Leveraging Existing Datasets to Advance Family Caregiving Research: Opportunities to Measure What Matters.

More than 17.7 million people in the U.S. care for older adults. Analyzing population datasets can increase our understanding of the needs of family caregivers of older adults. We reviewed 14 U.S. population-based datasets (2003-2023) including older adults' and caregivers' data to assess inclusion and measurement of 8 caregiving science domains, with a focus on whether measures were validated and/or unique variables were used. Challenges exist related to survey design, sampling, and measurement. Findings highlight the need for consistent data collection by researchers, state, tribal, local, and federal programs, for improved utility of population-based datasets for caregiving and aging research.

Mortality risk following end-of-life caregiving: A population-based analysis of hospice users and their families.

Experiencing the death of a family member and providing end-of-life caregiving can be stressful on families - this is well-documented in both the caregiving and bereavement literatures. Adopting a linked-lived theoretical perspective, exposure to the death and dying of one family member could be conceptualized as a significant life stressor that produces short and long-term health consequences for surviving family members. This study uses familial-linked administrative records from the Utah Population Database to assess how variations in family hospice experiences affect mortality risk for surviving spouses and children. A cohort of hospice decedents living in Utah between 1998 and 2016 linked to their spouses and adult children (n = 37,271 pairs) provides an ideal study population because 1) hospice typically involves family members in the planning and delivery of end-of-life care, and 2) hospice admission represents a conscious awareness and acknowledgment that the decedent is entering an end-of-life experience. Thus, hospice duration (measured as the time between admission and death) is a precise measure of the family's exposure to an end-of-life stressor. Linking medical records, vital statistics, and other administrative microdata to describe decedent-kin pairs, event-history models assessed how hospice duration and characteristics of the family, including familial network size and coresidence with the decedent, were associated with long-term mortality risk of surviving daughters, sons, wives (widows), and husbands (widowers). Longer hospice duration increased mortality risk for daughters and husbands, but not sons or wives. Having other family members in the state was protective, and living in the same household as the decedent prior to death was a risk factor for sons. We conclude that relationship type and sex likely modify the how of end-of-life stressors (i.e., potential caregiving demands and bereavement experiences) affect health because of normative gender roles. Furthermore, exposure to dementia deaths may be particularly stressful, especially for women.

Dying with dementia in nursing homes: A population-based study of decedents and their families.

BACKGROUND: Families play a critical role in end-of-life (EOL) care for nursing home (NH) residents with dementia. Despite the important role of family, little is known about the availability and characteristics of families of persons with dementia who die in NHs. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 18,339 individuals 65 years and older with dementia who died in a Utah NH between 1998 and 2016, linked to their first-degree family (FDF) members (n = 52,566; spouses = 11.3%; children = 58.3%; siblings = 30.3%). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and t-tests were used to describe the study cohort and their FDF members and to compare sociodemographic and death characteristics of NH decedents with (n = 14,398; 78.5%) and without FDF (n = 3941; 21.5%). RESULTS: Compared with NH decedents with FDF, NH decedents with dementia without FDF members were more likely to be older (mean age 86.5 vs 85.5), female (70.5% vs 59.3%), non-White/Hispanic (9.9% vs 3.2%), divorced/separated/widowed (84.4% vs 61.1%), less educated (<12th grade; 42.2% vs 33.7%), have Medicare and Medicaid (20.8% vs 12.5%), and die in a rural/frontier NH (25.0% vs 23.4%). NH decedents who did not have FDF were also more likely to die from cancer (4.2% vs 3.9%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; 3.9% vs 2.5%), and dementia (40.5% vs 38.4%) and were less likely to have 2+ inpatient hospitalizations at EOL (13.9% vs 16.2%), compared with NH decedents with FDF. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight differences in social determinants of health (e.g., sex, race, marital status, education, insurance, rurality) between NH decedents with dementia who do and do not have FDF-factors that may influence equity in EOL care. Understanding the role of family availability and familial characteristics on EOL care outcomes for NH residents with dementia is an important next step to informing NH dementia care interventions and health policies.

Palliating Serious Illness During Disasters and Public Health Emergencies.

