Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
1.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2411159, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743421

RESUMO

Importance: Clinical outcomes after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in people living with HIV have not been characterized in sufficient detail, and extant data have not been synthesized adequately. Objective: To better characterize clinical outcomes and postdischarge treatment of patients living with HIV after ACS or PCIs compared with patients in an HIV-negative control group. Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for all available longitudinal studies of patients living with HIV after ACS or PCIs from inception until August 2023. Study Selection: Included studies met the following criteria: patients living with HIV and HIV-negative comparator group included, patients presenting with ACS or undergoing PCI included, and longitudinal follow-up data collected after the initial event. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Clinical outcome data were pooled using a random-effects model meta-analysis. Main Outcome and Measures: The following clinical outcomes were studied: all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death, recurrent ACS, stroke, new heart failure, total lesion revascularization, and total vessel revascularization. The maximally adjusted relative risk (RR) of clinical outcomes on follow-up comparing patients living with HIV with patients in control groups was taken as the main outcome measure. Results: A total of 15 studies including 9499 patients living with HIV (pooled proportion [range], 76.4% [64.3%-100%] male; pooled mean [range] age, 56.2 [47.0-63.0] years) and 1 531 117 patients without HIV in a control group (pooled proportion [range], 61.7% [59.7%-100%] male; pooled mean [range] age, 67.7 [42.0-69.4] years) were included; both populations were predominantly male, but patients living with HIV were younger by approximately 11 years. Patients living with HIV were also significantly more likely to be current smokers (pooled proportion [range], 59.1% [24.0%-75.0%] smokers vs 42.8% [26.0%-64.1%] smokers) and engage in illicit drug use (pooled proportion [range], 31.2% [2.0%-33.7%] drug use vs 6.8% [0%-11.5%] drug use) and had higher triglyceride (pooled mean [range], 233 [167-268] vs 171 [148-220] mg/dL) and lower high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (pooled mean [range], 40 [26-43] vs 46 [29-46] mg/dL) levels. Populations with and without HIV were followed up for a pooled mean (range) of 16.2 (3.0-60.8) months and 11.9 (3.0-60.8) months, respectively. On postdischarge follow-up, patients living with HIV had lower prevalence of statin (pooled proportion [range], 53.3% [45.8%-96.1%] vs 59.9% [58.4%-99.0%]) and ß-blocker (pooled proportion [range], 54.0% [51.3%-90.0%] vs 60.6% [59.6%-93.6%]) prescriptions compared with those in the control group, but these differences were not statistically significant. There was a significantly increased risk among patients living with HIV vs those without HIV for all-cause mortality (RR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.32-2.04), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22), recurrent ACS (RR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.12-2.97), and admissions for new heart failure (RR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.73-6.62). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest the need for attention toward secondary prevention strategies to address poor outcomes of cardiovascular disease among patients living with HIV.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda , Infecções por HIV , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/cirurgia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Resultado do Tratamento , Revascularização Miocárdica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto
2.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 33(4): 770-777, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36774203

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The relationship between hostility and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) among black adults was investigated using the Jackson Heart Study (JHS) cohort. We hypothesized that Cook-Medley Hostility scores will be positively related with the prevalence of DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 3232 black adults who completed at least one question for each of the three subscales of the Cook-Medley Hostility Scale and had data available regarding DM status were included. Using multivariate logistic regression, we studied the cross-sectional relationship between the overall Total Cook-Medley Hostility scores and individual subscales, hostile affect (n = 3232), aggression (n = 3119) and cynical distrust (n = 3085), with prevalent DM, adjusting for known DM confounders. Our population was 36% male with a mean age of 53.5 ± 0.9 years. In risk-factor adjusted models, each point higher in the overall Total Cook-Medley Hostility scores was associated with increased odds of having DM [Adjusted OR 1.02, 95%CI 1.00-1.04, P = 0.03]. Higher scores of cynicism were independently associated with prevalent DM [Adjusted OR 1.04, 95%CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.021]. CONCLUSIONS: There was a positive relationship between overall hostility levels and prevalent DM. Future studies should investigate the extent to which additional social determinants may impact the relationship between hostile affect and prevalent DM.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Diabetes Mellitus , Hostilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/etnologia , Diabetes Mellitus/psicologia , Estudos Longitudinais , Prevalência , Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Agressão , Confiança , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/etnologia , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Circulation ; 147(10): 782-794, 2023 03 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36762560

