Health and illness beliefs in adults with tuberculosis infection during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.

Background: COVID-19 disrupted the TB prevention programme in the UK, especially for TB infection (TBI) care. We explore whether experience of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted on patients' perceptions of TBI and its treatment. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted as part of the Research to Improve Detection and Treatment of TBI (RID-TB) programme, exploring perceptual and practical barriers to TBI treatment. Nineteen people diagnosed with TBI were interviewed between August 2020 and April 2021. Recordings were transcribed and analysed using a constant comparative approach, allowing for a dynamic and iterative exploration of themes. Themes are organised using the Perceptions and Practicalities Approach. Findings: Some participants perceived TBI as a risk factor for increased susceptibility to COVID-19, while some thought that treatment for TBI might protect against COVID-19 or mitigate its effects. Adaptations to TB services (e.g., remote follow-up) and integrated practices during the COVID-19 restrictions (e.g., medication being posted) addressed some practical barriers to TBI treatment. However, we identified beliefs about TBI and COVID-19 that are likely to act as barriers to engagement with TBI treatment, including: interpreting service delays as an indication of TBI not being serious enough for treatment and concerns about contracting COVID-19 in TB clinics. Interpretation: COVID-19 and TBI service delays influence people's perceptions and practical barriers to TBI treatment adherence. Failure to address these beliefs may lead to people's concerns about their treatment not being fully addressed. Utilised service adaptations like remote consultations to address practical barriers may be relevant beyond COVID-19. Funding: NIHR RID-TB Program (RP-PG-0217-20009).

Healthcare and treatment experiences among people diagnosed with HIV before and after a province-wide treatment as prevention initiative in British Columbia, Canada.

INTRODUCTION: In 2010, the Canadian province of British Columbia (BC) initiated the Seek and Treat for Optimal Prevention of HIV/AIDS (STOP HIV/AIDS) program to improve HIV testing, linkage to care, and treatment uptake, thereby operationalizing the HIV Treatment as Prevention (TasP) framework at the population-level. In this analysis, we evaluated self-reported HIV care experiences and therapeutic outcomes among people diagnosed with HIV prior to and after implementation of this provincial program. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on the baseline data of a cohort of people living with HIV (PLWH) (19 years and older) in the province of BC sampled from July 2016 to September 2018. All participants consented to linking their survey data to the provincial HIV treatment registry. Individuals diagnosed with HIV from January 1 2000-December 31 2009 were classified as pre-intervention and those diagnosed January 1 2010-December 31 2018 as post-intervention cohorts. Bivariate analyses were run using Chi-square and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Cox proportional hazards regression model demonstrates time to antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation (from HIV baseline) and virological suppression (2 consecutive plasma viral load measurements < 200 copies/ml). RESULTS: Of the 325 participants included in this analysis, 198 (61%) were diagnosed with HIV in the pre-intervention era and 127 (39%) in the post-intervention era. A higher proportion of participants in post-intervention era were diagnosed at walk-in clinics (45% vs. 39%) and hospitals (21% vs. 11%) (vs pre-intervention) (p = 0.042). Post-intervention participants had initiated ART with less advanced HIV disease (CD4 count 410 vs. 270 cells/ul; p = 0.001) and were less likely to experience treatment interruptions at any point in the 5 years after HIV diagnosis (17% vs. 48%; p < 0.001). The post-intervention cohort had significantly more timely ART initiation (aHR: 5.97, 95%CI 4.47, 7.97) and virologic suppression (aHR: 2.03, 95%CI 1.58, 2.60) following diagnosis, after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: We found favourable treatment experiences and more timely ART initiation and virologic suppression after a targeted TasP provincial program. Our results illustrate the importance of accessible low-barrier HIV testing and treatment in tackling the HIV epidemic.

Community awareness of, use of and attitudes towards HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men in Vancouver, Canada: preparing health promotion for a publicly funded PrEP program.

Background HIV rates are persistently disproportionate among men who have sex with men (MSM). Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention method, now publicly funded in British Columbia. This study assessed PrEP-related attitudes, sexual behaviour and self-reported use before public funding. METHODS: Adult MSM were recruited from January to June 2017 through a local community-based organisation's PrEP campaign website (www.getpreped.ca). Participants self-completed an anonymous online questionnaire, and were stratified into three groups: (i) HIV-positive participants; (ii) HIV-negative participants not using PrEP; and (iii) HIV-negative participants using PrEP. Descriptive, bivariate and univariate regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Of 249 participants, 191 (77%) were HIV-negative not using PrEP, 41 (17%) were HIV-negative using PrEP and 17 (7%) were HIV-positive. Among PrEP users, 90% used PrEP daily and all reported having recommended medical follow-up care. Among HIV-negative, non-PrEP-users, 44% said they would reduce condom use if they used PrEP and 28% were uncomfortable asking their doctor for PrEP. Interest in PrEP among non-users was associated with higher objective risk scores (i.e. HIV Incidence Risk Index for MSM), higher self-perceived risk, greater perceived PrEP effectiveness, no prescription medications insurance, open or single relationship status (vs closed) and not always using condoms (vs always). Among HIV-positive participants, 53% agreed PrEP reduced stigma for people living with HIV. All study groups perceived a greater percentage of MSM on PrEP (10%, 15%, 18%) than in their own social networks (5%, 4%, 6%). CONCLUSIONS: PrEP health promotion must consider comprehensive PrEP education; accuracy of self-perceived HIV risk and PrEP social norms; and barriers to culturally safe primary care for MSM.