ABSTRACT: The increase in disasters and public health emergencies in recent years is a serious public health concern. The needs of suffering victims can be multifaceted, particularly the needs of those who are from systematically marginalized populations. Palliative care nurses play a vital role in mitigating the suffering of those affected by these events. Despite the acute need, there is a lack of nurses who specialize in hospice and palliative care and generalist nurses are not sufficiently prepared to provide palliative care during disasters and public health emergencies. Nurses and nursing students should use national and global resources and training opportunities to hone their palliative care skills as well as learn self-care skills to increase their resiliency. Outcomes from research and collaborative efforts should be used to educate the future nursing workforce and advocate for equitable delivery of quality palliative care for all people who are affected by disasters and public health emergencies.

Incident Cardiovascular Disease Risk among Older Asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Breast Cancer Survivors.

BACKGROUND: Cardiotoxicity among breast cancer survivors is associated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) among Asian, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (ANHPI) breast cancer survivors in the United States is unknown. METHODS: We used the SEER-Medicare linked database to estimate the risk of CVD among older breast cancer survivors. International Classification of Disease diagnosis codes were used to identify incident CVD outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing ANHPI with Non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients with breast cancer for CVD, and among ANHPI race and ethnicity groups. RESULTS: A total of 7,122 ANHPI breast cancer survivors and 21,365 NHW breast cancer survivors were identified. The risks of incident heart failure and ischemic heart disease were lower among ANHPI compared with NHW breast cancer survivors (HRheart failure, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.84; HRheart disease, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.88). Compared with Japanese patients with breast cancer, Filipino, Asian Indian and Pakistani, and Native Hawaiian breast cancer survivors had higher risks of heart failure. ischemic heart disease and death. Among ANHPI breast cancer survivors, risk factors for heart failure included older age, higher comorbidity score, distant cancer stage and chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support heterogeneity in CVD outcomes among breast cancer survivors among ANHPI race and ethnicity groups. Further research is needed to elucidate the disparities experienced among ANHPI breast cancer survivors. IMPACT: Filipino, Asian Indian and Pakistani, and Native Hawaiian patients with breast cancer had higher risks of heart failure, ischemic heart disease and death among ANHPI patients with breast cancer.

The Burden of having to Wonder: Hospice Caregiving Experiences of LGBTQ+ Cancer Family Caregivers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: LGBTQ+ people are more likely to be caregivers for family and friends with life-limiting illnesses than non-LGBTQ+ people. LGBTQ+ caregivers may also experience stigma, bias, and discrimination, in addition to caregiving stress. Yet few studies have elicited LGBTQ+ family caregivers' perspectives on their end-of-life (EOL) experiences of home hospice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with LGBTQ+ family caregivers of home hospice patients (N = 20). Following an interpretive descriptive approach, interview data were audio recorded, transcribed, and iteratively coded, and themes were developed and synthesized. RESULTS: The burden of having to wonder expressed caregivers' uncertainty and concern about whether their negative experiences were common to all EOL caregivers or stemmed from cultural stigma and provider bias. Participants described how invisibility vs. risks of disclosure, anticipatory anxiety, perceived microaggressions, and protective vigilance increased stress and complicated caregiver-provider communication. Navigating EOL universalities vs. minority realities depicted underlying tensions between commonly assumed universalities of EOL caregiving and LGBTQ+-specific experiences. Providers' discomfort, awkward communication, lack of access to culturally competent EOL support resources, and broader structural and cultural discrimination eroded their sense of connectedness and safety. Together, these themes characterized the impact of minority stress at EOL. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that LGBTQ+ hospice caregivers are at risk for minority stress in addition to more common sources of EOL caregiving pressures and thus have specific support and communication needs. Providers must understand this to deliver effective EOL care for all families.

Family Ties at End-of-Life: Characteristics of Nursing Home Decedents With and Without Family.