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic liver disease is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a new-user, retrospective cohort study of patients with AF and chronic liver disease who were enrolled in a large, US-based administrative database between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of DOACs (as a class and individually) compared with warfarin, and between DOACs in patients with AF and chronic liver disease. The primary outcomes were hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and hospitalization for major bleeding. Inverse probability treatment weights were used to balance the treatment groups on measured confounders. RESULTS: Overall, 10 209 participants were included, with 4421 (43.2%) on warfarin, 2721 (26.7%) apixaban, 2211 (21.7%) rivaroxaban, and 851 (8.3%) dabigatran. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism were 2.2, 1.4, 2.6, and 4.4 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. The incidence rates per 100 person-years for major bleeding were 7.9, 6.5, 9.1, and 15.0 for DOACs as a class, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin, respectively. After inverse probability treatment weights, the risk of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism was significantly lower between DOACs as a class (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.46-0.90]) or apixaban (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.19-0.82]) compared with warfarin, but not significantly different between rivaroxaban versus warfarin (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.47-1.21]) or rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 0.91-3.29]). Compared with warfarin, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was lower with DOACs as a class (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.58-0.82]), apixaban (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46-0.78]), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62-1.0]). However, the risk of hospitalization for major bleeding was higher for rivaroxaban versus apixaban (HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.18-2.14]). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AF and chronic liver disease, DOACs as a class were associated with lower risks of hospitalization for ischemic stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding versus warfarin. However, the incidence of clinical outcomes among patients with AF and chronic liver disease varied between individual DOACs and warfarin, and in head-to-head DOAC comparisons.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial , Embolia , AVC Isquêmico , Hepatopatias , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Varfarina/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Hemorragia/tratamento farmacológico , Dabigatrana/efeitos adversos , Hepatopatias/diagnóstico , Hepatopatias/epidemiologia , Embolia/epidemiologia , Embolia/prevenção & controle , Embolia/complicações , Administração Oral
4.
PLoS One ; 17(8): e0272497, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35951587

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between county-level COVID-19 outcomes (incidence and mortality) and county-level median household income and status of Medicaid expansion of US counties. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 3142 US counties was conducted to study the relationship between County-level median-household-income and COVID-19 incidence and mortality per 100,000 people in US counties, January-20th-2021 through December-6th-2021. County median-household-income was log-transformed and stratified by quartiles. Multilevel-mixed-effects-generalized-linear-modeling adjusted for county socio-demographic and comorbidities and tested for Medicaid-expansion-times-income-quartile interaction on COVID-19 outcomes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in COVID-19 incidence-rate across counties by income quartiles or by Medicaid expansion status. Conversely, for non-Medicaid-expansion states, counties in the lowest income quartile had a 41% increase in COVID-19 mortality-rate compared to counties in the highest income quartile. Mortality-rate was not related to income in counties from Medicaid-expansion states. CONCLUSIONS: Median-household-income was not related to COVID-19 incidence-rate but negatively related to COVID-19 mortality-rate in US counties of states without Medicaid-expansion.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Renda , Medicaid , Pobreza , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263498, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35130320

RESUMO

Shared medical appointments (SMAs) offer a means for providing knowledge and skills needed for chronic disease management to patients. However, SMAs require a time and attention investment from health care providers, who must understand the goals and potential benefits of SMAs from the perspective of patients and providers. To better understand how to gain provider engagement and inform future SMA implementation, qualitative inquiry of provider experience based on a knowledge-attitude-practice model was explored. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 health care providers leading SMAs for heart failure at three Veterans Administration Medical Centers. Rapid matrix analysis process techniques including team-based qualitative inquiry followed by stakeholder validation was employed. The interview guide followed a knowledge-attitude-practice model with a priori domains of knowledge of SMA structure and content (understanding of how SMAs were structured), SMA attitude/beliefs (general expectations about SMA use), attitudes regarding how leading SMAs affected patients, and providers. Data regarding the patient referral process (organizational processes for referring patients to SMAs) and suggested improvements were collected to further inform the development of SMA implementation best practices. Providers from all three sites reported similar knowledge, attitude and beliefs of SMAs. In general, providers reported that the multi-disciplinary structure of SMAs was an effective strategy towards improving clinical outcomes for patients. Emergent themes regarding experiences with SMAs included improved self-efficacy gained from real-time collaboration with providers from multiple disciplines, perceived decrease in patient re-hospitalizations, and promotion of self-management skills for patients with HF. Most providers reported that the SMA-setting facilitated patient learning by providing opportunities for the sharing of experiences and knowledge. This was associated with the perception of increased comradery and support among patients. Future research is needed to test suggested improvements and to develop best practices for training additional sites to implement HF SMA.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Consultas Médicas Compartilhadas , Adulto , Agendamento de Consultas , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Processos Grupais , Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Satisfação no Emprego , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Percepção , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
6.
PLoS One ; 16(9): e0251665, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34525124

