Development and validation of a bioanalytical assay for the measurement of total and unbound teicoplanin in human serum.

BACKGROUND: The glycopeptide teicoplanin is considered first-line treatment for severe infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Individualized treatment of teicoplanin is gaining interest. As only protein-unbound drug is pharmacologically active, a sensitive assay measuring unbound and total teicoplanin is indispensable for pharmacological research and dose optimization. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a UPLC-MS/MS method to quantify unbound and total teicoplanin in human serum. METHODS: The developed assay was validated according to the ICH guideline M10 on Bioanalytical Method Validation and study sample analysis. Unbound teicoplanin was obtained by ultrafiltration. The assay was cross-validated with a quantitative microsphere (QMS) immunoassay in a side-by-side comparison using 40 patient samples. RESULTS: With the developed and validated method, all main teicoplanin components (A2-1, A2-2/A2-3, A2-4/A2-5 and A3-1) can be quantified. Total run time was 5.5 min. Concentration range was 2.5-150 mg/L for total and 0.1-25 mg/L for unbound teicoplanin. Precision (coefficient of variation) and accuracy (bias) of total teicoplanin were 5.97% and 107%, respectively, and 7.17% and 108%, respectively, for unbound teicoplanin.Bland-Altman analysis showed total concentrations measured with the UPLC-MS/MS method were equivalent to the results of the QMS immunoassay. A total of 188 samples from 30 patients admitted to the ICU and haematology department were measured; total concentrations ranged between 2.92 and 98.5 mg/L, and unbound concentrations ranged between 0.37 and 30.7 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: The developed method provided rapid, precise and accurate measurement of unbound and total teicoplanin. The developed method is now routinely applied in pharmacological research and clinical practice.

A phase IIb, open-label, randomized controlled dose ranging multi-centre trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship of different doses of delpazolid in combination with bedaquiline delamanid moxifloxacin in adult subjects with newly diagnosed, uncomplicated, smear-positive, drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid is an effective, but toxic anti-tuberculosis drug that is currently recommended for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Improved oxazolidinones should have a better safety profile, while preserving efficacy. Delpazolid is a novel oxazolidinone developed by LegoChem Biosciences Inc. that has been evaluated up to phase 2a clinical trials. Since oxazolidinone toxicity can occur late in treatment, LegoChem Biosciences Inc. and the PanACEA Consortium designed DECODE to be an innovative dose-ranging study with long-term follow-up for determining the exposure-response and exposure-toxicity relationship of delpazolid to support dose selection for later studies. Delpazolid is administered in combination with bedaquiline, delamanid and moxifloxacin. METHODS: Seventy-five participants with drug-sensitive, pulmonary tuberculosis will receive bedaquiline, delamanid and moxifloxacin, and will be randomized to delpazolid dosages of 0 mg, 400 mg, 800 mg, 1200 mg once daily, or 800 mg twice daily, for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the rate of decline of bacterial load on treatment, measured by MGIT liquid culture time to detection from weekly sputum cultures. The primary safety endpoint will be the proportion of oxazolidinone class toxicities; neuropathy, myelosuppression, or tyramine pressor response. Participants who convert to negative liquid media culture by week 8 will stop treatment after the end of their 16-week course and will be observed for relapse until week 52. Participants who do not convert to negative culture will receive continuation phase treatment with rifampicin and isoniazid to complete a six-month treatment course. DISCUSSION: DECODE is an innovative dose-finding trial, designed to support exposure-response modelling for safe and effective dose selection. The trial design allows assessment of occurrence of late toxicities as observed with linezolid, which is necessary in clinical evaluation of novel oxazolidinones. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change in bacterial load, an endpoint conventionally used in shorter dose-finding trials. Long-term follow-up after shortened treatment is possible through a safety rule excluding slow-and non-responders from potentially poorly performing dosages. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DECODE was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov before recruitment start on 22 October 2021 (NCT04550832).

Pharmacokinetics of pyrazinamide during the initial phase of tuberculous meningitis treatment.

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most severe manifestation of tuberculosis. Pyrazinamide (PZA) is a pivotal antituberculous drug, but its dose has not been optimised for TBM. The aims of this study were to describe the pharmacokinetics of PZA during TBM treatment, to identify predictors of PZA exposure and to assess relationships between PZA dose and exposures in plasma and CSF. Plasma PZA pharmacokinetic data were assessed on Days 2 and 10 of treatment in 52 adult TBM patients. A CSF-to-plasma concentration ratio was determined on Day 2. Predictors of plasma PZA exposure, correlation between plasma and CSF exposures, and prediction of CSF concentrations based on dose and plasma exposure were evaluated. The geometric mean plasma PZA exposure (AUC0-24) and peak concentration (Cmax) on Day 2 were 709 h·mg/L and 59 mg/L following a median dose of 33.3 mg/kg/day; AUC0-24 on Day 10 (523 h·mg/L) was lower (P < 0.001). Dose and BMI correlated with AUC0-24 and Cmax. The CSF concentration at 3-6 h was 42 mg/L and the CSF-to-plasma ratio was 90%. AUC0-24, Cmax and CSF concentration were highly correlated. CSF concentration could be predicted based on dose and various plasma exposure measures with <5% bias and <21% imprecision. Exposure to PZA decreases during the first days of TBM treatment, possibly due to the evolving inductive effect of rifampicin. PZA penetrates well in CSF. The association between PZA dose and exposures in plasma and CSF provides a rationale to study higher PZA doses for TBM.

Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Dose-Finding Study To Evaluate High-Dose Rifampin for Tuberculous Meningitis.

High doses of rifampin may help patients with tuberculous meningitis (TBM) to survive. Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic evaluations suggested that rifampin doses higher than 13 mg/kg given intravenously or 20 mg/kg given orally (as previously studied) are warranted to maximize treatment response. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II trial, we assigned 60 adult TBM patients in Bandung, Indonesia, to standard 450 mg, 900 mg, or 1,350 mg (10, 20, and 30 mg/kg) oral rifampin combined with other TB drugs for 30 days. The endpoints included pharmacokinetic measures, adverse events, and survival. A double and triple dose of oral rifampin led to 3- and 5-fold higher geometric mean total exposures in plasma in the critical early days (2 ± 1) of treatment (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC0-24], 53.5 mg · h/liter versus 170.6 mg · h/liter and 293.5 mg · h/liter, respectively; P < 0.001), with proportional increases in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations and without an increase in the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events. The 6-month mortality was 7/20 (35%), 9/20 (45%), and 3/20 (15%) in the 10-, 20-, and 30-mg/kg groups, respectively (P = 0.12). A tripling of the standard dose caused a large increase in rifampin exposure in plasma and CSF and was safe. The survival benefit with this dose should now be evaluated in a larger phase III clinical trial. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02169882.).

Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, and Bacteriological Response of Rifampin Administered at 600, 900, and 1,200 Milligrams Daily in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

In a multiple-dose-ranging trial, we previously evaluated higher doses of rifampin in patients for 2 weeks. The objectives of the current study were to administer higher doses of rifampin for a longer period to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety/tolerability, and bacteriological activity of such regimens. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial, 150 Tanzanian patients with tuberculosis (TB) were randomized to receive either 600 mg (approximately 10 mg/kg of body weight), 900 mg, or 1,200 mg rifampin combined with standard doses of isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol administered daily for 2 months. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling occurred in 63 patients after 6 weeks of treatment, and safety/tolerability was assessed. The bacteriological response was assessed by culture conversion in liquid and solid media. Geometric mean total exposures (area under the concentration-versus-time curve up to 24 h after the dose) were 24.6, 50.8, and 76.1 mg · h/liter in the 600-mg, 900-mg, and 1,200-mg groups, respectively, reflecting a nonlinear increase in exposure with the dose (P < 0.001). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in only 2 patients in the 600-mg arm, 4 patients in the 900-mg arm, and 5 patients in the 1,200-mg arm. No significant differences in the bacteriological response were observed. Higher daily doses of rifampin (900 and 1,200 mg) resulted in a more than proportional increase in rifampin exposure in plasma and were safe and well tolerated when combined with other first-line anti-TB drugs for 2 months, but they did not result in improved bacteriological responses in patients with pulmonary TB. These findings have warranted evaluation of even higher doses of rifampin in follow-up trials. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT00760149.).

Exposure to total and protein-unbound rifampin is not affected by malnutrition in Indonesian tuberculosis patients.

Nutritional status may have a profound impact on the pharmacokinetics of drugs, yet only few data are available for tuberculosis (TB) drugs. As malnutrition occurs frequently among TB patients, we assessed the effect of malnutrition on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of total and protein-unbound rifampin during the intensive phase of TB treatment. In a descriptive pharmacokinetic study in Bandung, Indonesia, patients received a fixed standard rifampin dose of 450 mg once daily during the intensive phase of TB treatment. A full pharmacokinetic curve for rifampin was recorded, and total and unbound concentrations of rifampin were analyzed in all samples. Rifampin pharmacokinetic parameters were compared between severely malnourished (BMI of <16.0 kg/m(2)), malnourished (BMI of <18.5 kg/m(2)), and well-nourished (BMI of ≥18.5 kg/m(2)) individuals. No difference in total and protein-unbound pharmacokinetic parameters between severely malnourished (n = 7), malnourished (n = 11), and well-nourished (n = 25) patients could be demonstrated. In addition, no significant correlation between BMI and exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h [AUC0-24] and maximum concentration of drug in serum [Cmax]) was found. Females had significantly higher total AUC0-24 (geometric mean, 59.2 versus 48.2 h · mg/liter; P = 0.02) and higher unbound AUC0-24 (geometric mean, 6.2 versus 4.8 h · mg/liter; P = 0.02) than males. Overall, a marked 2-fold interindividual variation in the free fraction was observed (7.6 to 15.0%; n = 36). Nutritional status and BMI do not appear to have a major effect on total and protein-unbound pharmacokinetic parameters of rifampin in Indonesian subjects. The large interindividual variability in the free fraction of rifampin suggests that protein-unbound rather than total rifampin concentrations should preferably be used to study exposure-response relationships.