Background: Little is known about nursing home (NH) residents' family characteristics despite the important role families play at end-of-life (EOL). Objective: To describe the size and composition of first-degree families (FDFs) of Utah NH residents who died 1998-2016 (n = 43,405). Methods: Using the Utah Population Caregiving Database, we linked NH decedents to their FDF (n = 124,419; spouses = 10.8%; children = 55.3%; siblings = 32.3%) and compared sociodemographic and death characteristics of those with and without FDF members (n = 9424). Results: Compared to NH decedents with FDF (78.3%), those without (21.7%) were more likely to be female (64.7% vs. 57.1%), non-White/Hispanic (11.2% vs. 4.2%), less educated (<9th grade; 41.1% vs. 32.4%), and die in a rural/frontier NH (25.3% vs. 24.0%, all p < 0.001). Despite similar levels of disease burden (Charlson Comorbidity score 3 + 37.7% vs. 38.0%), those without FDF were more likely to die from cancer (14.2% vs. 12.4%), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (6.0% vs. 4.0%), and dementia (17.1% vs. 16.6%, all p < 0.001), and were less likely to have 2+ hospitalizations at EOL (20.5% vs. 22.4%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Among NH decedents, those with and without FDF have different sociodemographic and death characteristics-factors that may impact care at EOL. Understanding the nature of FDF relationship type on NH resident EOL care trajectories and outcomes is an important next step in clarifying the role of families of persons living and dying in NHs.

Hospice Family Caregivers' Uncertainty, Burden, and Unmet Needs in Prospective Audio Diaries.

Hospice cancer caregivers' (HCCs') burden and unmet needs are well documented in the literature through retrospective, standardized self-report surveys. Hospice cancer caregiver daily experiences of burden and unmet needs are rarely captured within a real-time context. The purpose of this secondary data analysis was to characterize HCCs' day-to-day burden and unmet needs with prospective HCC (N = 50) audio diary data between hospice enrollment and patient death. Uncertainty theory provided a framework for analysis. Diaries were transcribed, analyzed deductively and inductively, and organized thematically. Uncertainty in day-to-day experiences was an important driver of HCC burden and unmet needs. Unmet needs included unclear/unmet expectations regarding hospice care team support; not understanding the extent of HCC role and involvement; and communication challenges with hospice team members. Sources of HCCs' burden were dissonance between how they "should" feel and how they actually felt; feeling alone/having no outlet to express feelings; concerns about their own health and subsequent patient impact; and feeling helpless/occupying a liminal space. Uncertainty surrounding HCCs' experiences encompassed interactions with hospice care teams and the nature of end-of-life caregiving with symptom management, the dying process, and the HCC role. Hospice care teams can respond to uncertainty through assessment, understanding, and recognition of the daily context of HCCs.

Disparities and determinants of place of death: Insights from the Utah Population Database.

To better understand determinants and potential disparities in end of life, we model decedents' place of death with explanatory variables describing familial, social, and economic resources. A retrospective cohort of 204,041 decedents and their family members are drawn from the Utah Population Database family caregiving dataset. Using multinomial regression, we model place of death, categorized as at home, in a hospital, in another location, or unknown. The model includes family relationship variables, sex, race and ethnicity, and a socioeconomic status score, with control variables for age at death and death year. We identified the effect of a family network of multiple caregivers, with 3+ daughters decreasing odds of a hospital death by 17 percent (OR: 0.83 [0.79, 0.87], p < 0.001). Place of death also varies significantly by race and ethnicity, with most nonwhite groups more likely to die in a hospital. These determinants may contribute to disparities in end of life.

Caregiver Burden and Workplace Productivity Among Hospice Cancer Caregivers.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationships among family caregiver burden and workplace productivity and activity impairment among home hospice family caregivers of individuals with cancer who worked while providing end-of-life caregiving. SAMPLE & SETTING: Baseline data from a longitudinal study of communication between hospice providers and hospice family caregivers were used for this secondary analysis. METHODS & VARIABLES: Working family caregivers with complete workplace productivity and activity impairment data were included in this analysis (N = 30). Demographic data, caregiver burden, and workplace productivity and activity impairment were examined with descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and hierarchical linear regressions. RESULTS: Hospice family caregivers were primarily White, female, married, and employed full-time. Caregiver burden levels were significantly positively associated with activity impairment, presenteeism, and work productivity loss. These relationships remained statistically significant when controlling for age. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Hospice and oncology nurses can support working hospice family caregivers by assessing for burden and associated workplace challenges, as well as by providing referrals for respite and community resources.

Young Adult Cancer Care Partners: A Theoretical Description of an Emerging Population with Unique Needs.

As the U.S. population's demographics shift, young U.S. adults are increasingly engaged in informal caregiving for aging generations. Yet, there is little research on the unique experiences and needs of young adults who take on caregiving roles for adult cancer patients. Herein we demonstrate through a theoretical description that young adult cancer care partners deserve distinct recognition in the cancer control continuum given the psychological, physical, financial, and social features unique to their cancer experience.