RESUMO

Warfarin has been widely used to treat thromboembolism. The effect of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), on warfarin dosing remains unknown. This study aims to examine the effects of NAFLD/NASH on the average daily dose (ADD) of warfarin and the time in therapeutic range (TTR). This is a retrospective study utilizing an administrative data. We included patients with at least 2 months of warfarin dispensing and two subsequent consecutive INR measures. The ADD of warfarin to achieve therapeutic range INR levels, and TTR were compared between patients with and without NAFLD/NASH in four subgroups of patients accounting for the presence of obesity and diabetes. Generalized linear models (GLM) with Propensity score (PS) fine stratification were applied to evaluate the relative differences (RD) of warfarin ADD and TTR (>60%) in four subgroups. A total of 430 NAFLD/NASH patients and 38,887 patients without NAFLD/NASH were included. The ADD and TTR, were not significant in the overall cohort between those with and without NAFLD/NASH. However, GLM results in patients without diabetes or obesity (N = 26,685) showed a significantly lower warfarin ADD (RD: -0.38; 95%CI: -0.74--0.02) and shorter TTR (OR: 0.71; 95%CI: 0.52-0.97) in patients diagnosed with NAFLD/NASH. The effects of NAFLD/NASH on warfarin dose or TTR were observed in patients without obesity and diabetes. Obesity and diabetes appear to be significant modifiers for the effects of NAFLD/NASH on warfarin dose and TTR.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/diagnóstico , Varfarina/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Cálculos da Dosagem de Medicamento , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Varfarina/uso terapêutico
7.
R I Med J (2013) ; 103(9): 16-21, 2020 Nov 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33126781

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data on effectiveness of ambulatory intravenous (IV) diuretic clinics for volume management in patients with heart failure to prevent rehospitalization and mortality are limited. Therefore, the primary goal of this research is to evaluate the effectiveness of an out- patient multidisciplinary IV diuretic clinic versus standard observational hospitalizations of less than 48 hours for decompensated heart failure on the time to rehospitalization or death. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients with heart failure (n=90) at the Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center was conducted. Patients were included in the analyses if they received at least one ambulatory IV diuretic clinic visit or an observational hospitalization of less than 48 hours for decompensated heart failure between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2016. Using Cox proportional hazards modeling, we compared the time to any hospitalization or death between the IV clinic and the observational hospitalization cohort over 180 days of follow-up. RESULTS: In the ambulatory IV diuretic clinic group, 27 patients (mean age 78.3 ± 8.3 years) received a median of 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-12), IV diuretic treatments. In the comparison group, 63 patients (mean age 80.3 ± 11.0 years) were hospitalized for observation for 48 hours or less during the same time period. Adjusting for age and imbalances in baseline characteristics, left ventricular ejection fraction and enrollment in hospice care, the hazards of any hospitalization or death (HR 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 0.83) were reduced for patients in the ambulatory IV diuretic clinic versus those in the observational hospitalization cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with decompensated heart failure, an ambulatory IV diuretic clinic was associated with risk reduction of any rehospitalization or death over 180 days of follow up when compared to a strategy of observational hospitalization for less than 48 hours. Future research should prospectively analyze outpatient IV therapy in a larger and more diverse population.


