Bridging the Macro-micro Divide: A Qualitative Meta-synthesis on the Perspectives and Experiences of Health Care Providers on the Extramedical Use and Diversion of Buprenorphine.

OBJECTIVES: Opioid agonist therapy using buprenorphine is one of the most effective treatments for opioid use disorder. However, concerns regarding its extramedical use and diversion, such as adverse patient outcomes and damage to the legitimacy of addictions practice, are persistent. The aim of this review is to synthesize the perspectives and experiences of health care providers around the extramedical use of buprenorphine. METHODS: A qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted based on a systematic search of 8 databases. All primary qualitative and mixed-methods studies relating to the views of health care providers on the extramedical use of buprenorphine were included. A qualitative analysis informed by the constant comparative method was conducted, using NVivo for data management. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in this review. Findings were organizedunder 2 key themes: (1) Harm-producing versus harm-reducing effects of extramedical buprenorphine use and (2) driving forces of and responses to extramedical buprenorphine use. CONCLUSIONS: The studies included in our review identified a disconnect-health care providers noted that macro, health care system-level challenges drove extramedical use whereas the recommended solutions for prevention and management were primarily aimed at the micro, individual level. This study emphasizes the critical role that health care providers can play, in partnership with patients, in informing appropriate policies and health care system design to optimize the care for people with opioid use disorder.

Taking stock of global commitments on antimicrobial resistance.

Over the last six years, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has generated an unprecedented amount of global attention. This global attention has coincided with an increase in discussion around AMR at various multilateral organisations and international fora. This study catalogues and analyses AMR-related commitments made by the global community following the implementation of the AMR Tripartite's Global Action Plan (GAP) in 2015. In examining these commitments, we elucidated emergent themes and gaps in AMR discourse through a qualitative content analysis of global political resolutions, declarations and statements made by members of the United Nations, the World Health Assembly, Food and Agriculture Organization Conferences, World Organisation for Animal Health General Sessions, and the G7 and G20 summits and ministerial meetings between the years 2015 and 2021. Emergent themes included AMR research, surveillance and stewardship. Across sectors, fewer commitments were made for specific action on AMR in the environment. The themes and types of commitments were found to be consistent across time and fora but did not evolve into more concrete or nuanced pledges to action between 2015 and 2021. GAP objectives relating to infection prevention and efforts to address the root drivers of AMR appeared the least frequently in our analysis, indicating a lack of global commitment to take a proactive prevention-focused approach to AMR.

Chest Tube Insertion Among Surgical and Nonsurgical Trainees: How Skilled Are Our Residents?

BACKGROUND: Competency-based medical education has renewed focus on the attainment and evaluation of resident skill. Proper evaluation is crucial to inform educational interventions and identify residents in need of increased training and supervision. Currently, there is a paucity of studies rigorously evaluating resident chest tube insertion skill. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Residents of all training levels before their intensive care unit rotation or currently rotating through the intensive care unit were invited to participate. Trainees inserted a thoracostomy tube on a high-fidelity simulator. Their performances were recorded and scored by blinded raters using the validated TUBE-iCOMPT rubric. Surgical and nonsurgical residents were compared. RESULTS: Forty-nine residents participated; 30 from nonsurgical and 19 from surgical training programs. Overall, trainees were most deficient in the "preprocedural checks" and "patient positioning and local anesthetic" domains. Surgical trainees demonstrated higher chest tube insertion skill than their nonsurgical peers (median total score 88 [interquartile range, 74-90] versus 75 [interquartile range, 66-85], respectively, P = 0.01), particularly in the "patient positioning" and "blunt dissection" domains (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). These differences were no longer significant when controlled for experience and Advanced Trauma Life Support certification. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, surgical residents were more skilled than nonsurgical residents in tube thoracostomy placement. Relative skill deficits within the domains of chest tube insertion have also been identified among residents of different specialties. These areas can be targeted with educational interventions to improve resident performance, and ultimately, patient safety.