Cancer Hospice Caregivers' Self-care Behaviors: The Role of Caregiving Tasks, Burden, and Mental Health.

Cancer hospice family caregivers provide intensive support for patients at the end of life, sometimes at the expense of self-care. This secondary analysis examined the role of caregiving burden, activities of daily living, and mental health on self-care behaviors among cancer hospice family caregivers. Logistic regression models were adjusted for sociodemographic and caregiver characteristics, and model fit was evaluated with Hosmer-Lemeshow tests. Participants (N = 86) were mostly women (n = 62, 72.09%), White (n = 76, 88.37%), and spousal caregivers (n = 44, 51.16%). Almost half reported not getting enough rest (47.67%), time to exercise (47.67%), or time to slow down and rest when feeling ill (46.51%). Caregivers with better mental health reported being more likely to have enough time to exercise (adjusted odds ratio [OR adj ], 1.15, [1.05, 1.26]; P = .004), rest (OR adj , 1.11, [1.01, 1.22]; P = .031), and slow down when ill (OR adj , 1.16, [1.04, 1.30]; P = .010). Controlling for sociodemographic and caregiver characteristics, men caregivers had 88% lower odds of being able to rest when ill (OR adj , 0.12, [0.03, 0.52]; P = .005) compared with women. Number of care tasks, not caregiving burden, was associated with self-care behaviors. Findings provide a preliminary understanding of factors related to caregiver self-care and have implications for increased assessment of caregiver mental health and self-care needs to better support family-oriented hospice care.

Hospice Caregivers' Perception of Family and Non-Family Social Support and Stress over Time: Associations with Reports of General Support.

Social support has been identified as a key factor to protect wellbeing for home hospice cancer caregivers. However, few studies have assessed social support over time in this context, and measures of support are often limited to general assessments of perceived support. Our goal was to (1) describe change in cancer home hospice caregivers' social support over time during care and into bereavement and (2) explore the impact of perceived stress and support from family and non-family members on caregivers' perceived general social support. We conducted a secondary analysis of longitudinal prospective questionnaire data. Forty caregivers completed measures of general perceived support, family and non-family support and stress during hospice enrollment and 2 and 6 months post the patient's death. Linear mixed models were used to determine change in support over time and the contribution of specific support/stress ratings to general support assessments. Caregivers overall had moderate and stable levels of social support over time, though there was significant variation between and within individuals. Family and non-family support and stress from family predicted general perceptions of social support, while no effects were found for non-family stress. This work suggests a need for more specific measures of support and stress, and the need for research to focus on improving baseline levels of caregiver perceived support.

End-of-Life Experiences Among "Kinless" Older Adults: A Nationwide Register-Based Study.

Background: The population of older adults who are unpartnered and childless (i.e., "kinless") is increasing across the globe, and may be at risk for lower quality end-of-life (EoL) experiences due to lack of family support, assistance, and advocacy. Yet, little research exists on the EoL experiences of "kinless" older adults. Objectives: To document associations between family structure (i.e., presence or absence of partner or child) and intensity of EoL experiences (i.e., visits to medicalized settings before death). Design: The study design is a cross-sectional population-based register study of the population of Denmark. Subjects: Participants include all adults age 60 years and older who died of natural causes in Denmark from 2009 to 2016 (n = 137,599 decedents). Results: "Kinless" older adults (reference = has partner, has child) were the least likely group to visit the hospital (two or more times; odds ratio [OR] = 0.74, confidence interval [CI] = 0.70-0.77), emergency department (one or more times; OR = 0.90, CI = 0.86-0.93), and intensive care unit (one or more times; OR = 0.71, CI = 0.67-0.75) before death. Conclusions: "Kinless" older adults in Denmark were less likely to experience medically intensive care at the EoL. Further research is needed to understand factors associated with this pattern to ensure that all individuals receive high quality EoL care regardless of their family structure and family tie availability.

Moderating Effect of Work on Burden and Hospice Family Caregiver Well-Being.