Assuntos
Diuréticos , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diuréticos/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Hospitalização , Humanos , Alta do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Volume Sistólico , Função Ventricular Esquerda
8.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(7): e013570, 2020 04 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32192409

RESUMO

Background Women represent a large proportion of the growing heart failure (HF) epidemic, yet data are lacking regarding optimal dietary and lifestyle prevention strategies for them. Specifically, the association between magnesium intake and HF in a multiracial cohort of women is uncertain. Methods and Results We included 97 725 postmenopausal women from the WHI (Women's Health Initiative) observational studies and placebo arms of the hormone trial. Magnesium intake was measured at baseline by a 122-item validated food-frequency questionnaire and stratified into quartiles based on diet only, total intake (diet with supplements), and residual intake (calibration by total energy). Incident hospitalized HF (2153 events, median follow-up 8.1 years) was adjudicated by medical record abstraction. In Cox proportional hazards models, we evaluated the association between magnesium intake and HF adjusting for potential confounders. Analyses were repeated on a subcohort (n=18 745; median-follow-up, 13.2 years) for whom HF cases were subclassified into preserved ejection fraction (526 events), reduced ejection fraction (291 events) or unknown (168 events). Most women were white (85%) with a mean age of 63. Compared with the highest quartile of magnesium intake, women in the lowest quartile had an increased risk of incident HF, with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.32 (95% CI, 1.02-1.71) for diet only (P trend=0.03), 1.26 (95% CI, 1.03-1.56) for total intake, and 1.31 (95% CI, 1.02-1.67) for residual intake. Results did not significantly vary by race. Subcohort analyses showed low residual magnesium intake was associated with HF with reduced ejection fraction (hazard ratio, 1.81, lowest versus highest quartile; 95% CI, 1.08-3.05) but not HF with preserved ejection fraction. Conclusions Low magnesium intake in a multiracial cohort of postmenopausal women was associated with a higher risk of incident HF, especially HF with reduced ejection fraction.


Assuntos
Dieta , Suplementos Nutricionais , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Deficiência de Magnésio/epidemiologia , Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Recomendações Nutricionais , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Dieta/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fatores de Risco de Doenças Cardíacas , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Incidência , Deficiência de Magnésio/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pós-Menopausa , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Função Ventricular Esquerda
9.
J Telemed Telecare ; 26(5): 294-302, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30691328

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether a pharmacist-led telehealth disease management program is superior to usual care of nurse-led telehealth in improving diabetes medication adherence, haemoglobin A1C (A1C), and depression scores in patients with concomitant diabetes and depression. METHODS: Patients with diabetes and depression were randomized to pharmacist-led or nurse-led telehealth. Veterans with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, an A1C ≥ 7.5%, diagnosis of depression, and access to a landline phone were invited to participate. Patients were randomized to usual care of nurse-led telehealth or pharmacist-led telehealth. Patients were shown how to use the telehealth equipment by the nurse or pharmacist. In the pharmacist-led group, the patients received an in-depth medication review in addition to the instruction on the telehealth equipment. RESULTS: After six months, the pharmacist-led telehealth arm showed significant improvements for cardiovascular medication adherence (14.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4 to 27.6), antidepressant medication adherence (26.0; 95% CI 0.9 to 51.2), and overall medication adherence combined (13.9; 95% CI 6.6 to 21.2) from baseline to six-month follow-up. There was a significant difference in A1C between each group at the six-month follow-up in the nurse-led telehealth group (6.9 ± 0.9) as compared to the pharmacist-led telehealth group (8.8 ± 2.0). There was no significance in the change in patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) from baseline to follow-up in both groups. DISCUSSION: Pharmacist-led telehealth was efficacious in improving medication adherence for cardiovascular, antidepressants, and overall medications over a six-month period as compared to nurse-led telehealth. There was no significant improvement in overall depression scores.


Assuntos
Depressão/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Telemedicina/organização & administração , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Depressão/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração
10.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 8(16): e012779, 2019 08 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31423874

RESUMO

Background Center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) can be an alternative to increase access for patients who cannot participate in CBCR. Hybrid cardiac rehabilitation (CR) combines short-term CBCR with HBCR, potentially allowing both flexibility and rigor. However, recent data comparing these initiatives have not been synthesized. Methods and Results We performed a meta-analysis to compare functional capacity and health-related quality of life (hr-QOL) outcomes in HF for (1) HBCR and usual care, (2) hybrid CR and usual care, and (3) HBCR and CBCR. A systematic search in 5 standard databases for randomized controlled trials was performed through January 31, 2019. Summary estimates were pooled using fixed- or random-effects (when I2>50%) meta-analyses. Standardized mean differences (95% CI) were used for distinct hr-QOL tools. We identified 31 randomized controlled trials with a total of 1791 HF participants. Among 18 studies that compared HBCR and usual care, participants in HBCR had improvement of peak oxygen uptake (2.39 mL/kg per minute; 95% CI, 0.28-4.49) and hr-QOL (16 studies; standardized mean difference: 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.57). Nine RCTs that compared hybrid CR with usual care showed that hybrid CR had greater improvements in peak oxygen uptake (9.72 mL/kg per minute; 95% CI, 5.12-14.33) but not in hr-QOL (2 studies; standardized mean difference: 0.67; 95% CI, -0.20 to 1.54). Five studies comparing HBCR with CBCR showed similar improvements in functional capacity (0.0 mL/kg per minute; 95% CI, -1.93 to 1.92) and hr-QOL (4 studies; standardized mean difference: 0.11; 95% CI, -0.12 to 0.34). Conclusions HBCR and hybrid CR significantly improved functional capacity, but only HBCR improved hr-QOL over usual care. However, both are potential alternatives for patients who are not suitable for CBCR.


