong predictors for LR after the 3-month blanking period.

Lead dislodgement after a very long-term period of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation.

A 74-year-old man was admitted for a second replacement of a transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generator at 15 years after implantation. Postoperatively, electrocardiographic monitoring showed atrial lead malfunction. Chest X-ray revealed that the tip of the active fixation atrial lead was dislocated. We present a case of atrial lead dislodgement after a very long-term period of an ICD implantation.