Background: Hospice family caregiving is often physically and emotionally taxing, but it is unclear how employment status impacts hospice caregiver burden and well-being. Objective(s): To examine the relationship between caregiver burden and well-being, and the moderating role of employment status (i.e., working, not working). Design, Setting/Subjects: This was a secondary data analysis of baseline data from a longitudinal observational study of family caregivers of home hospice cancer patients in the United States. Descriptive statistics, correlations, hierarchical linear regressions, and moderation analyses were used. Measurements: Baseline data included demographics, preparedness for caregiving, perceived burden, and well-being (i.e., global health, positive affect and well-being, anxiety, depression). Results: The majority of the 90 participants were White (86.7%), married (71.1%), and college educated (85.6%). The mean age was 58.27 ± 14.22, 53.3% cared for a spouse, and 56.6% worked full or part time. After controlling for demographics, and using employment status as a moderator, greater caregiver burden was significantly associated with lower global health (ß = -0.82 [-1.22 to -0.42], p < 0.001), positive affect and well-being scores (ß = -0.69 [-1.03 to -0.36], p < 0.001), and higher depression (ß = 0.24 [0.12-0.37], p < 0.001) and anxiety scores (ß = 0.22 [0.07-0.37], p < 0.005). Employment status significantly moderated the relationship between burden and global health (ß = 0.65 [0.22 to 1.08], p < 0.005), and burden and positive affect and well-being (ß = 0.45 [0.06 to 0.84], p < 0.05). At high levels of burden, workers had greater well-being than nonworkers. Conclusion(s): More burdened hospice caregivers may experience worse well-being, especially among nonworking caregivers. Employment may be a protective factor for highly burdened hospice family caregivers.

The 2023-2026 Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association Research Agenda.

The Hospice and Palliative Nursing Association established the triannual research agenda to ( a ) provide focus for researchers to conduct meaningful scientific and quality improvement initiatives and inform evidence-based practice, ( b ) guide organizational funding, and ( c ) illustrate to other stakeholders the importance of nursing research foci. HPNA Research Agendas are developed to give direction for future research to continue advancing expert care in serious illness and ensure equitable delivery of hospice and palliative care.

Home Hospice Family Caregivers' Use of Audio Diaries and Reported Prevalence of Patient and Caregiver Symptoms.

CONTEXT: Family caregivers are essential to home hospice care for patients with advanced cancer, including reporting patient symptoms to hospice providers for follow-up. Hospice caregiving can also impact personal well-being. OBJECTIVES: 1) Assess home hospice caregivers' use of prospective, longitudinal audio diaries tracking patient and caregiver wellbeing; 2) Explore how patient-focused vs. caregiver-focused diary prompts perform; 3) Examine the prevalence of interactive voice response (IVR)-tracked symptoms and whether diaries revealed additional symptoms. METHODS: Caregivers (N=102) were asked to report patient and caregiver symptoms via daily IVR calls and could record optional diaries responding to patient-focused or caregiver-focused prompts. Diaries were transcribed, classified by presence/absence of new information, and compared by prompt type. Content coding for IVR-tracked symptoms and inductive coding for additional symptoms were summarized by frequency counts and exemplary quotes. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of participants (n=70) recorded diaries, and of these 72.86% (n=51) recorded ≥ one new-information diary. The median recording length was 53.00 seconds (SD=53.36). Participants responding to the caregiver-focused prompt (n=33) recorded more diaries than those in the patient-focused group (n=37; U=437.500, P=0.04. Most prevalent IVR-tracked symptoms were patient fatigue/weakness (26.54% of symptoms mentioned) and pain (23.08%), and caregiver anxiety/nervousness (47.51%) and fatigue (22.10%). The most prevalent additional symptoms were patient increasing sleepiness/sleeping (26.32%) and breathing difficulties (24.32%), and negative caregiver emotions (e.g., guilt, resentment, anger; 29.17%). CONCLUSION: Prospective audio diaries offer a viable avenue for communicating symptoms and support needs. Future research will focus on leveraging longitudinal data for developing focused and tailored caregiver support interventions.

"We Treat Everyone Equally": Hospice Care Team Members' Language Use Regarding Sexual and Gender Minority Patients and Caregivers.