Assuntos
Reabilitação Cardíaca/métodos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/reabilitação , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Centros de Reabilitação , Autocuidado , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 65(1): 125-135, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30010127

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Normal weight obesity (NWO) is associated with increased risk of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular- and all-cause mortality. However, no data have been reported on the relationship between adiposity and cognitive performance in NWO. We therefore studied the association between cognitive function and body fat percentage (BF%) in NWO, using a representative sample of the United States population. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed using the nationwide 1988 to 1994 data set from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Cognitive function was measured by three validated cognitive tests: simple reaction time test (SRTT), symbol digit substitution test (SDST), and serial digit learning test (SDLT). The association between BF% and cognitive performance was evaluated in 2,039 adults aged 20-59 years and with a body mass index ranging from 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2. Linear regression modeling was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Increased BF% was significantly associated with poorer performance on SDLT in the entire study sample (coefficient [95% CI]: 0.15 [0.01, 0.29]) and with poorer performance on SDST in the age group 20-29 years (coefficient [95% CI]: 0.30 [0.10, 0.49]). Increased BF% did not significantly predict poorer performance on SRTT. CONCLUSION: Higher BF% is significantly associated with poorer cognitive function in a nationally representative sample of US adults with NWO. The identification of possible complications associated with increased adipose tissue underlines the need to measure body fat content in NWO individuals, whose metabolic and cognitive dysfunction could go undetected for years due to their young age and normal body weight.


Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos/etiologia , Inquéritos Nutricionais , Obesidade/complicações , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Índice de Massa Corporal , Transtornos Cognitivos/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Impedância Elétrica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Resolução de Problemas/fisiologia , Tempo de Reação/fisiologia , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
12.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 71: 140-145, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29940335

RESUMO

A primary goal of this research project is to better understand how shared medical appointments (SMAs) can improve the health status and decrease hospitalization and death for patients recently discharged with heart failure (HF) by providing education, disease state monitoring, medication titration, and social support to patients and their caregivers. We propose a 3-site randomized-controlled efficacy trial with mixed methods to test a SMA intervention, versus usual care. Patients within 12 weeks of a HF hospitalization will be randomized to receive either HF-SMA (intervention arm) with optional co-participation with their caregivers, versus usual care (control arm). The HF-SMA will be provided by a non-physician team composed of a nurse, a nutritionist, a health psychologist, a nurse practitioner and/or a clinical pharmacist and will consist of four sessions of 2-h duration that occur every other week for 8 weeks. Each session will start with an assessment of patient needs followed by theme-based disease self-management education, followed by patient-initiated disease management discussion, and conclude with break-out sessions of individualized disease monitoring and medication case management. The study duration will be 180 days for all patients from the day of randomization. The primary study hypothesis is that, compared with usual care, patients randomized to HF-SMA will experience better cardiac health status at 90 and 180 days follow-up. The secondary hypotheses are that, compared to usual care, patients randomized to HF-SMA will experience better overall health status, a combined endpoint of hospitalization and death, better HF self-care behavior, and lower B-type natriuretic peptide levels.


Assuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Estrutura de Grupo , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Alta do Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Autocuidado , Apoio Social , Feminino , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Insuficiência Cardíaca/psicologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Gravidade do Paciente , Participação do Paciente , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/psicologia , Análise de Sobrevida
13.
PLoS One ; 13(4): e0195898, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29672567

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness and costs associated with addition of pharmacist-led group medical visits to standard care for patients with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is unknown. METHODS: Randomized-controlled-trial in three US Veteran Health Administration (VHA) Hospitals, where 250 patients with T2DM, HbA1c >7% and either hypertension, active smoking or hyperlipidemia were randomized to either (1) addition of pharmacist-led group-medical-visits or (2) standard care alone for 13 months. Group (4-6 patients) visits consisted of 2-hour, education and comprehensive medication management sessions once weekly for 4 weeks, followed by quarterly visits. Change from baseline in cardiovascular risk estimated by the UKPDS-risk-score, health-related quality-of-life (SF36v) and institutional healthcare costs were compared between study arms. RESULTS: After 13 months, both groups had similar and significant improvements from baseline in UKPDS-risk-score (-0.02 ±0.09 and -0.04 ±0.09, group visit and standard care respectively, adjusted p<0.05 for both); however, there was no significant difference between the study arms (adjusted p = 0.45). There were no significant differences on improvement from baseline in A1c, systolic-blood-pressure, and LDL as well as health-related quality-of-life measures between the study arms. Compared to 13 months prior, the increase in per-person outpatient expenditure from baseline was significantly lower in the group visit versus the standard care arm, both during the study intervention period and at 13-months after study interventions. The overall VHA healthcare costs/person were comparable between the study arms during the study period (p = 0.15); then decreased by 6% for the group visit but increased by 13% for the standard care arm 13 months post-study (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of pharmacist-led group medical visits in T2DM achieved similar improvements from baseline in cardiovascular risk factors than usual care, but with reduction in the healthcare costs in the group visit arm 13 months after completion compared to the steady rise in cost for the usual care arm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00554671 ClinicalTrials.gov.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Assistência Farmacêutica/economia , Farmacêuticos , Idoso , Comorbidade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Hospitais de Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
J Patient Exp ; 4(4): 169-176, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29276763

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) are clinical visits in which several patients meet with 1 or more providers at the same time. OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcomes of an interdisciplinary SMA for veterans recently discharged for heart failure (HF). METHODS: A retrospective chart review for patients' readmission rates, survival, medication adherence, and medication-related problems. For qualitative outcomes, we performed semistructured interviews on 12 patients who had undergone HF SMAs and their respective caregivers focusing on care satisfaction, HF knowledge, disease self-care, medication reconciliation, and peer support. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 70 patients-49% had left ventricular function <40% and 50% were prescribed >10 medications. Medication-related problems occurred in 60% of patients. Interviews revealed overall satisfaction with HF-SMA, but patients felt overwhelmed with HF instructions, perceived lack of peer support and self-efficacy, and feelings of hopelessness related to HF. CONCLUSION: Shared medical appointments are well-perceived. Medication problems and need for medication management are prevalent along with patient's lack of self-efficacy in HF care. Multiple HF-SMA visits may be needed to reinforce concepts, reduce confusion, and garner peer support.

15.
Int J Med Inform ; 93: 34-41, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27435945

RESUMO

AIM: To explore whether Video-Shared Medical Appointments (video-SMA), where group education and medication titration were provided remotely through video-conferencing technology would improve diabetes outcomes in remote rural settings. METHODS: We conducted a pilot where a team of a clinical pharmacist and a nurse practitioner from Honolulu VA hospital remotely delivered video-SMA in diabetes to Guam. Patients with diabetes and HbA1c ≥7% were enrolled into the study during 2013-2014. Six groups of 4-6 subjects attended 4 weekly sessions, followed by 2 bi-monthly booster video-SMA sessions for 5 months. Patients with HbA1c ≥7% that had primary care visits during the study period but not referred/recruited for video-SMA were selected as usual-care comparators. We compared changes from baseline in HbA1c, blood-pressure, and lipid levels using mixed-effect modeling between video-SMA and usual care groups. We also analyzed emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations. Focus groups were conducted to understand patient's perceptions. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients received video-SMA and charts of 69 subjects were abstracted as usual-care. After 5 months, there was a significant decline in HbA1c in video-SMA vs. usual-care (9.1±1.9 to 8.3±1.8 vs. 8.6±1.4 to 8.7±1.6, P=0.03). No significant change in blood-pressure or lipid levels was found between the groups. Patients in the video-SMA group had significantly lower rates of ED visits (3.2% vs. 17.4%, P=0.01) than usual-care but similar hospitalization rates. Focus groups suggested patient satisfaction with video-SMA and increase in self-efficacy in diabetes self-care. CONCLUSION: Video-SMA is feasible, well-perceived and has the potential to improve diabetes outcomes in a rural setting.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adesão à Medicação , Farmacêuticos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Autocuidado , Comunicação por Videoconferência/estatística & dados numéricos , Agendamento de Consultas , Pressão Sanguínea , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , População Rural
16.
Circ Heart Fail ; 9(4): e002698, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27056880