PURPOSE: The way Hospice Care Team (HCT) members talk about patients and caregivers reflects personal attitudes and experiences, training, and broader social and cultural discourse. This secondary analysis examined the framing language professional hospice care providers used when discussing end-of-life care for LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers. METHODS: Discourse analysis and frame theory informed a secondary, qualitative analysis of focus group data collected with hospice providers (N = 48) in 3 U.S. states regarding their knowledge, experience, and opinions about end-of-life care for LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers. RESULTS: The following four (often overlapping) frames were identified (1) A normalizing frame which dismissed differences between LGBTQ+ patients/caregivers and non-LGBTQ+ individuals in general, and especially at end-of-life (2) A homogenizing frame which cast being LGBTQ+ as an intrinsic, universal characteristic and did not differentiate between different groups, specifically conflating orientation and gender identity (3) A pathologizing frame in which providers related being LGBTQ+ to disease conditions or illegal behaviors (4) An individualizing frame which focused on between-group differences, acknowledged variation, and emphasized the importance of historical context for personalized care. CONCLUSION: Examination of discursive frames used by providers enhances understanding of how social and cultural influences, along with training and experience, shape how HCT members approach working with LGBTQ+ patients and families, and illuminates areas where additional education and training are needed. Our findings support the need for ongoing efforts to improve HCT members' knowledge and skill regarding the needs of LGBTQ+ patients and families within the context of hospice and end-of-life care.

Family Caregiver Reports of Their Own and Patient Symptoms in Cancer Home Hospice Approaching End-of-Life.

Context: Family caregivers assume the primary responsibility of assessing and managing hospice cancer patient symptoms while simultaneously managing their own wellbeing and symptoms. Objectives: Describe caregivers' assessment of hospice cancer patient and their own symptoms during the last 60 days of patient life, and assess the relationship between patient and caregiver symptoms over time. Methods: Caregiver symptom report of self and cancer home hospice patient symptom data were collected via telephone in the final 60 days of patient life. Descriptive data on symptom severity and prevalence were summarized. Exploratory Factor Analysis was used to group individual symptoms. Factors representing patient symptoms, caregiver symptoms, and caregiver outlook were analyzed using mixed-effects analysis to determine relationships between factors and change in relationship between factors over time. Results: Data from 61 patient-caregiver dyads are presented. At least 1 day of moderate-to-severe symptoms were reported in the majority of dyads. Significant auto-regressive associations were found, namely previous factor scores for an individual positively predicted the next factor scores for that individual. Previous caregiver report of patient symptoms was also positively associated with the next report of caregiver symptoms; previous caregiver report of their own symptoms were negatively associated with their next report of patient symptoms. Patient and caregiver symptoms and caregiver outlook worsened over time and the relationship between patient and caregiver symptoms strengthened closer to death. Conclusion: Our findings may guide hospice care team responses to caregiver and patient symptoms to promote individual level and unit level functioning.

Providing home hospice care for LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers: Perceptions and opinions of hospice interdisciplinary care team providers.

OBJECTIVES: Hospice patients and caregivers who are members of sexual and gender minority groups (i.e., LGBTQ+) have reported experiencing unmet needs at end of life (EOL). Negative experiences often stem from challenging interactions with healthcare providers due to ineffective or poor communication and providers' heteronormative assumptions and biases. Few studies, however, examine hospice care team (HCT) providers' knowledge, experience, and opinions related to EOL care for LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers despite this being identified as a gap in competency and education. We sought to examine HCT providers' perceptions regarding (1) awareness of LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers; (2) knowledge of specific or unique needs; and (3) opinions on best care and communication practices. METHODS: Six focus groups conducted with HCT providers (n = 48) currently delivering hospice care in three US states were audio-recorded and transcribed. Data were content coded (κ = 0.77), aggregated by topical categories, and descriptively summarized. RESULTS: Participants were mostly white and non-Hispanic (n = 43, 89.6%), cisgender female (n = 42, 87.5%), heterosexual (n = 35, 72.9%), and religious (n = 33, 68.8%); they averaged 49 years of age (range 26-72, SD = 11.66). Awareness of LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers depended on patient or caregiver self-disclosure and contextual cues; orientation and gender identity data were not routinely collected. Many viewed being LGBTQ+ as private, irrelevant to care, and not a basis for people having specific or unique EOL needs because they saw EOL processes as universal, and believed that they treat everyone equally. Providers were more comfortable with patients of lesbian or gay orientation and reported less comfort and limited experience caring for transgender and gender-diverse patients or caregivers. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Many HCT members were unaware of specific issues impacting the EOL experiences of LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers, or how these experiences may inform important care and communication needs at EOL.