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about magnesium intake and risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, particularly in blacks. We hypothesize that magnesium intake relates to HF hospitalization in blacks. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Jackson Heart Study cohort (n=5301), we studied 4916 blacks recruited during 2000 to 2004 in Jackson (Mississippi), who completed an 158-item Food-Frequency Questionnaire that included dietary supplements. Daily magnesium intake derived from the questionnaire was divided by the body weight to account for body storage and stratified by quartiles (0.522-2.308, 2.309-3.147, 3.148-4.226, and ≥4.227 mg magnesium intake/kg). Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed the association between quartiles of magnesium intake/kg and hospitalizations for HF adjusting for HF risk, energy intake, and dietary factors. The cohort had a mean age=55.3 (SD=12.7 years) and composed of 63.4% women, 21.6% diabetes mellitus, 62.7% hypertension, 7.1% coronary disease, and 2.8% with known HF. When compared with participants in the first quartile of magnesium intake/kg, those with higher magnesium intake (>2.308 mg/kg) had decreased risk of HF admission, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0. 66(95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.94) in the second quartile to 0.47 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.82) in the highest quartile. Results were similar when individuals with previously diagnosed HF (2.8%) were excluded or when the analysis was repeated using quartiles of magnesium intake without accounting for body weight. CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium intake <2.3 mg/kg was related to increased risk of subsequent HF hospitalizations. Future studies are needed to test whether serum magnesium levels predict risk of HF.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Dieta , Suplementos Nutricionais , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etnologia , Hospitalização , Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Diástole , Ecocardiografia Doppler , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Lineares , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mississippi/epidemiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Recomendações Nutricionais , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Sístole , Fatores de Tempo , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Adulto Jovem
17.
Diabetes Care ; 39(2): 308-18, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26798150

RESUMO

Diabetes is more common in older adults, has a high prevalence in long-term care (LTC) facilities, and is associated with significant disease burden and higher cost. The heterogeneity of this population with regard to comorbidities and overall health status is critical to establishing personalized goals and treatments for diabetes. The risk of hypoglycemia is the most important factor in determining glycemic goals due to the catastrophic consequences in this population. Simplified treatment regimens are preferred, and the sole use of sliding scale insulin (SSI) should be avoided. This position statement provides a classification system for older adults in LTC settings, describes how diabetes goals and management should be tailored based on comorbidities, delineates key issues to consider when using glucose-lowering agents in this population, and provides recommendations on how to replace SSI in LTC facilities. As these patients transition from one setting to another, or from one provider to another, their risk for adverse events increases. Strategies are presented to reduce these risks and ensure safe transitions. This article addresses diabetes management at end of life and in those receiving palliative and hospice care. The integration of diabetes management into LTC facilities is important and requires an interprofessional team approach. To facilitate this approach, acceptance by administrative personnel is needed, as are protocols and possibly system changes. It is important for clinicians to understand the characteristics, challenges, and barriers related to the older population living in LTC facilities as well as the proper functioning of the facilities themselves. Once these challenges are identified, individualized approaches can be designed to improve diabetes management while lowering the risk of hypoglycemia and ultimately improving quality of life.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/enfermagem , Assistência de Longa Duração , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Glicemia , Comorbidade , Complicações do Diabetes , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/etiologia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Qualidade de Vida , Estados Unidos
18.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 105(3): 327-35, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24969964

RESUMO

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of two maintenance strategies compared to usual care after discharge from a pharmacist-led cardiovascular risk reduction clinic (CRRC). METHODS: Open-label, randomized-controlled trial of 200 consecutive CRRC patients that met clinic discharge criteria (HbA1c ≤7% (53 mmol/mol); blood pressure ≤140/80 mmHg for those with diabetes and ≤140/90 mmHg for those without diabetes; and an LDL-cholesterol ≤2.59 mmol/l). Participants were randomized to either quarterly group medical visits or quarterly CRRC individual clinic visits, or a usual care control arm with the standard primary care alone first in a 1:1:1 ratio, followed by a 2:2:1 ratio after first 100 patients. Primary outcome measures were time to failure for guideline recommended goals of HbA1c and blood pressure over 12-months. RESULTS: Of the 200 participants randomized, 89% had diabetes and were similar in other cardiovascular risk factors. After 1-year, the HbA1c failure rate was 0.36 [95% CI, 0.28-0.47] per quarter for the group medical visit arm, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.18-0.33] per quarter for the quarterly CRRC individual arm and, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.96] per quarter for the usual care control arm, p<0.001. The rate of failure for blood pressure was 0.31 [95% CI, 0.23-0.41] per quarter for the group medical visit arm, 0.22 [95% CI, 0.16-0.30] per quarter for the CRRC individual arm and, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.40-0.71] per quarter the control arm, p<0.001. CONCLUSION: After discharge from a CRRC program, both individual and group interventions are more effective in maintaining glycemia and blood pressure control for patients with diabetes than usual care after 1-year of follow-up.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Cardiomiopatias Diabéticas/prevenção & controle , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Assistência ao Convalescente , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial , Biomarcadores/sangue , Pressão Sanguínea , Doenças Cardiovasculares/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Cardiomiopatias Diabéticas/sangue , Feminino , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente , Comportamento de Redução do Risco
19.
J Psychopharmacol ; 28(4): 395-400, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24218048

RESUMO

Olanzapine (OLZ), a commonly prescribed second generation antipsychotic drug, is associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome and may contribute to increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Opioidergic neurotransmission may be implicated in the development of these metabolic disturbances. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of opioid blockade on OLZ-treated patients' metabolic status. Patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (n=30) on a stable dose of OLZ were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive an opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone (NTX), (n=14) or placebo (n=16). The primary outcome measure was the change in body mass index (BMI) at 12 weeks. Secondary measures included body fat and fat-free mass, along with homeostasis model assessment-estimated insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), plasma lipids and liver function tests (LFTs). There was no significant change in BMI between the treatment arms. However, in comparison to the OLZ + placebo combination, the OLZ + NTX group displayed a significant decrease in the fat and increase in fat-free mass along with a trend towards improvement in HOMA-IR values. There were no significant differences in plasma lipids and LFTs. These findings suggest that addition of NTX to OLZ may attenuate OLZ-induced body fat mass gain. A larger study of longer duration will be needed to confirm these results.


Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo/efeitos dos fármacos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Naltrexona/farmacologia , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Índice de Massa Corporal , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Resistência à Insulina , Lipídeos/sangue , Testes de Função Hepática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Olanzapina , Projetos Piloto , Transtornos Psicóticos/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto Jovem
20.
Ann Pharmacother ; 46(9): 1205-11, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22932306

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10% of chemotherapy agents are administered orally, with anticipated annual growth of this practice. In the future, community pharmacy practitioners will potentially serve a larger role in the management of patients with cancer. OBJECTIVE: To improve pharmacist confidence, knowledge of oral chemotherapy agents, and dispensing behaviors through live continuing pharmacy education (CPE) programs. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of pharmacists attending live CPE programs in Rhode Island and Maine was conducted between March and May 2010. A survey was administered before and after the educational program; primary outcome measures included change in level of pharmacist confidence in oral chemotherapy knowledge, overall knowledge, and willingness to adjust behavior when dispensing oral chemotherapy agents in community pharmacy. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven of the 410 pharmacists in attendance participated in the survey. Pharmacists significantly improved in confidence level, from no confidence to some confidence (p < 0.001). Counseling the family on the safe handling of oral chemotherapy increased from 37.1% pre-CPE program to 100% post-CPE program. Following the CPE program, behaviors such as (1) using a separate counting tray, (2) wearing gloves, and (3) requiring a double-check improved from 22.5%, 31.5%, and 29.4% baseline to 92.0%, 81.3%, and 81.8%, respectively. All responses to knowledge-based questions improved significantly. CONCLUSIONS: A live CPE program on oral chemotherapy designed to improve pharmacist confidence and knowledge, as well as inform about behaviors, is an effective method. Additional education to improve the knowledge of community-based practitioners to safely dispense and properly counsel patients receiving oral chemotherapy is required.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia , Educação Continuada em Farmácia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Administração Oral , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Coleta de Dados , Humanos , Farmacêuticos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA